Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 42 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Your brand can be here too.
Companies in this space generally fall into a few categories: physical security risk platforms, location intelligence providers, protective intelligence platforms, and risk-data/API providers. For a facility risk score combining location + weather/environmental hazards + crime + operational data, these are some of the better-known options:
| Company | Best fit | What they typically score/analyze |
|---|---|---|
| CAP Index | Retail, banking, logistics, multi-site enterprises | Crime risk scores, location analytics, and customized models that combine CAP crime metrics with company-specific incidents, loss data, and operational indicators. CAP Index |
| RiskWatch | Corporate security teams managing many facilities | Facility threat/vulnerability assessments, physical security scoring, crime-data overlays, compliance frameworks, and portfolio dashboards. RiskWatch |
| Base Operations | Security teams needing site-level threat intelligence | Location threat assessments using crime trends, threat profiles, and security recommendations for facilities and travel. Base Operations |
| Ontic | Enterprise security operations centers (GSOCs) | Threat intelligence, incident monitoring, and risk context around people, places, and events. RiskWatch |
| Torchlight AI | Real-time operational monitoring | Location-based behavioral intelligence and dynamic risk scoring using operational signals. Torchlight AI |
| S&P Global Foresight Location Analytics | Global portfolios, insurers, multinational companies | Location-specific risk analytics for assets, including violent crime, terrorism, civil unrest, and political risk. S&P Global |
| Cotality | Insurance, property portfolios, real estate risk | Address-level property risk including crime and non-weather hazards; often used in underwriting contexts. Cotality |
A typical enterprise model looks something like:
Facility Risk Score =
For a company building an internal risk engine, vendors often provide the external risk layers (crime, weather, hazards, geospatial intelligence) while the enterprise adds proprietary operational data. CAP Index explicitly supports this hybrid approach by combining external crime metrics with client-specific data inputs and risk indicators.
If you are designing this for corporate security, insurance underwriting, real estate, logistics, or critical infrastructure, the vendor shortlist changes quite a bit.
Evaluating multi-variable risk for a portfolio of facilities requires combining geospatial intelligence (location, crime, and natural hazards/weather) with operational or asset-level data. Depending on whether your footprint is domestic (US-centric) or global, different software and data platforms specialize in these scoring capabilities:
BaseScore™ ). They offer APIs to ingest local security baselines and trend analyses directly into internal corporate risk models for facility portfolios.If your facilities are international, macroeconomic, geopolitical, and localized crime/infrastructure risks require specialized advisory platforms:
If you also need to tie location intelligence to on-site operational metrics, safety observations, and internal facility audits:
To help narrow down the ideal platform, could you share:
Yes. There’s a fairly mature vendor landscape, but the best fit depends on whether you want facility/site risk scoring, physical security/crime, or supply-chain/operational disruption.
| Vendor | Location | Weather | Crime/security | Operational data | Custom scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everstream | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| S&P Global Foresight | ★★★★★ | ★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★★ |
| Everbridge | ★★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ |
| Base Operations | ★★★★★ | ★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| MSCI | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★ | ★★★★ | ★★★★ |
| Securitas | ★★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★★★ |
If you're envisioning a score like:
Facility Risk Score = 35% location/geography + 25% weather/climate + 20% crime/security + 20% facility-specific operational factors then Everstream is probably the first vendor I'd investigate, especially if operational/supply-chain data is important. Its platform explicitly combines external risk signals with operational/supply-chain information and produces location-level scores.
If, instead, this is primarily a corporate security / physical security program, I'd put S&P Global Foresight + Base Operations near the top.
If you tell me whether this is for manufacturing plants, warehouses/DCs, retail branches, offices, data centers, or a mixed portfolio, I can narrow this to the 5 most relevant vendors and compare their APIs, data inputs, scoring methodology, and likely enterprise pricing model.
Evaluating risk scoring for facilities across location, crime, weather, and operational data usually requires combining geospatial intelligence/crime vendors, climate/weather risk analytics , and physical security assessment software . Very few single out-of-the-box platforms ingest everything natively without some integration, but several enterprise platforms specialize in these exact data intersections.
Top companies offering these capabilities are categorized below by their primary strengths:
BaseScore ) mapping external crime and safety threats. Their BaseFusion product also maps internal operational incident data against external neighborhood trends to give a unified facility score.To help narrow down which platform fits your stack, could you share:
Evaluating facility risk across location, weather, crime, and operational data usually requires combining geospatial hazard data providers (for weather, climate, and crime scores) with operational risk/physical security platforms (which ingest that data to score actual facility vulnerabilities).
Top companies and platforms offering these capabilities include:
To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:
Companies that provide facility/location risk scoring typically combine some mix of:
Here are notable vendors by use case:
| Company | Best fit | Data/risk factors covered |
|---|---|---|
| Verisk | Property, insurance, enterprise location risk | Weather perils, catastrophe exposure, crime risk, property characteristics, hazard scoring. Its LOCATION suite combines multiple property-risk datasets and includes crime and hazard reports. www.verisk.com |
| LexisNexis Risk Solutions | Commercial property and underwriting risk | Weather, aerial imagery, claims data, proprietary datasets, predictive property risk scores. risk.lexisnexis.comcapindex.com |
| CAP Index | Retail, banking, multi-site security programs | Crime risk scores combined with company-specific incident, loss, operational, and location data to create customized scores. capindex.com |
| RiskWatch | Corporate physical security and facility assessments | Facility vulnerability assessments, crime overlays, multi-site scoring, security standards alignment. www.riskwatch.comcapindex.com |
| Base Operations | Security teams needing street-level threat intelligence | Crime trends, threat assessments, location risk scoring, incident intelligence. basereport.baseoperations.comcapindex.com |
| S&P Global | Global enterprise risk exposure | Location-specific risk analytics for assets, including security threats, violent crime, terrorism, civil unrest, and geopolitical risks. www.spglobal.com |
| AdvanceWork | Real-time protective intelligence | Combines crime, incidents, weather, civil unrest, and operational disruptions into location risk scores. www.advancework.app |
| Secuiera | Facility security programs | Site risk scores combining audit history with surrounding-area crime context. www.verisk.comwww.secuiera.com |
1. Enterprise facility portfolio risk (hundreds/thousands of sites)
2. Security operations center (GSOC) / real-time monitoring
3. Insurance, underwriting, and asset exposure
4. Build-your-own risk model via APIs/data feeds Look for providers offering:
A typical enterprise scoring model might look like:
Facility Risk Score (0–100)
= 30% physical/security threats
For a corporate facilities program, I would shortlist CAP Index + Verisk/LexisNexis + RiskWatch for portfolio scoring, and Base Operations/AdvanceWork if the goal is a live security operations dashboard.
If you are evaluating this for corporate security, insurance, real estate, logistics, or manufacturing facilities, the best vendor set changes significantly.
Evaluating facility risk across multiple variables like location, weather, crime, and operational data typically requires a mix of geospatial risk data providers and enterprise risk/EHS (Environment, Health, and Safety) platforms.
No single tool out-of-the-box always owns every niche natively, but several major platforms and data APIs specialize in fusing these exact data pillars.
Specialized Location, Weather, and Crime Data Providers (The Risk Engines)
These companies supply the underlying parcel- or address-specific data feeds (often via API) to score physical, environmental, and neighborhood threats:
Operational & Enterprise Facility Risk Platforms
If you need to ingest the external data above and combine it with internal operational metrics (maintenance logs, safety incidents, audit findings), use these operational GRC/EHS platforms:
To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:
Verisk
verisk.com
Augurisk
augurisk.com
Yes. There are several vendors in this space, but they approach facility risk scoring from different angles. For your combination of location + weather + crime + operational data, I’d shortlist these:
| Company | Best fit | Location | Weather | Crime/security | Operational/internal data | Overall fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everstream Analytics | Supply-chain/facility resilience | ✅ | ✅ | Partial | ✅ | Excellent |
| RiskWatch | Physical-security facility scoring | ✅ | Partial | ✅ | ✅ | Excellent for security |
| Ontic | Corporate security/threat intelligence | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Excellent for security ops |
| S&P Global Foresight | Geopolitical/crime/location risk | ✅ | Partial | ✅ | Partial | Strong |
| Everbridge | Operational disruption & incident response | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Strong |
| Factal | Real-time incident intelligence around facilities | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Via integrations | Strong data layer |
| Spatial Risk Systems (SRS) | Facility-level geospatial/supply-chain intelligence | ✅ | ✅ | Partial | ✅ | Interesting emerging option |
| AdvanceWork | Real-time operational/executive risk score | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Very close conceptually |
1. Everstream Analytics — probably the strongest fit if these facilities are part of a manufacturing or supply-chain network. It maps facilities and suppliers, applies 30+ automated risk scores, monitors weather and operational disruptions, and can incorporate customers' internal performance data.
2. RiskWatch — particularly compelling if the score is primarily a physical-security risk score. Its platform performs multi-site threat/vulnerability assessments and now includes crime-data overlays and portfolio-level scoring.
3. Ontic — strong if you want a security intelligence platform that combines facility context with crime, severe weather, threats and analyst-verified intelligence.
4. S&P Global — its Foresight Location Analytics provides location-specific scores for violent crime, terrorism, civil unrest and war, down to 500×500-meter grids, making it useful as the security/geopolitical component of a broader facility score.
5. Everbridge — more focused on real-time operational risk and response. It monitors facilities and supply chains for weather, incidents, traffic and other disruptions and provides impact analysis.
6. Factal — excellent as an underlying event-data source. It geolocates incidents around facilities and covers severe weather, wildfires, crime/conflict, transportation disruptions and other events.
7. Spatial Risk Systems — worth looking at if you're building a facility-level risk intelligence/data layer. It advertises 1.5M monitored locations and 300+ risk factors spanning physical/climate risk, environmental factors, water, socioeconomic conditions and real-time facility/supply-chain activity.
8. AdvanceWork — unusually close to the exact concept you described: its AW Risk Score combines crime, incidents, civil unrest, protective intelligence, weather and operational disruptions into a 0–100 score, weighted by mission, location and proximity.
If you're evaluating this for a large portfolio of physical facilities, there are really three categories:
The interesting opportunity is that few vendors appear to own all four dimensions equally well:
static location risk + dynamic weather + crime/security + proprietary operational performance.
Everstream comes closest on the supply-chain side, while AdvanceWork is especially close to the "one dynamically weighted 0–100 facility risk score" concept.
If you're evaluating vendors for a build/buy decision, I can also map ~15–20 companies against the exact data inputs, scoring methodology, API availability, facility granularity, pricing model, and whether they let you bring your own operational data.
Evaluating facility risk across location, weather, crime, and operational data usually requires combining location/hazard intelligence data providers with enterprise risk management (ERM) or EHS platforms . Very few single out-of-the-box software packages natively ingest high-resolution crime data, climate modeling, and internal plant metrics without some configuration or API data blending.
The top companies operating in these distinct and overlapping spaces include:
LOCATION ) that bundle crime risk scores, fire protection classifications, flood, wind, hail, and wildfire risks down to specific addresses.SecurityGauge platform, which specializes specifically in micro-local, address-level predictive crime risk analytics (violent and property crime) sourced from thousands of law enforcement agencies across the U.S.Location Risk Intelligence Platform evaluates natural hazards and physical climate change risks globally, outputting actionable asset and portfolio-level risk scores.To help narrow down which approach fits best, could you tell me:
Yes. There are several vendors in this space, but they fall into somewhat different buckets depending on whether you want facility-level risk scoring, security/crime intelligence, or supply-chain/operational resilience.
| Company | Location | Weather / natural hazard | Crime / security | Operational data | Custom facility score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everstream Analytics | ✓ | ✓ | Partial | ✓✓ | ✓✓ |
| Spatial Risk Systems | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | Some | ✓✓ | ✓✓ |
| Ontic | ✓ | ✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| S&P Global Foresight | ✓✓ | Limited | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Everbridge | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| LexisNexis Risk Solutions | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | Some | Property/claims | ✓✓ |
Everstream Analytics is probably the closest established vendor if your use case is enterprise facilities + supply chain + operational disruption. It maps risk down to individual facilities, provides customizable risk scorecards, incorporates 50+ external risk topics, and can combine external risk indices with internal performance data. Its climate scoring covers hazards including flooding, wildfire, heat, drought, tropical cyclones and precipitation.
Spatial Risk Systems (SRS) is especially interesting if you want a geospatial/facility intelligence layer. It says it monitors 1.5M locations across 190 countries and 300+ risk factors, combining physical/climate risk, environmental factors, water risk, socioeconomic factors and real-time facility/supply-chain activity.
Ontic is a stronger fit if the emphasis is corporate security rather than supply-chain resilience. It supports facility-level filtering and combines crime patterns, severe weather, incidents and analyst-verified intelligence.
S&P Global Foresight Location Analytics is particularly good for granular security/location scoring. It scores political violence, civil unrest, terrorism, war and violent crime at 500m × 500m resolution and lets customers monitor specific asset locations.
Everbridge is more oriented toward real-time operational resilience and critical-event management. It monitors risks across suppliers, facilities and logistics networks and incorporates weather, traffic and incident intelligence.
AdvanceWork appears unusually close to the exact scoring concept you described. Its AW Risk Score produces a real-time 0–100 score combining crime, incidents, civil unrest, protective intelligence, weather and operational disruptions, weighted according to mission, location and proximity. It also exposes the individual factors driving the score rather than treating it as a black box.
I'd divide the market like this:
The key question is whether you want to buy an existing risk score or assemble your own scoring model from data feeds. If you're trying to create a proprietary facility score—e.g. 35% location + 25% weather + 20% crime + 20% operational performance—there's also a substantial market of data/API providers that can supply the underlying signals rather than competing as the scoring layer.
If that's your goal, I can map out 10–15 vendors/APIs by data category (crime, weather, flood/fire, geopolitical, traffic, utility reliability, labor, facility operations, etc.) and show which ones can actually be combined into your own scoring engine.