Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 320 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Use SiteGround for non-technical or small-client sites when you want quick setup, built-in email, and strong support so you can avoid server work. Use
Cloudways for growing or high-traffic clients that need higher performance, dedicated cloud resources, and pay-as-you-go pricing.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 83% of answers
Best for performance-focused or scaling clients: Cloudways delivers higher speed, dedicated cloud resources, and pay-as-you-go pricing for busy sites; tradeoff is more hands-on server management and migration nuance.
Named in 62% of answers
Named in 52% of answers
Named in 38% of answers
As a web designer, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways comes down to a fundamental trade-off: **convenience and managed hand-holding** versus **scalability, raw performance, and server control**. Both are top-tier choices, but they fit completely different workflow models for managing client websites.…
As a web designer, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways comes down to a fundamental trade-off: convenience and managed hand-holding versus scalability, raw performance, and server control.
Both are top-tier choices, but they fit completely different workflow models for managing client websites.
SiteGround: The Plug-and-Play Choice
SiteGround is a traditional, premium shared/cloud host running on Google Cloud infrastructure, wrapped in a custom, highly polished control panel (Site Tools).
Cloudways: The Scalable Powerhouse
Cloudways is a managed cloud hosting platform . Instead of giving you a slice of a shared server, they sit on top of top-tier cloud infrastructure providers (DigitalOcean, AWS, Google Cloud) and manage the server configuration for you.
Side-by-Side Comparison for Designers
| Feature | SiteGround | Cloudways |
|---|---|---|
| Server Type | Shared / Managed Cloud | Dedicated Managed Cloud (AWS, DigitalOcean, GCP) |
| Pricing Model | Annual plans with high renewals | Flexible hourly/monthly pay-as-you-go |
| Client Handover | Very easy (friendly custom dashboard) | Moderate (requires clear instructions or keeping control yourself) |
| Email Hosting | Included free | Not included (must use third-party) |
| Agency Profitability | Lower (per-site strict caps & costs) | Higher (host dozens of small client sites on one server) |
The Verdict: Which should you choose?
To help narrow this down, tell me:
If you’re a **web designer managing websites for clients**, I’d lean **Cloudways overall**—but **SiteGround is better if you want maximum simplicity and low-touch management**. Here’s how I’d look at it from an agency/freelancer perspective. ## Quick verdict
If you’re a web designer managing websites for clients, I’d lean Cloudways overall—but SiteGround is better if you want maximum simplicity and low-touch management.
Here’s how I’d look at it from an agency/freelancer perspective.
| SiteGround | Cloudways --- | --- | --- Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Multiple client sites | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Client/agency management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Staging & cloning | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Technical control | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ White-label/client access | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Predictable simplicity | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Value for growing agency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
For a web designer who might eventually manage 10, 20, 50+ client websites, Cloudways is the more attractive architecture. You can choose your underlying cloud provider, create multiple applications, clone sites/servers, use staging, scale resources, and manage multiple projects from one platform.
For example, Cloudways currently offers managed servers through providers including DigitalOcean and Vultr, with plans starting around $11/month for a 2GB/1-vCPU configuration.
That makes it particularly appealing when you want to treat hosting as part of your web-design business, rather than simply buying hosting for individual websites.
SiteGround is much easier for the average client.
Its standard hosting includes things such as SSL, CDN, daily backups, email, migrations, caching and 24/7 support. Its GrowBig and GoGeek plans also include staging, while GoGeek adds things such as white-label access and priority support.
That makes SiteGround excellent if your typical clients are:
You can essentially say:
"I'll build your website, host it, and take care of everything." And SiteGround makes that relatively painless.
Imagine you have 25 WordPress clients.
With Cloudways, you can organize applications/projects, clone sites, create staging environments, integrate Git, and scale server resources when necessary.
That's a much more developer/agency-oriented workflow.
It also gives you more architectural flexibility than traditional shared hosting. You're essentially putting your clients' websites on managed cloud infrastructure rather than simply putting everything into a conventional shared-hosting account.
That's the biggest reason I'd choose Cloudways as a web designer.
Cloudways is not necessarily cheaper for every client.
Its current Flexible plans start around $11/month for a small DigitalOcean configuration, but your actual cost rises as you select more resources, backups, add-ons, etc.
Meanwhile, SiteGround's advertised introductory pricing is extremely low—although its current published renewal prices are considerably higher. For example, GrowBig is advertised at $4.99/month initially and $29.99/month on renewal.
So don't compare the introductory prices directly.
