Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 326 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Your brand can be here too.
Hiring an executive assistant (EA) to support you in your role as a **Chief of Staff (CoS)** is a strategic move. A great EA-CoS partnership forms a powerful command center, allowing you to focus on high-level strategy while they protect your operational blind spots. Here is a step-by-step framework to hire the right…
Hiring an executive assistant (EA) to support you in your role as a Chief of Staff (CoS) is a strategic move. A great EA-CoS partnership forms a powerful command center, allowing you to focus on high-level strategy while they protect your operational blind spots.
Here is a step-by-step framework to hire the right person for this critical leverage role:
Role Breakdown: Map out your own responsibilities as CoS. Identify which tasks are transactional (calendar management, travel booking, expense reports) versus operational (project coordination, internal comms, meeting prep). Your EA should absorb the heavy lifting of the former and support you on the latter.
Competency Profile: Look for high EQ (emotional intelligence), radical discretion, exceptional anticipation (thinking three steps ahead), and a bias for action.
Positioning: Frame the role clearly. They aren't just supporting an executive; they are supporting the Chief of Staff to run an efficient organization.
Core Responsibilities: Detail calendar and inbox management, gatekeeping, cross-functional coordination, and handling confidential information.
Cultural Fit: Emphasize that they must thrive in a fast-paced, high-context environment where ambiguity is the norm.
Specialized Networks: Leverage executive assistant communities and specialized recruiting agencies that vet top-tier talent. Check out platforms like EAtoCoS resources via the Chief of Staff Network for peer insights.
Referral Networks: Tap into executive assistant networks on LinkedIn or specialized fractional/remote EA platforms (such as Athena, Boldly, or EA-specific boutique recruiters).
The Resume Screen: Look for longevity in previous roles, evidence of complex project management, and experience supporting high-capacity leaders.
The Initial Phone Screen: Test for communication style, baseline professionalism, and cultural alignment.
The Practical Assessment: Give them a realistic scenario test. For example: "Here is a chaotic, double-booked calendar and a messy inbox with conflicting priorities. How do you triage this in 15 minutes?" This tests prioritization and calmness under pressure.
The Final Interview: Involve a key stakeholder or peer to see how they interact with someone outside the direct reporting line.
Context Sharing: Don't just hand over a task list; share the "why" behind your priorities, company politics, and executive communication styles.
The First 30 Days: Establish clear communication cadences (daily syncs) and gradually transition ownership of the calendar and inbox once trust is established.
To help tailor this, would you like me to:
No sources cited
Hiring an executive assistant (EA) to support you **as a Chief of Staff** is a little different from hiring an EA for a CEO or executive directly. Your EA should not just “manage your calendar”; they should become the operating backbone that protects your time, improves your execution rhythm, and allows you to spend…
Hiring an executive assistant (EA) to support you as a Chief of Staff is a little different from hiring an EA for a CEO or executive directly. Your EA should not just “manage your calendar”; they should become the operating backbone that protects your time, improves your execution rhythm, and allows you to spend more time on strategic work. The key is to define the role clearly so it complements your Chief of Staff responsibilities rather than duplicating them.
Before writing a job description, list the recurring friction you want removed.
A strong EA supporting a Chief of Staff might own:
Calendar architecture
Protecting focus time
Preparing you for key meetings
Resolving scheduling conflicts using judgment
Managing recurring leadership rhythms
Meeting operations
Agenda collection
Pre-read coordination
Notes and action-item tracking
Follow-up reminders
Information flow
Inbox triage
Drafting responses
Surfacing priorities
Maintaining key documents
Stakeholder coordination
Internal and external scheduling
Executive relationships
Partner communications
Operational leverage
Travel
Expense management
Event logistics
Vendor coordination
Special projects
Your Chief of Staff should typically remain focused on strategy, alignment, decision support, and cross-functional execution—not become consumed by administrative mechanics.
