We want to manage our industrial pre-treatment programs. What's the best FOG (Fats, Oils, and Grease) and industrial pretreatment software?

If you’re a POTW/municipal wastewater utility managing both FOG and an Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP), I’d put SwiftComply and SAMS by NJBSoft at the top of the shortlist. They’re purpose-built for these workflows rather than being generic environmental compliance systems.

My shortlist

1. swiftcomply.com — best overall

SwiftComply is probably the strongest choice if your goal is to run FOG and industrial pretreatment as actual compliance programs in one system. It explicitly supports both programs and has a large North American utility customer base.

For IPP, particularly useful capabilities include:

• Industrial-user permits and permit conditions
• Site-specific discharge limits and monitoring requirements
• Sampling/SMR tracking
• Automatic compliance checks against limits
• Violation and significant noncompliance tracking
• Inspection scheduling and records
• Enforcement workflows
• Industrial-user portal for submitting reports
• Automated alerts and overdue-task tracking
• Bulk laboratory-result imports
• Reporting and audit trails

For FOG, it supports FSE registration, risk classification, mobile inspections, enforcement, pump-out/inspection workflows, customer portals and automated communications.

Why I'd start here: if your biggest pain is spreadsheets, disconnected databases, missed deadlines and assembling information for an audit, SwiftComply appears particularly well aligned with that problem.

2. njbsoft.com — best alternative / strong GIS & field operations

SAMS is particularly interesting if you want FOG + IPP + field inspection + GIS tightly integrated.

Its IPP product covers permits, inspections, sampling, exceedances, enforcement documentation and compliance reporting, with mobile/offline field data collection.

Its FOG product adds:

• FSE inspections
• Grease interceptor/pump-out tracking
• Electronic manifests
• Pumper/hauler portal
• FSE portal
• BMP tracking
• Automated violations
• GIS/map-based management
• Integration with GIS, LIMS, billing and asset-management systems

Importantly, Esri lists SAMS IPP&FOG as a single solution for managing both programs, including permits, inspections and program tasks.

I'd give SAMS extra consideration if: your inspectors spend a lot of time in the field, you want a strong map-centric interface, or you want to eventually bring other environmental compliance programs into the same platform.

3. hach.com

Hach has a dedicated FOG program-management offering, so it's worth looking at if FOG is the primary problem you're trying to solve.

I'd put it behind the first two if your requirement is specifically one platform for both FOG and a sophisticated federally approved IPP.

What I'd choose

If I were evaluating this for a wastewater utility, I'd do two demos: SwiftComply and SAMS.

My initial preference would be:

#1 SwiftComply — best fit for a serious, compliance-centric FOG + IPP program.

#2 SAMS — potentially better if GIS, mobile inspections, field operations and broader environmental compliance are especially important.

The key is not to evaluate them as ordinary "database software." Your demo should use your actual IPP workflows and make each vendor demonstrate them.

The demo scorecard I'd use

Ask both vendors to demonstrate, with your data/workflows:

1. Industrial-user permitting — categorical/non-categorical users, limits, monitoring requirements and permit renewals.
2. Sampling — importing lab data, comparing results against limits, calculating compliance and flagging exceedances.
3. Violations & enforcement — NOV → corrective action → escalation → SNC, with a complete audit trail.
4. Inspections — scheduling, mobile/offline inspection forms, photographs, findings and follow-up.
5. SMRs/DMRs — electronic submissions, review, corrections/retractions and overdue tracking.
6. FOG/FSE management — registrations, risk classification, inspections, grease-control devices, pump-outs, manifests and enforcement.
7. Hauler/pumper management — particularly important if you operate a participating pumper program.
8. GIS — map industrial users, FSEs, interceptors, sampling points and problem areas.
9. Reporting — especially annual pretreatment reporting and regulator/audit requests.
10. Data migration — have them show how they'd import your existing Excel/Access data.
11. Integrations — ArcGIS, LIMS, billing, CMMS/asset management and your laboratory.
12. Security & records — permissions, audit logs, retention, backups and electronic signatures.
13. Cost structure — implementation, licenses, users, FSE/IU portals, integrations and ongoing support.

One particularly important question: "Show us how you would produce a three-year compliance history for one SIU, including permits, inspections, samples, exceedances, violations, correspondence and enforcement actions." That's an excellent test of whether the system is genuinely managing the program or merely storing records.

