Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 277 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Use 
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 71% of answers
Best when you want an on‑premise, open-source solution to automate FTP uploads: runs on Linux or Raspberry Pi, supports templates and many stations; requires basic setup and a local Pi or computer.
Named in 70% of answers
Named in 68% of answers
Best when measurement accuracy is your priority and you accept extra cost/setup: Davis stations need a WeatherLink Live or USB data logger plus bridging software to perform FTP uploads.
Named in 61% of answers
Best when you want low-cost, flexible sensors that easily feed local software (WeeWX/Cumulus) for automated FTP uploads; affordable and widely recommended, but may need configuration to route files to your site.
Source | Citation share |
|---|---|
 Putting weather information on my own website - WXforum.nethttps://www.wxforum.net/index.php | 6.2% |
WeeWX: open source weather softwarehttps://weewx.com/ | 5.1% |
 WeatherTracker connectes to personal weather station.https://www.afterten.com/products/weathertracker/ | 2.0% |
 Weather MicroServer™ | Columbia Weather Systemshttps://columbiaweather.com/products/weather-monitoring/microserver/ | 1.7% |
 Virtual Weather Station Does Not Upload The Authenticated FTP Servers. - ambient weatherhttps://ambientweather.com/faqs/question/view/id/2233/ | 1.5% |
 Weather Displayhttps://www.weather-display.com/ | 1.5% |
 Templates – How to connect your weather station to weatherstations-online.net – Weatherstations onlinehttps://weatherstations-online.net/knowledgecenter/templates/ | 1.3% |
Tips for creating Wordpress site with Weather Display data - Let's Chathttps://discourse.weather-watch.com/t/tips-for-creating-wordpress-site-with-weather-display-data/70307 | 1.3% |
 Weather Station Data Loggerhttps://wmrx00.sourceforge.net/ | 1.3% |
 Weatherstation with public data access? : r/myweatherstationhttps://www.reddit.com/r/myweatherstation/comments/1kfxyh0/weatherstation_with_public_data_access/ | 1.3% |
Most modern consumer weather stations (like Ambient Weather, Davis, or Ecowitt) **do not natively FTP raw files** straight from the hardware console to a personal web hosting server. Instead, they push data via Wi-Fi to proprietary cloud servers (like AmbientWeather.net or WeatherLink.com) or use customized HTTP POST…
Most modern consumer weather stations (like Ambient Weather, Davis, or Ecowitt) do not natively FTP raw files straight from the hardware console to a personal web hosting server. Instead, they push data via Wi-Fi to proprietary cloud servers (like AmbientWeather.net or WeatherLink.com) or use customized HTTP POST request APIs.
To get your weather data onto a personal website via FTP, you have two main approaches: Hardware with a companion software bridge (PC/RPi running WeeWX or CumulusMX) or Ecowitt's custom server push combined with a processing script.
Method 1: The Gold Standard (Any good station + WeeWX or CumulusMX)
This is what most weather-website owners use. You buy a reliable hardware station, and let a small always-on computer (like a Raspberry Pi or an old PC/server) fetch the data and push fully rendered HTML pages, graphs, and data files to your web server via FTP or SFTP.
Method 2: Ecowitt "Customized" Server Push (No always-on PC required)
If you use an Ecowitt gateway (like the GW1000 Go to product viewer dialog for this item., GW2000 Go to product viewer dialog for this item., or HP2511 console), the hardware features a native setting called Customized under Weather Services in their app or local IP web interface.
Summary Recommendation
To help narrow down the best setup, tell me:
Yes — and the key distinction is whether you mean **the weather station itself should FTP files directly to your web host**, or whether you're okay with a small computer/Raspberry Pi doing the FTP upload. ### My recommendation: Davis + WeeWX For a personal website, I’d strongly consider a Davis Instruments Vantage Vue…
Yes — and the key distinction is whether you mean the weather station itself should FTP files directly to your web host, or whether you're okay with a small computer/Raspberry Pi doing the FTP upload.
For a personal website, I’d strongly consider a Davis Instruments Vantage Vue or Vantage Pro2, connected to a small Raspberry Pi running WeeWX.
The setup would look like:
Davis weather station → receiver/data interface → Raspberry Pi → WeeWX → FTP → your website
WeeWX is free/open-source weather-station software and specifically supports uploading generated weather pages/data to your own website via FTP or rsync. It supports a large range of weather stations, including Davis.
That gives you much more control than being locked into the manufacturer's cloud service: you can have your own weather.html, graphs, historical data, JSON/CSV files, etc. uploaded to your existing hosting account.
