Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 325 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
The best software for customs filing depends on the size and scope of your brokerage. CargoWise is the top choice for large, enterprise-level global trade operations. For small to mid-sized brokers,
SmartBorder and
CustomsNow are highly favored for their user-friendly interfaces, speed, and reliability. Additionally, serves as a strong, comprehensive contender for those seeking integrated compliance and entry management workflows.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 78% of answers
Named in 61% of answers
Named in 42% of answers
Best for mid-sized brokerages focused on accuracy and speed. It offers a highly automated, web-based platform with efficient validation checks and built-in filing for partner government agencies.
Named in 37% of answers
Ideal for large-scale operations and global freight forwarders. It provides a robust, enterprise-grade, cloud-based platform covering end-to-end logistics and complex customs compliance requirements.
If you mean **software for a U.S. customs brokerage to prepare and electronically file import entries through CBP’s ACE/ABI system**, my top choice for most dedicated brokerages would be **Descartes**. CBP’s ABI program is the electronic interface brokers use to transmit entry data into ACE, and CBP maintains a list…
If you mean software for a U.S. customs brokerage to prepare and electronically file import entries through CBP’s ACE/ABI system, my top choice for most dedicated brokerages would be Descartes.
CBP’s ABI program is the electronic interface brokers use to transmit entry data into ACE, and CBP maintains a list of ABI software providers. Being on CBP’s list is not an endorsement, and brokers still have to meet applicable testing/qualification requirements.
| Software | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| descartes.com | Dedicated customs brokerages | Best overall |
| cargowise.com | Large broker + freight forwarder | Best enterprise/all-in-one |
| magaya.com | Small/midsize broker + logistics | Strong integrated option |
| netchb.com | Small brokerage | Simple, broker-focused |
| SmartBorder | High-volume entry writing | Worth comparing with Descartes |
| CustomsNow | Small/midsize brokerage | Good workflow-oriented alternative |
Descartes specifically markets its U.S. Customs Declaration solution to customs brokers and self-filing importers, and identifies it as an approved CBP ABI software solution. It provides entry preparation, automated duty/tax/fee calculations, data validation, and electronic filing to CBP.
For a brokerage where customs entry filing is the core business, I'd choose Descartes over CargoWise unless you also need a large freight-forwarding operation.
CargoWise is exceptionally broad. Its customs module connects with ACE in the U.S., supports automated calculations and validation, PGAs, electronic documentation, and customs declarations.
I'd pick it if you're running:
If you're only filing U.S. import entries, however, CargoWise can be more platform than you need.
Don't evaluate these systems merely on whether they "file ACE." Almost all serious ABI systems do. I'd compare them on:
That last item is particularly important. The software is only as good as its ability to keep up with CBP and PGA changes.
If you told me, "I'm opening or running a customs brokerage and my primary job is filing U.S. import entries," I'd start with Descartes and get demonstrations from Magaya and SmartBorder as competitors.
If you tell me approximately how many entries you file per month (e.g. 100, 1,000, 10,000+), whether you also do freight forwarding, and whether you're a new or established brokerage, I can narrow this down to the 2–3 systems I'd actually demo and what each is likely to cost you.
When filing import entries with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) via the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) and Automated Broker Interface (ABI), there is no single "best" software for every broker. Instead, the right choice depends heavily on your **operation size, budget, and workflow integration**…
When filing import entries with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) via the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) and Automated Broker Interface (ABI), there is no single "best" software for every broker. Instead, the right choice depends heavily on your operation size, budget, and workflow integration (whether you are an independent boutique broker, a mid-market forwarder, or a massive multinational enterprise).
Industry consensus points to the following top platforms for CBP ABI/ACE filing:
To help narrow down which platform fits your desk best, tell me:
If you mean **software for a U.S. customs brokerage that actually prepares and transmits import entries to CBP through ACE/ABI**, my first choice would be **Descartes Customs & Regulatory Compliance**. CBP maintains an official list of ABI software vendors, and importantly, CBP does **not** endorse any particular…
If you mean software for a U.S. customs brokerage that actually prepares and transmits import entries to CBP through ACE/ABI, my first choice would be Descartes Customs & Regulatory Compliance.