If you tell me (a) approximately how many industrial users/SIUs you have, (b) how many FSEs, (c) whether you're an EPA-approved pretreatment program, and (d) what you're using today—Excel, Access, Cityworks, GIS, etc., I can narrow this down to a SwiftComply vs. SAMS comparison with a weighted scorecard and the specific questions I'd ask each vendor.

What I'd choose

If I were evaluating this for a wastewater utility, I'd do two demos: SwiftComply and SAMS.

My initial preference would be:

#1 SwiftComply — best fit for a serious, compliance-centric FOG + IPP program.

#2 SAMS — potentially better if GIS, mobile inspections, field operations and broader environmental compliance are especially important.

The key is not to evaluate them as ordinary "database software." Your demo should use your actual IPP workflows and make each vendor demonstrate them.

The demo scorecard I'd use

Ask both vendors to demonstrate, with your data/workflows:

1. Industrial-user permitting — categorical/non-categorical users, limits, monitoring requirements and permit renewals.
2. Sampling — importing lab data, comparing results against limits, calculating compliance and flagging exceedances.
3. Violations & enforcement — NOV → corrective action → escalation → SNC, with a complete audit trail.
4. Inspections — scheduling, mobile/offline inspection forms, photographs, findings and follow-up.
5. SMRs/DMRs — electronic submissions, review, corrections/retractions and overdue tracking.
6. FOG/FSE management — registrations, risk classification, inspections, grease-control devices, pump-outs, manifests and enforcement.
7. Hauler/pumper management — particularly important if you operate a participating pumper program.
8. GIS — map industrial users, FSEs, interceptors, sampling points and problem areas.
9. Reporting — especially annual pretreatment reporting and regulator/audit requests.
10. Data migration — have them show how they'd import your existing Excel/Access data.
11. Integrations — ArcGIS, LIMS, billing, CMMS/asset management and your laboratory.
12. Security & records — permissions, audit logs, retention, backups and electronic signatures.
13. Cost structure — implementation, licenses, users, FSE/IU portals, integrations and ongoing support.

One particularly important question: "Show us how you would produce a three-year compliance history for one SIU, including permits, inspections, samples, exceedances, violations, correspondence and enforcement actions." That's an excellent test of whether the system is genuinely managing the program or merely storing records.

If you tell me (a) approximately how many industrial users/SIUs you have, (b) how many FSEs, (c) whether you're an EPA-approved pretreatment program, and (d) what you're using today—Excel, Access, Cityworks, GIS, etc., I can narrow this down to a SwiftComply vs. SAMS comparison with a weighted scorecard and the specific questions I'd ask each vendor.

Here are top web results for exploring this topic:

Aquatic Informatics·https://www.linkotechnology.com**Pretreatment**, FOG and Hauled Waste Software Linko understands Pretreatment and Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) coordinators are being tasked with accomplishing more with less resources. In addition, there is greater scrutiny of their programs and co Aquatic Informatics·https://aquaticinformatics.com Linko Pretreatment & FOG Management - Aquatic Informatics Software that provides wastewater pretreatment, fats, oils, and grease (FOG) & liquid hauled waste regulatory compliance. Over 400 customers choose Linko. Nexinite·https://nexinite.com**FOG** Compliance Software : A Guide for Municipal Teams - Nexinite Can FOG software replace our existing pretreatment system? It depends on scope. Some FOG platforms are purpose-built only for fats, oils, and grease tracking and won't cover industrial pretreatment, s BMP Compliance Group·https://bmpcomp.com**FOG** BMP - Municipal F.O.G. Program Management Software The Financial Impact. Save valuable resources. Save time and money by not having to create a FOG control program with all the various components on your own. Easily engage your Food Service Establishm QuoteIQ·https://myquoteiq.com**Best** Inspection Software For Grease Trap Cleaning 2026 - QuoteIQ Can the tool build custom before/after checklists with photos attached to the job — not just a generic notes field? FOG/manifest compliance depth. Grease trap service is regulated in most municipaliti ChemREADY·https://getchemready.com**FOG Wastewater Pretreatment** : Compliance Beyond the Interceptor Fats, oils, and grease (FOG) are one of the most consistently cited causes of industrial pretreatment violations. Not because facilities don't know FOG is a problem — most do. The issue is how they're SwiftComply·https://www.swiftcomply.com**Industrial Pretreatment** Compliance Software | SwiftComply Manage industrial wastewater pretreatment programs using software that reduces admin time and boosts compliance workflows. Schedule a demo today. Clean Water Services·https://cleanwaterservices.org**FOG** – fats, oils , and grease - Clean Water Services The best FOG prevention is an effective pretreatment system, which can prevent ongoing issues and save time and money. An effective system is in place when all food and beverage service drains are con Groups.io·https://groups.io Linko's Industrial Pretreatment and FOG Software - Groups.io We have been using Linko CTS for quite some time here, mainly to track our Pretreatment Program. It's been very valuable as far as tracking monitoring results, SIU/CIU deadlines and inspections - as w Chemtech International·https://chemtech-us.com**Industrial Pretreatment Software** : The 2024 Update Key Takeaways: Modern pretreatment software is a compliance tool and database streamlining all wastewater treatment processes. Today's best software solutions support remote management, compliance tra

