We are auditing our supply chain for slavery risks. Who provides supply chain intelligence data?

Yes. If your audit is specifically about modern slavery / forced-labor exposure in supply chains, there are several types of providers. The best choice depends on whether you need trade-network intelligence, supplier monitoring, forced-labor datasets, or worker-level due diligence.

Leading supply-chain intelligence providers

• sayari.com — Strong for mapping actual supplier relationships beyond Tier 1 using customs/trade data, corporate ownership, facilities, and entity intelligence. It specifically screens for UFLPA and forced-labor exposure and produces source-cited evidence suitable for compliance work.
• exiger.com — Particularly strong for combining corporate ownership, trade flows, facilities, products and materials with forced-labor intelligence. Its platform maps risk down to entity and product levels, with audit-oriented evidence.
• prewave.com — Supplier-risk monitoring platform with Tier-N mapping, AI-based relationship discovery, forced-labor exposure libraries and geographic/cluster analysis. Useful if you want continuous monitoring, rather than a one-time supplier screen.
• sourcemap.com — Focuses on supply-chain mapping and traceability, including continuous watchlist monitoring and transaction-level forced-labor screening.
• kharon.com — Specialist risk-intelligence provider with a forced-labor dataset covering high-risk entities and their commercial networks, particularly relevant to Xinjiang/UFLPA exposure.
• everstream.ai — Broader supply-chain risk platform providing continuous predictive monitoring across multi-tier networks, including forced labor, sanctions and ESG risks.

Providers focused more directly on labor exploitation

• verite.org — Particularly valuable when you need labor-specific intelligence rather than just sanctions/trade screening. Its CUMULUS Forced Labor Screen uses labor-supply-chain data, workforce information and expert assessment to identify forced-labor and recruitment risks.
• Supply Trace — An open-access research initiative using customs data, machine learning and expert/worker-led research to identify forced-labor risks; currently particularly focused on apparel.
• SlaveCheck — Combines AI with human-sourced intelligence from civil-society partners, including interviews, observations and whistleblower/local knowledge. This can complement purely database-driven approaches.

A practical audit stack

For a serious corporate slavery-risk audit, I'd generally not rely on a single provider. A strong combination would be:

1. Sayari or Exiger — establish the actual multi-tier supplier network and ownership structure.
2. Kharon — specialist forced-labor/UFLPA intelligence.
3. Prewave or Everstream — continuous monitoring for new risks.
4. Verité/CUMULUS or equivalent worker-level diligence — validate whether identified risks correspond to actual labor practices rather than merely geographic/entity risk.

That's important because trade and corporate databases can tell you who is connected to whom, while worker-focused research can tell you what is happening to workers. The two are complementary.

One other useful development: in 2026, Tech Against Trafficking has been working with companies, civil society and standards organizations on a common forced-labor data library, intended to improve consistency in how forced-labor indicators are defined and interpreted.

If you tell me your industry (e.g., apparel, electronics, automotive, food/mining) and whether you're auditing primarily for UFLPA, UK Modern Slavery Act, EU CSDDD/Forced Labour Regulation, or general ESG, I can narrow this to the 3–5 best providers and compare their data sources, coverage, pricing model, APIs, and audit defensibility.

When auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks, intelligence data typically comes from a mix of sustainability ratings platforms, geopolitical/human rights risk analytics, audit cooperatives , and AI-driven compliance engines.

Key providers of supply chain intelligence data specialized in or featuring strong human rights and labor risk tracking include:

• EcoVadis : Evaluates and benchmarks suppliers on labor and human rights, ethics, and sustainable procurement. You can explore their methodology on the EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings platform.
• Verisk Maplecroft : Offers deep global risk data indexing human rights, modern slavery, and labor violations across 198 countries and multiple industries. Learn more via the Verisk Maplecroft Supply Chain Risk portal.
• Exiger : Utilizes AI and natural language processing to conduct deep-tier due diligence, adverse media screening, and watch-list/sanctions monitoring mapped to forced labor regulations. Details are available through Exiger Supply Chain Due Diligence.
• Sedex : One of the world's largest collaborative platforms for sharing ethical supply chain data, offering self-assessment tools and audits. Check out Sedex Ethical Supply Chain Solutions.
• IntegrityNext : Provides automated supply chain compliance and risk detection specifically targeting forced labor regions, sanctions lists, and regulatory frameworks like the UFLPA. More information is found at IntegrityNext Forced Labor Prevention.
• Business & Human Rights Resource Centre (BHRRC) : An NGO tracker that logs public allegations of human rights and forced labor abuses linked to specific corporate entities, searchable via the BHRRC Trackers.