If I were building a small-to-medium web design business today, I'd consider this model:
Client website → Cloudways → you manage hosting → client pays you monthly
For example:
Website build: $2,000 Hosting/maintenance: $75–150/month Includes: hosting + backups + updates + security + small maintenance allowance
Now hosting becomes a recurring revenue stream, rather than something you simply hand over to the client.
Cloudways is particularly well suited to this model because its platform is designed around multiple applications, teams, projects, staging, cloning and server management.
Interestingly, SiteGround Cloud is much more compelling for agencies than regular SiteGround shared hosting.
Their current Cloud offering starts at $100/month and includes unlimited websites, dedicated resources, automated scaling, white-label access, client roles, staging, Git, backups, CDN and priority support.
So I'd actually break the decision down like this:
If you're serious about becoming a web designer and hosting your clients' websites as an ongoing service, I'd choose Cloudways.
I'd start with a relatively modest server, put several low-traffic WordPress sites on it, establish your backup/security/maintenance workflow, and increase server resources as the portfolio grows.
SiteGround would be my choice if your priority is "make this ridiculously easy and don't make me think about infrastructure."
One more thing: don't automatically put every client on the same server. For higher-value or higher-traffic clients, I'd isolate them on their own server/application architecture so one client's traffic spike or problem doesn't become everyone else's problem.
If you tell me roughly how many client websites you expect to host (e.g. 5, 20, 50+) and whether they're mostly WordPress, I can map out the exact Cloudways vs SiteGround setup and what I'd charge each client per month.
Cloudways is not necessarily cheaper for every client.
Its current Flexible plans start around $11/month for a small DigitalOcean configuration, but your actual cost rises as you select more resources, backups, add-ons, etc.
Meanwhile, SiteGround's advertised introductory pricing is extremely low—although its current published renewal prices are considerably higher. For example, GrowBig is advertised at $4.99/month initially and $29.99/month on renewal.
So don't compare the introductory prices directly.
If I were building a small-to-medium web design business today, I'd consider this model:
Client website → Cloudways → you manage hosting → client pays you monthly
For example:
Website build: $2,000 Hosting/maintenance: $75–150/month Includes: hosting + backups + updates + security + small maintenance allowance
Now hosting becomes a recurring revenue stream, rather than something you simply hand over to the client.
Cloudways is particularly well suited to this model because its platform is designed around multiple applications, teams, projects, staging, cloning and server management.
Interestingly, SiteGround Cloud is much more compelling for agencies than regular SiteGround shared hosting.
If you’re a **web designer hosting multiple client websites**, I’d lean **Cloudways over SiteGround**—but it depends heavily on what kind of clients you serve. ### My quick verdict | **SiteGround** | **Cloudways**
If you’re a web designer hosting multiple client websites, I’d lean Cloudways over SiteGround—but it depends heavily on what kind of clients you serve.
| SiteGround | Cloudways --- | --- | --- Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Client-site management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ WordPress | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Staging | ✅ | ✅ Backups | ✅ Daily | ✅ Automated White-label/client access | ✅ | ✅ Server control | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Multiple client sites | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Beginner-friendly | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Growing agency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Value at scale | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
cloudways.com is the one I'd choose if your goal is to build a repeatable hosting business around your web-design clients.
The big advantage is that Cloudways lets you host on infrastructure from DigitalOcean, AWS, Google Cloud, Vultr, and others, while Cloudways handles much of the server management. It also provides staging, cloning, backups, scaling, firewall/security features, and centralized management.
That makes it particularly attractive when you go from:
"I have 3 client websites" to:
"I manage 20–50+ WordPress websites." You can manage multiple applications from one Cloudways dashboard rather than treating hosting as an individual product for every client.
siteground.com is arguably the easier choice for smaller clients.
Its WordPress environment is very polished: automated daily backups, staging, SSH/WP-CLI, Git, WordPress management, migration tools, client/collaborator access, and white-label capabilities are built into its ecosystem.
And current independent testing still rates SiteGround highly for small businesses and ease of use, particularly because of its support and user-friendly Site Tools interface.
The catch is renewal pricing. Promotional pricing can look excellent initially, but the regular price can be substantially higher.
I'd actually think about hosting as part of your service offering, rather than simply asking "which host is better?"
Choose SiteGround.
Good for:
It's extremely easy to hand a client a SiteGround account and say, "Here's your website."
Choose Cloudways.
This is where I think it becomes much more interesting for a web designer.
For example, you could offer:
Website Care — $99/month
Your actual hosting cost becomes just one component of the recurring revenue.
Cloudways is particularly well suited to this model because it gives you more control over the underlying infrastructure and lets you scale resources as your clients grow.
Cloudways, without much hesitation.