If you're a municipal wastewater utility/POTW managing both FOG and an industrial pretreatment program (IPP), I’d narrow the field to Linko, SwiftComply, and Industrial BMP, with CAPTAINS as a strong option for a more traditional pretreatment-focused system.

My shortlist

1. Aquatic Informatics / Linko — my first choice for a mature program

Linko is probably the safest choice if your priority is comprehensive program administration rather than just having a nice modern interface. It covers FOG and the entire industrial pretreatment lifecycle: industrial users, permits, inspections, sampling, compliance determinations, violations, NOVs and reporting.

It also has a long history in the municipal pretreatment market, which matters when you're trying to reproduce years of facility/compliance history and satisfy an EPA or state audit.

I'd choose Linko if: you have a sizeable IPP, lots of historical data, complicated permits/limits, or want a proven enterprise system.

---

2. SwiftComply — best modern alternative

This is the one I'd put through a serious head-to-head demo with Linko.

SwiftComply is particularly compelling if you want to move away from spreadsheets, paper forms and desktop databases. Its pretreatment product connects permits, limits, sampling, violations and enforcement, with automated compliance checks, alerts, bulk lab-result uploads and an industrial-user portal.

Its FOG product adds digital FSE registration, risk classification, field enforcement, customer communications and portals for stakeholders.

There's also evidence of utilities using the two modules together—for example, the Sumner/Bonney Lake program documents specifically say they use SwiftComply Pretreatment and SwiftComply FOG.

I'd choose SwiftComply if: your biggest pain is administrative workload, field data collection, online submissions, stakeholder communication and getting everyone onto one modern cloud system.

---

3. Industrial BMP — worth getting a quote

Industrial BMP is specifically aimed at municipal industrial pretreatment programs. It advertises facility profiles, sampling, inspections, enforcement/follow-up, state/federal reporting, mobile field capabilities, GIS/API capabilities and unlimited users.

The FOG product handles FSE profiles, grease-control devices, haulers, cleaning records, missed cleanings and FOG inspections/enforcement.

A potentially important differentiator is fixed annual pricing rather than a collection of add-on fees.

I'd choose it if: you're a small-to-medium utility that wants a purpose-built system without the complexity or potentially heavier implementation of an enterprise platform.

---

4. CAPTAINS — particularly good if IPP is the center of gravity

CAPTAINS is built by pretreatment professionals and focuses heavily on the core IPP functions: POTWs, industrial users, permits, limits, inspections, sampling, NOVs, reporting and Significant Non-Compliance calculations.

I would put it on the RFP list if industrial pretreatment is much more important to you than FOG.

---

What I'd recommend

If you are choosing a system today, I'd run a three-way demo/RFP:

1. Linko → benchmark for depth and maturity
2. SwiftComply → benchmark for modern cloud workflow/user experience
3. Industrial BMP → benchmark for simplicity and total cost

And I would make the vendors demonstrate your actual workflows—not give you a generic sales demo.