There are also weather stations/data loggers with networking built in. However, true direct FTP-to-your-own-web-host support is surprisingly uncommon in modern consumer stations.
For example, Davis's current WeatherLink ecosystem primarily sends data to WeatherLink Cloud, with an API and embeddable widgets for your website rather than arbitrary FTP to your hosting account.
An older Ambient Weather WeatherHub4 system did support FTP directly to your own website, but I wouldn't recommend buying old hardware without checking availability and current support.
If you're comfortable with a little Linux setup, Ecowitt + WeeWX can be a very cost-effective route. Ecowitt has inexpensive Ethernet/Wi-Fi gateways such as the GW3000, and WeeWX handles the website/FTP side.
If you tell me your budget (e.g. under $200, $300–500, or $500+) and whether you already have a Raspberry Pi, I can narrow this down to 2–3 specific stations that will work with your existing FTP website.
Uploading weather data directly via raw FTP from a modern consumer weather station console is increasingly rare. Most contemporary stations (like **Ecowitt**, **Ambient Weather** , or **Davis Instruments** ) use Wi-Fi to push data via an HTTP/S API or a custom server/IP push protocol rather than maintaining an active…
Uploading weather data directly via raw FTP from a modern consumer weather station console is increasingly rare. Most contemporary stations (like Ecowitt, Ambient Weather , or Davis Instruments ) use Wi-Fi to push data via an HTTP/S API or a custom server/IP push protocol rather than maintaining an active FTP client on the hardware.
To get your data onto a personal website, the standard modern approach is to use a station that supports a Custom Server / Customized Upload setting (which sends an HTTP GET/POST request to a PHP script on your server) or to pair your hardware with a dedicated weather software bridge like WeeWX running on a small computer (like a Raspberry Pi) which handles the FTP heavy lifting.
Top Weather Station Recommendations
The Ultimate Solution: Using WeeWX
If your web host only accepts traditional FTP/SFTP file uploads (overwriting a clientraw.txt or JSON file every few minutes for a custom skin), do not rely on the weather station console to do the FTP work.
Instead, buy any reliable station listed above (Ecowitt is a favorite for this) and run WeeWX on a cheap local device like a Raspberry Pi or an always-on home server.
To help me narrow down the exact setup you need, tell me:
Yes. If **direct FTP upload to your own web hosting** is the key requirement, I’d focus on stations/gateways that can send data to a custom endpoint, rather than stations that only upload to the manufacturer’s cloud. ### Best fit: Ecowitt - **Ecowitt WittBoy New 7-in-1 Weather Station** - $199.99 (ecowittweather)
Yes. If direct FTP upload to your own web hosting is the key requirement, I’d focus on stations/gateways that can send data to a custom endpoint, rather than stations that only upload to the manufacturer’s cloud.
Ecowitt is probably the best starting point. Its Wi-Fi gateways support customized server uploads; the configuration lets you specify a server/hostname, path, port, upload interval, and protocol.
The catch is that Ecowitt's native custom upload is HTTP rather than traditional FTP. So if your website host only gives you FTP/SFTP access, you'd typically put a small PHP/CGI/Python endpoint on the site that receives the weather data and writes it into your site's files/database.
For a lower-cost setup, you could use an Ecowitt gateway such as the GW3000 with compatible sensors:
Davis Instruments makes considerably more expensive but very well-established stations. Davis supports getting current and historical data onto your own website through its API, rather than directly FTPing files.
That's a more unusual requirement. There are three possible architectures:
If you tell me what kind of hosting your personal website uses (e.g. GoDaddy/cPanel shared hosting, WordPress, a VPS, Raspberry Pi, etc.) and your budget, I can narrow this down to 2–3 stations that will work with it, including the exact upload method.
Davis Instruments makes considerably more expensive but very well-established stations. Davis supports getting current and historical data onto your own website through its API, rather than directly FTPing files.
That's a more unusual requirement. There are three possible architectures:
Yes. **If you specifically mean the weather station itself should upload files directly to your web host via FTP**, rather than merely sending data to a manufacturer's cloud, there are some good options. ### My top choices - **Davis Vantage Vue** - $425.00 (Sper Scientific Direct)
Yes. If you specifically mean the weather station itself should upload files directly to your web host via FTP, rather than merely sending data to a manufacturer's cloud, there are some good options.
Davis Vantage Vue - $425.00 (Sper Scientific Direct)
Davis Vantage Pro2 - $735.00 (Davis Instruments)
Ambient Weather WS-2902C - $199.99 (Micro Center)
Ambient Weather WS-5000 - $549.99 (Tractor Supply Company)
Davis Vantage Vue + WiFiLogger 2 — probably my favorite setup if reliability and long-term data quality matter. WiFiLogger is a third-party network logger for Davis consoles that can autonomously upload CSV archive files and current-data files via FTP, without leaving a PC running.
