Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 277 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
To address high international chargeback rates, look for a Merchant of Record (MoR) to handle global fraud liability and tax compliance. Paddle is the leading recommendation for B2C SaaS, while
Lemon Squeezy is better for smaller creators. For enterprise-grade needs, choose Cleverbridge. Businesses flagged as high-risk may need specialized providers like PaymentCloud or Durango Merchant Services.
Named in 69% of answers
Ideal for software and B2C SaaS businesses needing to outsource global tax, subscription billing, and fraud/chargeback liability. Tradeoff: Best suited for software, may be less flexible for varied physical goods.
Named in 69% of answers
Named in 48% of answers
Named in 39% of answers
Best for indie creators and small digital product sellers wanting a simple, automated setup. It handles taxes and fraud risk effectively but is designed specifically for ease of use in the creator economy.
If your goal is to **move global fraud and chargeback liability away from your company**, you’re looking for a **Merchant of Record (MoR)** provider—not just a payment processor. An MoR becomes the legal seller in the transaction and typically takes responsibility for payment disputes, refunds, fraud controls, and…
If your goal is to move global fraud and chargeback liability away from your company, you’re looking for a Merchant of Record (MoR) provider—not just a payment processor. An MoR becomes the legal seller in the transaction and typically takes responsibility for payment disputes, refunds, fraud controls, and related compliance obligations.
Common MoR providers to evaluate:
| Provider | Best fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Paddle | SaaS, software, AI products, subscriptions | Positions itself as an MoR handling payments, fraud protection, disputes, and global tax/compliance responsibilities. Paddle |
| FastSpring | SaaS, software, games, digital goods | Full-stack MoR with global payments, fraud prevention, chargeback handling, tax management, and subscription support. FastSpring FastSpring |
| 2Checkout (Verifone) | Digital goods and international ecommerce | Long-standing global payments/MoR option with international payment support. Chartsy |
| PayPro Global | Software vendors and digital products | Focused on global software sales, localization, taxes, and payment risk management. awaited.dev |
| Lemon Squeezy | Developer-focused SaaS and digital products | Acts as MoR and handles payment compliance, refunds, chargebacks, and fraud-related processes. Lemon Squeezy Docs LemonSqueezy |
A few considerations before switching:
If you share:
I can narrow this to the best-fit MoR shortlist.
When you use a **Merchant of Record (MoR)** , they legally act as the reseller of your product, meaning they assume the responsibility for global tax collection (VAT, GST, sales tax), regulatory compliance, and—crucially for your situation—**fraud liability and chargeback…
When you use a Merchant of Record (MoR) , they legally act as the reseller of your product, meaning they assume the responsibility for global tax collection (VAT, GST, sales tax), regulatory compliance, and—crucially for your situation—fraud liability and chargeback management.
The best MoR provider for your business depends heavily on whether you sell SaaS/digital goods or physical products , as most MoRs specialize in one or the other.
For SaaS, Software, and Digital Products
If your business sells software, digital downloads, or online courses, dedicated MoRs handle global fraud screening and completely absorb chargeback losses:
- [Paddle](https://www.paddle.com/blog/what-is-merchant-of-record) *: Best overall for B2B/B2C SaaS and subscription billing. They handle global checkout, local payment methods, automated tax remittance, and take 100% of the liability for fraud and chargebacks.[[1]](https://www.ebrands.com/blog-posts/merchant-of-record-companies-compared)
- FastSpring *: A long-standing player tailored for software companies, digital publishers, and online course creators selling internationally. They manage localized pricing, taxes, and fraud monitoring.[](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aHffVBpGYQ&t=771) [[1]](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aHffVBpGYQ&t=771)[[2]](https://www.ebrands.com/blog-posts/merchant-of-record-companies-compared)
- Lemon Squeezy *: Acquired by Stripe, this is a streamlined, developer-friendly MoR geared toward micro-SaaS, indie hackers, and digital creators needing fast international setup with full fraud shielding.[[1]](https://www.ebrands.com/blog-posts/merchant-of-record-companies-compared)[[2]](https://www.workast.com/blog/5-best-merchant-of-record-services-in-2026/)
- PayPro Global *: Frequently utilized by mid-market software companies, security utilities, and cross-border tech vendors needing robust local compliance and fraud mitigation.[[1]](https://www.ebrands.com/blog-posts/merchant-of-record-companies-compared)
For Physical Goods and E-Commerce
Finding a true Merchant of Record for physical merchandise is trickier because physical inventory requires logistics, shipping compliance, and customs handling. However, specialized platforms and localized global checkout partners can assist:
To help narrow down the best path forward, could you share:
If your main pain point is **international chargebacks and fraud liability**, you are looking for a **merchant of record (MoR)** rather than a standard payment processor. An MoR becomes the legal seller for the transaction and typically takes on responsibilities such as fraud screening, dispute handling, chargebacks,…
If your main pain point is international chargebacks and fraud liability, you are looking for a merchant of record (MoR) rather than a standard payment processor. An MoR becomes the legal seller for the transaction and typically takes on responsibilities such as fraud screening, dispute handling, chargebacks, tax compliance, and local payment requirements.
