Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 343 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
If you need live, zero-copy access to analytics datasets, use Snowflake Secure Data Sharing inside
Snowflake; if you want an open, cross-platform live-sharing standard that avoids vendor lock-in, use
Databricks . For direct delivery into partners' cloud lakes, choose . For strict compliance and file-focused transfers, consider or .
Brands AI recommends here
Snowflake Secure Data Sharing: best when partners need live, zero-copy access to analytics tables inside Snowflake—instant, current views. Caveat: this is for Snowflake ecosystems, not cross-platform sharing.
Databricks Delta Sharing: best when you need an open, cross-platform way to grant live access to lake or warehouse data without copying it—helps avoid vendor lock-in. Caveat: geared to analytics workflows, not file collaboration.
Bobsled: best when you must deliver datasets directly into partners' cloud data lakes or warehouses (S3/Azure/GCS) while keeping control of the source. Caveat: it's delivery-focused, not an end-user file-collaboration tool.
Kiteworks: best when strict compliance and regulated transfers are required—offers FedRAMP/FIPS-level controls and secure content networking. Caveat: focused on compliant file transfers rather than zero-copy analytics sharing.
If by “doesn’t require moving data” you mean partners can query/access governed data where it already lives, my top choice is Snowflake—assuming your data is already in Snowflake.
Snowflake’s Secure Data Sharing is specifically designed for this: no actual data is copied or transferred between Snowflake accounts. Partners get read-only access to the objects you authorize, while the underlying data remains in your Snowflake environment.
Key advantages:
If partners need to see/query the underlying rows, use a zero-copy data-sharing mechanism such as Snowflake Secure Data Sharing.
If partners should learn from your data without being able to access the raw data—for example, matching customers, measuring advertising audiences, or calculating joint analytics—a data clean room is the better architecture. Snowflake, Databricks, and BigQuery all offer this style of collaboration.
My short recommendation: Snowflake Secure Data Sharing for general B2B data sharing; Snowflake Data Clean Rooms when the data is sensitive and partners shouldn't receive raw access.
If you tell me where your data currently lives (Snowflake, Databricks, S3, Azure, on-prem, etc.) and whether partners need raw rows or only analytics, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 platforms and compare cost, security, and implementation effort.
When you need to share data securely without moving, copying, or duplicating it (often referred to as zero-copy or in-place sharing), traditional file-transfer or ETL pipelines are out. Instead, you need a data clean room or a cloud data warehousing architecture with native sharing protocols.
The best platforms for this use case depend on your current tech stack:
To help narrow down the right choice, let me know:
When you need to collaborate with external partners without extracting, copying, or moving your raw data (a concept widely known as zero-copy data sharing or in-place collaboration ), the "best" platform depends heavily on where your data already lives and how strict your privacy requirements are.
The top enterprise-grade platforms that specialize in zero-movement data sharing include:
To help narrow down which platform fits best, could you tell me:
If your key requirement is secure partner access without copying or relocating the underlying data, I’d put Snowflake Secure Data Sharing at the top of the shortlist—especially if your data is already in Snowflake.
Snowflake lets you share selected tables, views, and other database objects with partner accounts without actually copying or transferring the data. Partners get governed, read-only access to the live data, while you retain control and can revoke access.
That gives you:
If you're already on Databricks, OpenSharing/Delta Sharing is probably the better choice. It's an open protocol designed to let external organizations access governed data without requiring them to adopt Databricks. Partners can consume shared data through tools such as Spark, pandas, and BI platforms.
That's a different use case. Consider a data clean room:
My rule of thumb:
| Situation | Best fit |
|---|---|
| Data already in Snowflake | Snowflake Secure Data Sharing |
| Data already in Databricks/lakehouse | Databricks OpenSharing / Delta Sharing |
| Partners need live access to governed datasets | Snowflake or Delta Sharing |
| Multiple parties need to analyze sensitive data without seeing raw data | Data Clean Room |
| Data lives across AWS and multiple parties need joint analysis | AWS Clean Rooms |
If you tell me where the data currently lives (S3, Snowflake, Databricks, Azure, on-prem, etc.) and what partners need to do with it (read tables, query, contribute data, run analytics, etc.), I can narrow this to the best architecture and platform.
If your key requirement is secure partner data sharing without physically moving or duplicating the data, I’d shortlist these:
| Platform | Best for | Data movement | Key advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snowflake Secure Data Sharing | Partners already using Snowflake | None | Very simple, near-instant access; shared data remains in the provider’s account. docs.snowflake.com |
| AWS Clean Rooms | Multi-company analytics, especially AWS environments | None | Partners analyze data where it lives, with configurable query/output controls. docs.aws.amazon.com |
| Databricks OpenSharing | Databricks/lakehouse environments | No replication | Cross-platform sharing of live data; recipients don't need Databricks. docs.databricks.com |
| Snowflake Data Clean Rooms | Sensitive data requiring controlled collaboration | Designed to avoid exposing raw data | Partners can run approved analyses and receive controlled results rather than raw data. docs.snowflake.com |
| Databricks Clean Rooms | Highly sensitive multi-party collaboration | No direct raw-data access | No-trust model, code approval, restricted access, and auditability. docs.databricks.com |
For straightforward partner sharing: Snowflake Secure Data Sharing is probably the cleanest option if your data is already in Snowflake. It doesn't copy or transfer the underlying data, and access can be revoked.