CBP maintains an official list of ABI software vendors, and importantly, CBP does not endorse any particular vendor; the broker still has to qualify for the applicable ABI functions.
| Software | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| Descartes | Dedicated customs brokerages | Best overall |
| CargoWise | Large brokerage + freight forwarding operations | Best enterprise option |
| Magaya | Small/midsize brokerage + logistics | Best integrated platform |
| NetCHB | Smaller/new brokerages | Good for simplicity |
| International Trade Systems / MercuryGate | Larger/customized operations | Worth evaluating |
For a pure customs brokerage, this is where I'd start.
Descartes is an approved CBP ABI software vendor and supports electronic entry filing, data validation, duty/tax/fee calculations, document creation, reporting, workflow controls and customer visibility.
Its ABI software also supports things beyond the basic consumption entry, including in-bonds, FTZ entries, warehouse entries/withdrawals, reconciliation and other specialized transactions.
One particularly important advantage is its ability to integrate with your existing systems through EDI/XML, which becomes increasingly valuable as entry volume grows.
I'd look seriously at CargoWise if you're doing customs brokerage + freight forwarding + warehousing + transportation rather than customs entries alone.
It's more of an operating platform than simply an ABI filing system. The tradeoff is that it can be considerably more complex to implement and operate.
Magaya is worth considering if you want customs filing tied closely to freight forwarding, shipment management, warehouse and customer operations.
I would put it ahead of CargoWise for a smaller organization that wants an integrated logistics system without necessarily needing the depth of a large enterprise installation.
Don't evaluate these systems merely on whether they can "file an entry." I'd put heavy weight on:
The last point is particularly important. The best brokerage software isn't necessarily the one with the nicest entry screen—it is the one that eliminates the most data entry.
CBP specifically identifies ABI as the mechanism for electronic entry and entry-summary filing; the ACE Secure Data Portal itself isn't the replacement for ABI entry filing.
I'd separate entry filing software from classification/trade-content software.
For example, Descartes also offers CustomsInfo, which is designed for HTS classification, rulings, duty rates, PGA information, AD/CVD and other trade-content information.
For a serious brokerage, that combination can be much more valuable than an inexpensive ABI filing program by itself.
If I were opening or upgrading a brokerage today, I'd demo these three in this order:
And I would not choose based on monthly price alone. I'd have each vendor demonstrate the same real-world entry from commercial invoice → classification → entry preparation → ABI transmission → CBP response → billing → PSC, including an entry with multiple HTS lines and additional duties.
If you tell me roughly how many entries you file per month (e.g. 100, 1,000, 10,000+) and whether you do ocean, air, truck, or all three, I can narrow this down considerably and compare pricing, features, ease of use, ABI connectivity, and implementation costs for your particular brokerage.
Descartes is an approved CBP ABI software vendor and supports electronic entry filing, data validation, duty/tax/fee calculations, document creation, reporting, workflow controls and customer visibility.
Its ABI software also supports things beyond the basic consumption entry, including in-bonds, FTZ entries, warehouse entries/withdrawals, reconciliation and other specialized transactions.
One particularly important advantage is its ability to integrate with your existing systems through EDI/XML, which becomes increasingly valuable as entry volume grows.
I'd look seriously at CargoWise if you're doing customs brokerage + freight forwarding + warehousing + transportation rather than customs entries alone.
It's more of an operating platform than simply an ABI filing system. The tradeoff is that it can be considerably more complex to implement and operate.
Magaya is worth considering if you want customs filing tied closely to freight forwarding, shipment management, warehouse and customer operations.
I would put it ahead of CargoWise for a smaller organization that wants an integrated logistics system without necessarily needing the depth of a large enterprise installation.
Don't evaluate these systems merely on whether they can "file an entry." I'd put heavy weight on:
The last point is particularly important. The best brokerage software isn't necessarily the one with the nicest entry screen—it is the one that eliminates the most data entry.