Some providers to evaluate:
| Provider | Best fit | Fraud / chargeback handling |
|---|---|---|
| Paddle | SaaS, subscriptions, digital products | Acts as MoR for SaaS sales and handles payment, tax, and compliance complexity. Transact Bridge |
| FastSpring | Software and digital goods | Provides MoR services including global payments, compliance, and risk management. Transact Bridge |
| PayPro Global | Software, SaaS, games | Handles global sales infrastructure, taxes, compliance, and fraud prevention. PayPro Global |
| Reach | Companies wanting MoR infrastructure without a full checkout replacement | States that it assumes fraud liability and manages chargebacks/disputes as MoR. Reach Reach |
| MyAKA | Digital commerce businesses expanding internationally | Positions itself as taking over fraud, chargebacks, refunds, and compliance obligations. MyAKA |
| Nordgate | Software companies selling globally | States that it becomes seller of record and carries fraud liability and chargebacks. Nordgate |
A few selection criteria matter because “MoR” can mean different things operationally:
If you are seeing high chargebacks from international customers, the strongest candidates are usually:
The right choice depends heavily on what you sell (SaaS, physical goods, marketplace, digital downloads), your monthly volume, and which countries are driving the disputes.
When dealing with high international chargeback rates, transitioning from a standard Payment Service Provider (PSP) like Stripe or PayPal to a **Merchant of Record (MoR)** shifts the legal and financial burden. Because an MoR acts as the official reseller of your product to the end customer, they assume full liability…
When dealing with high international chargeback rates, transitioning from a standard Payment Service Provider (PSP) like Stripe or PayPal to a Merchant of Record (MoR) shifts the legal and financial burden. Because an MoR acts as the official reseller of your product to the end customer, they assume full liability for global tax compliance, local regulations, and—crucially—fraud and chargeback management.
The top Merchant of Record services specializing in digital products, software (SaaS), and global risk liability include:
Note: If you are selling physical goods rather than digital products or software, true Merchant of Record models are rarer, and you may instead need to rely on specialized fraud-prevention layer services (like Riskified or Signifyd) that offer 100% chargeback guarantee coverage while you remain the merchant of record.
If you let me know what type of product you sell (SaaS, digital downloads, or physical goods) and your approximate monthly volume , I can help you determine which MoR or fraud-guarantee partner fits your business model best.
Yes. If the goal is specifically to **transfer fraud/chargeback liability away from your company**, you want a true **Merchant of Record (MoR)** rather than a conventional payment processor. ### Strong options to evaluate | Provider | MoR / fraud liability | Best fit |
Yes. If the goal is specifically to transfer fraud/chargeback liability away from your company, you want a true Merchant of Record (MoR) rather than a conventional payment processor.
| Provider | MoR / fraud liability | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Stripe Managed Payments | Stripe says its MoR product handles fraud and dispute management, with MoR applied at the transaction level. stripe.com | Companies already on Stripe; flexible migration |
| Paddle | Established MoR for SaaS/digital products; handles global payments, tax and disputes | Established SaaS and larger international businesses |
| Lemon Squeezy | Explicitly says it takes responsibility for payments, refunds and chargebacks; its docs say it generally handles chargebacks on sellers' sales. stripe.comdocs.lemonsqueezy.comdocs.lemonsqueezy.com | SaaS, software and digital products |
| Reach | Explicitly offers complete fraud and chargeback liability transfer and says it owns fraudulent transactions, disputes and chargebacks when acting as MoR. www.withreach.com | Businesses where fraud exposure is the primary concern |
| PayPro Global | MoR focused on global software/SaaS sales, including payments and compliance | Software/SaaS with substantial international sales |
| FastSpring | MoR model for digital products, handling international commerce and associated payment operations | Digital products and SaaS |
Don't assume "we use Stripe/Adyen/etc." = "they absorb our chargebacks." With ordinary payment processing, you remain the merchant of record and generally retain the economic liability for disputes. Stripe itself distinguishes ordinary Stripe processing from Managed Payments: with ordinary Stripe transactions, your business remains responsible for refunds and chargebacks.
