Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 271 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
To run a private, self-hosted coding assistant without telemetry, use a local model runner like Ollama to power your LLM, paired with an IDE extension such as
Continue,
Tabby, or . This setup ensures all processing remains on your local infrastructure. For advanced, autonomous task completion, tools like RooCode or can be configured to use these local models while maintaining strict data privacy.
Brands AI recommends here
Ollama is the recommended engine for running models locally. It provides the core privacy-first execution environment required to ensure no code telemetry is shared when paired with IDE-specific extensions.
Continue is a versatile open-source extension for VS Code and JetBrains that connects your IDE to local hardware-run models. It is a top choice for developers needing an integrated, privacy-focused coding environment.
RooCode acts as an autonomous, agent-based coding assistant. It is best suited for complex tasks requiring multi-file edits, with local model configuration allowing for complete telemetry control.
Yes. If “self-hosted + no telemetry” is a hard requirement, I’d shortlist these:
If your requirement is:
“My source code must never leave my infrastructure, and I don't want the assistant itself phoning home.” I'd choose Tabby + a local model for a server-based setup, or Continue + Ollama/another local inference server for an individual developer workstation.
The important distinction is that self-hosting the assistant isn't enough by itself. If you connect it to OpenAI, Anthropic, OpenRouter, etc., your code/context can still leave your machine. With a local model, you can keep the entire inference path inside your network. Continue specifically documents an air-gapped configuration using local models.
If you tell me your hardware (CPU/GPU/RAM), IDE (VS Code/JetBrains/etc.), and whether this is for one developer or a team, I can recommend a concrete stack and model that stays completely offline.
To build a completely private, self-hosted coding assistant with zero telemetry and zero cloud dependencies, the gold-standard architecture relies on pairing a local inference engine with an open-source IDE extension.
The most robust and popular stack for this setup combines Ollama, Continue , and a dedicated coding model like Qwen2.5-Coder.
The Recommended Open-Source Stack
- **What it does:** Runs large language models locally on your hardware (Mac, Linux, or Windows).
- **Privacy/Telemetry:** Completely offline-capable, open-source, and does not phone home or track usage.
- **Quick setup:** Download via Ollama Downloads and pull a specialized coding model in your terminal:
ollama run qwen2.5-coder (or a specific size like qwen2.5-coder:7b)
- **What it does:** An open-source autopilot/chat extension for VS Code and JetBrains that acts like a local GitHub Copilot.
- **Privacy/Telemetry:** Fully open-source with telemetry explicitly disabled or configurable out-of-the-box. It connects directly to your local Ollama instance via `localhost`.
- **Configuration:** Point `config.json` inside Continue to your local Ollama endpoint, letting you chat, highlight code to refactor, or use inline tab-completions locally.[](https://google.com/goto?url=CAESTgHrOzAVQ-jrYlL8KwkGs3Cha0sbgB84kDULVrVhNxWCooipOBepOnXR5muEOVTZy4gWCZIK5xfxIbtNohPmwgeTLPFdhUX40hwKnGXugg) [[1]](https://google.com/goto?url=CAESTgHrOzAVQ-jrYlL8KwkGs3Cha0sbgB84kDULVrVhNxWCooipOBepOnXR5muEOVTZy4gWCZIK5xfxIbtNohPmwgeTLPFdhUX40hwKnGXugg)
- **What it does:** Available in various sizes (from 1.5B up to 32B parameters), Qwen2.5-Coder matches or beats many proprietary mid-tier models specifically for code generation, multi-file reasoning, and debugging.
- **Hardware requirement:** A 7B or 14B parameter version runs smoothly on standard developer machines (with 16GB–32GB RAM/VRAM), while larger models benefit from dedicated GPU acceleration.
Would you like help with:
config.json to wire Continue and Ollama together?To set up a completely private, self-hosted coding assistant with zero telemetry and no cloud dependencies , you need to split the stack into two parts:
The best open-source tools to build this zero-telemetry stack are organized below by workflow.
Phase 1: The Local LLM Backend (Choose 1)
deepseek-coder or qwen2.5-coder.Phase 2: The Coding Assistant Interface (Choose based on workflow)
config.json to your local Ollama port.deepseek-coder ). No cloud connection or telemetry.To help narrow down the exact setup, let me know:
Yes. If “self-hosted + no telemetry” is a hard requirement, I’d shortlist these:
If your requirement is literally “my source code must never leave my network, and the assistant must not phone home”, I'd go with:
Tabby + a local model + network egress blocked.
