For a B2B firm heavily using LinkedIn, which marketing platforms sync best with lead forms and support multi-channel follow-up sequences?

For a B2B firm where LinkedIn is a major lead source, I’d shortlist these:

My top two

1. HubSpot — best all-around choice

LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms can sync directly into HubSpot as contacts, with custom field mapping. HubSpot can then trigger workflows, lead scoring, sales notifications, email nurturing, ad audiences, and CRM tasks. LinkedIn also supports syncing conversion events back to LinkedIn, allowing optimization toward outcomes such as SQLs and closed-won deals.

For most B2B companies, this is the cleanest architecture:

LinkedIn Ad → Lead Gen Form → HubSpot → qualification/scoring → email nurture + sales task → retargeting → opportunity

2. Salesforce + Account Engagement — best for enterprise

Salesforce has a direct LinkedIn Lead Gen integration that creates leads automatically in Salesforce. Those leads can then sync into Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (formerly Pardot), where automation rules can place prospects into Engagement Studio programs or segmented lists.

This is particularly strong if your sales organization already lives in Salesforce and you need sophisticated lead routing, attribution, account-based marketing, and sales/marketing handoffs.

One important distinction

If by “multi-channel” you mean email + sales-rep tasks + LinkedIn retargeting + CRM automation, HubSpot and Salesforce are excellent.

If you mean automated LinkedIn outreach/messages themselves, that's a different category. LinkedIn's Lead Gen integration gets the lead into your CRM/automation system; you generally shouldn't assume that means your marketing platform can automatically send arbitrary LinkedIn messages on your behalf. LinkedIn's documented Lead Gen capability is primarily about syncing lead data into CRMs/CDPs/marketing automation platforms and triggering workflows.

My recommendation: If you're choosing from scratch, I'd start with HubSpot. If you already have a substantial Salesforce sales operation, choose Salesforce + Account Engagement rather than introducing a second CRM.

If you tell me your company size, approximate LinkedIn leads/month, CRM, and whether you want email/SMS/LinkedIn outreach, I can rank 3–5 stacks specifically for your situation.

For B2B firms heavily leveraging LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms, the ideal platform needs a native or near-instant API sync to capture form submits without data loss, combined with robust multi-channel sequencing (email, LinkedIn tasks/actions, and phone calls).

The top-performing platforms fit for this specific workflow, categorized by their core strengths, include:

• LinkedIn Sync: Offers a seamless, native integration with LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms that maps form fields directly into your CRM database in real-time.

• Multi-Channel Sequences: Allows you to trigger automated email sequences, internal task reminders for manual LinkedIn touchpoints (like profile views or connection requests), and ad retargeting loops based on engagement.

• Best For: Mid-market to enterprise B2B teams wanting an all-in-one CRM, inbound/outbound alignment, and attribution tracking.

• LinkedIn Sync: Syncs natively or via tools like Zapier/Make to ingest LinkedIn form leads directly into prospecting views.

• Multi-Channel Sequences: Exceptionally strong at multi-channel sequencing, blending automated email steps with built-in LinkedIn action steps (view profile, send connection request, message) and phone tasks.

• Best For: Lean to mid-market sales and marketing teams looking for integrated contact data, enrichment, and execution under one roof.

• LinkedIn Sync: Typically integrated via CRM bridge (e.g., Salesforce or HubSpot pulling the LinkedIn form data first) or direct connectors.

• Multi-Channel Sequences: Industry gold standards for enterprise sales cadences. They orchestrate hyper-structured, multi-touch sequences (combining emails, phone calls, and automated LinkedIn sales navigator touch tasks) for outbound and inbound SDR teams.

• Best For: Larger sales-led B2B organizations with dedicated SDR/BDR teams executing high-volume cadences.

• LinkedIn Sync: Connects smoothly via CRM or webhooks from LinkedIn ad campaigns.

• Multi-Channel Sequences: Built explicitly for modern multi-channel outbound and inbound mixing, combining native email sending with automated LinkedIn networking and messaging sequences.

• Best For: Agile growth teams looking for nimble, AI-assisted multi-channel copywriting and trigger-based sequencing.

If you want to narrow this down, tell me:

• What is your current CRM (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot, or none)?
• Do you need the tool to handle automated LinkedIn messaging directly, or just sales tasks/reminders for manual outreach?

