Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 2,791 AI responses · See how Parse measures this
Recruiting Sourcing and Screening Software
Parse
https://parse.gl
GitHub has emerged as the top-recommended platform for sourcing technical talent, according to AI assistants. While specialized AI sourcing tools like and have seen their prominence decline since late 2025, AI now increasingly suggests sourcing on platforms like and where developers are natively active.
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A strong choice for deep technical and diversity sourcing, though less dominant recently. | 45% | |
| 2 | The primary professional network for broad searches and executive recruiting. | 41% | |
| 3 | Frequently cited for AI-powered sourcing across platforms to find passive candidates. | 40% | |
| 4 | Recommended for sourcing based on 'real signals' like actual code contributions. | 31% | |
| 5 | Recommended for candidate engagement, analytics, and managing outreach to passive talent. | 26% | |
| 6 | Aggregates developer data from communities like | 22% | |
| 7 | 17% | ||
| 8 | Consistently recommended for its 'blind hiring' and resume anonymization capabilities. | 15% | |
| 9 | 15% | ||
| 10 | 14% | ||
| 11 | An AI-first tool using natural language to source from many platforms. | 13% | |
| 12 | 13% | ||
| 13 | Cited as an ATS with built-in resume anonymization and auditable screening. | 13% | |
| 14 | A specialized blind recruiting tool praised for redacting PII to reduce bias. | 10% | |
| 15 | 10% | ||
| 16 | 10% | ||
| 17 | 7% | ||
| 18 | 7% | ||
| 19 | 7% | ||
| 20 | 6% | ||
| 21 | 6% | ||
| 22 | 6% | ||
| 23 | 6% | ||
| 24 | 6% | ||
| 25 | 6% |
Dropped from #1 to #3 in mentions between Oct 2025 and Mar 2026.
Climbed from #6 to #2 in overall mentions from Oct 2025 to Mar 2026.
Fell from #2 to #4 in niche-wide mentions from Oct 2025 to Mar 2026.
Rose from #4 to #1 in overall mentions between Oct 2025 and Mar 2026.
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48% | 41% | ||
| 42% | 34% | ||
| 36% | 33% | ||
| 30% | 25% | ||
| 24% | 24% |
The two models disagree most about Juicebox AI (ChatGPT #25, Google #6) and AmazingHiring (ChatGPT #23, Google #7).
Sources AI cited
linkedin.com is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 38% of analyzed answers.
Share of direct mentions
share of answers
Github has emerged as the top-recommended platform for sourcing technical talent, according to AI assistants. While specialized AI sourcing tools like SeekOut and hireEZ have seen their prominence decline since late 2025, AI now increasingly suggests sourcing on platforms like Github and LinkedIn where developers are natively active.
Across 2,791 AI responses, SeekOut is mentioned most, named in 45% of them, followed by LinkedIn (41%) and hireEZ (40%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 2,791 AI responses to this market's buyer questions. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is published weekly.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
Best sourcing tool for technical candidates with real signals?
Early responses in late 2025 heavily featured specialized tools like SeekOut and
hireEZ. Since early 2026,
GitHub and
have become just as prominent, with AI assistants highlighting the value of sourcing where developers are natively active.
share of answers
Brands mentioned
Pinpoint quickly established itself as the dominant recommendation for this prompt, consistently cited by both platforms since Nov 2025. Other tools like
MeVitae and
Greenhouse gained traction later, often mentioned as components of a comprehensive blind hiring strategy.
The market map