Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 1,244 AI responses · Shares cover the last 30 days · See how Parse measures this
Nonprofit CRM and Volunteer Software
Parse
https://parse.gl
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Top choice for comprehensive volunteer scheduling and management. | 54% | |
| 2 | Offers comprehensive tools for the entire volunteer lifecycle. | 38% | |
| 3 | A modern, mobile-friendly platform often highlighted for its free tier. | 35% | |
| 4 | Praised for user-friendly scheduling, especially for event-based coordination. | 34% | |
| 5 | A comprehensive solution for detailed volunteer scheduling and reporting. | 34% | |
| 6 | Frequently recommended for simple event sign-ups and ease of use. | 32% | |
| 7 | 23% | ||
| 8 | 19% | ||
| 9 | 18% | ||
| 10 | 17% | ||
| 11 | A leading recommendation for rapid, lightweight disaster response coordination. | 17% | |
| 12 | Recognized for its volunteer-centric features and automated shift matching. | 16% | |
| 13 | 16% | ||
| 14 | 15% | ||
| 15 | 15% | ||
| 16 | A top pick for structured task assignment for nonprofit projects. | 14% | |
| 17 | 13% | ||
| 18 | 11% | ||
| 19 | 11% | ||
| 20 | 11% | ||
| 21 | 10% | ||
| 22 | 10% | ||
| 23 | 9% | ||
| 24 | 8% | ||
| 25 | 8% |
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
Sources AI cited
volunteerhub.com is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 48% of analyzed answers.
Solidified its leadership position, becoming the top recommendation by early 2026.
Gained significant traction between November 2025 and March 2026, rising from rank #18 to #2.
Dropped from a top-two position in late 2025, appearing less frequently by early 2026.
“A general project tool mention” → “The primary, intuitive choice for coordinating occasional volunteers”
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 57% | 49% | ||
| 42% | 38% | ||
| 0% | 47% | ||
| 19% | 39% | ||
| 24% | 16% |
The two models disagree most about Bloomerang (ChatGPT #11, Google #25) and Asana (ChatGPT #7, Google #20).
Across 1,244 AI responses, VolunteerHub is mentioned most, named in 54% of them, followed by Better Impact (38%) and POINT Volunteer App (35%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 1,244 AI responses to this market's buyer questions over the last 30 days. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is re-measured on the same 30-day window.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
Initially varied, responses have consistently centered on VolunteerHub as the top all-in-one choice since late 2025.
Better Impact,
Volgistics, and a rising
SignUpGenius are also frequently mentioned for their specific strengths in scheduling and ease of use.
Brands mentioned
Initially varied, responses have consistently centered on VolunteerHub as the top all-in-one choice since late 2025.
Better Impact,
Volgistics, and a rising are also frequently mentioned for their specific strengths in scheduling and ease of use.
AI responses consistently and overwhelmingly recommend VolunteerHub for shift scheduling, with its mention rate often exceeding 80% by 2026. Other tools like
Volgistics, , and are cited as strong alternatives for specific needs like robust reporting or event focus.
Brands mentioned
I am looking for a "volunteer management" platform for scheduling shifts.
AI responses consistently and overwhelmingly recommend VolunteerHub for shift scheduling, with its mention rate often exceeding 80% by 2026. Other tools like
Volgistics,
VolunteerLocal, and
Golden Volunteer are cited as strong alternatives for specific needs like robust reporting or event focus.