Davis Vantage Pro2 + WiFiLogger 2 — same idea, but the Pro2 gives you a more configurable/professional sensor package. Davis describes the Vantage Pro2 as a professional-grade station.
Ambient Weather WS-5000 / compatible Ecowitt gateway — another interesting route. Ambient's newer systems can communicate directly with your own server, although I'd want to verify the exact FTP protocol supported by the particular console/gateway before buying. Ambient documents direct server uploading from its AWNET-capable consoles.
A station + WeeWX — if you're willing to run a Raspberry Pi or small computer, this gives you tremendous flexibility. WeeWX supports 70+ types of weather hardware and can upload generated web pages to your server using FTP, FTPS, or rsync.
If your requirement is:
Outdoor sensors → Wi-Fi/Ethernet → my web host → FTP → my own weather webpage I'd lean toward Davis Vantage Vue + WiFiLogger 2.
The important distinction is that Davis's current WeatherLink system isn't really an FTP-to-your-website solution. It primarily sends data to WeatherLink Cloud, where you can then use an API or embedded widget on your site.
WiFiLogger, on the other hand, explicitly supports FTP exports of both current weather data and archive data.
If you don't mind having a Raspberry Pi running 24/7, I'd actually recommend WeeWX + a Davis or Ecowitt station even more. It lets you completely control the HTML, graphs, database, FTP uploads, and historical archive rather than being locked into a manufacturer's cloud.
If you tell me (1) your approximate budget, (2) whether you want Wi-Fi or Ethernet, and (3) whether your web host gives you FTP/FTPS, I can narrow this down to 2–3 specific stations and the exact hardware/software needed to get the data onto your site automatically.
Direct FTP uploading straight from a consumer weather station console (without a computer or intermediary bridge) is rare nowadays. Most modern Wi-Fi weather stations (like Ambient Weather or Ecowitt) push data via http/API to cloud services (like Weather Underground or their own servers) rather than maintaining an…
Direct FTP uploading straight from a consumer weather station console (without a computer or intermediary bridge) is rare nowadays. Most modern Wi-Fi weather stations (like Ambient Weather or Ecowitt) push data via http/API to cloud services (like Weather Underground or their own servers) rather than maintaining an active FTP client on the hardware.
To get your weather station data uploaded to your personal website via FTP, the most reliable and customizable approach is using a two-part setup : a dependable hardware station paired with weather software (running on a local PC, Mac, or Raspberry Pi) that handles the automated FTP transactions.
The Recommended Setup Approach
To help narrow down the ideal gear and software:
Most modern consumer Wi-Fi weather stations (like Ambient Weather, Ecowitt, or Davis) do **not** upload directly to a personal web server via FTP on their own . Instead, they send data via HTTP/API to proprietary cloud services (like AmbientWeather.net or Weather…
Most modern consumer Wi-Fi weather stations (like Ambient Weather, Ecowitt, or Davis) do not upload directly to a personal web server via FTP on their own . Instead, they send data via HTTP/API to proprietary cloud services (like AmbientWeather.net or Weather Underground).
To feed a personal website via FTP, the standard and most reliable method is using a two-tier setup : a dependable sensor array/gateway paired with a 24/7 local computer or a tiny server (like a Raspberry Pi) running dedicated weather software that handles the FTP/sFTP formatting and uploading.
Top hardware and software combinations to achieve an FTP-driven personal weather site include:
Ecowitt sensors are widely considered the best value and most open for local hackers. A gateway receives local sensor data, and you can run WeeWX on a Raspberry Pi or local server to pull that data and automatically push generated HTML/graphic files via FTP or rsync to your web host.
The gold standard for rugged, long-lasting hardware. Paired with a local PC or a Raspberry Pi running software like WeeWX or CumulusMX, it can format custom templates (such as the popular Saratoga PHP/AJAX templates) and push them over FTP.
The Tempest is a sleek, modern, all-in-one ultrasonic station with no moving parts . It broadcasts UDP data locally over your Wi-Fi network, meaning a local script or WeeWX can intercept it instantly without cloud dependency and FTP it straight to your site.
To help narrow down the ideal setup for you, tell me:
Yes. **If direct FTP upload to your own website is a hard requirement, I’d avoid stations that only upload to their manufacturer’s cloud.** You want a station/gateway that can generate files and send them to your FTP server. ### Best fit: Ecowitt Ecowitt's Wi-Fi gateways are particularly interesting because they can…
Yes. If direct FTP upload to your own website is a hard requirement, I’d avoid stations that only upload to their manufacturer’s cloud. You want a station/gateway that can generate files and send them to your FTP server.