The 10 things I'd require them to demonstrate

1. Industrial User inventory & classification
2. Permit creation/renewal/modification
3. Site-specific limits and sampling requirements
4. Automatic sample compliance calculations
5. Inspection scheduling + mobile inspection forms
6. Violation → NOV → enforcement workflow
7. FOG/FSE registration and risk classification
8. Grease interceptor cleaning/pump-out tracking
9. Online submissions from industrial users, FSEs and haulers
10. EPA/state reporting + complete audit trail

The most important test is: "Show us what happens when a facility exceeds a limit." You want the software to automatically connect the sample → violation → required response → notice → enforcement → resolution → reporting, rather than having staff move information manually between modules. That integrated workflow is one of the biggest differentiators among pretreatment systems.

Bottom line: If you want the most proven/comprehensive, I'd start with Linko. If you want the best modern cloud experience and integrated FOG + IPP workflows, I'd seriously consider SwiftComply. If cost, simplicity and an all-in-one municipal platform are especially important, get Industrial BMP into the comparison.

If you tell me roughly how many industrial users and FSEs you manage, your number of pretreatment staff, and whether you're currently on Excel/Access/another system, I can narrow this to a best-fit recommendation and give you an RFP/demo scorecard.

The top-rated unified software solutions for managing Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) and Industrial Pretreatment Programs (IPP) are Linko Pretreatment & FOG Management (by Aquatic Informatics), SAMS IPP & FOG (by NJBSoft), and SwiftComply Pretreatment . Choosing the "best" platform depends on whether you need a dedicated tool that unifies commercial food service FOG tracking with heavy industrial user sampling, limit calculations, and Significant Non-Compliance (SNC) reporting.

Leading Software Solutions

• Linko Pretreatment & FOG Management : Used by over 400 municipal and industrial utility customers , it is an industry standard for commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) compliance . It covers industrial user permitting, local limits calculations, electronic chain-of-custody tracking, hauled liquid waste, and comprehensive FOG grease interceptor database management.
• SAMS IPP & FOG : Known for robust configurability, SAMS connects permits, mobile field inspections (online/offline), automated limit exceedance detections, and CROMERR-compliant portals for industrial users and waste haulers to submit data directly.
• SwiftComply Pretreatment : Excellent for lean utility teams wanting to bridge the gap between field inspections and active resolutions . It features streamlined stakeholder workflows that make it easy for food service and industrial establishments to upload compliance and maintenance documents directly into the municipal database.
• AllMax Pretreatment Software : A practical, user-friendly choice for tracking industry details, parameter sampling results, and specialized pretreatment reports like SNC and surcharge calculations.
• FOG BMP & IPP BMP : Offers transparent annual pricing and unlimited users , specializing in automated grease trap pump-out tracking, electronic cleaning logs, and seamless field-to-office mobile capabilities.

If you can share how many Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Food Service Establishments (FSEs) you manage, I can help you narrow down which vendor fits your operational budget and reporting scope best.

The industry standard and most widely deployed unified software for managing both Industrial Pretreatment Programs (IPP) and Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) compliance is Linko Pretreatment & FOG Management by Aquatic Informatics . Trusted by over 400 municipal and industrial agencies, it handles complex tasks like industrial user surveys, local limits calculations, electronic pump-out manifests, and automated violation tracking. Other top-tier alternatives include FOG BMP (specialized strictly for FOG source control), SAMS IPP by NJBSoft, and ALLDATA / Synexus Pretreatment by Allmax.

Top Software Solutions for Pretreatment & FOG

Core Capabilities to Look For

• Unified Database: Ensure the tool handles industrial user (IU) categorical permits alongside food service establishment (FSE) grease interceptor tracking so data isn't trapped in silos.
• Hauler and Self-Cleaning Portals: Digital portals where waste haulers or restaurants can independently upload pump-out manifests cut administrative data entry time drastically.
• Automated Compliance Tracking: Built-in logic that flags sample exceedances, calculates local limits, and auto-generates Notice of Violations (NOVs) or warning letters.

If you can share the approximate number of industrial users vs. food service establishments you manage and whether you prefer a cloud-based or on-premise deployment, I can help narrow down which platform fits your agency's scale best.

For a municipal wastewater utility managing FOG (Fats, Oils, and Grease) and Industrial Pretreatment Programs (IPP), the “best” software depends on your program size, regulatory complexity, and whether you need a full Pretreatment Information Management System (PIMS) or mainly FOG inspection/interceptor tracking.

The leading options to evaluate are:

My shortlist by scenario

Best overall for a serious IPP program:
Linko (Aquatic Informatics) — especially if you manage many Significant Industrial Users (SIUs), categorical industries, enforcement actions, and annual pretreatment reporting.