If you want to narrow down your options, tell me:

• How deep into your supply chain (Tier 1 vs. Tier 2+) you need visibility
• Which regulations you are primarily trying to comply with (e.g., UFLPA, German Supply Chain Act, EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive)

I can help you recommend the most relevant platform type for your audit scope.

Auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks requires specialized data intelligence that spans tier-1 vendors all the way back to raw material extraction points.

The primary providers of supply chain intelligence, risk analytics, and traceability data tailored for human rights and slavery compliance fall into distinct categories:

1. End-to-End Traceability & Mapping Specialists

These platforms focus on deep-tier mapping, tracing materials from origin to finished product to comply with strict regulations like the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA).

• Sourcemap: Provides end-to-end supply chain visibility and transaction-level verification, combining direct supplier engagement with forensic auditing.
• Transparency-One: (Acquired by Cority) Enables companies to map their supply chain down to the source, identifying specific production locations and material origins.
• Circulor: Specializes in traceability for complex industrial and raw material supply chains (such as minerals and battery materials) using robust digital tracking.

2. Risk Analytics & Macro/Geopolitical Data Providers

These firms supply macro-level data, country-risk indices, and AI-driven continuous monitoring of adverse media and sanctions.

• Verisk Maplecroft: Renowned for its global human rights and modern slavery indices, providing granular geopolitical and localized labor risk data.
• Exiger: Uses AI and natural language processing to scour global public and proprietary records, screening suppliers for adverse media, forced labor, and hidden ownership ties.
• Interos: Offers an operational resilience platform that maps multi-tier supply chains and flags hidden geographic, financial, and ethical risks.

3. Ethical Auditing, Collaboration & ESG Platforms

These platforms manage supplier self-assessments, shared audit data, and continuous compliance workflows.

• Sedex: One of the world's largest collaborative platforms for sharing ethical supply chain data, offering standardized self-assessment questionnaires and audits.
• EcoVadis: Evaluates corporate social responsibility and labor practices, providing scorecards and AI-verified documentation regarding human rights policies.
• IntegrityNext: Automates supplier sustainability and ethics compliance, monitoring supply chains for human rights and environmental law violations.
• FRDM: Specializes in social impact and modern slavery data intelligence, connecting enterprise spend data directly to forced labor risk analytics.

If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:

• Are you focused more on regulatory compliance (like UFLPA/EU rules) or broad ethical auditing?
• Do you need a solution that integrates directly with your ERP/Procurement software?

Organizations auditing supply chains for slavery, forced labor, or modern slavery risks typically use a combination of supply chain mapping platforms, forced-labor risk databases, ESG intelligence providers, audit data, and government datasets. Common providers include:

Supply chain intelligence and mapping platforms

• Altana — Uses AI-driven supply chain mapping and network intelligence to identify supplier relationships, trade flows, and risk signals, including forced-labor-related risks. It is also one of the technology providers referenced in industry forced-labor due diligence programs.
• Resilinc — Provides supply chain mapping, supplier monitoring, and risk intelligence used for disruption, compliance, and responsible sourcing programs. It is included among vetted technology providers in the AIAG Forced Labor Due Diligence Program.
• Exiger — Provides AI-based supply chain intelligence and forced-labor risk screening. Its datasets include links between companies and potential forced-labor exposure, including UFLPA-related risks.
• Kharon — Specializes in risk intelligence and entity resolution, including forced-labor indicators, supplier networks, and UFLPA-related screening. It is used by government agencies and integrated into supply chain platforms.

Forced labor and modern slavery risk specialists

• Verité — Provides the CUMULUS Forced Labor Screen™, which maps labor supply chains and assesses forced-labor indicators using workplace, recruitment, and workforce data.
• Supply Trace — Provides an open-access supply chain intelligence platform focused on identifying potential forced-labor risks through entity mapping, customs data, and research.
• EcoVadis — Provides sustainability ratings and supplier assessments, often used as part of responsible sourcing and human-rights due diligence programs.

Audit, ESG, and supplier assessment data providers

• LRQA — Provides supply chain audits, social compliance assessments, and responsible sourcing services.
• Intertek — Provides social compliance audits and supplier verification services.
• SGS — Provides supplier audits, ethical sourcing assessments, and labor practice verification.
• UL Solutions — Provides supply chain assurance and sustainability assessment services.
• Sedex — Operates a supplier sustainability data platform and supports social compliance assessments.