For WooCommerce, membership sites, LMS sites, high-traffic sites, etc., I'd rather have the additional infrastructure flexibility and scaling options available through Cloudways.
Cloudways currently also offers features such as autoscaling, advanced caching, Cloudflare integration, staging/cloning, automated backups, and managed security.
Don't choose Cloudways simply because it's "faster."
The bigger distinction is:
SiteGround = hosting product
Cloudways = managed cloud infrastructure platform
That's a meaningful difference.
If you're a designer who doesn't want to think about servers, Cloudways can actually be more complexity than you need.
If you're becoming an agency/freelancer managing dozens of websites, that additional flexibility becomes a major advantage.
If I were starting a web-design business today:
1–5 client sites: SiteGround 5–20 sites: Cloudways 20–100+ sites: Cloudways or a more agency-focused managed WordPress host High-end/eCommerce: Cloudways / Kinsta / similar premium managed infrastructure
And if your ultimate goal is "I build websites and charge clients monthly for hosting + maintenance", I'd pick Cloudways between these two.
One caveat: Cloudways' current pricing/features have changed considerably, including new WordPress plans and additional services, so I'd evaluate the actual cost per client site at your expected number of sites, rather than comparing the advertised entry prices.
If you tell me roughly how many client websites you expect to manage (5, 20, 50, 100+) and whether they're mostly WordPress, I can give you a much more concrete "here's exactly what I'd buy and how I'd price it to clients" recommendation.
As a web designer, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways comes down to a fundamental trade-off: **convenience and managed support** versus **scalability and raw…
As a web designer, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways comes down to a fundamental trade-off: convenience and managed support versus scalability and raw performance.
Both are heavily favored by digital professionals, but they serve different workflow styles and client tiers.
SiteGround: The Plug-and-Play Choice
SiteGround functions as a traditional, premium shared/cloud host heavily customized for WordPress and SiteTools (their custom cPanel alternative).
Cloudways: The Performance & Scaling Choice
Cloudways is a managed cloud hosting platform . Instead of hosting your sites on a traditional server, they sit on top of high-performance cloud infrastructure providers like DigitalOcean, AWS, or Google Cloud.
The Verdict: Which should you choose?
To help narrow this down, tell me:
When choosing between **SiteGround** and **Cloudways** as a web designer for client websites, you are looking at two entirely different beasts . SiteGround is a premium shared/cloud-hybrid managed WordPress host , while Cloudways is a platform that provisions and manages dedicated cloud servers (DigitalOcean, Vultr,…
When choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways as a web designer for client websites, you are looking at two entirely different beasts . SiteGround is a premium shared/cloud-hybrid managed WordPress host , while Cloudways is a platform that provisions and manages dedicated cloud servers (DigitalOcean, Vultr, AWS, Google Cloud) for you.
Both are top-tier, but they serve different agency workflows and technical appetites.
SiteGround for Client Sites
SiteGround uses a custom, user-friendly dashboard ("Site Tools") and is famous for its beginner-friendly ecosystem and stellar in-house support.
Cloudways for Client Sites
Cloudways is a managed cloud layer . You pick a provider (like Vultr High Frequency or DigitalOcean), and Cloudways optimizes it, handles the firewall, and gives you a clean dashboard to host as many individual "apps" (websites) as your server resources can handle.
The Verdict: Which is Best?
If you'd like, let me know:
I can help you map out the exact pricing math or workflow strategy for your design business.
Yes — for a **web designer managing client websites**, I’d lean **Cloudways over SiteGround**, but there’s an important distinction: they’re designed for somewhat different workflows. ### My verdict | | **SiteGround** | **Cloudways** |
Yes — for a web designer managing client websites, I’d lean Cloudways over SiteGround, but there’s an important distinction: they’re designed for somewhat different workflows.
| SiteGround | Cloudways | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Small/simple client sites | Agencies & growing client portfolios |
| Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Managing many sites | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Client separation | Good | Excellent |
| Staging/cloning | Yes | Yes |
| Support | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Email hosting | Yes | No, separate service |
| Pricing model | Intro pricing + renewal | Pay-as-you-go |
| Developer control | Good | Excellent |
Cloudways is essentially a managed layer on top of cloud infrastructure. You can choose providers such as DigitalOcean or Vultr, and Cloudways handles much of the server management for you. Its current Flexible offering includes things like staging/cloning, free migration, vertical scaling, firewall, caching, and WordPress tools.
That's particularly attractive if you're doing this:
You → manage hosting → 10–50+ client websites → clients pay you monthly
Cloudways gives you a much more "agency" oriented setup.
