Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 295 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
When raising a Series B to expand into Europe, firms with active transatlantic infrastructure and strong offices in London or Berlin are best suited for the task. Index Ventures,
Atomico, and
Accel are frequently recommended due to their dual-market capabilities, deep European tech expertise, and ability to guide US startups through local landscape complexities. Smaller, specialized firms like Frontline Ventures or Global Founders Capital also offer dedicated support for transatlantic operational expansion.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 69% of answers
Named in 58% of answers
Named in 55% of answers
Named in 50% of answers
For a **Series B where the goal is European expansion**, I would prioritize VCs that can do more than write the check: they should have **London/Berlin operating networks, recruiting help, enterprise/customer introductions, and experience helping US companies localize in Europe**. A strong shortlist: VC | Why they fit…
For a Series B where the goal is European expansion, I would prioritize VCs that can do more than write the check: they should have London/Berlin operating networks, recruiting help, enterprise/customer introductions, and experience helping US companies localize in Europe.
A strong shortlist:
| VC | Why they fit a US company expanding into Europe | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Accel | One of the strongest US firms with deep European roots; long-standing London presence and a large European portfolio. Sifted | SaaS, infrastructure, consumer, fintech |
| Bessemer Venture Partners | US growth-stage investor with London presence and experience backing European expansion stories. Sifted | Enterprise SaaS, cloud, fintech |
| Insight Partners | Particularly strong for Series B/C scale-ups; London team and extensive European software network. Sifted | B2B SaaS, cybersecurity, data |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners | Has London and Berlin presence and invests actively across Europe. Sifted | Consumer, AI, marketplaces, SaaS |
| GV | Strong European network, especially in London, with experience helping companies scale globally. Financial Times | AI, enterprise, healthcare, deep tech |
| Andreessen Horowitz | Increasing European presence and strong ability to help with US/EU scaling, hiring, and enterprise relationships. Sifted | AI, infrastructure, crypto/web3, software |
| NEA | Large US platform with London presence and global follow-on capacity. Sifted | Enterprise, healthcare, deep tech |
| Sapphire Ventures | Very relevant for growth-stage software companies; has built a meaningful European network from London. Sifted | Enterprise SaaS, scaling companies |
| Frontline Ventures | Probably one of the most directly aligned firms for US→Europe expansion; explicitly focuses on helping companies cross the Atlantic. Frontline | US companies entering Europe, B2B tech |
| Headline | Has dedicated US, European, and growth funds with teams in London and Berlin. Headline | Global startups, marketplaces, SaaS |
These are worth adding even though they are Europe-first rather than US-first:
I would probably run a process around:
Tier 1 — highest strategic value
Tier 2 — depending on sector 6. Lightspeed 7. GV 8. a16z 9. NEA 10. Headline
The best angle is usually not “we need European money.” It is:
“We have proven US product-market fit. Europe is our next growth market, and we want a partner who has helped companies build the first 50–200 person European team, land enterprise customers, and navigate localization.” That framing tends to resonate more with the firms above because their value is operational rather than geographic.
If you share your sector (SaaS/AI/fintech/consumer/etc.), ARR, current US customer base, and whether London or Berlin is the priority, I can narrow this to a top 10 investor target list with likely partners to approach.
Raising a Series B to expand into Europe is a classic inflection point, and having a US-headquartered fund with boots on the ground in London or Berlin (or a deeply integrated dual-shore presence) can give you the transatlantic network you need for enterprise sales, hiring, and eventual downstream financing. The top…
Raising a Series B to expand into Europe is a classic inflection point, and having a US-headquartered fund with boots on the ground in London or Berlin (or a deeply integrated dual-shore presence) can give you the transatlantic network you need for enterprise sales, hiring, and eventual downstream financing.
The top US-based VCs with strong, active footprints in London and/or Berlin that frequently lead or co-lead Series B rounds in European expansion include the following:
To help narrow down which of these funds (or top local European counterparts like Balderton or Atomico) fit best, tell me:
Expanding a US-based B2B or consumer tech company into Europe via a Series B requires investors who not only write the check from US pools of capital but also boast deeply embedded local networks in London and Berlin to help with regulatory alignment, localized go-to-market strategies, and regional executive hiring.…
Expanding a US-based B2B or consumer tech company into Europe via a Series B requires investors who not only write the check from US pools of capital but also boast deeply embedded local networks in London and Berlin to help with regulatory alignment, localized go-to-market strategies, and regional executive hiring.
