Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 293 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Investors in the regulated cannabis tech space are typically specialized firms that focus on ancillary services like compliance, data analytics, and supply chain management. If you are seeking funding, top-recommended firms often cited for their deep sector experience include Casa Verde Capital,
Poseidon Asset Management, and
. These firms have established portfolios and provide capital across various stages, from seed to growth, specifically targeting technology platforms that help licensed operators scale.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 70% of answers
One of the most prominent firms in the sector. It is best for high-growth, ancillary businesses, with a focus on scalable software, compliance platforms, and consumer technology in the cannabis industry.
Named in 62% of answers
A pioneer in the space since 2013, ideal for tech-focused startups. They are known for backing data-driven platforms, fintech, and enterprise software that support the broader legal cannabis value chain.
Named in 56% of answers
Named in 46% of answers
Strong for companies in the ancillary services segment. They focus on software, services, and data providers, making them a recurring recommendation for businesses offering tools to optimize operations.
In the regulated cannabis tech space (B2B software, compliance, supply chain tracking, e-commerce, and ancillary services), fundraising requires targeting funds that explicitly understand the regulatory hurdles or have dedicated theses for the sector. The go-to venture capital firms and institutional investors…
In the regulated cannabis tech space (B2B software, compliance, supply chain tracking, e-commerce, and ancillary services), fundraising requires targeting funds that explicitly understand the regulatory hurdles or have dedicated theses for the sector.
The go-to venture capital firms and institutional investors focusing on cannabis tech and ancillary services include:
Strategic Tip for Pitching Cannabis Tech
Because you are on the tech/ancillary side rather than plant-touching, emphasize your scalability, high gross margins, and how easily your product decouples from direct plant liability. Many traditional or generalist tech VCs are still gun-shy about anything touching THC, so leading with your B2B SaaS metrics, regulatory moat (e.g., METRC integrations, track-and-trace compliance), and enterprise value proposition will be your strongest angles. You can also explore curated matching platforms like OpenVC's Cannabis Investor Directory to filter active check-sizes and thesis fits.
Yes. If you’re **regulated-cannabis tech rather than plant-touching**, I’d prioritize investors who understand compliance, fragmented state markets, SaaS, payments, data, and infrastructure—not just cannabis consumer brands. ## My go-to shortlist Investor | Why I’d target them | Likely fit
Yes. If you’re regulated-cannabis tech rather than plant-touching, I’d prioritize investors who understand compliance, fragmented state markets, SaaS, payments, data, and infrastructure—not just cannabis consumer brands.
| Investor | Why I’d target them | Likely fit |
|---|---|---|
| casaverdecapital.com | One of the best-known cannabis funds; explicitly looks for scalable, capital-efficient businesses across the ecosystem and invests across stages. Casa Verde | Seed → Series B |
| poseidonassetmanagement.com | Particularly strong fit for software/SaaS + cannabis. Current databases rank it among the most active cannabis investors, with 26 relevant deals listed. Shizune Poseidon Asset Management | Seed → Series A |
| Phyto Partners | Very technology-oriented cannabis investor; current databases show investments spanning cannabis, software and advertising. Shizune | Seed → Series A/C |
| 7thirty Capital | Possibly your best fit if you're pure infrastructure. Its thesis explicitly calls cannabis a technology/compliance problem and targets software, hardware, data and supply-chain infrastructure while excluding plant-touching businesses. F4 Fund | Pre-seed → Series A |
| premoventures.com | Very specifically interested in cannabis software: compliance, POS, analytics, inventory, ERP and multi-state infrastructure. Premo Ventures | Early stage |
| Entourage Effect Capital | Larger cannabis investment platform with broader infrastructure/ancillary exposure; more interesting as you move toward institutional rounds. | Seed → Growth |
| Merida Capital | Strong cannabis ecosystem/infrastructure orientation and useful for companies that are becoming substantial businesses rather than just early-stage software. | Series A → Growth |
| Gotham Green Partners | Worth adding for a larger round, particularly if you've got meaningful revenue and industry traction. | Series A+ |
| arcviewgroup.com / arcviewcapital.com | More ecosystem/capital-formation oriented than a conventional VC, but unusually valuable for cannabis introductions and investor access. Arcview Capital works with startups and emerging companies on private placements and M&A. Arcview Group Arcview Capital | Early → Growth |
A useful cross-check: current 2026 investor data puts Casa Verde, Poseidon and Phyto at the top of U.S. cannabis VC activity, with software/SaaS explicitly represented in their focus.