That gives you defense in depth: even if a future component unexpectedly tries to make an outbound request, your firewall can prevent it. Tabby can be deployed with Docker and supports consumer-grade GPUs.
If you tell me your OS, GPU/RAM, and whether you want autocomplete, ChatGPT-style coding, or an autonomous agent, I can recommend a specific completely-local stack.
To build a completely private, self-hosted coding assistant with zero telemetry and zero external network calls, you need a decoupled two-part stack:
Phase 1: The Local Inference Backend (Choose One)
localhost:11434 , and contains no telemetry. Get it from Ollama.Recommended local coding models to pull:
Phase 2: The Coding Assistant Interface (Choose One)
localhost.Recommended Quick-Start Stack
For the fastest and most private setup in VS Code:
ollama run qwen2.5-coder.Ollama , and point the Base URL to http://localhost:11434.Would you like help sizing this based on your hardware specifications (GPU VRAM and system RAM) , or do you prefer an editor-based extension vs. a terminal tool like Aider?
Yes. If self-hosting + no telemetry are hard requirements, I’d shortlist these:
| Tool | Best for | Telemetry/privacy | Local models | Agentic coding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tabby | Copilot-style autocomplete | No telemetry; no phone-home | ✅ | Limited |
| Continue + Ollama | VS Code/JetBrains | Can run entirely locally | ✅ | Moderate |
| Aider + Ollama | Terminal/Git workflows | Local if using local model | ✅ | Strong |
| OpenHands | Autonomous coding agent | Self-hostable | ✅/BYO | Very strong |
TabbyML's Tabby is probably the closest match to your requirements. It's open source, self-hosted, and designed as an on-premises alternative to Copilot. Its current privacy policy explicitly says “No telemetry” and that it doesn't collect personal data or phone home.
The important distinction is that your model provider can still receive code if you configure Tabby to use a cloud LLM. For maximum privacy, run the model locally as well. Tabby's server can run with consumer GPUs.
Continue gives you a VS Code/JetBrains experience with chat, autocomplete, and codebase context. Pairing it with Ollama and a local model means your code and prompts can remain on your machine.
This is what I'd choose if you want something more like modern Copilot/Cursor while retaining control over the model.
Aider is excellent if you're comfortable with a terminal. It edits multiple files, understands Git repositories, and can use local Ollama models.
For example, the architecture would be:
VS Code → Aider → Ollama → local LLM
No code needs to leave your machine.
OpenHands is more ambitious: it can actually plan, modify code, run commands/tests, and work across a repository. Its platform supports self-hosted/private deployments where your code stays in your environment.
The tradeoff is complexity: it's much more of an AI software-engineering agent than a lightweight Copilot replacement.
If your requirement is literally “the source code must never leave my network, and I don't want telemetry”, I'd use:
VS Code / JetBrains
│
▼
Continue or Tabby
│
▼
Ollama
│
▼
Local coding model
Then firewall the machine/server so the assistant has no outbound Internet access except whatever you deliberately allow for updates.
One important caveat: “self-hosted” doesn't automatically mean “zero telemetry.” For example, some projects have local event/usage logging even though the data doesn't leave your infrastructure. That's why I'd verify the actual network behavior and, for a high-security deployment, enforce it at the firewall/container level rather than relying solely on a vendor's privacy setting.
If you tell me your OS + GPU/RAM (e.g. Ubuntu + RTX 4090, Mac M-series, etc.), I can recommend the best local model + assistant combination for your hardware.
Yes. If self-hosted + no telemetry is a hard requirement, I’d narrow it to these:
| Tool | Best for | Fully local? | Telemetry/privacy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tabby | Copilot-style autocomplete + chat | Yes | Designed as self-hosted/on-prem; no need for a cloud service github.com |
| Continue 2.0 | VS Code / JetBrains agent | Yes with local models | Final 2.0 release explicitly removed anonymous telemetry and authentication docs.continue.dev |
| Aider | Terminal-based coding agent | Yes with local LLMs | Open source; can connect directly to local models github.com |
If you want something closest to Cursor/Copilot, I'd use Continue as the coding interface and Ollama as the local model server.
If you want a more server-oriented setup for a team, choose Tabby instead. Tabby is explicitly designed as a self-hosted coding-assistant server, supports IDE extensions, and can run entirely on infrastructure you control.