For a B2B firm that is LinkedIn-heavy, I’d shortlist these platforms:

LinkedIn explicitly supports syncing Lead Gen Forms into CRMs and marketing-automation platforms so that submissions can trigger workflows rather than requiring CSV uploads.

My recommendation

1. HubSpot — best balance of simplicity + breadth

This would be my default recommendation for most mid-market B2B firms. HubSpot can directly sync LinkedIn lead-ad forms into the CRM, and its workflows/sequences give you a straightforward path from:

LinkedIn ad → Lead Gen Form → CRM → qualification → email sequence → sales task → retargeting/nurture

HubSpot's current documentation confirms direct syncing from LinkedIn lead-ad forms.

2. Salesforce — best if Sales/RevOps already lives there

If Salesforce is already your system of record, I wouldn't introduce another CRM just for LinkedIn. Salesforce now has a direct LinkedIn Lead Gen integration that creates leads automatically and can sync them into Marketing Cloud Account Engagement.

3. Marketo — best for sophisticated marketing automation

I'd choose this when you have substantial lead scoring, segmentation, nurture programs, multiple product lines, and a dedicated marketing-ops team. It's more powerful than HubSpot for some complex enterprise marketing architectures, but also considerably heavier to operate.

4. 6sense — add it when ABM is central

6sense makes more sense as an ABM/orchestration layer than as the basic destination for LinkedIn leads. It becomes particularly attractive when you're targeting named accounts and want advertising, intent, sales engagement, and account-level prioritization working together.

One important distinction

If by “multi-channel” you mean email + LinkedIn + SDR outreach, don't evaluate these solely on whether they ingest the LinkedIn form. LinkedIn handles the lead capture particularly well; the real differentiator is what happens after the form submission—routing, enrichment, scoring, email automation, sales tasks, retargeting, and attribution. LinkedIn itself highlights automation, enrichment, scoring, routing, and reporting as key benefits of its marketing-partner ecosystem.

Bottom line:

• Mid-market B2B: HubSpot
• Enterprise / Salesforce-centric: Salesforce + Account Engagement/Marketing Cloud
• Marketing-ops-heavy enterprise: Marketo
• ABM-first: 6sense + your CRM/marketing automation
• SDR-sequence-heavy: pair your CRM with Outreach or Salesloft

If you tell me your company size, CRM, average deal size, and whether “multi-channel” means email + LinkedIn + phone, I can narrow this to the best 2–3-stack options and compare them on cost, setup complexity, and automation depth.

My recommendation

1. HubSpot — best balance of simplicity + breadth

This would be my default recommendation for most mid-market B2B firms. HubSpot can directly sync LinkedIn lead-ad forms into the CRM, and its workflows/sequences give you a straightforward path from:

LinkedIn ad → Lead Gen Form → CRM → qualification → email sequence → sales task → retargeting/nurture

HubSpot's current documentation confirms direct syncing from LinkedIn lead-ad forms.

2. Salesforce — best if Sales/RevOps already lives there

If Salesforce is already your system of record, I wouldn't introduce another CRM just for LinkedIn. Salesforce now has a direct LinkedIn Lead Gen integration that creates leads automatically and can sync them into Marketing Cloud Account Engagement.

3. Marketo — best for sophisticated marketing automation

I'd choose this when you have substantial lead scoring, segmentation, nurture programs, multiple product lines, and a dedicated marketing-ops team. It's more powerful than HubSpot for some complex enterprise marketing architectures, but also considerably heavier to operate.

4. 6sense — add it when ABM is central

6sense makes more sense as an ABM/orchestration layer than as the basic destination for LinkedIn leads. It becomes particularly attractive when you're targeting named accounts and want advertising, intent, sales engagement, and account-level prioritization working together.

One important distinction

If by “multi-channel” you mean email + LinkedIn + SDR outreach, don't evaluate these solely on whether they ingest the LinkedIn form. LinkedIn handles the lead capture particularly well; the real differentiator is what happens after the form submission—routing, enrichment, scoring, email automation, sales tasks, retargeting, and attribution. LinkedIn itself highlights automation, enrichment, scoring, routing, and reporting as key benefits of its marketing-partner ecosystem.