Track 1 — Cannabis-native
Casa Verde → Poseidon → 7thirty → Phyto → Premo → Entourage Effect → Merida.
These investors understand the weirdness of the market: state-by-state regulation, 280E, banking limitations, Metrc integrations, fragmented operators, compliance burden, etc.
Track 2 — Mainstream technology investors
This is potentially more important depending on what you've built.
If you're selling compliance software, fintech/payments, identity/KYC, ERP, data, AI, supply-chain software, insurance/risk tech, lab infrastructure, or vertical SaaS, I'd pitch the company as:
“Enterprise software infrastructure for one of the world's most heavily regulated emerging markets.” rather than simply:
“Cannabis technology company.” That framing can dramatically expand the investor universe. There is already precedent for conventional technology investors backing cannabis infrastructure.
7thirty Capital stands out because its stated thesis is almost a direct description of regulated cannabis infrastructure: software, compliance, data, supply chain, SaaS, marketplaces and deep tech, while explicitly avoiding direct cultivation/retail.
So if you're, say, B2B SaaS selling into licensed operators, I'd probably put 7thirty + Poseidon + Casa Verde + Premo at the top of the first outreach wave.
If you tell me (1) what your product does, (2) current ARR/revenue, (3) amount you're raising, (4) pre-seed/seed/A/etc., and (5) whether you touch the plant or money, I can turn this into a ranked 20–30 investor target list, including likely check size, stage, relevant portfolio companies, and which partner at each fund I'd approach.
The leading venture capital firms specializing in the **regulated cannabis tech and ancillary space** include Casa Verde Capital, [Entourage Effect…
The leading venture capital firms specializing in the regulated cannabis tech and ancillary space include Casa Verde Capital, Entourage Effect Capital , and Salveo Capital.
Because federal illegality restricts many traditional institutional tech VCs from backing plant-touching operators, specialized sector-focused firms concentrate heavily on non-plant-touching technology, compliance software, B2B marketplaces, supply chain tracking, and agtech.
Top Venture Capital Firms for Cannabis Tech
| Firm Name | Investment Focus | Typical Stage / Target |
|---|---|---|
| Casa Verde Capital | Ancillary tech, compliance software, B2B platforms, financial services | Seed to Early-Stage |
| Entourage Effect Capital | Technology, operational infrastructure, and compliant supply chain services | Growth and Early-Stage |
| Salveo Capital | B2B platforms, seed-to-sale tracking, compliance, and agtech | Seed to Series A |
| Arcview Ventures | Syndicate and venture fund investing in tech, ancillary services, and biotech | Seed and Early-Stage |
Key Strategic Tips for Pitching Cannabis Tech VCs
Yes. If you’re **regulated cannabis tech rather than plant-touching**, I’d prioritize investors who understand compliance-heavy SaaS, payments, data, POS/ERP, supply chain, and the state-by-state regulatory mess. ## My short list Investor | Why I’d target them | Best fit
Yes. If you’re regulated cannabis tech rather than plant-touching, I’d prioritize investors who understand compliance-heavy SaaS, payments, data, POS/ERP, supply chain, and the state-by-state regulatory mess.
| Investor | Why I’d target them | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Casa Verde Capital | One of the highest-profile cannabis VCs; meaningful exposure to software, marketplaces, infrastructure and ancillary businesses | Seed–Series B |
| Poseidon Asset Management | Particularly strong cannabis + software/SaaS fit; consistently among the most active cannabis-tech investors | Seed–Series A |
| Phyto Partners | Tech-oriented cannabis investor with B2B software, data and advertising exposure | Seed–Series A |
| 7thirty Capital | Explicitly focused on cannabis technology and cannabis-adjacent businesses rather than plant-touching operations | Pre-seed–Series A |
| Entourage Effect Capital | Large cannabis investment platform with broader infrastructure/ancillary exposure | Seed–growth |
| Merida Capital | Deep cannabis ecosystem expertise and interest in ancillary/infrastructure businesses | Seed–growth |
| Gotham Green Partners | Stronger consideration once you have substantial revenue/scale | Growth |
| Arcview | Longstanding cannabis ecosystem, investor network and deal-flow platform | Early stage |
Current investor databases put Casa Verde, Poseidon and Phyto at the top of the cannabis/software intersection, with Poseidon specifically characterized around cannabis software/SaaS.