Data from Dealroom.co on US investment in Europe shows US mega-funds increasingly backing European expansions. The top US-headquartered VCs with heavy, active footprints in London and/or Berlin that frequently lead or co-lead Series B rounds include:
To help narrow down which of these partners fits best, could you share:
Yes. For a **U.S.-based company raising a Series B specifically to establish a European footprint**, I’d optimize for three things: ability to lead a B, an actual European team rather than occasional travel, and a portfolio/operating network that can help with hiring, customers, and local GTM. One important…
Yes. For a U.S.-based company raising a Series B specifically to establish a European footprint, I’d optimize for three things: ability to lead a B, an actual European team rather than occasional travel, and a portfolio/operating network that can help with hiring, customers, and local GTM.
One important distinction: Index Ventures is arguably one of the best fits overall, but it isn't U.S.-based. If “U.S.-based” is a hard requirement, I’d prioritize the firms below.
| Rank | VC | London / Berlin | Best fit | Why I’d call them |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | General Catalyst | London + Berlin | Broad; AI, enterprise, fintech, healthcare | Probably the strongest literal fit for a London/Berlin expansion. GC has offices in both cities and positions itself as a multistage investor supporting companies through international expansion. General Catalyst General Catalyst |
| 2 | Accel | London | Enterprise, AI, SaaS, fintech, consumer | Exceptional U.S.–Europe bridge. Accel has had a London office since 2000 and a substantial local investment/ecosystem team. Accel Accel |
| 3 | Insight Partners | London / Europe | B2B SaaS, enterprise, growth | Especially attractive for a Series B because of its scaling/GTM playbook. Insight says nearly 60% of its portfolio companies over the past decade expanded into Europe. It also continues to lead European Series Bs, including a $150M B for Wonderful in 2026. Insight Partners Insight Partners |
| 4 | Bessemer Venture Partners | London | SaaS, cloud, AI, cybersecurity | Very strong if you're enterprise software. Bessemer explicitly expanded its London practice to include growth-stage European SaaS, with a local team covering SaaS/cloud, cybersecurity, AI and other areas. Bessemer Venture Partners Bessemer Venture Partners |
| 5 | Battery Ventures | London | B2B software, industrial tech, growth | Underrated choice for enterprise software. Battery operates as one global team and has a London office; it has been increasing its on-the-ground European investment capability. Battery Ventures Battery Ventures |
| 6 | Lightspeed Venture Partners | London / Europe | AI, infrastructure, enterprise, fintech | I'd move them into the top tier if you're AI/infrastructure-heavy. Strong global network and substantial European investing activity. |
| 7 | Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) | London | AI, infra, fintech, crypto, software | Great if you're building a category-defining company and want the U.S. platform/network as much as European operating help. |
| 8 | NEA | Europe / London network | Deep tech, healthcare, enterprise | Worth including for a larger Series B where breadth, reserves and eventual growth financing matter. |
General Catalyst is the standout. It isn't merely a London-based fund covering Germany: GC lists a physical Berlin office, and its European strategy has been closely connected to the Berlin ecosystem, including its combination with La Famiglia.
I'd therefore approach:
Then I'd add a Germany-native co-investor if hiring and local customer access in Germany are central to the plan.
I'd change the order slightly:
Accel → Insight → General Catalyst → Bessemer → Battery → Lightspeed
Accel has unusually deep institutional roots in London—the firm opened its London office in 2000—and still has a dedicated local team supporting European companies.
Insight is particularly interesting for a Series B because its value proposition is less "we know Europe" and more "we know how to turn a U.S. growth company into an international one." Its own expansion research specifically focuses on helping U.S. portfolio companies enter Europe.
Index Ventures.
If you're willing to relax the headquarters requirement, I'd put Index in the top 3, possibly #1. It's one of the most natural investors for a company that needs to bridge U.S. capital with European hiring, customers and networks.
So my actual target list would be:
For example, if you're B2B SaaS doing $10–30M ARR and raising a $30–50M B, I'd put Insight, Accel, GC, Index and Bessemer at the top of the partner-targeting list. Bessemer's London team is explicitly focused on European SaaS growth, while Insight has recent European Series B examples such as Omnea and Wonderful.
If you give me your sector, ARR/growth, target Series B size, and whether London or Berlin is the primary office, I can narrow this to 10–15 specific partners (not just firms) and tell you who I'd approach first, including the partner's relevant portfolio companies and likely investment thesis.
Insight is particularly interesting for a Series B because its value proposition is less "we know Europe" and more "we know how to turn a U.S. growth company into an international one." Its own expansion research specifically focuses on helping U.S. portfolio companies enter Europe.
Index Ventures.
If you're willing to relax the headquarters requirement, I'd put Index in the top 3, possibly #1. It's one of the most natural investors for a company that needs to bridge U.S. capital with European hiring, customers and networks.
So my actual target list would be:
For example, if you're B2B SaaS doing $10–30M ARR and raising a $30–50M B, I'd put Insight, Accel, GC, Index and Bessemer at the top of the partner-targeting list. Bessemer's London team is explicitly focused on European SaaS growth, while Insight has recent European Series B examples such as Omnea and Wonderful.
Yes. For a **US company raising a Series B specifically to accelerate European expansion**, I’d prioritize firms that can do more than write the check: they should have partners on the ground, European hiring/GTM networks, and enough US-market reach to support the next round. ### My top targets VC | London / Berlin…
Yes. For a US company raising a Series B specifically to accelerate European expansion, I’d prioritize firms that can do more than write the check: they should have partners on the ground, European hiring/GTM networks, and enough US-market reach to support the next round.
| VC | London / Berlin presence | Why I'd target them |
|---|---|---|
| Accel | London | Probably the strongest US–Europe bridge. Longstanding London team and exceptional European network; particularly strong for SaaS, fintech and enterprise. |
| General Catalyst | London + Berlin | Excellent for a Series B/growth story and international scaling. Particularly compelling for enterprise, fintech, healthcare and AI. |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners | London + Berlin | One of the few major US firms with meaningful presence in both cities. Strong across AI, SaaS, consumer and fintech. Sifted |
| Bessemer Venture Partners | London | Especially attractive for B2B SaaS/cloud. Strong European investing history and a useful scaling playbook. Sifted |
| Insight Partners | London | Very strong if the business is already showing meaningful revenue/enterprise traction. Their scaling and international-expansion capabilities are a major advantage. |
| Andreessen Horowitz | London | Worth targeting if you're in AI, infrastructure, developer tools, fintech or another category where a16z can bring substantial platform leverage. |
| New Enterprise Associates | European investing presence | Broad sector coverage and deep reserves for subsequent rounds; more compelling for capital-intensive businesses. |
A useful cross-check is recent US VC activity: in 2025, General Catalyst ranked #1 among venture-growth investors in the US, while Insight, Lightspeed, Bessemer, Accel and Index were all among the more active late-stage investors.
I'd actually put Index Ventures at or near the top of the list, even though it isn't technically a "US-based VC." Its London/SF structure is almost tailor-made for what you're doing. Index has consistently been one of the leading investors in European Series A/B companies, and its transatlantic network is a major advantage for a US company entering Europe.
I'd weight the list:
If London is the first European hub, I'd move Accel, Index, Insight and Bessemer up.
And there's a good reason not to over-index on Berlin specifically: London remains Europe's deepest VC hub, while many global firms use London as their European base even when they actively invest in Berlin.
I'd probably approach 10–15 funds, with roughly:
The strongest pitch isn't simply "we're expanding to Europe." It's "we've proven the US motion, and here's why the same engine can become substantially larger in Europe." The VC should be able to help with the European country prioritization, first 10–20 hires, enterprise introductions and local follow-on capital.
If you tell me your sector, current ARR/revenue, Series B target size, and whether London or Berlin is the intended first hub, I can narrow this to a ranked 10-fund target list, including the specific partners I'd approach at each firm and why.
When expanding a US startup into Europe via Series B, partnering with US-based VCs that have physical offices, dedicated partners, and active cross-border networks in hubs like London and Berlin can make execution significantly smoother. Top US-headquartered venture firms with a strong, active presence on the ground…
When expanding a US startup into Europe via Series B, partnering with US-based VCs that have physical offices, dedicated partners, and active cross-border networks in hubs like London and Berlin can make execution significantly smoother.