For a B2B firm relying heavily on LinkedIn advertising and native lead generation forms, bridging the gap between instant capture and automated, multi-channel nurturing requires platforms with robust native integrations (or reliable webhook/API syncs) and powerful sequence engines.

The top marketing and sales automation platforms that sync seamlessly with LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms and excel at multi-channel follow-ups (email, phone, tasks, and LinkedIn actions) include:

1. HubSpot Marketing & Sales Hub

• LinkedIn Sync: Offers a first-party, robust native integration with LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms. Leads sync into HubSpot in real-time, mapping custom form fields directly to contact properties.
• Multi-Channel Follow-Up: Through HubSpot sequences and workflows, you can trigger multi-step, multi-channel cadences combining automated emails, task creation for manual LinkedIn touchpoints (like connecting or messaging via Sales Navigator), and phone calls.
• Best For: Mid-market to enterprise B2B teams wanting an all-in-one CRM, marketing automation, and ad-tracking ecosystem. Check out details on HubSpot.

2. Apollo.io

• LinkedIn Sync: Connects directly via native integrations or tools like Zapier to ingest LinkedIn form leads instantly, enriching them with verified emails, phone numbers, and firmographic data.
• Multi-Channel Follow-Up: Apollo is widely known for powerhouse outbound sequencing. It natively supports multi-channel playbooks mixing automated/manual emails, phone calls, and specific LinkedIn engagement steps (such as viewing a profile or sending a connection request).
• Best For: Sales-led B2B organizations looking to blend inbound LinkedIn form captures with aggressive outbound data enrichment and sequencing. Explore Apollo.io.

3. ActiveCampaign

• LinkedIn Sync: Syncs cleanly with LinkedIn Lead Gen forms via native extensions or third-party connectors to trigger immediate automation.
• Multi-Channel Follow-Up: Excellent automation builder that handles complex conditional logic. While its direct native social selling touchpoints are lighter than sales-heavy tools, it triggers comprehensive email nurture flows, SMS, and CRM task assignments for your sales reps.
• Best For: SMB to mid-market firms prioritizing deep marketing automation logic and behavior-based triggers. Visit ActiveCampaign.

4. GoHighLevel

• LinkedIn Sync: Features direct integration capabilities to map LinkedIn Lead Gen Form fields instantly into pipelines without manual exports.
• Multi-Channel Follow-Up: Built explicitly for multi-channel communication, allowing automated follow-up sequences via email, SMS, voice drops, and Facebook/LinkedIn touchpoint tasks.
• Best For: Agencies and B2B service firms needing rapid-fire speed-to-lead automation. Learn more at GoHighLevel.

If you can share your current CRM/stack and whether your follow-ups are sales-led (reps reaching out manually) or marketing-led (fully automated) , I can recommend the exact platform fit for your workflow.

For a B2B firm relying heavily on LinkedIn, executing a frictionless handoff from a native LinkedIn Lead Gen Form into a cohesive multi-channel follow-up sequence requires platforms capable of handling instant webhook syncing, robust CRM data mapping, and coordinated cross-channel execution (email, phone, and automated/manual LinkedIn touches).

The top-performing marketing and sales platforms for this specific workflow fall into three distinct architectural categories depending on your team's sophistication:

1. Enterprise All-In-One Marketing Automation (Best for Inbound & Scaled Nurturing)

• HubSpot Marketing Hub: Features a native, highly reliable integration with LinkedIn Campaign Manager. Form submissions sync instantly into the HubSpot CRM, triggering powerful visual workflow builders. From there, you can enroll leads into automated multi-channel sequences spanning email, internal task creation for sales reps (calls/social touchpoints), and targeted ad retargeting. Utilizing features like Breeze AI further assists in autonomous lead research and routing.
• Adobe Marketo Engage: The gold standard for enterprise-level B2B attribution and complex routing. While Marketo doesn't natively manage direct LinkedIn social actions out of the box, it captures LinkedIn Lead Gen Form data seamlessly via native APIs or connectors like LeadsBridge, allowing you to trigger complex multi-channel nurture trees and pass clean data down to Salesforce for sales engagement.

