Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 297 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
To secure manufacturing environments with legacy systems without causing production downtime, use specialized tools that favor passive monitoring or surgical endpoint protection. Nozomi Networks and
Dragos are the primary recommendations for passive network traffic analysis to avoid interfering with fragile industrial controllers. For older, unpatchable workstations that cannot run modern security software,
provides adaptive protection like application whitelisting and virtual patching.
Brands AI recommends here
Best for passive, non-intrusive network visibility in legacy OT environments. It uses deep packet inspection to monitor assets without active polling, preventing potential crashes of sensitive industrial controllers.
Best for protecting legacy workstations running outdated operating systems like Windows XP or 7. Its lockdown technology and virtual patching provide security without the performance impact of traditional antivirus.
Yes. For a manufacturer with legacy PLCs, HMIs, SCADA/DCS, and fragile industrial protocols, I’d prioritize passive, agentless, OT-aware monitoring over conventional IT vulnerability scanners. The goal is to get visibility and detection without putting traffic onto the control network or requiring changes to old endpoints.
| Option | Best fit | Why it works for legacy OT |
|---|---|---|
| Claroty | Large/mixed manufacturing estates | Passive monitoring, OT protocol awareness, asset discovery, exposure management and secure remote access. Its passive collection generates no network traffic. Claroty |
| Nozomi Networks | Multi-site manufacturing | Purpose-built for production environments, with continuous monitoring, asset inventory and process-anomaly detection. Particularly compelling where legacy equipment is sensitive to network changes. Nozomi Networks |
| Dragos | High-consequence ICS environments | Passive-first ICS monitoring plus deep packet inspection, OT-specific threat intelligence and managed threat hunting/monitoring. Dragos Dragos |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Microsoft-heavy SOC | Agentless OT monitoring, asset/vulnerability visibility and integration with Microsoft Sentinel/Defender. It can be deployed across on-prem, cloud and hybrid OT environments. Microsoft Microsoft Learn |
Two approaches stand out:
Start passive, then progressively harden. Don't begin by scanning PLCs or deploying agents.
For a brownfield manufacturer, my first three proof-of-concepts would be Nozomi, Claroty, and Dragos. If you're already deeply invested in Microsoft Sentinel/Defender, I'd add Defender for IoT to the POC rather than automatically buying a separate OT SOC stack.
The key POC requirement should be: “Show us what you can learn without sending packets to our PLCs, and demonstrate that detection/monitoring doesn't affect the control loop.” That is much more important for legacy OT than a conventional IT-security feature checklist.
Securing operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems (ICS) running on legacy infrastructure is a high-wire act—touch the wrong PLC or inject the wrong packet, and you risk a costly line stoppage.
To secure these systems without disrupting production, the industry relies on passive, agentless, and out-of-band technologies coupled with specialized managed services.
Top Non-Disruptive OT/ICS Security Tools
The golden rule for legacy OT is never install an active endpoint agent or run aggressive active vulnerability scans that could crash fragile real-time operating systems (RTOS). Instead, use these platforms:
Leading OT MSSPs (Managed Security Services)
If your internal team lacks 24/7 industrial SOC capabilities, partnering with an OT-native Managed Security Service Provider is safer than trying to force standard IT MSSPs to handle plant floors:
Best Practices for Non-Disruptive Implementation
To help narrow down the right fit, could you share:
Yes. For a manufacturer with brownfield/legacy PLCs, HMIs, SCADA, and other systems that cannot tolerate agents or active scanning, I’d prioritize OT-native platforms that start with passive network monitoring and then pair them with an MSSP that understands plant operations.
| Vendor / service | Best fit | Why it is low-disruption |
|---|---|---|
| Dragos | High-consequence manufacturing, complex ICS | Passive-first ICS monitoring, industrial protocol awareness, and dedicated OT managed monitoring. Its OT Watch Complete includes 24/7 monitoring, alert triage, asset visibility and vulnerability management. Dragos Dragos |
| Claroty | Broad manufacturing/CPS visibility | Passive monitoring generates no additional network traffic and doesn't interact directly with assets, making it particularly appropriate for fragile legacy environments. Claroty |
| Nozomi Networks | Distributed plants and mixed OT/IoT | Guardian sensors passively observe mirrored traffic/taps without generating traffic or disrupting critical processes; it also supports on-prem and air-gapped deployments. Nozomi Networks Nozomi Networks |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Companies already standardized on Microsoft/Sentinel | Agentless OT monitoring, with on-prem, cloud and hybrid options—including air-gapped environments. It integrates into Microsoft Sentinel and other SOC tooling. Microsoft Learn Microsoft Learn |
| Deloitte + Dragos | You want an MSSP/SOC rather than operating OT security yourself | Deloitte uses Dragos for passive ICS asset identification and continuous monitoring, and its SOC can provide managed coverage during unmanned hours and surges. Dragos |
If production uptime is the overriding constraint: start with Dragos, Claroty, or Nozomi rather than adapting a conventional IT vulnerability scanner to the plant floor. These platforms are designed around passive/OT-aware collection; that matters because legacy PLCs often can't run agents and may react badly to conventional active scanning.