Top US-headquartered venture firms with a strong, active presence on the ground in London and/or Europe include:
To help narrow down the best specific partners or check if a hybrid US/European syndicate makes sense, tell me:
When raising a Series B to scale into Europe, partnering with a US-based VC that has a true, boots-on-the-ground presence in London or Berlin gives you the best of both worlds: deep domestic check sizes/valuation expectations paired with local regulatory, go-to-market, and hiring networks. Top US-headquartered VCs…
When raising a Series B to scale into Europe, partnering with a US-based VC that has a true, boots-on-the-ground presence in London or Berlin gives you the best of both worlds: deep domestic check sizes/valuation expectations paired with local regulatory, go-to-market, and hiring networks.
Top US-headquartered VCs with active, dedicated European footprints and strong Series B capabilities include:
Alternative (Transatlantic Hybrid) approach:
If you want a native European fund that partners seamlessly with US heavyweights, consider top-tier local growth allies like London-based Dawn Capital (B2B software/fintech), Atomico , or Berlin/London-based Cherry Ventures , which often co-invest alongside incoming US Series B leads.
To help narrow down which of these funds match your exact profile, tell me:
Yes. For a **U.S.-based company raising a Series B specifically to build a European business**, I’d prioritize firms that can do three things: lead a meaningful Series B, provide U.S. follow-on capital, and put real people/network on the ground in Europe. One important nuance: **London is much more common than Berlin…
Yes. For a U.S.-based company raising a Series B specifically to build a European business, I’d prioritize firms that can do three things: lead a meaningful Series B, provide U.S. follow-on capital, and put real people/network on the ground in Europe.
One important nuance: London is much more common than Berlin as the European base for U.S. VCs. General Catalyst is the standout exception with offices in both London and Berlin.
| Firm | Europe footprint | Series B fit | Best reason to call |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Catalyst | London + Berlin | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best if Germany/Berlin is central |
| Accel | Large London team | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Exceptional transatlantic network |
| Insight Partners | London | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Excellent for scaling GTM internationally |
| Lightspeed | London/Europe | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Strong AI, infrastructure, enterprise |
| Bessemer Venture Partners | London | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | Excellent SaaS/cloud/infrastructure network |
| Battery Ventures | London | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | Particularly strong for B2B software |
| Sequoia Capital | London/Europe | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | Strong brand + global scaling network |
This is probably the cleanest fit for a U.S. company whose European strategy genuinely includes Germany. GC officially lists offices in both London and Berlin, rather than merely covering Germany remotely.
I'd put them particularly high for AI, enterprise software, fintech, healthcare and other businesses where European regulation, hiring and enterprise relationships matter.
Pitch: “We're not just opening a European sales office; Europe is becoming a second growth engine.”
Accel has had its London office since 2000, and its current London team includes investors covering AI, SaaS, fintech, cybersecurity and later-stage companies.
For a Series B, I particularly like the combination of U.S. institutional credibility + European operating/investing experience. Accel also explicitly talks about its network across European hubs including Berlin.
I'd move Insight toward #1 if you're already showing substantial ARR and the Series B is principally about hiring European sales, marketing and customer-success teams.
Insight has a London office and a particularly strong history of Series B/growth investments in companies pursuing international expansion. For example, it led Xelix's $160M Series B in 2025 and describes itself as having offices in London, New York and the Bay Area.
Very compelling for AI, developer infrastructure, cybersecurity, enterprise software and fintech. I'd put Lightspeed high if European expansion is also a way to access technical talent or major enterprise customers.
A particularly good target for B2B SaaS, cloud, infrastructure and AI. Bessemer has a London office and a dedicated Europe team; its current European activity spans AI/ML, infrastructure and deep tech.
I'd put Battery unusually high for enterprise/B2B software. It has a substantial London presence, including partners investing across Europe and North America. Battery has also been actively expanding its on-the-ground European investment capability.
I'd probably sequence it:
Tier 1 — lead candidates
Tier 2 5. Bessemer 6. Battery 7. Sequoia
And if Berlin/Germany is a major part of the plan, I'd strongly consider adding a German co-investor alongside the U.S. lead. Berlin has excellent local funds such as Cherry Ventures and Project A, while the large U.S. funds generally operate Germany from London.
Don't optimize for “VC with a London office.” Optimize for “partner who has personally helped U.S. portfolio companies build EMEA.” That's much more valuable than simply having an address in London.
If you give me your sector, current ARR, growth rate, Series B target ($ amount), and whether London or Berlin is the first beachhead, I can narrow this to 10–15 specific partners, including who at each firm is most likely to lead your round and why.
When expanding from the US into Europe via major hubs like London or Berlin, securing a lead or strong co-investor with boots on the ground changes everything for local hiring, regulatory navigation, and cross-border customer acquisition. Top US-based venture capital firms with dedicated local footprints and heavy…
When expanding from the US into Europe via major hubs like London or Berlin, securing a lead or strong co-investor with boots on the ground changes everything for local hiring, regulatory navigation, and cross-border customer acquisition.
Top US-based venture capital firms with dedicated local footprints and heavy activity in Series B European rounds include:
(Note: While not US-headquartered, pairing a US fund with top-tier domestic European growth leads like Atomico, Balderton Capital in London, or Earlybird and Project A in Berlin is a very common playbook for US startups setting up shop in Europe.)
If you can share your vertical (e.g., B2B SaaS, Fintech, Deep Tech/AI) and which European city (London vs. Berlin) is your primary landing zone, I can narrow down which specific partners at these firms are most active in your space.
If the goal is **a Series B that funds a U.S. company’s European expansion**, I’d prioritize VCs that can do more than invest: they should have partners on the ground, recruiting/customer networks, and experience helping U.S. companies establish a European GTM operation. ### My shortlist | Rank | VC | London / Berlin…
If the goal is a Series B that funds a U.S. company’s European expansion, I’d prioritize VCs that can do more than invest: they should have partners on the ground, recruiting/customer networks, and experience helping U.S. companies establish a European GTM operation.
| Rank | VC | London / Berlin | Why I’d target them |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | General Catalyst | London + Berlin | Probably the best fit if Germany matters. GC has actual offices in both cities and explicitly positions itself as a multistage investor supporting companies through international expansion. Its Berlin team also has deep local ecosystem relationships. www.generalcatalyst.com |
| 2 | Insight Partners | London | My top choice if you're a scaling B2B/SaaS company. Insight is unusually strong at Series B and later, and has repeatedly led European Series Bs—including Cognigy, Ably, incident.io, Omnea and Xelix. www.insightpartners.com |
| 3 | Accel | London | One of the deepest U.S.–Europe networks. Accel has had a London office since 2000 and has built a substantial European team; its London partners cover both early and later-stage investing. www.accel.com |
| 4 | Bessemer Venture Partners | London | Excellent for enterprise/cloud/AI. Bessemer has a dedicated London team and explicitly expanded its European practice into growth-stage SaaS. www.bvp.com |
| 5 | Lightspeed Venture Partners | London / European network | Particularly compelling for AI, infrastructure, enterprise software and fintech. I'd put it higher if your business is in one of those categories. |
| 6 | Andreessen Horowitz | London | Strong if you're a category-defining company in AI, software, fintech, crypto or developer infrastructure. More U.S.-centric than the firms above, but its European presence can be very valuable. |
| 7 | NEA | London / Europe | Worth including for a larger B, particularly if you want a very broad platform and eventual growth-capital support. |
If London is the primary beachhead:
I'd put Insight, Accel, Bessemer and General Catalyst at the top of the outreach list.
If Germany/Berlin is strategically important:
I'd move General Catalyst to #1. Its combination of London + Berlin offices is unusually useful; GC's Berlin team includes investors specifically focused on European opportunities.
If you're B2B SaaS and already have meaningful ARR:
I'd strongly favor Insight → Bessemer → Accel → GC. Insight in particular has an impressive record of leading European Series Bs and helping portfolio companies scale internationally.
One important caveat: Index Ventures would be near the very top of my list for this job, but I wouldn't classify it as U.S.-based—it has offices in London, San Francisco and New York and is fundamentally a transatlantic firm. Its track record of helping U.S. companies establish European HQs is exceptional: Index says 31 portfolio companies have successfully established European operations, with 16 choosing London.
If you give me your sector, current ARR, Series B target ($ amount), and whether London or Berlin is the first market, I can narrow this to 10–15 specific partners I'd approach, including who has led comparable Series Bs and the best likely introduction paths.