Common profiles:
Best if you mainly need:
Best if you need:
Best if your environment is fast-moving and ambiguous:
For a Chief of Staff, I would usually bias toward an Executive Business Partner profile rather than a traditional administrative EA.
Avoid:
“Looking for someone to manage calendar and scheduling.” Use something like:
“Partner with the Chief of Staff to increase executive leverage by managing operating rhythms, protecting priorities, improving information flow, and ensuring critical commitments move forward.” Example success metrics:
First 90 days
After 6 months
The best candidates usually demonstrate:
A great EA is often less about administrative speed and more about trust, prioritization, and judgment.
I’d recommend:
Ask:
Give them a realistic scenario:
“You have three leadership meetings, a board prep deadline, a travel disruption, and a CEO request that conflicts with a team commitment. How do you prioritize?” Evaluate their thinking, not the “correct” answer.
Ask them to:
Ask former executives:
Good places:
For senior EA roles, referrals are especially valuable because trust and working style matter so much.
The most successful partnerships are built when the EA understands: “My job is to make my executive more effective.”
Title: Executive Business Partner to Chief of Staff
Reports to: Chief of Staff
Mission: Increase the Chief of Staff’s leverage by managing executive operations, strengthening communication flow, and ensuring priorities move from decision to execution.
Ideal background:
If you are the Chief of Staff at a startup, large company, nonprofit, or government organization, the ideal profile and compensation range can differ significantly. I can help tailor the role description and interview scorecard to your environment.
Reports to: Chief of Staff
Mission: Increase the Chief of Staff’s leverage by managing executive operations, strengthening communication flow, and ensuring priorities move from decision to execution.
Ideal background:
If you are the Chief of Staff at a startup, large company, nonprofit, or government organization, the ideal profile and compensation range can differ significantly. I can help tailor the role description and interview scorecard to your environment.
If you mean **“I’m already the Chief of Staff, and I want an Executive Assistant who makes me dramatically more effective,”** I’d hire for a **high-trust, operator-level EA**, not a conventional administrative assistant. The key is to design the role around **leverage**, rather than simply dumping tasks on someone. ##…
If you mean “I’m already the Chief of Staff, and I want an Executive Assistant who makes me dramatically more effective,” I’d hire for a high-trust, operator-level EA, not a conventional administrative assistant.
The key is to design the role around leverage, rather than simply dumping tasks on someone.
Before recruiting, look at your last 2–3 weeks and categorize your work:
For a CoS, I'd aim for the EA to own the operational layer around you, while you retain the higher-order judgment, strategy, and relationship work. That's consistent with the distinction between EA and CoS: the EA protects the executive's time and operating system; the CoS typically works further into organizational priorities and strategy.
A useful test is:
“What am I doing repeatedly that someone with good judgment could do 80–90% as well as me?” That's your EA's territory.
For someone supporting a Chief of Staff, I'd prioritize these traits:
The best candidate may have the title Executive Assistant, but I'd look for someone who has already operated as a senior EA, executive partner, business coordinator, or operations lead. High-level CoS guidance similarly emphasizes trust, follow-through, organizational savvy and the ability to operate with considerable autonomy.
I'd structure the job around outcomes, not a list of 40 tasks.
For example:
Outcome 1: My calendar reflects my priorities. They own scheduling, prioritization, meeting hygiene, buffers and protecting focus time.
Outcome 2: Nothing important falls through the cracks. They maintain your commitments, follow-ups and action items and proactively surface overdue items.
Outcome 3: I'm prepared for every important interaction. They ensure you have the right context, documents, people and objectives before meetings.
Outcome 4: Communication flows efficiently. They triage your inbox/messages, draft responses and escalate only what genuinely requires you.
Outcome 5: My operating system gets better over time. They continually improve processes rather than simply performing them.
That's much more powerful than “manage calendar and travel.”
This is particularly important in your case.
You probably don't want an EA who thinks their job is to become your second Chief of Staff. And you don't want a CoS-level person who becomes frustrated because 60% of their day is scheduling.