For example, you can have:
…and manage them from your hosting environment rather than treating each website like a separate little hosting account.
Cloudways also currently offers unlimited applications/sites subject to the server's resources, staging, cloning, vertical scaling, and centralized management.
SiteGround is arguably the better choice if your priority is simplicity and support.
Their current WordPress plans include free SSL, CDN, backups, email, staging on higher plans, migrations, managed updates, SSH/WP-CLI, and 24/7 human support.
And that's a big deal when a client calls you and says:
"My website is down and I don't know what I did."
SiteGround is easier for a less technical client/business owner to understand.
The downside is renewal pricing. For example, SiteGround currently advertises StartUp at $2.99/month initially, but lists $17.99/month as the renewal price; GrowBig is $4.99 initially and $29.99 on renewal.
This is one of the reasons I wouldn't automatically put every client on Cloudways.
SiteGround includes email hosting. Cloudways doesn't function as your traditional email host.
So if you have:
client.com
and they need:
you'll generally want something like Google Workspace or Microsoft 365 alongside Cloudways.
That's not necessarily bad — I actually prefer separating website hosting from business email for professional client setups.
If I were building a web design business today, I'd probably do:
Domain: Cloudflare Registrar / appropriate registrar
↓
DNS: Cloudflare
↓
Website: Cloudways
↓
Email: Google Workspace or Microsoft 365
↓
WordPress: Cloudways-managed
↓
Backups: Cloudways + independent backup
↓
Client billing: You bill client monthly for hosting/maintenance
This gives you much cleaner infrastructure than putting absolutely everything inside one hosting company.
Cloudways' current platform also has features specifically useful for this type of setup, including staging/cloning, server scaling, monitoring, and centralized application management.
Don't buy Cloudways simply because someone says "cloud hosting is faster." Your WordPress configuration, theme/page builder, plugins, database, images, caching and CDN can matter enormously.
Independent 2026 comparisons generally put Cloudways ahead for performance/scalability and SiteGround ahead for simplicity/support, which matches how I'd position the two.
1–5 client websites: → SiteGround is perfectly fine.
5–20 websites: → Cloudways starts making considerably more sense.
20+ websites / serious agency: → Cloudways, and I'd build a proper standardized hosting/maintenance system around it.
High-traffic WooCommerce/LMS sites: → Cloudways, particularly its higher-performance/autoscaling options. Cloudways now offers an Autonomous WordPress product specifically aimed at dynamic, high-traffic WordPress/eCommerce/LMS workloads.
Clients who need email bundled with hosting: → SiteGround is easier.
Cloudways: 9/10
SiteGround: 8/10
If you're planning to resell hosting to your web-design clients and charge them a monthly hosting/maintenance fee, I'd pick Cloudways.
If you tell me roughly how many client websites you expect to host (5, 10, 25, 50+) and whether they're mostly WordPress/Elementor, I can also break down the actual monthly cost per client and what I'd charge the client.
For a **web designer managing client websites**, I would generally choose **Cloudways over SiteGround** — but it depends on your client profile and how much technical control you want. They solve different problems.…
For a web designer managing client websites, I would generally choose Cloudways over SiteGround — but it depends on your client profile and how much technical control you want. They solve different problems.
| Cloudways | SiteGround | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Designers/agencies managing multiple client sites | Small businesses needing simple WordPress hosting |
| Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Scaling | Excellent | Limited by plan |
| Client management | Better | Good |
| Ease of use | Moderate | Easier |
| Email hosting | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Multiple websites | Excellent | Depends on plan |
| Technical control | High | Medium |
| Beginner friendliness | Medium | High |
If you build 10, 20, or 50 client sites, Cloudways fits the agency model better:
This means you can maintain client sites from one dashboard instead of managing many separate hosting accounts.
Client websites increasingly need speed for SEO and conversions. Cloudways runs on cloud infrastructure providers and gives you dedicated server resources rather than traditional shared hosting.
A typical setup:
This is a stronger foundation for:
A common agency model:
Cloudways makes it easier to package this as a professional service.
SiteGround is excellent when your client wants:
✅ "I just need a website and email"
✅ Simple WordPress site
✅ Non-technical owner who wants phone support
✅ A low-maintenance setup
It also includes email hosting, which many small businesses expect. Cloudways does not provide traditional mailbox hosting, so you would typically pair it with something like Google Workspace or another email provider.
Option A: Professional agency setup
Option B: Beginner-friendly client handoff
If you are trying to build a web design business, I would lean Cloudways. If you are mostly delivering one-off websites to small businesses and handing everything over, SiteGround is simpler.
As a web designer, choosing between **SiteGround** and **Cloudways** for client websites depends heavily on your agency model, your technical comfort level, and how you plan to handle ongoing maintenance. They operate on entirely different hosting architectures and cater to different…
As a web designer, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways for client websites depends heavily on your agency model, your technical comfort level, and how you plan to handle ongoing maintenance. They operate on entirely different hosting architectures and cater to different workflows.
An evaluation of both platforms through the lens of a web designer highlights which option best fits specific scenarios.
SiteGround: The Client-Handover & Simplicity Choice
SiteGround is a premier, heavily optimized shared/cloud-hybrid platform built on Google Cloud infrastructure. It is designed for out-of-the-box ease.
Cloudways: The Agency-Scaling & Performance Choice
Cloudways is a managed cloud hosting platform. Instead of giving you a shared account, they sit on top of top-tier cloud infrastructure providers like DigitalOcean, Vultr, and AWS, letting you deploy dedicated virtual private servers (VPS).
Summary Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
To help narrow this down, let me know:
If you're a **web designer hosting websites for clients**, I would generally choose **Cloudways over SiteGround**—especially if you plan to manage more than a handful of client sites. The key distinction is: - **SiteGround = easier traditional hosting**
If you're a web designer hosting websites for clients, I would generally choose Cloudways over SiteGround—especially if you plan to manage more than a handful of client sites.
The key distinction is:
| SiteGround | Cloudways | |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Multiple client sites | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Developer control | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Client/agency workflows | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Support | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Pricing as you scale | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Best for | Small-business sites | Agencies/freelancers |
Cloudways is specifically positioned toward agencies and developers, and its current platform lets you run multiple websites on a managed cloud server, with features such as staging/cloning, backups, SSL, free migration, firewall/security features, and vertical scaling.
SiteGround, meanwhile, is extremely easy to use and has strong support, making it particularly attractive when you want a client to be able to manage their own hosting without much technical knowledge.
Imagine you eventually have 20–50 client websites.
With Cloudways, you can organize sites into applications on servers and scale the server resources as needed. You don't necessarily need a separate hosting plan for every client. Current Cloudways plans advertise unlimited websites on the standard Flexible infrastructure, subject to the server's resources.
That gives you a much better business model:
Client → You → Cloudways
Rather than:
Client → Separate SiteGround account
You can then charge clients something like:
Website hosting & maintenance — $50/month
while your actual infrastructure cost is shared across multiple sites.
That's where Cloudways becomes particularly attractive.
Cloudways is not simply "better SiteGround."
Cloudways gives you considerably more control over the server environment, which means you are taking on more responsibility. It's still managed hosting, but you'll be dealing with concepts like servers, applications, PHP versions, server resources, staging, caching, DNS, etc.
SiteGround is more "just put the website here and let us handle it."
So I'd make the decision based on your business model:
A recent 2026 comparison similarly reaches the basic conclusion that SiteGround is better suited to smaller/simple sites, while Cloudways makes more sense for developers and agencies managing multiple sites.
I wouldn't make "cheapest hosting" the selling point to your clients.
As a web designer, your hosting is part of your service offering.
I'd package it something like:
Website Care Plan — $75/mo
Then the hosting becomes infrastructure behind your recurring-revenue service rather than something you're simply reselling at cost.
If I were setting up a web-design business today:
1. Cloudways — best overall for an agency/freelancer
2. SiteGround — best for simplicity and smaller client sites
3. WP Engine — excellent premium WordPress option, but expensive
4. Kinsta — excellent, but usually harder to justify for typical small-business clients
Bottom line: I'd choose Cloudways if you're serious about hosting your clients yourself. SiteGround is easier, but Cloudways gives you a much better foundation for turning hosting + maintenance into a recurring revenue stream.
If you tell me roughly how many client websites you expect to host (e.g. 5, 20, 50+) and whether they're WordPress, I can also break down exactly which Cloudways vs. SiteGround plan I'd use and what I'd charge each client per month.
For a web designer managing client websites, choosing between **SiteGround** and **Cloudways** depends on your technical comfort level, how you want to bill your clients, and the scale of the sites you build. They are fundamentally different platforms: SiteGround is a traditional managed shared/cloud host, while…
For a web designer managing client websites, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways depends on your technical comfort level, how you want to bill your clients, and the scale of the sites you build. They are fundamentally different platforms: SiteGround is a traditional managed shared/cloud host, while Cloudways is a managed cloud platform sitting on top of infrastructure providers like DigitalOcean, Vultr, or AWS.
A head-to-head comparison tailored specifically to a web designer's workflow highlights these differences:
The Verdict for Web Designers
To help narrow this down, tell me: