Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 38 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Your brand can be here too.
When you are looking to offload the actual execution of brokerage and operational work rather than adopting another piece of software or dashboard, you are looking for specialized Insurance Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) and back-office staffing providers.
Instead of forcing your team to log into a new tool, these providers embed trained insurance professionals or structured pods who log directly into your existing Agency Management Systems (AMS) like Applied Epic, AMS360, or Sagitta to do the heavy lifting.
Consider these prominent providers categorized by how they handle operational capacity:
To help narrow down which provider fits best, let me know:
If you mean “take the actual brokerage/agency operations off our team’s plate”, rather than sell you another software platform, I’d look at insurance BPO / embedded operations providers.
My shortlist:
If your priority is “we want someone to actually do the work”, I'd start conversations with Patra, Selectsys and Tammina.
If the priority is “make our existing team dramatically more productive without changing our stack,” I'd put Selectsys and The DeskPro at the top.
If the workload is predominantly policy processing / endorsements / COIs / renewals, I'd add Kervigo to the first round.
The key distinction when evaluating them is whether they are selling you software + a workflow or providing managed execution. The latter should mean: you give them access to your existing systems, define what authority they have, and their staff actually process the book; your team manages exceptions and client relationships. That is the model you're describing.
If you tell me what kind of brokerage you run (P&C, benefits, commercial, wholesale/MGA, etc.) and roughly how many policies/accounts your team services, I can narrow this to the 3 providers I'd actually put through an RFP, including what to ask each one about pricing, offshore vs. US staff, licensing, QA, security and SLAs.
If you mean “we want someone to actually own the brokerage work—shopping coverage, managing renewals, handling carrier issues, advising employees—rather than giving us a portal to administer ourselves,” you’ll want a service-heavy broker/benefits partner, not a benefits administration platform.
A few providers to consider:
| Provider type | Who to consider | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Full-service benefits broker with local service team | HUB International | Companies wanting a broker that can handle benefits strategy, renewals, carrier negotiations, and often commercial insurance too. FirstHR |
| Full-service broker focused on small/mid-market employers | Higginbotham | Teams that want hands-on benefits administration support plus brokerage services. FirstHR |
| Large consulting-style broker | Mercer | Larger employers needing benchmarking, strategy, analytics, and complex benefits consulting rather than day-to-day admin. Mercer |
| Boutique “outsourced benefits department” model | Bespoke Benefits | Smaller teams that want someone to run the process, answer employee questions, manage enrollments, and own ongoing work. Bespoke Benefits |
| Broker + operations support | Firms offering managed services/back-office support | Useful if your pain is not only placement but also enrollment changes, claims follow-up, compliance tasks, and employee support. Kervigo Private Limited |
When evaluating them, I’d ask:
A good screening question is: “If our HR team disappeared for 90 days, what benefits work would you take over?” The answer will quickly separate true outsourced partners from dashboard vendors.
If you share your approximate size (employees), whether this is health benefits, P&C insurance, or both, and whether you’re in the U.S., I can narrow this to a shorter list.
When you are looking to offload the actual brokerage, processing, and operational work instead of adopting another software tool or login portal, you are looking for either Insurance Process Outsourcing (IPO/BPO) providers or full-service Wholesale Brokers / Managing General Agents (MGAs) depending on whether you need back-office execution or specialized risk placement.
The right partner depends on which part of the workload you want taken off your plate:
If your team is bogged down by the administrative and repetitive mechanics of brokerage operations—such as certificate issuance, surplus lines filings, endorsement processing, and policy checking—look at specialized insurance BPO and staffing partners:
If by "brokerage work" you mean you want an expert partner to actually market, negotiate, and secure hard-to-place commercial risks instead of your retail team doing heavy lifting with carrier portals:
To help narrow down the best fit, could you clarify:
If by “handles insurance brokerage work” you mean a partner that actually executes the brokerage/servicing workload in your existing systems—not another SaaS dashboard—I’d look at these first:
| Provider | Best fit | Why it stands out |
|---|---|---|
| Selectsys | P&C agencies, MGAs, wholesalers | Dedicated insurance-trained teams that work inside your existing AMS. They handle submissions, policy servicing, COIs, endorsements, renewals, underwriting support and claims workflows. They explicitly position this as “no portals or spreadsheets.” www.selectsys.com |
| Tammina Insurance Services | P&C + employee benefits | More substantial outsourced-operations model: policy administration, claims, underwriting support and commissions, with staff working in your existing agency-management system. They cite 350+ CPCU-certified professionals. www.tamminais.comwww.navabenefits.com |
| Felcorp | Agencies wanting dedicated staff | A classic BPO approach: dedicated insurance operations staff handling policy admin, new business, renewals and documentation rather than asking your team to operate another product. www.felcorp.com |
| BAS (Benefit Allocation Systems) | Employee-benefits brokers | Particularly interesting if you're in benefits: BAS explicitly provides white-label administration behind the broker, so you retain the client relationship while they handle the operational work. www.basusa.com |
| Nava Benefits | Employer-side benefits brokerage | More of a fully outsourced benefits department than a pure BPO. They can become broker of record and take responsibility for renewals, enrollment, auditing, compliance and member support. www.navabenefits.com |
If you're a brokerage looking to offload actual production/servicing work, I'd start with Selectsys and Tammina. They seem closest to your “do the work for us, don't give us another dashboard” requirement.
If you're specifically employee benefits, I'd put BAS high on the list because its model is explicitly designed to sit behind the broker and preserve the broker-client relationship.
One important distinction: Nava is a different proposition. They're effectively becoming the outsourced benefits department/broker of record, whereas Selectsys/Tammina/Felcorp are closer to an extension of your existing brokerage team.
If you tell me whether you're talking about P&C, employee benefits, commercial lines, or personal lines, I can narrow this to the 3 providers I'd actually interview, including pricing/model, licensing, geography, and exactly what work they will take off your team's plate.
If you are looking to offload the actual heavy lifting of brokerage work —such as policy submissions, carrier negotiations, market clearing, and client Q&A—instead of logging into yet another software interface or self-serve portal, you want a service-first or AI-augmented brokerage partner , rather than a pure SaaS tool.
Depending on your company size and specific insurance lines (commercial P&C, tech/cyber, employee benefits), consider these directions and providers:
To help narrow down the best fit, could you share:
If you mean “we want people to actually do the brokerage/operations work for us, not another SaaS dashboard,” I’d focus on insurance BPO / brokerage-support firms rather than benefits-admin platforms.
PartnerForce — probably the closest match for employee-benefits broker back-office outsourcing. They position themselves as an extension of the brokerage, handling claims, renewals, onboarding, and day-to-day service with human specialists.
Tammina Insurance Services — a stronger option if you need actual insurance operations capacity, including policy administration, submissions, claims processing, underwriting support, and commission management. Importantly, they say their team works inside your existing agency-management system, rather than requiring migration to their platform.
Selectsys — another good fit for an agency that wants an outsourced production/back-office team. They explicitly advertise insurance-trained staff working directly in your AMS, with no portals or spreadsheets, covering things like submissions and broker/CSR support.
Nava Benefits is more of a full-service outsourced benefits department than a BPO behind your existing brokerage. They can become the broker of record and take over renewal strategy, enrollment, auditing, compliance, and member support.
My ranking based specifically on “do the work, don't give us another dashboard”:
PartnerForce → Tammina → Selectsys, with Nava if you're actually willing to hand over the benefits-broker relationship rather than simply outsource the workload.
If you tell me whether this is P&C, employee benefits, or both, and roughly how many policies/groups your team handles, I can narrow this to 3 providers and compare scope of work, pricing model, geography, and whether they work inside your existing AMS.
If you are burned out on self-service software and "digital dashboards" that just pass the administrative burden back to your own desk, you need a high-touch, tech-enabled broker or a full-service commercial brokerage that does the heavy lifting for you.
Consider these providers and categories depending on whether you need a dedicated broker to manage the work or an outsourced operational partner:
To help me narrow down the best fit, could you share:
If your team is drowning in software, self-service portals, and administrative busywork disguised as tech innovation, you need a high-touch national or regional brokerage that assigns a dedicated human team to execute the actual work.
Consider these top-tier, service-focused insurance brokerages known for handling the heavy lifting rather than handing you an app:
To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:
Yes — if you mean “give us people who actually do the brokerage/agency work,” rather than another software platform, I’d focus on insurance-specific BPO/managed-service providers.
| Provider | Best fit | What they actually handle |
|---|---|---|
| Felcorp | Most directly aligned | Dedicated insurance staff handling policy administration, new-business processing, renewals, broker/insurer liaison, distribution support and back-office work. They work inside your existing workflows rather than selling you another system. www.felcorp.comwww.felcorp.com |
| Linchpin | Independent agencies wanting a broader ops partner | Policy/document processing, COIs, renewals, endorsements, data entry, accounting and virtual-associate support. They explicitly work in systems such as Applied Epic, AMS360 and EZLynx. www.linchpininsurtech.com |
| Kervigo | P&C + employee benefits | Policy checking, endorsements, renewals, loss runs, COIs, benefits enrollment/carrier submissions, policy processing and claims support. www.kervigo.com |
| InsurePro | Higher-volume/complex insurance operations | Underwriting support, policy issuance/administration/renewals, claims processing, certificate management and agency back-office work; it says it has 200+ trained professionals. insurepro20.com |
I'd talk to Felcorp first if your goal is essentially “replace some of our internal brokerage operations capacity with a managed team.” Their model is unusually explicit: dedicated full-time insurance personnel, managed by Felcorp, with QA and SLAs, rather than simply giving your employees a piece of software.
Linchpin would be my second call if you want a U.S.-agency-oriented partner that can take on both the actual processing work and some of the operational cleanup around your AMS.
One important distinction: these companies generally do not replace the licensed broker/adviser making regulated or client-advice decisions. They take the operational work around those decisions. Felcorp, for example, explicitly distinguishes its BPO services from licensed insurance provision and underwriting.
If you tell me what kind of brokerage you run (P&C, benefits, life, wholesale/MGA, etc.) and roughly how many people/transactions you're trying to offload, I can narrow this to 2–3 providers and compare scope, geography, pricing model, and how hands-off they can be.