Also, MoR doesn't necessarily mean you pay zero for every chargeback. For example, Lemon Squeezy says it generally handles chargebacks, but a chargeback can result in the refunded amount plus a dispute fee being deducted from the seller's payout.
For your situation, I'd shortlist Reach, Stripe Managed Payments, Paddle, and Lemon Squeezy first. The key diligence question isn't simply "Are you an MoR?" but:
"If an international customer uses a stolen card and the transaction is charged back, exactly who bears the principal, network fees, dispute fees, and any fraud-program penalties?"
I'd also ask each provider about reserve requirements, prohibited/high-risk countries, acceptable chargeback ratios, account termination/holds, 3DS/SCA coverage, and whether liability transfer applies to friendly fraud as well as stolen-card fraud.
If you tell me what you're selling (SaaS, physical goods, marketplace, etc.), monthly volume, average order value, and your top international markets, I can narrow this to the 2–3 providers most likely to work and compare their pricing/liability terms.
When dealing with high international chargeback rates, offloading the legal, tax, and financial risk to a **Merchant of Record (MoR)** is a proven strategy. Unlike a standard Payment Service Provider (PSP) like Stripe or Adyen—where you remain the legal seller on record and absorb fraud/dispute liabilities—an MoR…
When dealing with high international chargeback rates, offloading the legal, tax, and financial risk to a Merchant of Record (MoR) is a proven strategy. Unlike a standard Payment Service Provider (PSP) like Stripe or Adyen—where you remain the legal seller on record and absorb fraud/dispute liabilities—an MoR legally resells your product or service, taking 100% of the liability for chargebacks, global sales tax/VAT compliance, and local regulatory requirements.
The top global Merchant of Record providers tailored for international digital goods, SaaS, and e-commerce include:
To help narrow down the right MoR partner, could you share:
When you use a true **Merchant of Record (MoR)** , they legally become the entity selling your product or service to the end consumer. Because they stand in as the seller of record, they take absolute financial and legal responsibility for global tax collection, regulatory compliance, and—crucially—**fraud liability…
When you use a true Merchant of Record (MoR) , they legally become the entity selling your product or service to the end consumer. Because they stand in as the seller of record, they take absolute financial and legal responsibility for global tax collection, regulatory compliance, and—crucially—fraud liability and chargeback management.
Keep in mind that standard Payment Service Providers (PSPs) like Stripe or Adyen only process payments; you are still the merchant of record and bear the ultimate chargeback risk.
Depending on what kind of product you sell (SaaS, digital downloads, video games, or physical goods), different MoR platforms specialize in offloading international risk:
If you share what type of product or business model you have (e.g., SaaS, physical goods, digital downloads) and your approximate monthly volume , I can help you evaluate whether an MoR makes more financial sense than adding a dedicated fraud mitigation layer like Chargeflow or Sift.
Yes. If the goal is specifically to **shift transaction-level fraud/chargeback liability to a Merchant of Record (MoR)** rather than merely add a fraud tool to your existing PSP, the strongest options to evaluate are: | Provider | MoR / chargeback handling | Best fit | |---|---|---|
Yes. If the goal is specifically to shift transaction-level fraud/chargeback liability to a Merchant of Record (MoR) rather than merely add a fraud tool to your existing PSP, the strongest options to evaluate are:
| Provider | MoR / chargeback handling | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Paddle | Paddle is the seller/MoR; disputes are raised against Paddle, and it handles fraud protection and chargebacks. mor.paddle.comdeveloper.paddle.com | SaaS, apps, AI, digital products |
| FastSpring | Acts as MoR, manages fraud and chargebacks, and says it assumes transaction-related liability. fastspring.comfastspring.com | SaaS, software, games, apps, e-learning, digital goods |
| 2Checkout / Verifone | Offers an MoR model covering global tax, invoicing and fraud monitoring across 190+ markets. However, its seller agreement can pass certain chargeback/dispute costs back to the seller, so contract terms need careful review. www.2checkout.comwww.2checkout.com | Businesses wanting broad international coverage / flexible PSP + MoR models |
1. Paddle — probably the first one I'd investigate if you're selling SaaS or other digital products. Its documentation explicitly says you don't carry the chargeback liability/scope that you would under a conventional PSP model, and its MoR structure puts the dispute against Paddle.
2. FastSpring — particularly compelling if reducing operational burden is the priority. It explicitly offers chargeback management and fraud protection as part of its MoR service.
3. 2Checkout/Verifone — worth including if you need its geographic/payment-method reach, but don't assume “MoR” means all economic fraud risk disappears. Its published seller agreement contains provisions charging sellers for certain disputes and chargeback fees.
One important distinction: MoR doesn't necessarily mean you pay zero dollars for every fraudulent transaction. The commercial agreement may still contain reserves, fees, deductibles, fraud thresholds, or situations where the seller bears losses—especially where the dispute is attributed to the seller's product/service or conduct.
If your primary objective is “international card fraud happens → the MoR absorbs the financial chargeback and handles the dispute, rather than our merchant account,” I'd put Paddle and FastSpring at the top of the RFP and make “who bears the loss by chargeback reason code?” a mandatory contract question.
Yes. If the goal is specifically to **transfer global fraud/chargeback liability away from your company**, you want a true **Merchant of Record (MoR)** rather than a conventional payment processor. Good options include: | Provider | Best fit | Fraud/chargeback liability |
Yes. If the goal is specifically to transfer global fraud/chargeback liability away from your company, you want a true Merchant of Record (MoR) rather than a conventional payment processor.
Good options include:
| Provider | Best fit | Fraud/chargeback liability |
|---|---|---|
| Paddle | SaaS, software, digital products | Paddle is the MoR; disputes are raised against Paddle, and it handles the chargeback process. www.paddle.com |
| FastSpring | SaaS, software, games, apps, digital goods | Handles fraud monitoring and chargebacks as MoR, including the transaction-level responsibility. developer.fastspring.com |
| Global-e | Physical/e-commerce brands selling cross-border | Particularly strong for international retail; Global-e explicitly says it assumes fraud liability for qualifying cross-border fraud chargebacks. docs.global-e.com |
| Reach | Global commerce / payments infrastructure | Explicitly offers transfer of fraud, chargeback and dispute liability to Reach when it is the MoR. www.withreach.com |
| Stripe Managed Payments | Businesses already using Stripe | Stripe now offers an MoR product, Managed Payments, that handles fraud and dispute management; ordinary Stripe processing does not transfer this liability. stripe.com |
| Neon | Digital products/publishing | Neon says it absorbs dispute liability and handles chargebacks and fraud for transactions it processes as MoR. docs.neonpay.com |
If you're SaaS/digital: start with Paddle, FastSpring, and Stripe Managed Payments.
If you're physical international e-commerce: look closely at Global-e and Reach.
One important nuance: “MoR” doesn't necessarily mean every type of chargeback is covered. For example, Global-e explicitly covers fraudulent chargeback codes but excludes product/service disputes such as “item not as described,” delivery disputes, and subscription disputes. docs.global-e.com Paddle likewise still has chargeback-rate thresholds and processes disputes through the payment ecosystem.
So when comparing vendors, I'd ask each one for the contractual answer to these five questions:
If you tell me what you sell (SaaS, physical goods, subscriptions, marketplace, etc.), approximate annual international volume, and your biggest customer regions, I can narrow this to the 2–3 MoRs most appropriate for your situation and compare their liability models and pricing.
When you use a standard Payment Service Provider (PSP) like Stripe or PayPal, you are the Merchant of Record (MoR)—meaning you retain full legal and financial liability for fraud, global sales taxes, and international chargebacks.[](https://blog.cleeng.com/what-is-a-merchant-of-record)…
When you use a standard Payment Service Provider (PSP) like Stripe or PayPal, you are the Merchant of Record (MoR)—meaning you retain full legal and financial liability for fraud, global sales taxes, and international chargebacks.
Switching to a true Merchant of Record shifts that burden: the MoR legally resells your product, appears on the customer's bank statement, and assumes 100% of the liability for cross-border fraud and chargeback management.
Top MoR providers categorized by what they specialize in selling include:
Note: Most MoR platforms focus primarily on digital products, SaaS, and downloadable goods rather than physical e-commerce inventory, due to the complexities of global shipping and customs.
If you share whether you are selling SaaS/digital products or physical goods , along with your estimated monthly international volume , I can help you narrow down which MoR is the best technical and financial fit.