A useful division is:
| You, as CoS | Your EA |
|---|---|
| Decide priorities | Organize around priorities |
| Drive strategic initiatives | Drive administrative follow-through |
| Manage senior stakeholders | Coordinate logistics |
| Prepare executive decisions | Prepare meetings/materials |
| Solve ambiguous organizational problems | Solve recurring operational problems |
| Own cross-functional outcomes | Own the system supporting you |
| Represent leadership judgment | Represent your availability/process |
a16z explicitly cautions against making a CoS primarily an EA, noting that if administrative/personal work dominates the role, an EA is probably what you need.
I'd do four stages.
Look for evidence of autonomy.
Ask:
The last question is particularly revealing.
Don't just ask whether they're “great.”
Ask the former executive:
“If you could hire this person again tomorrow, what would you trust them with immediately?” Then:
“What did you still have to manage yourself?” And:
“What kind of executive would this person not work well with?” That last question can uncover fit issues quickly.
This is probably the most valuable part.
Give candidates a fictionalized version of your actual environment:
Here are 15 emails, 8 meeting requests, 5 competing priorities, a messy calendar and three urgent requests.
Show me how you would organize my next two days, what you'd handle yourself, what you'd escalate, and what you'd push back on. Then give them a second exercise:
“I have an important meeting tomorrow with X. Prepare me.” You're testing judgment, not formatting.
Have the finalist spend 60–90 minutes with you.
Give them permission to ask questions and challenge assumptions.
You want to see whether they naturally say things like:
“Why are you attending this meeting?” or
“Could we move these three meetings together and preserve Friday afternoon?” rather than:
“What time would you like me to schedule this?” That's the difference between an assistant who processes requests and an executive partner who creates leverage.
Don't expect them to magically understand your brain.
For the first few weeks, give them unusually high exposure to how you work. SHRM recommends substantial CEO/CoS interaction during the early period, including shadowing and regular check-ins; the same principle applies strongly to an EA supporting a CoS.
I'd structure it:
Days 1–30: Learn
Days 31–60: Own
Days 61–90: Improve
By day 90, the goal should be that you can't imagine going back to your old operating model.
Don't evaluate them on “how busy” they are.
Track things like:
A good EA should make you less administratively busy and more cognitively available.
I'd probably advertise the role as something like:
Executive Assistant to Chief of Staff — High-Trust Executive Partner
And I'd target someone with 5–10+ years of experience, including meaningful experience supporting a founder, CEO, C-suite executive, investor, or senior operator.
I would not over-index on a bachelor's degree, prestigious company names, or a particular software stack. I'd care much more about whether the person has repeatedly demonstrated:
“Give me an ambiguous mess and I'll quietly turn it into a functioning system.” That's the person I'd want beside a Chief of Staff.
If you tell me your company size, what your CoS role encompasses, and what you currently spend most of your time doing, I can help you design the exact EA profile, compensation level, interview scorecard, and a 30/60/90-day plan.
Have the finalist spend 60–90 minutes with you.
Give them permission to ask questions and challenge assumptions.
You want to see whether they naturally say things like:
“Why are you attending this meeting?” or
“Could we move these three meetings together and preserve Friday afternoon?” rather than:
“What time would you like me to schedule this?” That's the difference between an assistant who processes requests and an executive partner who creates leverage.
Don't expect them to magically understand your brain.
For the first few weeks, give them unusually high exposure to how you work. SHRM recommends substantial CEO/CoS interaction during the early period, including shadowing and regular check-ins; the same principle applies strongly to an EA supporting a CoS.
I'd structure it:
Days 1–30: Learn
Days 31–60: Own
Hiring an executive assistant (EA) to act as your right hand while you serve as Chief of Staff is one of the highest-leverage moves you can make. It frees you up to focus on strategic initiatives, cross-functional leadership, and high-level execution. Here is a step-by-step roadmap to finding, hiring, and onboarding…
Hiring an executive assistant (EA) to act as your right hand while you serve as Chief of Staff is one of the highest-leverage moves you can make. It frees you up to focus on strategic initiatives, cross-functional leadership, and high-level execution.