Then decide whether you need an MSSP:
I'd make "passive by default, active only with explicit OT authorization" a hard requirement. Ask each vendor/MSSP to demonstrate in a production-like test network that it can:
That last point is crucial: in OT, "respond automatically" shouldn't mean "quarantine the PLC." The safer architecture is usually observe → validate → alert/escalate → coordinate remediation with operations, with active controls introduced only after they're proven safe.
If you tell me your plant size (e.g., 5 vs. 100 sites), major PLC/SCADA vendors, whether you already use Microsoft/Splunk/etc., and whether you want 24×7 managed monitoring, I can narrow this to a 3-vendor shortlist and compare likely deployment models and tradeoffs.
Securing legacy OT/ICS environments without causing downtime requires a passive-first approach. Because older PLCs, RTUs, and HMIs can crash or drop packets when subjected to active vulnerability scanning or intrusive agents, the tools and Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) listed below specialize in non-disruptive, agentless discovery and monitoring.
Top Non-Disruptive OT/ICS Security Tools (CPS Platforms)
These platforms utilize passive network monitoring (via SPAN ports or optical taps) to map assets and analyze traffic without touching or querying fragile legacy controllers directly.
Leading Industrial-Grade MSSPs
If you prefer outsourcing monitoring and incident response to teams that understand production safety constraints over raw IT metrics, consider these providers:
To help narrow down the best path, could you share:
Securing legacy OT/ICS environments without risking unplanned downtime requires a strict passive-first philosophy . Because legacy programmable logic controllers (PLCs), remote terminal units (RTUs), and unpatched human-machine interfaces (HMIs) cannot handle active vulnerability scanning or standard IT endpoint agents, protection relies on network monitoring, deep protocol parsing, and specialized managed services.
Top Non-Disruptive OT/ICS Security Tools
These platforms use passive monitoring (via TAP/SPAN mirror ports) to build asset inventories and detect threats without sending intrusive packets to fragile legacy controllers.
Specialized OT MSSPs & Managed Service Providers
If you lack a 24/7 internal industrial SOC that understands the difference between an IT ping sweep and an accident on a legacy Modbus/DLP3 network, partnering with an OT-centric Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP) is vital.
Key Tactics for Zero-Disruption Rollouts
To help narrow down the best path, tell me:
Claroty
claroty.com
For a manufacturer with legacy PLCs, SCADA systems, HMIs, and brownfield plants, the safest OT/ICS security approach is usually passive visibility first: tools that observe traffic through network taps/SPAN ports, build an asset inventory, detect anomalies, and integrate with your SOC—rather than agents, active scans, or inline blocking that could affect production.
A shortlist of MSSPs and platforms commonly considered for non-disruptive OT security:
| Vendor / MSSP approach | Best fit | Why manufacturers consider it |
|---|---|---|
| Dragos | Large industrial manufacturers, critical infrastructure, plants needing OT expertise | OT-native monitoring, ICS threat intelligence, incident response, and managed monitoring options. Dragos emphasizes passive-first monitoring and ICS-aware detection designed to avoid production impact. www.dragos.comwww.dragos.com |
| Claroty | Multi-site manufacturers with mixed OT/XIoT environments | Strong asset visibility, exposure management, and secure remote access capabilities; commonly deployed passively in OT networks. www.ciopages.com |
| Nozomi Networks | Factories needing broad asset discovery and anomaly detection | Known for passive OT monitoring, asset inventory, and industrial protocol visibility without requiring agents on legacy equipment. www.dragos.comwww.nozominetworks.com |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Organizations already standardized on Microsoft security tooling | Useful when you want OT telemetry integrated with existing Microsoft security operations workflows. www.ciopages.com |
| Tenable OT Security | Teams already using Tenable for vulnerability management | Extends exposure management into OT environments; requires careful deployment planning around legacy assets. www.ciopages.com |
| Forescout | Large enterprises with many connected devices | Broad device visibility and segmentation use cases across IT, OT, and IoT. www.ciopages.com |
Rather than hiring a generic SOC provider, look for an MSSP with:
Examples of managed OT security offerings include Dragos’ managed OT monitoring services, which combine platform telemetry with OT threat hunting and analyst support.
