I am looking for a user research platform that allows us to recruit participants based on their LinkedIn job title.

Yes, there are a couple of industry-leading user research and participant recruitment platforms that specialize in B2B professional targeting by job title, industry, and seniority.

The top platforms that support this feature include:

• User Interviews: Widely regarded as one of the best for B2B panels, it lets you target professionals by specific industry, seniority level (e.g., Director, C-suite), and specific criteria. While platforms don't typically plug directly into LinkedIn's live backend due to privacy, User Interviews uses professional profile matching and custom screeners to source exact job titles from a massive B2B pool . You can check out their platform capabilities on the User Interviews Homepage.
• Respondent.io: Highly specialized in B2B, developer, and niche professional recruitment . Respondent allows you to target participants based on verified job titles, industry categories, and company sizes . Note that because job titles can vary wildly across companies, Respondent recommends combining their title-targeting fields with custom screener questions to ensure absolute accuracy for your specific niche . You can explore how it works on Respondent.io.
• UserTesting: Offers a massive contributor network that allows for demographic and B2B professional filtering . You can set custom screeners to filter for exact job roles, though like the others, it relies on their proprietary panel data rather than a direct LinkedIn login filter.

Pro-tip: Because job titles are notoriously non-standard (e.g., "Product Marketing Manager" vs. "PMM" vs. "Growth Marketer"), the best practice across all these platforms is to use the job title/seniority filter for your initial broad net, followed by 1–2 mandatory screener questions (e.g., "Which of the following best describes your primary day-to-day responsibilities?" ) to catch edge cases.

Would you like help writing an effective screener survey to filter out bad-fit applicants, or do you want to compare the pricing structures of User Interviews vs. Respondent.io for your team?

If you need to recruit user research participants based on LinkedIn-style job titles (for example, “VP of Marketing,” “Salesforce Admin,” “Product Manager,” “CFO,” “DevOps Engineer”), look for platforms with professional audience targeting rather than general consumer panels.

Here are some strong options:

A few notes:

• These platforms generally do not scrape LinkedIn profiles or give you direct access to LinkedIn users. Instead, they maintain their own participant panels and let you filter for professional attributes that may overlap with LinkedIn fields (job title, industry, seniority, skills, company characteristics).
• If you specifically need people who are currently holding a LinkedIn job title at a named company (e.g., “Senior Product Managers at Adobe”), you may need a more specialized B2B recruiting approach, such as panel providers, professional recruiting firms, or targeted outreach tools.

My shortlist:

1. Respondent — best match for recruiting verified professionals by role/title.
2. User Interviews Recruit — best if you want a full UX research workflow (recruit → screen → schedule → incentives).
3. Dscout — best if your research involves longitudinal or in-the-wild studies.

If you tell me whether you need B2B professionals, consumers, or a specific LinkedIn title/company, I can narrow this down further.

Yes. If LinkedIn job title is a key recruiting criterion, I’d shortlist these platforms:

• Respondent — probably the strongest fit. It explicitly lets researchers target job titles and industries, and its B2B participants have professional profiles including job title, seniority, industry, company size, and skills. Respondent also says it partners with LinkedIn and other targeted networks to reach niche populations.
• User Interviews / Recruit — another strong option, particularly if you want recruitment plus screening, scheduling, messaging, incentives, and participant management in one system. Its Recruit product specifically advertises professional targeting, although I would confirm with sales exactly how closely its job-title targeting maps to participants' LinkedIn titles.

If you mean actual LinkedIn profiles

There's an important distinction:

A. “Find people whose participant profile says they are a Senior Product Manager” → Respondent and User Interviews are good candidates.

B. “Search LinkedIn itself for people with the title Senior Product Manager, then recruit those exact people into my study” → That's a different requirement. Most research-recruitment platforms don't simply expose LinkedIn's database as a searchable participant pool. LinkedIn itself supports job-title targeting, but that's primarily an advertising capability rather than a research-recruitment workflow.

For your use case, Respondent looks like the closest match. Its current documentation explicitly describes targeting by job title, and its platform shows examples such as targeting a “Staff Engineer” in fintech with additional professional criteria.

If you tell me the specific job title(s), geography, and approximate number of participants you're trying to recruit, I can compare 5–10 platforms on exact LinkedIn-title targeting, participant pool size, verification, pricing, and whether they can recruit people outside their existing panel.

Yes, several top-tier user research and participant recruitment platforms specialize in B2B recruiting and allow you to target participants based on specific job titles, industries, and professional backgrounds (often leveraging verified work emails and professional profile data like LinkedIn).