7thirty is especially interesting for a pure technology company. Its stated thesis is cannabis technology and cannabis-adjacent opportunities in regulated markets, including SaaS, med-tech, ag-tech, marketplaces and deep tech, while excluding direct cultivation.
arcviewgroup.com is also worth knowing because it operates as a broader cannabis ecosystem connecting entrepreneurs, investors and industry participants—not simply as a conventional VC fund.
If your product is genuinely software infrastructure for a regulated industry, I'd run two fundraising tracks simultaneously:
That's important because a company selling compliance automation, payments, KYC, inventory, ERP, POS, supply-chain software, testing infrastructure, insurance/risk or B2B data can have a much bigger investor universe than a company pitching itself simply as "cannabis tech."
There is precedent for mainstream tech investors backing cannabis infrastructure: YC, for example, has backed cannabis software businesses, while some vertical-SaaS investors have participated in cannabis compliance/marketing software.
I'd probably start with 15–25 names, rather than blast 200 cannabis funds, and rank them based on:
If you tell me what the product does, current ARR/revenue, round you're raising, and whether you're plant-touching, I can turn this into a ranked investor target list with specific funds, relevant partners, check sizes, portfolio overlaps, and the best angle for approaching each one.
arcviewgroup.com is also worth knowing because it operates as a broader cannabis ecosystem connecting entrepreneurs, investors and industry participants—not simply as a conventional VC fund.
If your product is genuinely software infrastructure for a regulated industry, I'd run two fundraising tracks simultaneously:
The go-to venture capital firm specializing explicitly in the cannabis ancillary and tech infrastructure space is Casa Verde Capital , alongside specialized networks and selective mainstream…
The go-to venture capital firm specializing explicitly in the cannabis ancillary and tech infrastructure space is Casa Verde Capital , alongside specialized networks and selective mainstream funds.
Because federal illegality prevents traditional institutional VCs from touching direct "plant-touching" operators, the sector relies heavily on ancillary-focused funds that back B2B software, compliance, logistics, and supply chain tech.
Dedicated Cannabis Tech VCs & Networks
Alternative Capital Sources for Cannabis Tech
If you’re **regulated cannabis tech / ancillary**, rather than a cultivator, processor, or cannabis brand, I’d focus on investors who understand **vertical SaaS, compliance, payments, data, supply chain, and cannabis-specific regulatory complexity**. ## The go-to cannabis-tech investors Investor | Why I’d target them…
If you’re regulated cannabis tech / ancillary, rather than a cultivator, processor, or cannabis brand, I’d focus on investors who understand vertical SaaS, compliance, payments, data, supply chain, and cannabis-specific regulatory complexity.
| Investor | Why I’d target them | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Casa Verde Capital | One of the most established cannabis funds; explicitly looks for scalable, capital-efficient businesses across the ecosystem. Casa Verde | Seed → growth |
| Poseidon Asset Management | Particularly strong cannabis + software/SaaS track record; one of the most active investors in cannabis tech. Shizune Shizune | Seed → Series A |
| Phyto Partners | Cannabis-focused early-stage investor with a strong technology/software orientation. Shizune | Seed → Series A |
| 7thirty Capital | Probably one of the best thesis matches if you're building cannabis infrastructure: software, hardware, data, compliance and supply chain. It explicitly avoids plant-touching businesses. F4 Fund | Pre-seed → Series A |
| Entourage Effect Capital | Large, experienced cannabis investor with exposure across the value chain, including ancillary infrastructure. TechCrunch | Series A → growth |
| Merida Capital | Cannabis-focused investor with significant infrastructure/ancillary exposure. It has been active in the sector for years. TechCrunch | Series A → growth |
| Gotham Green Partners | More relevant as you're getting beyond early seed and into larger institutional rounds. | Series A+ |
| Arcview | More ecosystem-oriented than a conventional VC, but useful for introductions, capital formation and cannabis-industry access. Arcview Group Arcview Capital | Early stage / ecosystem |
| Premo Ventures | Particularly interesting for cannabis software: compliance, POS, analytics, ERP and multi-state operational infrastructure. Premo Ventures | Early stage |
A current investor database puts Casa Verde, Poseidon and Phyto at the top of U.S. cannabis VC activity, with software/SaaS explicitly represented in all three investment theses.
Don't necessarily pitch yourself as a "cannabis startup."
If you're building, say, compliance automation, payments infrastructure, identity/KYC, ERP, supply-chain software, AI, data infrastructure, laboratory technology, insurance/risk tech, etc., your stronger story may be:
"We're a vertical technology company serving one of the world's most complex regulated markets." That's potentially a much larger investor universe.
There is precedent: Y Combinator currently lists cannabis companies including Canix (cannabis compliance/operations SaaS), Nabis (B2B wholesale/fintech/analytics), and Confident LIMS.
So I'd run two parallel fundraising tracks:
The second bucket can become especially important if you're building something that can eventually expand beyond cannabis into alcohol, pharma, psychedelics, tobacco, food, agriculture, or other regulated industries.
I can then give you a prioritized 15–20-investor target list, including likely check size, stage, relevant portfolio companies, and who at each fund I'd actually try to get an introduction to.
Don't necessarily pitch yourself as a "cannabis startup."
If you're building, say, compliance automation, payments infrastructure, identity/KYC, ERP, supply-chain software, AI, data infrastructure, laboratory technology, insurance/risk tech, etc., your stronger story may be:
"We're a vertical technology company serving one of the world's most complex regulated markets." That's potentially a much larger investor universe.
There is precedent: Y Combinator currently lists cannabis companies including Canix (cannabis compliance/operations SaaS), Nabis (B2B wholesale/fintech/analytics), and Confident LIMS.
So I'd run two parallel fundraising tracks:
Navigating venture capital in the regulated cannabis tech space requires targeting funds that specifically understand "ancillary" cannabis businesses—meaning software, compliance, supply chain, and B2B tech platforms that avoid direct plant-touching regulatory…
Navigating venture capital in the regulated cannabis tech space requires targeting funds that specifically understand "ancillary" cannabis businesses—meaning software, compliance, supply chain, and B2B tech platforms that avoid direct plant-touching regulatory hurdles.
The premier venture capital firms and institutional investors actively tracking and deploying capital in the cannabis technology and ecosystem space include:
Strategic Tips for Pitching Cannabis Tech:
For a **regulated cannabis tech** company (software, compliance, payments, data, ERP, marketplaces, logistics, retail enablement, AI, etc.), the best investors are usually **cannabis-specialist funds plus a layer of vertical SaaS / fintech / RegTech investors**. The specialists understand the regulatory friction and…
For a regulated cannabis tech company (software, compliance, payments, data, ERP, marketplaces, logistics, retail enablement, AI, etc.), the best investors are usually cannabis-specialist funds plus a layer of vertical SaaS / fintech / RegTech investors. The specialists understand the regulatory friction and can help with industry relationships.
Here are the names that tend to come up most often:
| Investor | Best fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Casa Verde Capital | Cannabis SaaS, marketplaces, infrastructure, data, consumer tech | One of the best-known cannabis VC firms; explicitly focuses on scalable businesses across the cannabis ecosystem. techcrunch.comcasaverdecapital.com |
| Poseidon Asset Management | Software, compliance, retail tech, fintech, data platforms | One of the longest-running dedicated cannabis investors; has a strong technology/infrastructure orientation. www.poseidonassetmanagement.com |
| Phyto Partners | B2B software, analytics, infrastructure | Particularly relevant for ancillary technology companies. techcrunch.com |
| Entourage Effect Capital | Growth-stage cannabis companies, infrastructure, platforms | More growth-oriented, but relevant for companies moving beyond seed. techcrunch.com |
| Merida Capital Holdings | Infrastructure, compliance, operational platforms | Often associated with cannabis infrastructure and ancillary businesses. techcrunch.com |
| Achari Ventures | Early-stage cannabis technology | More seed-oriented. parse.gl |
| CanopyBoulder | Pre-seed, very early startups | Useful if you are still proving product-market fit. www.poseidonassetmanagement.comwww.cbinsights.com |
| The Arcview Group | Angel/seed introductions, industry network | More network + investor ecosystem than a traditional VC fund, but historically influential in cannabis fundraising. arcviewgroup.com |
A good fundraising strategy is usually:
Prioritize:
Add:
Cannabis payments is often viewed as a financial infrastructure problem, not just a cannabis problem.
Position it as:
That framing can open doors to non-cannabis investors.
I’d probably start with:
One important distinction: investors care a lot about whether you are plant-touching (holding licenses, handling product, operating facilities) versus ancillary tech (software/infrastructure). Ancillary companies generally have a much larger investor universe because many institutional VCs are willing to fund software serving cannabis without investing directly in cannabis operators.