2. Sales Engagement Platforms (Best for Outbound & Direct SDR Sequences)

• Outreach / Salesloft: These platforms excel at structured, multi-channel sales cadences (combining email, phone calls, and required social/LinkedIn steps). While they are traditionally fed via prospecting databases like ZoomInfo or Apollo, they connect cleanly with LinkedIn Lead Forms via middleware or native integrations to drop high-intent inbound ad leads straight into aggressive, timed sales cadences rather than slow marketing drips.
• Reply.io: Combines multi-channel sequences (email, LinkedIn automation, SMS, and calls) with AI-powered SDR capabilities. It handles the ingestion of inbound leads well and lets you build unified workflows where the next touchpoint is decided by prospect engagement rather than siloed channels.

3. Specialized Integration Middleware (The "Glue" for Custom Stacks)

• LeadsBridge: If your primary CRM or sales sequencer doesn't have a robust native plug-in for LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms, LeadsBridge is widely considered the best specialized integration bridge. It provides real-time, error-handled lead syncing from LinkedIn Ads directly into dozens of specialized CRMs and multi-channel marketing platforms without data loss.
• Make / Zapier: Ideal if you use a modular stack (e.g., capturing leads on LinkedIn, enriching them via a waterfall data provider like Clay, and pushing them into a multi-channel outreach tool like Lemlist or instantly).

If you share your current CRM (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive) and sales engagement tools , I can help map out the exact integration architecture to minimize lead response time.

For a B2B firm that relies heavily on LinkedIn, the strongest platforms are usually the ones that can capture LinkedIn Lead Gen Form submissions directly, enrich/score those leads, and trigger multi-touch nurture sequences across email, ads, and sales workflows. LinkedIn supports integrations with major CRM and marketing automation partners so leads can flow into existing workflows instead of being manually exported.

Here are the main contenders:

Typical B2B LinkedIn workflow setups

1. Growth-stage B2B (most common recommendation)

• LinkedIn Lead Gen Form → HubSpot CRM
• Instant lead notification to sales
• Automated email sequence:
  • Day 0: resource delivery
  • Day 2: case study
  • Day 7: webinar/demo invite
  • Day 14: sales follow-up task
• LinkedIn retargeting audience sync

HubSpot is often chosen here because it combines CRM, marketing automation, and LinkedIn campaign syncing in one environment.

2. Enterprise ABM

• LinkedIn → Marketo → Salesforce
• Account scoring
• Multi-stakeholder nurture
• Sales alerts when target accounts engage

Marketo is designed for complex B2B lifecycle management and LinkedIn-based account programs.

3. Salesforce-first organizations

• LinkedIn → Salesforce CRM → Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
• Sales owns pipeline visibility
• Marketing runs automated journeys

Salesforce’s B2B automation tools are built around lead/account management, nurturing, and sales coordination.

Features I’d prioritize when evaluating platforms

• Native LinkedIn Lead Gen Form sync (not CSV uploads)
• Bi-directional CRM sync
• Lead scoring based on company size, role, engagement
• Triggered email sequences
• Sales task creation
• LinkedIn audience retargeting
• Multi-touch attribution
• Account-based marketing support

For many B2B firms heavily invested in LinkedIn, the shortlist usually ends up as:

1. HubSpot — best balance of speed, usability, and LinkedIn workflow coverage
2. Salesforce + Account Engagement — best for complex sales organizations
3. Adobe Marketo Engage — best for enterprise ABM and sophisticated nurture programs

The right choice depends mostly on whether your sales process is SMB/mid-market inbound, enterprise ABM, or salesforce-driven outbound.

For B2B firms heavily leveraging LinkedIn, the ideal setup requires a platform that captures native Lead Gen Form data instantaneously and triggers multi-channel sequences (combining email, phone/calls, SMS, and LinkedIn actions).

The top-performing marketing and sales engagement platforms that handle this synchronization and multi-channel orchestration break down as follows:

• HubSpot Marketing Hub stands out as the best native, all-in-one enterprise option. It features a robust, direct integration with LinkedIn Ads that pulls Lead Gen Form submissions in real time without third-party connectors. Its visual workflow builder lets you automatically enroll those leads into multi-channel nurturing sequences (email, internal task creation for phone calls, and targeted ad retargeting).
• Apollo.io is exceptional for B2B prospecting and data enrichment. While it acts primarily as a sales engagement platform rather than a heavy marketing automation suite, it supports advanced multi-channel sequences (LinkedIn steps, email, phone touches). You can pipe LinkedIn form leads into Apollo via native integrations or tools like Make to trigger immediate outbound touches.
• Reply.io serves as a powerful sales acceleration and outreach platform designed explicitly for building complex multi-channel sequences across email, LinkedIn steps, and calls. When integrated with LinkedIn ad data (often bridged via tools like LeadsBridge or Make ), it puts immediate multi-touch follow-ups on autopilot while optimizing timing and AI-driven personalization.
• Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (Pardot) is built for enterprise B2B organizations. It offers official native connectors for LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms, allowing enterprise teams to map custom form fields directly, score incoming leads, and trigger intricate, multi-channel engagement studio journeys.

To help narrow down which platform fits your current operations best, could you share:

• What CRM are you currently using?
• Roughly how many leads per month do you generate through LinkedIn ads?

For a B2B firm that is LinkedIn-heavy, I’d shortlist these platforms:

My recommendation

1. HubSpot — best balance

LinkedIn says HubSpot is a supported integration, and HubSpot can automatically sync LinkedIn Lead Gen Form submissions into contacts.

This is probably the best choice if you want a relatively simple flow like:

LinkedIn Lead Form → HubSpot contact → segmentation/scoring → immediate email → sales task → follow-up emails → retargeting → CRM pipeline

The big advantage is that the CRM, marketing automation, sales sequences, and reporting live in one ecosystem rather than requiring several integrations.

2. Salesforce + Marketing Cloud Account Engagement — best for sophisticated revenue operations

LinkedIn's current Salesforce integration can create leads directly in Salesforce and sync them to Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (formerly Pardot).

I'd favor this when you already have Salesforce as the system of record and need sophisticated routing, lead scoring, account-level processes, and multi-channel journeys. Salesforce specifically supports multi-channel customer journeys and personalized outreach.

3. Marketo Engage — best for enterprise demand generation

Marketo has a particularly clean LinkedIn workflow: a LinkedIn Lead Gen Form submission can immediately trigger a Marketo Smart Campaign.

That's attractive if your marketing team builds complex nurture programs, scoring models, ABM campaigns, and branching journeys rather than straightforward sales follow-up.

4. Zapier — best as an integration layer, not the core platform

LinkedIn explicitly lists Zapier among its Marketing Partners, and LinkedIn documents its Lead Gen Form integration with Zapier.

It's useful if your stack is something like LinkedIn → Zapier → CRM → email/engagement platform, but I'd generally prefer a native integration for a high-volume B2B operation.

If I were choosing

• SMB/mid-market B2B: HubSpot
• Enterprise with Salesforce already deployed: Salesforce + Account Engagement
• Enterprise marketing/ABM team: Marketo
• Unusual/custom tech stack: Zapier as the glue

One important distinction: LinkedIn Lead Gen Form syncing and LinkedIn prospecting/sequencing are different things. The platforms above are excellent at taking a submitted LinkedIn form and putting that lead into an automated nurture process. LinkedIn itself supports syncing Lead Gen data to CRMs/CDPs/marketing automation platforms for automated workflows.

If your goal is specifically “someone submits a LinkedIn form → automatically run a 10–15 touch sequence across email + LinkedIn + phone + retargeting”, I can compare the best HubSpot vs. Marketo vs. Salesforce vs. Outreach/Salesloft-style stack for that exact workflow.

For a B2B firm that is heavily dependent on LinkedIn, I’d shortlist these platforms:

LinkedIn itself supports syncing Lead Gen Forms directly into supported CRMs/marketing-automation platforms so that submissions can trigger workflows rather than requiring CSV exports.

My ranking

1. HubSpot — best default choice

If you're building a LinkedIn → nurture → sales pipeline, HubSpot is probably the cleanest option. A LinkedIn form submission can enter the CRM and trigger workflows, lead scoring, routing, email nurturing, and sales follow-up. LinkedIn specifically lists HubSpot as an example of a platform that can integrate with Lead Gen Forms.