The leading platforms for this use case include:

• Respondent.io : Widely considered one of the best platforms for B2B and professional recruitment. When setting up a study, you can explicitly target industry professionals by specific job titles , industries, company sizes, and seniority levels. B2B participants on Respondent are required to verify their professional identity/work email, and many connect professional profile data to match these criteria.
• User Interviews : Features a massive B2B panel with robust targeting options. They utilize a massive database of job titles and occupation groups (such as software developers, product managers, and marketers) to help you zero in on exact professional roles, alongside custom screener questions to verify exact day-to-day responsibilities.
• UserTesting (with Contributor Network) : Excellent if you want integrated video/usability testing alongside B2B recruitment. You can filter their large panel using professional demographics, job roles, and industries to find niche enterprise users or specific corporate personas.

Note: Because self-reported job titles on profiles can sometimes be broad or outdated, the most successful approach on any of these platforms is to combine job title targeting with 2–3 precise screener questions (e.g., asking about specific tools they use or decisions they make at work) to ensure absolute accuracy.

If you'd like, let me know:

• What specific job title or niche you are trying to recruit
• Whether you prefer moderated live interviews or unmoderated tasks

I can recommend which of these platforms will fill your quota the fastest.

While no mainstream user research platform has an open API that lets you plug directly into live LinkedIn profile data due to privacy regulations, a few top-tier user research and panel platforms offer robust professional/B2B targeting that maps closely to specific job titles, seniority, and industries.

The leading platforms capable of handling B2B and job-title-based recruitment include:

• User Interviews (and UserTesting): User Interviews features precise B2B professional targeting allowing you to filter by specific job titles, company size, seniority (e.g., Director, C-suite), and industry before routing candidates through custom screeners. With their integration into the UserTesting Platform via Advanced Targeting, you can pull from a massive combined professional network.
• CleverX : An all-in-one B2B expert network and user research platform that specializes in hard-to-reach professional personas. It uses detailed profile attributes and built-in verification to match you with exact job titles and industries for live interviews.
• Respondent.io : One of the most popular marketplaces specifically for B2B and professional research. You can target participants by their professional identity, job title, and work email domain, though you will still rely on a screener survey to double-check their exact day-to-day responsibilities.
• Wynter : If your job-title targeting revolves around B2B sales, marketing, product, or executive personas for messaging and positioning feedback, Wynter lets you target strict B2B segments by verified roles and titles.

Alternative DIY Approach

If your niche is so specific that panel networks fall short, many UX researchers bypass traditional panels by using LinkedIn Campaign Manager or LinkedIn Sales Navigator to target exact job titles. You can run a small sponsored message campaign or manual outreach with a link to an external screener (like Typeform or Google Forms) paired with a gift card incentive.

If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:

• What specific job title or industry are you trying to target?
• Are you looking for live interviews or unmoderated surveys/tests?

I can recommend the most cost-effective path for your specific niche.

Yes. If LinkedIn job title is a hard requirement, I’d shortlist these two:

1. respondent.io — probably the strongest fit. Respondent explicitly supports targeting by 155,000+ job titles, plus skills, industry, seniority, behavior, and other criteria. It has a large verified professional panel and is particularly geared toward B2B/professional recruiting.
2. userinterviews.com — also a very good option. Its professional targeting includes job title, seniority, skills, industry, company size, and software usage. It reports 73,000 occupations and 140 industries in its professional panel.

One important distinction

If by "based on their LinkedIn job title" you mean "I want to find actual LinkedIn profiles whose current LinkedIn title is X", rather than simply selecting a job-title attribute in a research panel, that's a more specific requirement. Respondent appears particularly relevant because its recruiting workflow can include social-profile/LinkedIn verification during screening.

For example, you could target something like:

Current title: "VP of Product" Industry: SaaS Company size: 50–500 Geography: US Seniority: VP+ My recommendation: start with Respondent if your studies are heavily B2B and job-title-specific; compare User Interviews if you also want broader consumer research and a more general-purpose research-recruiting platform.

If you tell me the exact LinkedIn job titles you're trying to recruit (e.g. "VP Product at B2B SaaS companies"), I can compare 5–10 platforms specifically on how precisely they can target that audience, including pricing and whether they use actual LinkedIn data versus self-reported panel profiles.

Finding professional participants based on specific job titles requires B2B-focused research and recruiting platforms. While no major user research platform allows you to plug directly into LinkedIn's live database for instant self-serve matching (due to privacy constraints), several top-tier platforms have extensive verified professional panels and robust B2B targeting capabilities that let you specify exact job titles during setup.