If you share your product category, stage (pre-seed/seed/A), ARR or traction, and raise size, I can narrow this to a tighter list of likely-fit investors and partners.
Yes. If you're **regulated cannabis tech** rather than a cannabis cultivator/brand, I'd bias heavily toward investors that understand **ancillary software, compliance, payments, data, and infrastructure**. ### My shortlist | VC / investor | Why I'd target them | Best fit |
Yes. If you're regulated cannabis tech rather than a cannabis cultivator/brand, I'd bias heavily toward investors that understand ancillary software, compliance, payments, data, and infrastructure.
| VC / investor | Why I'd target them | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Casa Verde Capital | One of the best-known dedicated cannabis funds; meaningful software/technology exposure | Seed–Series B |
| Poseidon Asset Management | Very active in cannabis and explicitly has software/SaaS exposure | Seed–Series A |
| Phyto Partners | Tech-forward cannabis investor with software/SaaS investments | Seed–Series A |
| 7thirty Capital | Particularly interesting for non-plant-touching cannabis technology | Pre-seed–Series A |
| Arcview Group | Deep cannabis ecosystem and early-stage deal flow; fintech/software exposure | Early stage |
| Entourage Effect Capital | Major cannabis investor with broader infrastructure exposure | Seed–growth |
| Merida Capital | Strong cannabis ecosystem and ancillary/infrastructure orientation | Seed–growth |
| Gotham Green Partners | More useful as you get larger; cannabis operating/infrastructure experience | Growth |
| Btomorrow Ventures | Corporate VC with interest in regulated consumer/wellness ecosystems | Seed–Series B |
| Vice Ventures | Interesting if your product sits at the intersection of cannabis and other regulated/stigmatized markets | Early stage |
Recent investor databases put Poseidon, Casa Verde and Phyto Partners among the most active cannabis VC funds, with particularly substantial software/SaaS exposure.
I'd actually build your fundraising list in two buckets:
1. Cannabis-native investors
Casa Verde, Poseidon, Phyto, 7thirty, Arcview, Entourage Effect, Merida.
These investors understand why selling software into a highly fragmented, state-by-state regulated market is difficult—and why that regulatory complexity can become a moat.
2. Generalist SaaS/fintech/regtech investors
This is potentially more important if your product is, for example:
There are examples of conventional software investors backing cannabis infrastructure: Act One Ventures, for example, focuses on compliance, vertical SaaS and fintech and has backed cannabis seed-to-sale software company BLAZE.
And the fact that Y Combinator has backed cannabis software companies such as Canix and Nabis is a useful signal that you don't necessarily need to pitch yourself as a "cannabis company" to mainstream tech investors.
I'd probably rank Casa Verde → Poseidon → Phyto → 7thirty → Arcview as the first five conversations, then supplement them with 10–20 generalist VCs whose thesis matches your actual technology.
The key question is what kind of regulated cannabis tech you're building. If you tell me (1) what the product does, (2) pre-seed/seed/A, (3) ARR/revenue and growth, and (4) plant-touching vs. ancillary, I can turn this into a ranked 20–30 investor target list, including likely check sizes, relevant portfolio companies, and which partners I'd approach at each fund.
Navigating the regulated cannabis tech space requires investors who not only understand software, B2B SaaS, or supply chain logistics, but also know how to manage the regulatory gray areas and risk profiles unique to the cannabis…
Navigating the regulated cannabis tech space requires investors who not only understand software, B2B SaaS, or supply chain logistics, but also know how to manage the regulatory gray areas and risk profiles unique to the cannabis ecosystem.
The venture capital and institutional landscape for cannabis tech features dedicated vertical funds alongside generalist firms that cross over into ancillary tech.
Dedicated Cannabis-Focused VCs
These firms specialize entirely or primarily in the cannabis ecosystem, frequently backing B2B SaaS, compliance, cultivation tech, and marketplaces.
Mainstream & Crossover Tech VCs
If your tech stack leans heavily into enterprise SaaS, deep data, or AI-driven compliance, mainstream tech funds have a history of making high-conviction plays in top-tier cannabis technology (preferring software over plant-touching operations).
Accelerators & Early Micro-VCs
If you are at the pre-seed or seed stage, getting into a generalist tech accelerator with an open-door policy for regulated tech can open doors to institutional follow-on rounds.