CBP specifically identifies ABI as the mechanism for electronic entry and entry-summary filing; the ACE Secure Data Portal itself isn't the replacement for ABI entry filing.
I'd separate entry filing software from classification/trade-content software.
For example, Descartes also offers CustomsInfo, which is designed for HTS classification, rulings, duty rates, PGA information, AD/CVD and other trade-content information.
For a serious brokerage, that combination can be much more valuable than an inexpensive ABI filing program by itself.
If I were opening or upgrading a brokerage today, I'd demo these three in this order:
Choosing the "best" software for filing import entries via the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) using Automated Broker Interface (ABI) certification depends heavily on the scale of your operations, your budget, and whether you function as a standalone customs brokerage or an end-to-end freight…
Choosing the "best" software for filing import entries via the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) using Automated Broker Interface (ABI) certification depends heavily on the scale of your operations, your budget, and whether you function as a standalone customs brokerage or an end-to-end freight forwarder.
The top-tier software solutions utilized by U.S. customs brokers break down by operational fit:
To help narrow down the ideal platform for your workflow, let me know:
If you're a **U.S. customs broker filing import entries through CBP's ACE/ABI system**, there isn't one universally "best" platform. But for most brokerages, I'd narrow the field to **Magaya Customs Compliance, Descartes, CargoWise, and a few broker-focused systems**. CBP confirms that ABI is the electronic interface…
If you're a U.S. customs broker filing import entries through CBP's ACE/ABI system, there isn't one universally "best" platform. But for most brokerages, I'd narrow the field to Magaya Customs Compliance, Descartes, CargoWise, and a few broker-focused systems.
CBP confirms that ABI is the electronic interface used to transmit commercial entry data, and more than 96% of entries are filed electronically through ABI. CBP also maintains an ABI vendor list, while explicitly noting that being on the list is not an endorsement.
| Software | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| Magaya Customs Compliance | Small–mid-size brokerages | Best overall for many independent brokers |
| Descartes Customs | Mid-size/large brokerages | Best for sophisticated compliance & high volume |
| CargoWise | Large forwarders + brokerage | Best if customs is part of a larger global logistics operation |
| NetCHB | Smaller independent brokers | Good broker-centric option |
| CustomsNow | Small–mid-size brokers | Good if simplicity/support are priorities |
| SmartBorder | High-volume entry processing | Strong choice when entry throughput is the priority |
If you are primarily a customs brokerage rather than a huge freight-forwarding operation, I'd put Magaya Customs Compliance at the top of the list.
It is the successor to ACELYNK and is an ACE-certified ABI solution. It supports ISF, cargo release, entry summaries, in-bonds, FTZ, drawback, reconciliation, AES and other filings, with direct ACE connectivity. It also has invoice-data automation/AI that can extract information from PDFs or spreadsheets to create entries.
Why I like it for a broker:
Magaya also says its platform can handle entries with up to 998 line items, which is useful for high-line-count transactions.
I'd seriously consider Descartes if you're running a larger brokerage or have sophisticated compliance requirements.
Descartes' U.S. Customs Declaration solution is an approved CBP ABI vendor and emphasizes automated validation, duty/tax/fee calculations, and data requirements for other government agencies.
I'd lean toward Descartes over Magaya if your brokerage has large volumes, complex compliance requirements, multiple offices, or significant integration requirements.
CargoWise becomes very compelling if you're both a freight forwarder and customs broker.
Its advantage isn't necessarily that it files a 7501 better than everyone else; its advantage is that customs can live inside a much larger operational system covering forwarding, warehousing, accounting, transportation and international logistics.
For a pure customs brokerage, however, I wouldn't automatically choose CargoWise. It can be considerably more system than you need.
The biggest thing I'd evaluate isn't just the software's ability to transmit a 3461/7501. Nearly all serious ABI systems can do that. The difference is how much work they eliminate before transmission.
For example, I'd score a system on:
And I'd put invoice automation and error prevention ahead of interface appearance. Saving an entry writer two minutes per entry across 10,000 entries is worth far more than having a prettier dashboard.
One important point: CBP's vendor list is the authoritative place to verify ABI capabilities; CBP updates the list periodically and says vendors may support different combinations of ACE Entry, In-Bond, DIS, Drawback, FTZ, GBI and ISF services.
If you tell me roughly how many entries you file per month, how many entry writers you have, whether you do ISF/PGA/in-bond, and whether you're currently using another system, I can give you a much more specific Magaya vs. Descartes vs. CargoWise recommendation, including what I'd expect to pay and which one would save your staff the most time.
Its advantage isn't necessarily that it files a 7501 better than everyone else; its advantage is that customs can live inside a much larger operational system covering forwarding, warehousing, accounting, transportation and international logistics.
Choosing the "best" software for filing import entries via the Automated Broker Interface (ABI) into U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) [Automated Commercial Environment (ACE)](https://www.cbp.gov/trade/automated/catair) depends heavily on your brokerage's size, volume, and operational scope. Because direct…
Choosing the "best" software for filing import entries via the Automated Broker Interface (ABI) into U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) depends heavily on your brokerage's size, volume, and operational scope. Because direct filing requires a CBP-certified ABI vendor, the market divides into a few distinct tiers:
To help narrow down the ideal platform, tell me:
If you’re a **U.S. customs broker filing import entries directly with CBP through ACE/ABI**, I’d narrow the field to **Descartes, CargoWise, Magaya, and NetCHB**. CBP confirms that ABI is the electronic interface used for entry filing, and more than 96% of commercial entries are filed through ABI.…
If you’re a U.S. customs broker filing import entries directly with CBP through ACE/ABI, I’d narrow the field to Descartes, CargoWise, Magaya, and NetCHB. CBP confirms that ABI is the electronic interface used for entry filing, and more than 96% of commercial entries are filed through ABI.
| Software | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| Descartes Customs & Compliance | Dedicated customs brokerages | Best overall |
| CargoWise | Large brokerages + freight forwarding | Best enterprise platform |
| Magaya | Small/midsize brokerages wanting an integrated system | Best value/integration |
| NetCHB | Small brokerages / startups | Best for simplicity and lower overhead |
If your primary business is customs brokerage rather than freight forwarding, this is probably where I'd start. Descartes specifically offers U.S. Customs Declaration software for brokers and self-filing importers and is an approved CBP ABI software vendor. It handles entry preparation, duty/tax/fee calculations, validation, and government-agency data requirements.
Why I like it:
CargoWise is extremely powerful if you want customs + forwarding + transportation + accounting + shipment management in one ecosystem. Its customs module can automatically populate entries from existing shipment data and transmit customs transactions electronically.
The downside is that CargoWise can be overkill for a small brokerage. Implementation, configuration, training, and ongoing administration are substantial.
Magaya is worth a serious look if you want something more approachable while still having an integrated logistics platform. It's particularly attractive if you handle both brokerage and freight forwarding.
If you're operating a relatively small shop and primarily want entry filing without buying an enormous enterprise platform, NetCHB deserves a demo. The economics and simplicity can make more sense than CargoWise for a small operation.
Don't confuse trade-compliance/classification software with the actual ACE/ABI filing system.
For example, you might use a separate tool for:
…and have Descartes/CargoWise/etc. actually transmit the entry to CBP.
CBP maintains an official list of ABI software vendors, and being on that list does not constitute CBP endorsement; brokers also have to complete CBP/ACE testing and qualification for applicable ABI operations.
If you told me:
If you tell me approximately how many entries you file per month, whether you do ocean/air/truck, and whether you're a standalone broker or also a freight forwarder, I can give you a much more specific recommendation—including approximate pricing, implementation difficulty, and which one I'd choose for your operation.