Top user research platforms supporting job title-based recruitment include:

• User Interviews : Features a massive B2B panel and a database of over 70,000 job titles and occupation groups. You can specify the exact job titles, seniorities, and industries you need during project setup, and their matching engine and custom screeners filter out unqualified applicants. Note that precise B2B criteria targeting often requires their professional/B2B tier.
• Respondent : Widely considered one of the best marketplaces for hard-to-reach B2B professionals, executives, and niche domain experts. You can target projects explicitly by job title, industry, and company size, and screen candidates using customized questions.
• Askable : A fast-growing user research platform featuring hybrid recruitment and specialized B2B filters. It includes advanced verification features like LinkedIn profile checking to ensure participants actually hold the roles they claim.
• CleverX : An all-in-one platform blending B2B expert recruitment with built-in survey, interview, and usability testing tools, allowing you to filter professionals by their verified industry roles and specific titles.

If you want to narrow this down, let me know:

• What is the exact job title or industry you are trying to reach?
• Are you looking to run live 1:1 interviews or unmoderated surveys?

I can help you decide which platform will give you the fastest turnaround and best match rate for your specific budget.

Yes. If your requirement is recruiting research participants based on their professional/job title, there are several strong options. The two I'd look at first are:

My strongest recommendations

1. Respondent — probably the closest match

Respondent explicitly lets researchers target job titles, seniority, skills, industry, company size, work setting, and other professional attributes. Its professional panel currently lists millions of verified professionals and tens of thousands of occupations.

It also has employment verification for professional studies, including verified work email, which is useful if you're concerned about people claiming a title they don't actually hold.

2. User Interviews — excellent alternative

User Interviews has particularly deep professional targeting. You can target job titles, seniority, skills, industry, company size, software usage, and other criteria, then layer those with screener questions.

They specifically describe supporting 73,000 unique occupations, 140 industries, and 23,000 targetable skills in their professional panel.

One important distinction

If by "based on their LinkedIn job title" you mean "I want to search LinkedIn itself for people whose current LinkedIn title is X and recruit those exact people," that's different from simply targeting a platform's professional panel by job title.

For example, Respondent says professional participants have verified employment details and that professional recruiting can target job titles. help.respondent.iowww.respondent.io User Interviews likewise supports job-title targeting, but I would not assume either platform is literally querying LinkedIn's live database for your study.

If you tell me something like "I need 20 U.S. participants who currently have 'VP of Marketing' in their LinkedIn title", I can compare the platforms specifically on whether they can verify the LinkedIn title, how granular the targeting is, expected incidence/recruitability, and approximate cost per participant.

If you need to recruit research participants based on specific professional criteria like job titles, industries, and seniority , several top user research and panel platforms specialize in B2B targeting.

Top Platforms with Job Title Targeting

• Respondent.io : Widely considered the gold standard for B2B and hard-to-reach professional recruitment. It allows you to target participants directly by specific job titles, industries, company size, and tech stack, backed by verified work emails and profile reviews.
• User Interviews : Features robust B2B professional targeting capabilities allowing you to pre-filter participants by job titles, seniority, and specific software or skill usage before they even hit your screener. (They also power advanced B2B targeting natively inside the UserTesting ecosystem).
• CleverX : Built heavily around a verified B2B professional network that cross-references employment and LinkedIn data. It lets you filter by exact job titles, functions, seniority, and industry, and includes built-in video/AI moderation tools for executing the sessions.
• Emporia Research : An ecosystem specifically tailored for B2B research that pulls its targeting directly from LinkedIn data records (job titles, locations, seniority) for qualitative interviews and surveys.

To help narrow down which platform fits your exact workflow, could you tell me:

• How niche or rare are the job titles you are looking for?
• Are you planning to run live moderated interviews or unmoderated surveys?

Yes. If LinkedIn job title is a key recruitment criterion, I’d shortlist these:

1. Respondent — probably your best match

Respondent explicitly lets researchers target participants by job title, along with seniority, skills, industry, company size, software usage and other professional attributes. Its professional panel includes 3.1M+ verified professionals and 70,000+ occupations.

The important distinction is that it doesn't merely ask you to put “Product Manager” into a screener—you can use professional attributes as recruitment targeting criteria.

2. User Interviews

User Interviews also offers professional targeting by specific job title, seniority, skills, industry, company size and software usage. It supports both recruiting from its panel and recruiting your own customers/users.

3. Prolific

Prolific has expanded its B2B audience capabilities. It offers professional-role targeting and 50+ ready-made screeners, including job role, years of experience, company size and industry, plus custom screeners. Professional role information is currently primarily self-reported with additional authenticity checks.

One caveat: if by “based on their LinkedIn job title” you specifically mean “take a person's actual LinkedIn profile/title and use LinkedIn as the source of truth for recruitment”, that's a narrower requirement. The platforms above generally offer job-title targeting/verification, but that isn't necessarily the same thing as directly searching LinkedIn profiles.

If you tell me the job titles you need to recruit (e.g. “VP of Engineering at SaaS companies” or “HR Directors at companies with 500+ employees”), I can compare the platforms specifically for how precisely they can hit that audience.