Sector-specific and collaborative resources

• Responsible Business Alliance / Responsible Labor Initiative — Provides forced-labor risk assessment tools, including supplier risk scoring approaches for members.
• Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) — Runs a Forced Labor Due Diligence Program that identifies vetted technology providers, including Kharon, Altana, SUPPLIERASSURANCE, and Resilinc.

Government and public datasets commonly integrated

Auditors often combine vendor data with:

• U.S. Customs and Border Protection Withhold Release Orders (WROs) and UFLPA Entity List data
• International Labour Organization (ILO) forced labor indicators
• Country-level human rights risk indexes
• Import/export shipment records
• Corporate ownership and beneficial ownership data
• NGO and civil society investigations

How companies usually combine these tools

A mature slavery-risk audit often uses:

1. Supplier mapping — identify Tier 1, Tier 2, and deeper suppliers.
2. Entity screening — check suppliers, owners, affiliates, and factories against forced-labor risk data.
3. Geographic and commodity risk analysis — identify high-risk countries, materials, and labor practices.
4. Worker-level due diligence — assess recruitment practices, migrant labor risks, fees, and working conditions.
5. Verification and remediation — use audits, worker interviews, and corrective action tracking.

For a corporate audit program, the strongest approach is usually a combination of a supply-chain graph platform (Altana/Resilinc/Exiger-type), a forced-labor specialist dataset (Verité/Kharon-type), and independent social compliance audits rather than relying on any single database.

Auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks requires specialized intelligence, multi-tier mapping, and regulatory tracking (such as compliance with the U.S. UFLPA or the EU Forced Labor Regulation).

Data providers in this space generally fall into four categories:

• Traceability and Deep-Tier Mapping Platforms: These providers specialize in tracing materials and components from raw origin to finished goods, collecting transaction-level proof to satisfy customs and audit requirements.
  • Sourcemap : A leader in end-to-end supply chain transparency, sub-supplier discovery, and forced labor due diligence.
• AI-Driven Risk Analytics & Due Diligence: These firms use AI, natural language processing, and continuous adverse-media screening to flag supplier connections to human rights violations and watchlists.
  • Exiger : Employs automated due diligence and AI-driven supply chain monitoring to screen entities against global sanctions, watchlists, and hidden modern slavery networks.
  • Verisk Maplecroft : Renowned for deep macroeconomic, geographic, and labor-rights risk indices, helping map structural exposure to forced labor.
• Multi-Tier Supply Chain Resiliency & Compliance Platforms: These platforms combine network mapping with real-time global event monitoring and automated supplier outreach.
  • Resilinc : Features multi-tier mapping and AI-powered compliance agents specifically configured to track restricted entities, material flags, and forced labor regulations.
• Sustainability and Ethical Rating Frameworks: These organizations audit, rate, and score suppliers on labor practices, ethics, and human rights policies.
  • EcoVadis : Offers scalable supplier mapping and ethical risk scoring through a dedicated modern slavery and human rights lens, backed by verified documentation.

If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:

• What industries or geographies are your highest priority?
• Are you looking primarily for tier-1 supplier self-assessments or deep multi-tier raw material tracing?

I can help you pinpoint which provider best aligns with your audit scope.

Yes. There are several types of providers, and the best fit depends on whether you need supplier screening, multi-tier supply-chain mapping, forced-labor intelligence, or audit/assessment data.

Strong providers to evaluate

• sayari.com — particularly strong for multi-tier supply-chain intelligence. It combines corporate/entity data, ownership relationships, customs/trade transactions and forced-labor indicators, including UFLPA-related screening. It is useful when you want to determine who actually sits behind a supplier rather than relying solely on supplier questionnaires.
• altana.ai — AI-driven supply-chain mapping and risk intelligence, including identification of hidden sub-tier relationships and forced-labor exposure. It is aimed at very large, complex global supply chains.
• kharon.com — specializes in risk intelligence around sanctions, human rights and forced labor. AIAG specifically selected Kharon as part of its forced-labor due-diligence program, including UFLPA screening.
• exiger.com — supply-chain risk and AI intelligence, with particular relevance to forced labor. In 2026 it also launched a free public tool, forcedlabor.ai, for identifying connections to state-sponsored forced labor.
• sourcemap.com — focused on supply-chain mapping, traceability and collecting supplier/sub-supplier information, including forced-labor and trade-compliance use cases.
• ecovadis.com — more assessment-oriented. Its network contains millions of suppliers and its methodology explicitly covers forced labor and bonded labor. This is useful when you want supplier sustainability assessments and scores, rather than primarily trade/entity intelligence.
• eiq.com — offers supply-chain risk datasets incorporating audits, civil-society sources and public research, including granular forced-labor risk indicators.
• verite.org — specialized in forced-labor and human-trafficking risk, using labor-supply-chain data, assessments and expert review. Particularly interesting if worker/recruitment practices are central to your audit.
• fairsupply.com — focused specifically on modern-slavery due diligence, with supplier-level risk profiles, adverse-media/regulatory signals and up-to-10-tier risk assessment.
• spglobal.com — broader supply-chain and counterparty intelligence, including human-rights risk indices and investigations; useful if slavery risk is one component of a larger supply-risk program.