Here is a step-by-step roadmap to finding, hiring, and onboarding the right partner:
Would you like me to help you draft a job description/scorecard or design a practical work test for the interview process?
No sources cited
If you’re already a **Chief of Staff**, I’d hire an **operator-grade Executive Assistant**, not a traditional administrative assistant. The goal is to make you dramatically more effective by taking ownership of the coordination and logistics around your work, while you stay focused on strategy, decision-making, and…
If you’re already a Chief of Staff, I’d hire an operator-grade Executive Assistant, not a traditional administrative assistant. The goal is to make you dramatically more effective by taking ownership of the coordination and logistics around your work, while you stay focused on strategy, decision-making, and cross-functional execution.
The distinction matters: an EA should optimize your time and information flow; you should be optimizing the executive’s leverage and the organization’s priorities.
I’d make the EA responsible for five things:
That last category is the differentiator. A good EA doesn't merely do things you ask them to do; they learn your priorities well enough to anticipate what needs to happen next. Modern EA descriptions emphasize calendar ownership, communications, travel, confidentiality, liaison work, and project coordination.
I'd prioritize judgment over years of experience.
Your ideal person is:
The killer trait is anticipation.
You want someone who sees:
"The CEO meeting is Thursday, the deck isn't final, three people owe us data, and the executive is traveling Wednesday." …and thinks:
"I'll get the data Tuesday, coordinate the deck, put a briefing packet on their desk Wednesday, and flag the two decisions they need to make." rather than:
"What would you like me to do?"
I'd avoid requiring a particular degree or industry background unless there's a genuine reason.
Instead, ask candidates for examples of situations where they:
This is much more revealing than "How organized are you?"
I would absolutely use a work sample.
Give the finalist something like:
"Here is my calendar for next week, a list of meetings, 15 unread emails, five outstanding commitments, and my priorities for the quarter. You have 90 minutes. Tell me what you would change, what you would delegate, what you would flag to me, and what you would handle yourself." Don't care whether they produce the "correct" calendar.
Watch how they think.
Then give them a second exercise:
"I need to prepare for a 45-minute meeting with our CEO tomorrow. Here's the background. Create the briefing I should have going into the meeting." You're testing synthesis, judgment, writing, prioritization, and anticipation simultaneously.
About the role
We are looking for an exceptionally organized, proactive, high-judgment Executive Assistant to partner directly with our Chief of Staff.
This person will operate as the Chief of Staff's force multiplier—owning the systems, coordination, communication, and logistics that allow the Chief of Staff to focus on the highest-leverage work across the organization.
You will:
You are successful when:
This is probably the most important part of the hire.
Create three buckets:
"EA decides."
"EA recommends; CoS decides."
"CoS decides."
The more decisions you can move into the first bucket over time, the more valuable the EA becomes.
I'd have the onboarding sequence look roughly like this:
Week 1: Shadow you obsessively. Learn your calendar, communication style, stakeholders, priorities, preferences, and recurring commitments.
Week 2: Take over calendar + logistics.
Week 3: Take over inbox triage, meeting prep, and follow-up systems.
Week 4: Start proactively managing your operating rhythm and identifying things you're doing that you shouldn't be doing.
Then establish a 30-minute weekly EA/CoS meeting:
A high-performing CoS role itself is often described as a "control tower" that protects executive focus and keeps priorities moving; your EA should effectively become the control tower for your control tower.
Don't accidentally hire an EA and then give them a Chief of Staff workload.
If you're expecting this person to own company strategy, independently drive major cross-functional initiatives, advise the CEO, and operate as an executive-level decision-maker, you've moved into CoS/operations territory. The two roles can be tightly coupled, but they aren't interchangeable.