If you prefer CLI/agent workflows, choose Aider. It works directly against your Git repository and supports local models as well as cloud providers.
Important distinction: "self-hosted" doesn't automatically mean "no data leaves the machine." For a strict zero-telemetry setup, run the assistant and the LLM locally, and ideally firewall the container/server from outbound Internet access. That gives you a much stronger guarantee than simply trusting a vendor's telemetry policy.
If you tell me your OS + GPU/RAM (e.g. Ubuntu + RTX 4090 24 GB, MacBook M-series, etc.), I can recommend a specific local model and give you a minimal Docker setup.
To set up a completely self-hosted, zero-telemetry AI coding assistant that keeps your code and context entirely on your local infrastructure, you will want to combine a local model runtime with an open-source extension or agent client.
The most effective, privacy-first open-source stacks available are organized below by how they integrate into your workflow:
llama.cpp . Because it is open source (Apache 2.0) with no cloud dependency or telemetry, your code never leaves your machine.To help narrow down the best setup for your environment, let me know:
The ideal open-source, telemetry-free stack for an individual developer is Ollama paired with the Continue extension inside VS Code or JetBrains, running a local model like Qwen2.5-Coder . For a self-hosted team or enterprise setup that requires a unified server, Tabby provides a self-contained, Docker-deployable alternative.
Recommended Telemetry-Free Stacks
| Component | Role | Privacy & Telemetry Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ollama | Local Model Runtime | 100% Offline/Local (No telemetry when run disconnected) |
| Continue | IDE Assistant Client | Configurable off (Set allowAnonymousTelemetry: false) |
| Tabby | Self-Hosted Server | Self-Contained (Keeps source code inside your infrastructure) |
| Qwen2.5-Coder | Code LLM (7B/14B) | Open-Weights (Runs entirely on your local hardware) |
How to Set Up an Individual Local Stack
Use code with caution.
3. **Install the IDE Plugin:** Install the **Continue** extension from your editor's marketplace.
4. **Disable Telemetry & Connect:** Open the `config.json` inside your `.continue` folder, ensure anonymous telemetry is disabled (`"allowAnonymousTelemetry": false` ), and point the model provider to your local Ollama endpoint (`http://localhost:11434`).[](https://danubedata.ro/blog/self-host-ai-coding-assistant-2026) [[1]](https://danubedata.ro/blog/self-host-ai-coding-assistant-2026)[[2]](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIbVdatFl6I)[[3]](https://www.sitepoint.com/openclaude-with-deepseek-v4-running-a-fully-private-ai-coding-engine/)[[4]](https://medium.com/@walterdeane/running-a-local-llm-for-code-assistance-dea64748041a)
If you tell me your **hardware specs (RAM and GPU VRAM available)** , I can recommend whether you can run a **7B, 14B, or larger parameter model** for the best balance of speed and accuracy.
If zero telemetry / no data leaving your environment is the requirement, I’d narrow it to these:
| Tool | Self-hosted | Telemetry | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tabby | ✅ | Best fit for fully local deployment | Copilot-style autocomplete + chat |
| Continue 2.0 | ✅ | Removed in final 2.0 | VS Code/JetBrains agent + local models |
| Aider | ✅ | Opt-out; can be permanently disabled | Terminal-based coding agent |
| Cline | ✅/local models | Optional telemetry | More autonomous coding agent |
TabbyML's Tabby is probably the cleanest match. It's explicitly open-source and self-hosted, and its server can run your coding model on infrastructure you control. It doesn't require a cloud service or external database.
The interesting option is Continue 2.0. The project says its final 2.0 release removed anonymous telemetry and authentication, and it can be configured for completely offline operation with local models.
One caveat: the Continue project is now no longer actively maintained, so I wouldn't choose it for a new long-lived deployment unless its feature set is exactly what you need.
Aider is excellent if you prefer a terminal workflow. Its analytics are not inherently zero-telemetry, but you can permanently disable them with:
aider --analytics-disable
Aider states that its analytics don't include your code, chats, API keys, or personal information.
Self-hosted doesn't automatically mean zero telemetry. For maximum privacy, I'd use:
Tabby/agent → local LLM (e.g. Ollama) → no external network access
Then enforce the last part at the firewall/container level. That gives you a technical guarantee rather than relying solely on a vendor's telemetry setting.
If you tell me your hardware (CPU/GPU/RAM) and whether you use VS Code, JetBrains, or terminal, I can recommend the best specific stack and model.