Passive discovery
Risk baseline
Detection before prevention
Controlled improvements
For a typical brownfield manufacturer, I would usually compare Dragos vs Claroty vs Nozomi first, then decide whether an IT-security incumbent (Microsoft, Tenable, Palo Alto, etc.) is preferable because of existing enterprise tooling.
If you share your industry (automotive, food & beverage, chemicals, pharma, discrete manufacturing, etc.), plant size, and whether you already have a SOC/SIEM, I can narrow the shortlist and MSSP model.
Securing legacy operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems (ICS) without risking unplanned downtime requires a non-disruptive, passive-first approach . Because older programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and vintage operating systems (like Windows XP or early embedded kernels) can crash under active vulnerability scans or heavy endpoint agents, the strategy relies on listening to traffic rather than touching the machinery.
Top Non-Disruptive OT/ICS Security Tools
The following platforms specialize in passive monitoring via SPAN ports/TAPs, behavioral baselining, and wrapping security around legacy hardware:
Top MSSPs for Managed OT/ICS Security
If internal engineering and plant teams lack the bandwidth to monitor industrial SOC alerts 24/7, specialized Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) can bridge the IT/OT gap safely:
Key Non-Disruptive Implementation Rules
If you'd like to narrow this down, please share:
Yes. For a manufacturer with legacy PLCs, HMIs, SCADA/DCS, and equipment that cannot tolerate agents, active scans, or downtime, I’d prioritize passive/agentless OT monitoring first, then put an OT-capable MSSP around it.
| Option | Best fit | Why it works for legacy production |
|---|---|---|
| Claroty | Broad OT/XIoT visibility | Passive monitoring generates no additional traffic and doesn't interact with assets, making it particularly suitable for fragile OT. claroty.com |
| Nozomi Networks | Manufacturing-heavy environments | Passive network sensors, OT protocol awareness, asset inventory and behavioral detection; also supports on-prem deployments for environments that can't send data to cloud. www.nozominetworks.com |
| Dragos | Highest OT/ICS specialization | Passive-first ICS monitoring plus deep industrial protocol expertise. Its OT Watch Complete adds 24/7 monitoring, tuning, threat hunting and vulnerability management as a managed service. www.dragos.com |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Microsoft/Sentinel shops | Agentless network monitoring, on-prem/cloud/hybrid deployment, and integration with Sentinel and existing SOC tooling. Microsoft explicitly supports fully on-premises operation for air-gapped environments. www.nozominetworks.comlearn.microsoft.comclaroty.com |
| Tenable OT Security | IT/OT exposure-management consolidation | Attractive when you want OT asset/risk information tied into a broader Tenable vulnerability-management program. |
| Forescout | Large heterogeneous estates | Worth evaluating where you need broad device visibility across IT, OT and IoT rather than an exclusively ICS-focused platform. |
Optiv is particularly relevant for a manufacturer. Its OT practice covers advisory, deployment and ongoing operation, including OT alert triage, technology management and an OT SOC. It explicitly emphasizes maintaining facility uptime and safety.
IBM is another strong enterprise-scale option. IBM offers OT monitoring, threat detection, IR, segmentation and remote-access security, and importantly has MSSP relationships with both Claroty and Nozomi.
Quorum Cyber is interesting if you're Microsoft-centric. Its Clarity OT service provides 24×7 OT/ICS monitoring using Defender for IoT and Sentinel, while also accepting telemetry from Claroty, Nozomi, Armis and Dragos. Its response model explicitly puts plant safety/change-control ahead of disruptive containment.
Accenture makes sense for very large manufacturers undergoing broader plant modernization. Its manufacturing/Siemens work includes managed security services for OT devices and critical manufacturing systems.
I'd structure the architecture like this:
PLC/DCS/SCADA → passive OT sensors → OT security platform → MSSP/SOC → IT SIEM/SOAR
The important distinction is that the MSSP should monitor and investigate without automatically pushing IT-style remediation into the plant.
For example:
That approach is much safer than dropping an endpoint agent or vulnerability scanner onto decades-old controllers. Passive monitoring is specifically designed for this constraint; Claroty, Dragos, Nozomi and Microsoft all describe agentless/passive approaches for OT environments.
If I were narrowing it to three for a manufacturing RFP:
Dragos for deepest ICS expertise, Claroty or Nozomi for broad passive OT visibility, and Microsoft Defender for IoT + an OT-specialist MSSP if you already run a substantial Microsoft/Sentinel environment.