When choosing the best software for filing import entries via the Automated Broker Interface (ABI) into U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) [Automated Commercial Environment (ACE)](https://www.cbp.gov/trade/automated) , the "best" option depends heavily on your agency’s size, transaction volume, and whether you…
When choosing the best software for filing import entries via the Automated Broker Interface (ABI) into U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) , the "best" option depends heavily on your agency’s size, transaction volume, and whether you need standalone entry filing or an all-in-one freight forwarding and logistics platform.
The industry-leading software solutions widely used by licensed U.S. customs brokers fall into a few distinct categories based on operational strengths:
Key Features to Demand from Any Vendor:
To help narrow down the ideal platform, tell me:
When filing import entries with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the "best" software depends heavily on the scale of your operations, whether you need a dedicated stand-alone customs tool or a unified freight-forwarding stack, and how heavily you rely on…
When filing import entries with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the "best" software depends heavily on the scale of your operations, whether you need a dedicated stand-alone customs tool or a unified freight-forwarding stack, and how heavily you rely on automation.
To connect to CBP's Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) via the Automated Broker Interface (ABI) , you must use a solution officially certified by CBP. The industry leaders and top-rated platforms used by licensed customs brokers include:
If you tell me the size of your brokerage (solo filer vs. large team) and whether you need freight forwarding integration or just pure compliance/filing , I can help you narrow down the best platform fit and pricing structure.
If you’re a **U.S. customs broker filing import entries directly to CBP**, I’d focus on **ABI/ACE-certified broker software**, rather than generic customs-compliance software. CBP says ABI is the electronic interface used by qualified participants to file import data, and more than 96% of entries are filed through…
If you’re a U.S. customs broker filing import entries directly to CBP, I’d focus on ABI/ACE-certified broker software, rather than generic customs-compliance software. CBP says ABI is the electronic interface used by qualified participants to file import data, and more than 96% of entries are filed through ABI.
| Software | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| Magaya Customs Compliance / AcelýnK | Small–mid-size brokerage | Best overall value |
| Descartes OneView | Growing/large brokerage | Best enterprise option |
| NetCHB | Small brokerage / startups | Best for simplicity and lower overhead |
| CargoWise | Customs + freight forwarding | Best if you need a full logistics platform |
| SmartBorder ABI/ACE | Traditional customs brokerage | Strong entry-writing focus |
| CustomsCity | Modern/cloud-oriented brokerage | Worth evaluating alongside the big vendors |
These aren't merely software that claims to work with CBP: CBP maintains an official ABI software-vendor list, and the current list includes providers such as AcelýnK by Magaya and numerous other ABI vendors.
For a standalone customs brokerage, I'd start with Magaya/AcelýnK, Descartes OneView, and NetCHB.
Magaya/AcelýnK would probably be my first demo. It gives you the core ABI entry functionality without forcing you into a huge freight-forwarding ecosystem. It's particularly attractive if you're building a brokerage where entry-writing speed, document management, billing, and customer workflow matter more than having an enormous enterprise platform.
Descartes OneView is where I'd look if you're expecting significant volume, multiple offices/users, sophisticated reporting, and more extensive compliance functionality. The tradeoff is generally greater complexity and cost.
NetCHB is worth a serious look if you're starting relatively small and want a web-based system without the investment associated with something like CargoWise.
CargoWise is excellent if you're actually building a freight forwarder + customs brokerage rather than just a brokerage. I wouldn't choose it solely for filing entries unless you need the rest of the ecosystem.
One important point: ACE Portal isn't really a substitute for commercial ABI broker software for routine entry filing. ABI handles electronic transmission, validation, responses, status, statement processing, ACH, etc.
Don't just ask, "Can you file a 7501?" Every serious ABI vendor can. I'd test:
That last one is particularly important. Experienced broker feedback tends to suggest that the major ABI systems can all accomplish the basic CBP filing; workflow, reporting, usability, support, and how quickly the vendor adapts to CBP changes become the real differentiators.
If you tell me approximately how many entries/month you file (e.g. 100, 1,000, 10,000+) and whether you're a standalone customs brokerage or also a freight forwarder, I can narrow this down to the 2–3 systems I'd actually recommend and compare their likely pricing, strengths, weaknesses, and implementation requirements.