Conversely, don't hire someone whose entire job is "calendar + travel" if what you really need is someone who can think with you.
You — Chief of Staff → Strategy, executive advising, cross-functional priorities, operating cadence, decision-making
EA — Your operating partner → Calendar, communications, preparation, coordination, follow-through, logistics, anticipation
That pairing can be incredibly powerful because it creates a clean division: you own leverage; they eliminate friction.
If you tell me (1) the size/stage of your company, (2) who you support as CoS (CEO/founder/etc.), (3) what currently consumes most of your time, and (4) whether you want this EA in-office, hybrid, or remote, I can turn this into a specific hiring scorecard, compensation range, interview process, and 30/60/90-day plan for your situation.
This is probably the most important part of the hire.
Create three buckets:
"EA decides."
"EA recommends; CoS decides."
"CoS decides."
The more decisions you can move into the first bucket over time, the more valuable the EA becomes.
I'd have the onboarding sequence look roughly like this:
Week 1: Shadow you obsessively. Learn your calendar, communication style, stakeholders, priorities, preferences, and recurring commitments.
Week 2: Take over calendar + logistics.
Week 3: Take over inbox triage, meeting prep, and follow-up systems.
Week 4: Start proactively managing your operating rhythm and identifying things you're doing that you shouldn't be doing.
Then establish a 30-minute weekly EA/CoS meeting:
A high-performing CoS role itself is often described as a "control tower" that protects executive focus and keeps priorities moving; your EA should effectively become the control tower for your control tower.
Don't accidentally hire an EA and then give them a Chief of Staff workload.
Hiring an executive assistant (EA) to support you as a Chief of Staff (CoS) is one of the highest-leverage moves you can make. Since your role as CoS already bridges strategy and execution, your EA will essentially become your operational co-pilot, managing your bandwidth so you can protect the executive's…
Hiring an executive assistant (EA) to support you as a Chief of Staff (CoS) is one of the highest-leverage moves you can make. Since your role as CoS already bridges strategy and execution, your EA will essentially become your operational co-pilot, managing your bandwidth so you can protect the executive's time.
Here is a step-by-step framework to hire the right EA:
To help tailor this strategy, could you tell me:
Hiring an executive assistant (EA) to support you in your role as a Chief of Staff (CoS) requires a strategic approach. As a CoS, you are likely looking for a force multiplier—someone who can manage the tactical administrative burden so you can focus on strategic execution and high-level organizational…
Hiring an executive assistant (EA) to support you in your role as a Chief of Staff (CoS) requires a strategic approach. As a CoS, you are likely looking for a force multiplier—someone who can manage the tactical administrative burden so you can focus on strategic execution and high-level organizational priorities.
Here is a step-by-step framework to hire the right EA for your partnership:
To help tailor this process, let me know:
If by “support me as Chief of Staff” you mean **you want an Executive Assistant who makes you dramatically more effective in the CoS role**, I’d hire for a slightly different profile than a traditional EA. The key distinction: an EA should **own your operating system**—calendar, communications, logistics,…
If by “support me as Chief of Staff” you mean you want an Executive Assistant who makes you dramatically more effective in the CoS role, I’d hire for a slightly different profile than a traditional EA.
The key distinction: an EA should own your operating system—calendar, communications, logistics, follow-through, information flow—while you own the strategic/organizational work of the Chief of Staff. Current hiring guidance makes the same distinction: if the role is mostly administrative, hire an EA; a CoS should spend substantially more time on organizational priorities and execution.
I would look for an “Executive Assistant / Executive Operations Partner to the Chief of Staff” rather than a generic EA.
Their mission:
Make the Chief of Staff faster, more organized, better informed, and harder to surprise.
I'd want them to own:
A good EA should eventually be able to say, “I noticed this was going to become a problem, so I handled it,” rather than waiting for you to assign every task.