The most important RFP question isn't “Can you detect an attack?” It's “Show us exactly what happens when you detect one on a production PLC at 2 a.m.—what actions are automatic, what requires plant approval, and how do you guarantee you won't disrupt the process?”
Yes. For a manufacturer with legacy PLCs, HMIs, SCADA, and other fragile OT, I’d prioritize vendors that can monitor passively/agentlessly and keep enforcement out of the production path.
| Vendor / approach | Best fit | Production-disruption profile |
|---|---|---|
| Dragos | Deep ICS threat detection, threat hunting, managed monitoring | Excellent — passive-first network monitoring; Dragos explicitly positions its collection as non-disruptive. www.dragos.comwww.dragos.com |
| Claroty | Asset inventory, vulnerability/risk management, network monitoring, remote access | Excellent — passive monitoring generates no additional traffic and doesn't interact with OT assets. claroty.com |
| Nozomi Networks | Manufacturing-focused visibility, asset inventory, anomaly/threat detection | Excellent — purpose-built for production environments and continuous monitoring. www.nozominetworks.com |
| **Microsoft Defender for IoT | Good if you're already heavily invested in Microsoft/Sentinel | Very good — agentless, network-layer monitoring supports legacy devices without installing agents. learn.microsoft.com |
| Armis | Broad OT/IoT asset visibility and enterprise-wide exposure management | Good, particularly when you want OT plus IoT/medical/enterprise assets in one platform |
| Forescout | Network/device visibility and segmentation across heterogeneous environments | Good, particularly for large multi-vendor estates |
Dragos is particularly interesting because it combines the OT platform with an actual managed service. Its OT Watch Complete offering includes 24/7 monitoring, alert triage, platform tuning, asset visibility, vulnerability management, threat hunting and access to OT specialists. It can also work alongside an existing SOC/MSSP rather than replacing it.
That distinction matters: a generic MSSP may be excellent at SIEM/EDR but still generate poor OT alerts because it doesn't understand PLC protocols, engineering workstations, process changes, or what constitutes dangerous behavior in a control system.
I'd use a "visibility first, enforcement later" architecture:
1. Passive OT sensors → 2. OT-specific detection/asset inventory → 3. SOC/MSSP monitoring → 4. Controlled segmentation/remediation
For example:
PLC/HMI/SCADA → SPAN/TAP → Dragos / Claroty / Nozomi sensor → SIEM/SOC
This lets you inventory devices and communications without putting an agent on a PLC or actively probing it. Claroty specifically notes that passive monitoring creates no additional traffic; Dragos similarly describes passive-first collection for legacy devices and proprietary ICS protocols.
I'd be cautious about deploying active vulnerability scanners, endpoint agents, inline IPS, or automated blocking directly in an old control network until the controls/engineering team has validated them. Legacy Windows HMIs and old PLCs are precisely where an otherwise reasonable IT security mechanism can become an availability problem.
If I were evaluating three vendors for a manufacturing RFP, I'd start with:
Then I'd consider Microsoft Defender for IoT if your organization already has a substantial Microsoft/Sentinel SOC and wants to consolidate.
The key RFP requirement I'd put in bold is: “Must support passive/agentless monitoring of production OT with no active probing or traffic injection unless explicitly approved by OT engineering.”
If you tell me roughly how many plants, whether you're Siemens/Rockwell/mixed, and whether you already have an MSSP/SIEM such as Sentinel, Splunk, or QRadar, I can narrow this to a 3–5 vendor shortlist and explain which architecture is least disruptive.
Securing legacy OT/ICS environments without risking production downtime requires a "do no harm" philosophy . Traditional IT security strategies—like active network vulnerability scans, aggressive intrusion testing, or forced automated patching—will routinely crash fragile legacy PLCs, corrupt proprietary ladder logic, or halt manufacturing lines.
To protect unpatchable 20-to-30-year-old control systems safely, industry leaders rely on purely passive monitoring, non-intrusive network overlays, and specialized OT-certified Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs).
Top OT-Native Security Tools for Legacy Systems
The standard approach for legacy gear relies on passive Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) via SPAN ports or network TAPs. These tools listen to traffic invisibly without injecting a single packet into your production line.
Leading MSSPs for Industrial Cyber Defense
Outsourcing OT monitoring is challenging because a standard IT-focused SOC will misinterpret routine PLC programming changes or firmware queries as anomalies, or worse, execute a disruptive containment playbook. You need an MSSP with an OT-aware 24/7 SOC.
Key Non-Disruptive Deployment Best Practices
If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me: