Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 1,166 AI responses · See how Parse measures this
AI Contract Review & Extraction Software
ParseChatGPT + Google AIParse
https://parse.gl
Measured across ChatGPT & Google AI
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  IroncladEnterprise CLM with AI for playbook-driven redlining and metadata extraction. | Enterprise CLM with AI for playbook-driven redlining and metadata extraction. | 35% |
| 2 | SpellbookAI copilot for redlining and drafting directly within  Microsoft Word. | AI copilot for redlining and drafting directly within Microsoft Word. | 30% |
| 3 |  LegalOnTechPraised for attorney-built playbooks and 'Day 1 ready' accuracy for contract review. | Praised for attorney-built playbooks and 'Day 1 ready' accuracy for contract review. | 22% |
| 4 |  LinkSquaresAI-powered CLM focused on post-signature contract analysis and risk scoring. | AI-powered CLM focused on post-signature contract analysis and risk scoring. | 22% |
| 5 |  SirionOneRecognized for accurate extraction and risk scoring, especially for supplier contracts. | Recognized for accurate extraction and risk scoring, especially for supplier contracts. | 20% |
| 6 |  Icertis | 19% | |
| 7 |  EvisortAI-native CLM focused on bulk ingestion and analysis of legacy contracts. | AI-native CLM focused on bulk ingestion and analysis of legacy contracts. | 19% |
| 8 |  Litera | 16% | |
| 9 |  Luminance | 16% | |
| 10 |  DocusignE-signature leader, now frequently cited for its integrated AI clause analysis. | E-signature leader, now frequently cited for its integrated AI clause analysis. | 15% |
| 11 |  DocJuris | 15% | |
| 12 |  LegalSifterWord-integrated tool for risk-flagging and playbook-based redlining. | Word-integrated tool for risk-flagging and playbook-based redlining. | 14% |
| 13 |  Harvey | 14% | |
| 14 |  Agiloft | 13% | |
| 15 |  LexCheck | 12% | |
| 16 |  GatekeeperHQ | 10% | |
| 17 |  ContractPodAI | 9% | |
| 18 |  Ivo | 8% | |
| 19 |  Conga | 8% | |
| 20 |  Juro | 8% | |
| 21 |  Robin AI | 7% | |
| 22 |  Thomson Reuters | 7% | |
| 23 |  IntelAgree | 7% | |
| 24 |  goHeather | 6% | |
| 25 | Microsoft | 6% |
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
Sources AI cited
spellbook.legal is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 33% of analyzed answers.
Jumped from rank #44 in Oct 2025 to #1 by Mar 2026.
Dropped from #1 mention rank in Oct 2025 to #3 by Mar 2026.
Became the dominant recommendation for integrated signing tools since Dec 2025.
“Primarily an e-signature platform.” → “An 'Intelligent Agreement Management' suite with integrated AI for contract analysis.”
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ironclad | 63% | 26% | |
| SirionOne | 0% | 43% | |
| Spellbook | 30% | 32% | |
| Luminance | 32% | 10% | |
| LegalOnTech | 15% | 23% |
The two models disagree most about Harvey (ChatGPT #4, Google #24) and Luminance (ChatGPT #2, Google #14).
Spellbook has surged to the top of the AI contract review niche, consistently recommended as a drafting and redlining assistant inside Microsoft Word. This rapid ascent from relative obscurity reflects a broader market trend where specialized, workflow-integrated tools are gaining significant traction over early generalized platforms.
Across 1,166 AI responses, Ironclad is mentioned most, named in 35% of them, followed by Spellbook (30%) and LegalOnTech (22%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 1,166 AI responses to this market's buyer questions. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is published weekly.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
MicrosoftSpellbook
Brands mentioned
Spellbook
LegalSifter
Brands mentioned
MicrosoftI want a legal contract reviewer that flags risk levels and does not give legal advice.
The market map
Recommended by need