Ecowitt's Wi-Fi gateways are particularly interesting because they can send station data directly to a server, and they work with a wide range of sensors. A current gateway option is:
$54.99
The GW3000 provides both Wi-Fi and Ethernet, so you can put the gateway on your network and use it as the Internet connection for the weather sensors.
$2,030.00
Davis makes excellent hardware, but the current Davis ecosystem is more cloud/API-oriented than FTP-oriented. Its WeatherLink system uploads to the Davis cloud, and the WeatherLink v2 API lets you retrieve the station data for your own application.
For an older/compatible Davis console, the WiFiLogger is especially relevant to your requirement: it explicitly supports FTP exports of archive CSV data and current Realtime.txt/JSON data, without needing a computer running 24/7.
If your goal is something like:
Weather station → Wi-Fi/Ethernet → FTP → yourwebsite.com/weather/
I'd lean toward Ecowitt + a compatible gateway for a new installation. If you want professional-grade sensors and long-term durability, I'd choose Davis + an FTP-capable intermediary such as WiFiLogger.
$54.99
$2,030.00
$707.99
If you tell me (1) your approximate budget, (2) whether you need wind/rain/UV/solar radiation, and (3) whether your website accepts ordinary FTP or SFTP, I can narrow this down to a specific station + gateway combination that will upload directly to your site.
Very few consumer weather station consoles natively handle direct **FTP uploads** anymore; most modern stations (like Ambient Weather or Ecowitt) prefer pushing data via API to cloud dashboards like Weather Underground or their own…
Very few consumer weather station consoles natively handle direct FTP uploads anymore; most modern stations (like Ambient Weather or Ecowitt) prefer pushing data via API to cloud dashboards like Weather Underground or their own servers.
To feed a personal website via FTP (often used with popular packages like the Saratoga PHP/AJAX templates), the most robust method is using a weather station paired with dedicated weather software or a small intermediary bridge running on your local network.
Top hardware choices and the configurations that enable FTP web uploading include:
Ecowitt (such as the GW2001 Go to product viewer dialog for this item. or HP2561 series)
Meteobridge / WeatherBridge Hardware Intermediary
To help narrow down the best setup, tell me:
Yes. The key distinction is that **very few modern weather stations upload directly to arbitrary FTP servers themselves**. The most flexible setup is: **Weather station → local computer/Raspberry Pi → weather software → FTP → your website** ### My top recommendation
Yes. The key distinction is that very few modern weather stations upload directly to arbitrary FTP servers themselves. The most flexible setup is:
Weather station → local computer/Raspberry Pi → weather software → FTP → your website
$123.99
The Ecowitt WS2910 is a good value choice. Its Wi-Fi console can send weather data to customized servers, and Ecowitt supports fairly open data protocols.
Pair it with WeeWX on a Raspberry Pi or other always-on computer. WeeWX generates the weather pages/files and has a built-in FTP uploader, including FTPS support.
That gives you something like:
Outdoor sensors
↓
Ecowitt WS2910 console
↓ Wi-Fi
Raspberry Pi running WeeWX
↓ FTP/FTPS
yourdomain.com/weather/
You can have WeeWX automatically update your site every few minutes, with graphs, current conditions, historical data, rainfall, wind, etc.
$735.00
The Davis Vantage Pro2 is considerably more expensive but is an excellent long-term choice for accuracy, durability, and expandability. Davis supports integration through WeatherLink, and WeeWX has long-standing support for Davis stations.
I'd choose Davis + WeeWX if the weather data itself is more important than minimizing cost.
$399.99
Ambient Weather stations use a very similar ecosystem to Ecowitt and can work well with software that relays data to a website. A third-party service such as Pro Weather specifically supports Ecowitt/Fine Offset/Ambient Weather gateways pushing data to a personal upload endpoint.
| Goal | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Best value / flexible website | Ecowitt WS2910 + Raspberry Pi + WeeWX |
| Best quality/long-term station | Davis Vantage Pro2 + WeeWX |
| Want lots of sensors/add-ons | Ecowitt ecosystem |
| Don't want to run a computer | We should look specifically for a station/gateway with native FTP support |
One important question: do you mean that you specifically need FTP/FTPS to your existing web host, with your username/password and a directory such as /public_html/weather/? If so, tell me your approximate budget and whether you're willing to leave a Raspberry Pi or small computer running 24/7, and I can narrow this to 2–3 exact setups.