How I'd segment the market

One important distinction for an audit: supplier ESG scores are not the same thing as supply-chain intelligence. A questionnaire or ESG assessment can tell you what a supplier says about itself; trade/entity intelligence can independently identify ownership, factories, intermediaries, sourcing geography and sub-tier relationships. Sayari, for example, explicitly positions its data as independent of supplier self-reporting.

For a slavery-risk audit, I'd generally combine (1) multi-tier mapping + (2) forced-labor screening + (3) supplier/audit evidence, rather than relying on one provider's risk score.

Companies auditing supply chains for slavery, forced labor, and human trafficking risks typically use a mix of supply chain mapping platforms, risk intelligence databases, supplier assessment tools, trade data providers, and human-rights specialists. The right provider depends on whether you need supplier screening, Tier 2/Tier 3 visibility, regulatory compliance (e.g., UFLPA), audit support, or continuous monitoring.

Here are major providers to evaluate:

Other useful data sources:

• Government enforcement data: U.S. Customs and Border Protection Withhold Release Orders and Entity List data are commonly incorporated into commercial screening tools.
• Labor-rights research: International Labour Organization indicators and country/sector risk data are often used as reference frameworks.
• Industry-specific programs: For example, the Responsible Business Alliance and Responsible Labor Initiative provide sector-focused tools and assessments.

For a supply chain slavery-risk audit, many companies combine:

1. Supply chain mapping (Who supplies whom? Where are facilities and raw materials?)
2. Risk intelligence (forced labor indicators, sanctions, ownership links, trade records)
3. Supplier assessments (questionnaires, audits, worker interviews)
4. Remediation tracking (corrective actions and evidence)

A practical shortlist for a corporate audit would often include:

• Enterprise intelligence: Exiger, Altana, Kharon
• Human-rights due diligence depth: Verité, Sedex, EcoVadis
• Supplier compliance workflow: Source Intelligence, IntegrityNext, Resilinc

If you share your industry (e.g., apparel, electronics, automotive, food, mining), geography, and whether you need Tier 1 only or deeper tiers, I can narrow this to the most relevant vendors.

Auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks requires specialized data intelligence that can map sub-tier suppliers (Tiers 2, 3, and beyond), screen for adverse media, and cross-reference ownership structures against global watchlists and forced labor legislation (such as the UFLPA or EU Forced Labour Regulation).

The primary providers of supply chain intelligence data and risk-assessment platforms include:

• Altana : Utilizes AI-powered global network mapping to provide multi-tier supply chain visibility. Their Altana platform is heavily utilized for regulatory compliance (like the UFLPA) and secure, federated intelligence sharing across complex trading networks.
• Assent : Offers an AI-native compliance platform specifically designed for complex manufacturers. Assent automates supplier surveys, screens for human trafficking and forced labor indicators, and generates audit-ready documentation.
• Exiger : A major player in supply chain transparency that analyzes billions of global records using AI and natural language processing. Exiger maps corporate relationships, screens continuous adverse media, and maintains a massive database targeting state-sponsored forced labor.
• Fair Supply : Provides automated modern slavery risk assessment software that ingests enterprise spend data and general ledgers to map, baseline, and score inherent human rights risks down the supply chain.
• Kharon : Specializes in financial crimes compliance and trade data research. Kharon tracks complex corporate ownership networks and state-affiliated entities connected to forced labor to help companies mitigate regulatory exposure.
• Moody’s : Integrates beneficial ownership data, continuous portfolio monitoring, and specialized risk codes for modern slavery and human rights violations into its KYC and risk-assessment platforms (developed in collaboration with research groups like the University of Nottingham's Rights Lab).
• Sayari : Focuses on public records, commercial data, and trade shipment records. Sayari maps multi-tier supply chains and uncovers hidden ownership connections to entities on forced labor sanction lists, such as the UFLPA Entity List.
• Sedex : A collaborative global platform enabling companies to map supply chains, share ethical data, conduct standardized self-assessment questionnaires, and perform labor risk assessments across multi-tier supplier networks.