For partners who need to collaborate on sensitive data without seeing the underlying records: I'd choose a data clean room—particularly AWS Clean Rooms if you're AWS-centric, or Snowflake/Databricks Clean Rooms if you're already on those platforms. AWS explicitly supports querying data from its original location, including Snowflake and AWS, without ETL.
If avoiding vendor lock-in matters: Databricks OpenSharing is especially interesting because it's an open protocol and supports recipients outside Databricks.
If you tell me where the data currently lives (Snowflake, S3, Azure, BigQuery, Databricks, on-prem, etc.) and whether partners need raw data or only query results, I can narrow this to the best 1–2 choices.
The "best" platform depends heavily on your current data stack, but the gold standard category for sharing data without moving or copying it is Data Clean Rooms (DCRs) and Zero-Copy Data Sharing networks.
Instead of exporting files, setting up heavy ETL pipelines, or replicating databases, these platforms allow external partners to run queries or derive joint insights while your raw data remains safely locked in its original location.
The top platforms for zero-movement, secure partner data sharing include:
To help narrow down which platform fits your situation best, tell me:
If your key requirement is secure partner access without copying or relocating the underlying data, my top pick is Snowflake Secure Data Sharing—assuming your data already lives in Snowflake.
My rule of thumb:
| Your situation | Best choice |
|---|---|
| Data already in Snowflake | Snowflake Secure Data Sharing |
| Data already in Databricks/Delta Lake | Delta Sharing / Databricks OpenSharing |
| Partners use many different platforms | Delta Sharing |
| Partners need analytics but shouldn't see raw data | Clean room |
| Data isn't in either platform | I'd first evaluate whether an open protocol such as Delta Sharing can expose the existing cloud data without introducing another copy. delta.io |
So, if you tell me where your data currently lives (S3, Azure Blob, Snowflake, Databricks, on-prem SQL, etc.) and what your partners use, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 options and explain the architecture.
The best approach to sharing data securely without moving or copying it is using a Data Clean Room (DCR) or In-Place Data Sharing Platform , with industry leaders being Databricks Clean Rooms powered by Delta Sharing , and Snowflake Data Clean Rooms . These platforms let you grant partners real-time, governed access to live datasets through isolated, ephemeral compute environments so that underlying raw files or tables never leave your infrastructure or get replicated into third-party silos.
Top In-Place Data Sharing Solutions
Key Capabilities of In-Place Platforms
If you can share what format your data is in (e.g., cloud data lake, SQL database, or document files) and what your partners need to do with it (just read/query vs. joint analytics), I can recommend the most efficient platform architecture for your stack.
If by “doesn’t require moving data” you mean zero-copy / in-place sharing, my top pick is Snowflake—especially if your data already lives in Snowflake.
Snowflake’s sharing model lets partners query read-only data without copying or transferring the underlying data. You can expose specific tables, views, secure views, etc., while retaining control through roles and permissions.
Why I'd choose it:
Databricks OpenSharing is an excellent alternative. It supports sharing data and AI assets with organizations outside Databricks, using open protocols. Databricks also offers Clean Rooms when partners need to collaborate on sensitive data without getting direct access to each other's underlying data.
| Situation | Best choice |
|---|---|
| Data already in Snowflake | Snowflake Secure Data Sharing |
| Data already in Databricks/lakehouse | Databricks OpenSharing |
| Partners need analysis but shouldn't see raw data | Snowflake or Databricks Clean Rooms |
| Partners are on different platforms | Databricks OpenSharing or Snowflake's newer Open Data Sharing |
| Need a simple, governed B2B data-sharing arrangement | Snowflake |
One caveat: “no data movement” doesn't necessarily mean no network transfer. The underlying data can remain in your storage while query results travel to the partner, and cross-cloud access can still incur network/egress costs. Snowflake explicitly distinguishes zero-copy sharing from cross-region considerations.
Bottom line: If you're starting from scratch and the primary requirement is secure partner access without creating copies, I'd shortlist Snowflake first, with Databricks OpenSharing as the main alternative.
The modern standard for sharing data securely without physically moving or copying it is zero-copy data sharing (or data federation/in-place collaboration). Instead of exporting files via SFTP or building fragile ETL pipelines, you grant partners governed, real-time access to live data right where it resides.
The best platforms for this approach depend on your current tech stack:
If you can share what cloud environment or data warehouse your organization currently uses (e.g., Snowflake, AWS, Databricks), I can recommend the most seamless implementation path for your partners.