Mindgard, Synack, Nmap entered the AI Red Teaming & Pen Testing top ten.
+2 more
share of answers
Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 2,956 AI responses · See how Parse measures this
AI Red Teaming & Pen Testing
Parse
https://parse.gl
Mindgard has maintained its position as the top-cited brand for AI red teaming services throughout the observation window. Meanwhile, a wave of developer-focused and open-source tools like and 's surged in prominence, marking a significant shift in AI recommendations since late 2025.
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offers an automated platform for continuous testing across the AI lifecycle. | 24% | |
| 2 | Cited for agentless, network-focused automated security validation and continuous pentesting. | 20% | |
| 3 | Provides human-led adversarial testing via a community of security researchers. | 16% | |
| 4 | Adapts traditional red team adversary emulation for AI-specific attack vectors. | 15% | |
| 5 | 15% | ||
| 6 | An AI-driven continuous pentesting solution integrating into the development lifecycle. | 14% | |
| 7 | An early leader in automated red teaming, now cited less frequently. | 12% | |
| 8 | 12% | ||
| 9 | 12% | ||
| 10 | 12% | ||
| 11 | 11% | ||
| 12 | A powerful exploitation framework for validating vulnerabilities in corporate environments. | 11% | |
| 13 | 11% | ||
| 14 | 11% | ||
| 15 | The essential, industry-standard tool for network discovery and port scanning. | 10% | |
| 16 | 10% | ||
| 17 | A flexible open-source tool for testing LLM pipelines against vulnerabilities. | 10% | |
| 18 | 10% | ||
| 19 | 10% | ||
| 20 | 10% | ||
| 21 | 9% | ||
| 22 | 9% | ||
| 23 | 9% | ||
| 24 | 9% | ||
| 25 | 8% |
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
Sources AI cited
mindgard.ai is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 24% of analyzed answers.
+2 more
share of answers
Share of direct mentions
share of answers
“A human-led option for bespoke audits.” → “Positioned as the go-to for human expertise, contrasting with automated platforms.”
Dropped from #2 to #15 in overall rank between October 2025 and March 2026.
Emerged in late 2025 and surged to the #2 rank by March 2026.
Microsoft's framework became a top recommendation between November 2025 and March 2026.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31% | 20% | ||
| 11% | 24% | ||
| 19% | 11% | ||
| 8% | 18% | ||
| 17% | 9% |
The two models disagree most about Synack (ChatGPT #23, Google #3) and PyRIT (ChatGPT #22, Google #6).
Mindgard has maintained its position as the top-cited brand for AI red teaming services throughout the observation window. Meanwhile, a wave of developer-focused and open-source tools like Promptfoo and Microsoft's PyRIT surged in prominence, marking a significant shift in AI recommendations since late 2025.
Across 2,956 AI responses, Mindgard is mentioned most, named in 24% of them, followed by Pentera (20%) and HackerOne (16%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 2,956 AI responses to this market's buyer questions. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is published weekly.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
Pentera has dominated AI responses for this prompt since November 2025, consistently positioned as the top choice for agentless, network-wide validation. also emerged as a strong contender, frequently recommended as a developer-centric alternative for integration into CI/CD pipelines.
Brands mentioned
What is the best automated penetration testing tool for continuous security validation?
Pentera has dominated AI responses for this prompt since November 2025, consistently positioned as the top choice for agentless, network-wide validation.
Aikido also emerged as a strong contender, frequently recommended as a developer-centric alternative for integration into CI/CD pipelines.
The market map