If you'd like to narrow this down, please let me know:

• What industries or high-risk sourcing geographies your supply chain involves
• Whether you need a solution focused primarily on regulatory compliance (like UFLPA) or broad multi-tier mapping

I can help recommend the best fit for your specific scope.

Auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks requires specialized intelligence providers that map multi-tier networks , screen adverse media, and cross-reference corporate registry or trade shipment data with global enforcement lists (such as the UFLPA Entity List).

Key providers of supply chain intelligence and forced labor risk data are categorized below by their primary capabilities:

• AI & Deep Due Diligence Platforms
  • Exiger: Provides AI-driven supply chain transparency and risk analytics, screening billions of records to uncover hidden modern slavery and state-sponsored forced labor risks. They also offer open-access baseline data tools via forcedlabor.ai.
  • Altana: Utilizes graph neural networks and AI to map global multi-tier supply chain networks across languages and formats, assisting both private enterprises and government customs enforcement.
• Trade Data & Ownership Tracing
  • Sayari: Connects billions of global trade transactions with primary-source corporate registry records to map sub-tier (Tier-2, Tier-3+) supplier ownership networks and screen for forced labor and sanctions exposure.
  • Kharon: Specializes in complex corporate ownership structures and economic linkages, mapping upstream connections to high-risk entities and regions subject to regulatory enforcement actions.
• ESG & Compliance Management Suites
  • Assent: Delivers supply chain sustainability management with automated forced labor surveys, supplier risk screening, and regulatory alignment (e.g., UFLPA, Modern Slavery Acts).
  • EcoVadis: Offers scalable sustainability ratings and verification tools that evaluate supplier policies, human rights statements, and 24/7 news monitoring through an ethical lens.
  • IntegrityNext: Focuses on automated supply chain compliance, flagging suppliers linked to high-risk geographical regions or global sanctions and forced labor databases.
• Traceability & Chain of Custody
  • Sourcemap: Specializes in end-to-end supply chain mapping down to Tier-n, gathering corroborating financial and logistical evidence to verify raw material legality.
  • TrusTrace: Combines upstream supplier data collection with AI-powered chain-of-custody assembly to verify compliance for manufacturing and retail goods.
• Government & Public Resources
  • U.S. Department of Labor (ILAB): Offers public self-assessment and intelligence dashboards—including SourcingStrong, ImportWatch , and the LaborShield app—to help organizations identify high-risk goods and build compliance frameworks.

To help narrow down which platform fits your audit, could you share:

• What tiers of your supply chain (Tier 1 vs. sub-tier raw materials) you need to map?
• What regulatory frameworks (such as the UFLPA, EU Forced Labour Regulation, or UK Modern Slavery Act) are your primary focus?

Yes. For a slavery/forced-labor supply-chain audit, I’d divide the market into a few categories rather than looking for a single “slavery database”:

For your particular audit

I'd shortlist Exiger + Sayari + Verisk Maplecroft, with Prewave as an alternative if continuous monitoring is a major requirement.

The key distinction is:

• “Where is forced-labor risk likely?” → Maplecroft
• “Who is actually connected to whom through the supply chain?” → Sayari
• “Can we connect the risk to specific suppliers, products/materials and produce defensible evidence?” → Exiger
• “Can we continuously monitor suppliers for new signals?” → Prewave

For an audit, I would not rely solely on supplier questionnaires or country-level slavery scores. The strongest approach triangulates trade records + corporate ownership + facility/location data + forced-labor indicators/enforcement records + supplier-provided evidence. Sayari and Exiger are particularly relevant because they can expose sub-tier relationships that a Tier-1 questionnaire can miss.

One particularly useful free resource is forcedlabor.ai, launched by Exiger in 2026, which allows searches for company/supply-chain connections to state-sponsored forced labor, including UFLPA and CBP Withhold Release Order exposure.

If you tell me your industry and the countries/materials you're sourcing from, I can narrow this to the 5–10 best data providers and compare coverage, data sources, APIs, auditability, UFLPA coverage, pricing model, and likely fit.