It's particularly attractive if you want something like:

LinkedIn Lead Form → enrich/score → instant email → assign rep → sales sequence → retarget/nurture → pipeline reporting

2. Salesforce + Account Engagement — best for complex B2B organizations

If Salesforce is already your CRM, I wouldn't introduce another CRM just for LinkedIn. Salesforce's current LinkedIn integration can automatically create leads from LinkedIn Lead Gen ads and sync them into Marketing Cloud Account Engagement.

This is the stronger choice when you have sophisticated lead routing, multiple sales teams, complex lifecycle stages, and enterprise reporting requirements.

3. Marketo Engage — best for sophisticated marketing automation

Marketo is compelling when the marketing team—not sales—is driving a highly structured nurture program involving scoring, segmentation, branching journeys, and multiple campaigns. It's less appealing than HubSpot if you want an all-in-one system that's relatively easy for a smaller team to operate.

4. Apollo — best if LinkedIn is only one part of an outbound motion

Apollo makes more sense when your workflow is:

LinkedIn engagement → prospect identification → email/call sequence → sales rep → CRM

rather than primarily:

LinkedIn ad → Lead Gen Form → marketing nurture.

So I'd treat Apollo more as a sales-engagement/outbound layer than a replacement for HubSpot/Marketo.

One important distinction

If by "multi-channel" you mean email + LinkedIn + sales tasks, don't just evaluate whether a platform imports LinkedIn leads. Evaluate whether it can trigger actions based on LinkedIn activity.

For example:

LinkedIn form submitted → ICP score > 80 → email immediately → create sales task → LinkedIn touch → wait 3 days → second email → notify AE → move to nurture if no response.

That's where HubSpot and Salesforce/Account Engagement become much more interesting than a basic LinkedIn-to-CRM connector.

Also, LinkedIn's Lead Gen Forms support hidden fields such as UTM/source information, which is useful for campaign-level attribution once the lead reaches your CRM.

Bottom line:

• Choose HubSpot if you want the best balance of LinkedIn integration + automation + ease of use.
• Choose Salesforce + Account Engagement if you're already a Salesforce organization.
• Choose Marketo if you have a sophisticated marketing-ops team and complex nurture requirements.
• Add Apollo if outbound prospecting/sequencing is a major part of the motion.

If you tell me your company size, CRM (if any), and whether follow-up is primarily email, LinkedIn, phone, or all three, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best stacks and compare them on integration depth, automation, and likely cost.

For a B2B firm relying heavily on LinkedIn, selecting a platform that natively synchronizes with LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms while orchestrating multi-channel follow-ups (email, phone, and native/automated LinkedIn touches) depends largely on whether your strategy leans toward Inbound Marketing Automation or Outbound Sales Engagement.

The top platforms categorized by how they handle this workflow include the following:

• HubSpot Marketing Hub : Best overall for inbound-focused B2B teams. It features a robust native integration with LinkedIn Campaign Manager, syncing Lead Gen Form submissions instantly into the CRM. Its visual workflow builder triggers multi-channel follow-ups (primarily email, task creation for phone calls, and internal alerts) the moment a form is submitted. * limitation: Native LinkedIn direct-message sequencing is limited, so sales follow-ups usually rely on email and phone tasks.*
• Apollo.io : Best for combining prospecting data with aggressive multi-channel execution. While it excels at outbound database building, it supports integrations to capture inbound leads and map them into advanced, multi-touch sequences spanning email, phone/calls, and LinkedIn steps (like automated connection requests or view profiles).
• Reply.io : Best for dedicated sales development (SDR) teams running active outbound and inbound blends. It provides native/supported integrations for ad forms via connectors (or direct webhooks) and specializes in building deep multi-channel sequences incorporating automated LinkedIn actions and email steps.
• LeadsBridge : Best as a specialized integration middleware if your core marketing automation or CRM (such as standalone Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics, or ActiveCampaign) doesn't have a seamless or real-time native connector for LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms. LeadsBridge acts as the bridge that pushes form fields instantly into your sequence-ready sales engagement platform.

To help narrow down the ideal platform, could you share:

• Are you looking for a pure marketing automation platform (like HubSpot) or a sales engagement/outreach platform (like Apollo or Reply)?
• Do your multi-channel sequences need automated LinkedIn messaging steps , or just email and phone tasks for your reps?