I'd rank the attributes roughly:
The biggest mistake is hiring someone who is excellent at completing instructions but needs instructions for everything.
You want someone who can distinguish:
“This needs your attention.”
from
“I can handle this.”
from
“Nobody needs to do this.”
This is probably more predictive than another hour of interviewing.
Give finalists something like:
“It's Monday morning. Here are 35 emails, 12 calendar requests, 8 outstanding action items, a board meeting Thursday, an executive meeting Wednesday, and a travel change. You have 90 minutes. Show me how you would approach this.”
Then ask them to:
You're testing judgment, prioritization and executive intuition, not typing speed. Those are specifically among the capabilities recommended for EA hiring.
I'd use questions like:
The last question is particularly revealing.
Your ideal person may be more senior than a conventional EA but not necessarily someone with a fancy title.
Great backgrounds can include:
I wouldn't over-index on credentials. A phenomenal EA with five years supporting a demanding executive can be much better for you than a Harvard MBA who has never actually run an executive operating system.
They should report directly to you, with an explicit mandate to operate on your behalf.
I'd give them permission to:
That's where the leverage comes from.
First 30 days: learn you.
Days 31–60: take ownership.
They should independently own calendar, inbox triage, meeting preparation, action tracking and logistics.
Days 61–90: anticipate.
The goal is for them to start saying:
“You have three priorities this week. I've cleared the calendar accordingly, prepared the materials for Tuesday, followed up with Finance, and flagged one decision I think you'll need to make.”
That's when you've stopped hiring an assistant and started building an executive leverage system.
This is important. If you tell candidates:
“You'll support me with anything and everything.”
you'll attract people who are comfortable being reactive.
Instead, define the outcomes.
For example:
Success after six months:
That makes the role compelling and measurable.
Before hiring, I'd determine how much of your current pain is administrative versus strategic.
If you're spending your days thinking “I have too many meetings, too many emails, too many loose ends, and nobody is keeping track of everything,” → hire the EA.
If you're thinking “I need someone to help me drive company-wide priorities, analyze problems, influence executives and make strategic decisions,” → you're actually describing a Chief of Staff.
And if you're the Chief of Staff yourself, the sweet spot is an operator-grade EA who takes the executional infrastructure off your plate, so you can do the work only you can do. That's consistent with current guidance distinguishing the two roles.
If you tell me what you currently spend your time doing as Chief of Staff, what you wish you could stop doing, and roughly how much you'd like to spend on the hire, I can help you define the exact profile, compensation level, interview process, and first-90-day scorecard.
To hire an **executive assistant (EA)** to support you in your role as a **Chief of Staff (CoS)**, `you must first recognize the distinction between your macro-level strategic focus and the tactical, operational leverage an EA provides` . Because a Chief of Staff amplifies executive strategy [0.36], an EA supporting a…
To hire an executive assistant (EA) to support you in your role as a Chief of Staff (CoS), you must first recognize the distinction between your macro-level strategic focus and the tactical, operational leverage an EA provides . Because a Chief of Staff amplifies executive strategy [0.36], an EA supporting a CoS acts as a force multiplier to handle inbox triage, calendar logistics, project tracking, and cross-functional coordination , freeing you up to focus on high-level organizational alignment.
Define the Scope and Split of Duties
Source and Screen for High Judgment
Utilize Specialized Sourcing Channels
If you'd like, tell me:
I can help you draft a custom job description tailored to your workflow.
If you’re a **Chief of Staff**, I’d hire an **operator-grade Executive Assistant**, not a traditional administrative assistant. The goal is to give you leverage: they should own the mechanics of your operating system so you can spend more time on strategy, cross-functional execution, and high-value relationships. A…
If you’re a Chief of Staff, I’d hire an operator-grade Executive Assistant, not a traditional administrative assistant. The goal is to give you leverage: they should own the mechanics of your operating system so you can spend more time on strategy, cross-functional execution, and high-value relationships.
A useful distinction is: EA owns the “when/where/how”; you own the “why/what/who.” That division is also consistent with how experienced operators describe the EA/CoS relationship.
Don't start with "manage my calendar." Start with what you want to be different 6 months after hiring them.
I'd define 5 outcomes:
My calendar reflects my priorities.
Nothing falls through the cracks.
I walk into meetings prepared.
My communication load is intelligently filtered.
The Chief of Staff function runs smoothly.
The strongest CoS/EA hires tend to be exceptionally organized, proactive closers, strategically minded, and highly trustworthy with sensitive information.
I'd prioritize these characteristics:
| Trait | What you're looking for |
|---|---|
| Judgment | Knows what to handle vs. escalate |
| Proactivity | Sees problems before you do |
| Prioritization | Can distinguish urgent from important |
| Follow-through | Doesn't need to be reminded |
| Discretion | Comfortable with confidential information |
| Communication | Concise, polished, appropriately persistent |
| Tech fluency | Excellent with calendar, email, Slack, docs, AI tools |
| Composure | Doesn't melt when five things go wrong simultaneously |
| Low ego | Happy to make things happen without needing credit |
| Executive presence | Can interact confidently with senior people |
Don't over-index on having worked at a famous company or having the exact title. A16Z's hiring guidance for Chiefs of Staff similarly recommends assessing transferable competencies rather than title history.
I'd make the process 3–4 stages:
Stage 1 — 30-minute screen
Test:
Stage 2 — Deep-dive interview
Explore actual examples of:
Stage 3 — Paid practical exercise
This is probably the most important step.
Give them something like:
"It's 4:30 PM on Thursday. I have six meetings tomorrow, two conflicting commitments, 150 unread emails, a board meeting Monday, and a flight Monday evening. Here's my calendar and inbox. Show me what you'd do."
Don't tell them what the "right" answer is.
You're evaluating how they think, not whether they know your particular calendar software.
Stage 4 — Final chemistry interview
Then spend substantial time together. The role is unusually intimate: this person will see how you work, what stresses you, what you're bad at, who you're talking to, and potentially highly confidential company information. Trust and working chemistry matter enormously.
Structured scorecards are useful here because they make candidates easier to compare and reduce interview bias.
This is where many EA hires fail.
If you tell someone:
"Manage my calendar."
but every calendar decision still requires your approval, you've hired a scheduler.
Instead:
"You are responsible for protecting my time. Make the decision whenever you reasonably can. Escalate only exceptions."
Give them permission to:
You can establish rules such as:
Calendar rules
That turns your calendar into an operating system rather than a list of appointments.
I'd establish a short daily or near-daily cadence:
10–15 minute daily sync
And a weekly 30-minute operating review:
Your EA should progressively learn your preferences so that after 3–6 months you're giving fewer instructions, not more.
I'd use a combination of:
Don't simply post a generic "Executive Assistant" job description. The best candidates will be attracted to a role with unusually clear scope, autonomy, and proximity to meaningful work.
Executive Assistant to the Chief of Staff
We are looking for an exceptional Executive Assistant to partner closely with our Chief of Staff. This is an operating role for someone who thrives in a fast-moving environment, anticipates needs before they arise, and takes extraordinary ownership of details and follow-through.
You will own the Chief of Staff's calendar, travel, meeting preparation, communications workflow, and administrative operating system. You'll also support leadership meetings, strategic projects, and cross-functional coordination.
The ideal candidate has excellent judgment, strong written and verbal communication skills, exceptional organizational discipline, high emotional intelligence, and the ability to operate independently with confidential information.
We're looking for someone who doesn't wait to be told what to do. You see around corners, close loops, protect priorities, and make the people around you more effective.
Don't hire someone because they're "nice, organized, and responsive."
Those are table stakes.
The person you really want is someone who makes you think:
"I don't know exactly how they did that, but somehow that entire problem disappeared."
That's the EA who will actually make a Chief of Staff materially more effective.