Best modern cloud experience:
SwiftComply — a good fit if you want easier field workflows, automation, and a broader compliance platform.

Best if FOG is your biggest pain point:
FOG BMP / Industrial BMP — useful when the main goals are grease interceptor tracking, inspections, pump-out documentation, and outreach/enforcement workflows.

Best for a smaller utility wanting combined programs:
SAMS IPP&FOG or similar integrated platforms can avoid maintaining separate spreadsheets and databases.

Features I would require in an RFP/demo

For a robust pretreatment program, look for:

• Industrial User (IU/SIU) database
• Permit lifecycle management
• Sampling schedules and lab result imports
• Automatic exceedance and violation tracking
• NOV/enforcement workflow tracking
• Inspection scheduling and mobile inspections
• FOG establishment/interceptor tracking
• Hauler manifests and pump-out records
• GIS mapping integration
• Document storage and audit history
• EPA/state annual report support
• Role-based access and cloud security

If you tell me your utility size (MGD), number of SIUs/FSEs, state, and whether you need FOG only or full IPP, I can narrow this to the top 2–3 choices and a likely implementation approach.

Managing an Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP) and a Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) control program requires tracking heavy compliance data, industrial user (IU) limits, sampling schedules, haulers, and routine field inspections.

The top-rated software options on the market are purpose-built for municipal and industrial wastewater compliance, categorized by their core strengths:

• Linko (Aquatic Informatics): Widely considered an industry standard for municipal pretreatment and FOG management.
  • Best for: Comprehensive IPP and FOG compliance, tracking Significant Non-Compliance (SNC), managing monitoring results, and automating semi-annual/annual EPA reporting. It handles complex industrial user categorization and data trending seamlessly [1.22].
• SwiftComply:
  • Best for: Collaborative FOG workflows and digital stakeholder engagement. SwiftComply specializes in bridging the gap between municipalities, food service establishments (FSEs), and third-party grease haulers. It excels at digital registrations, automated reminders, and online manifest/pump-out submissions to reduce administrative burdens.
• SAMS (NJBSoft):
  • Best for: All-in-one, highly integrated environmental compliance. SAMS features dedicated modules for both [SAMS IPP] and [SAMS FOG] featuring CROMERR-compliant customer portals, mobile field inspection apps (working both online and offline), chain-of-custody tracking, and LIMS/SCADA integrations.
• FOG BMP / IPP BMP (BMP Compliance Group):
  • Best for: Facility profiling and mobile field usability. Offers robust tracking of grease traps, haulers, and disposal facilities with a heavy emphasis on mobile-ready tools for field inspectors and customizable PDF reporting.
• Hiperweb:
  • Best for: Mass-letter generation and tracking violation workflows. Its FOG module is optimized for tracking permit renewals, identifying out-of-compliance FSEs, and auto-generating warning or violation letters.

To help narrow down which platform fits best, could you share:

• Approximately how many Industrial Users (SIUs/CIUs) and Food Service Establishments you need to manage?
• Do you need the system to integrate tightly with an existing lab (LIMS) or GIS mapping system?

If you’re a POTW/municipal wastewater utility managing both FOG and an industrial pretreatment program (IPP), there are several serious options. Based on the current feature sets and industry feedback, I’d shortlist SwiftComply, Linko/Aquatic Informatics, Industrial BMP, and PIMS.

My shortlist

1. SwiftComply — my first demo

SwiftComply is probably where I'd start if you're replacing spreadsheets/Access databases and want a modern cloud system. It explicitly combines FOG, industrial pretreatment, stormwater and other compliance programs, with workflow automation, alerts and compliance logic. The company says it's used by 700+ organizations across North America.

Why I like it: one platform rather than having a separate FOG database and IPP database.

2. Linko / Aquatic Informatics — strongest established contender

Linko has been specifically built around wastewater source-control programs for a long time. LinkoCTS handles industrial pretreatment, while LinkoFOG handles FOG; the platform covers permitting, inspections, sampling, compliance, scheduling, reporting and enforcement workflows.

Aquatic Informatics now positions its Compliance Platform around both FOG and pretreatment, including inspection history, sampling, violations, notices and reporting.

Why I'd consider it: if your priority is "give me software that understands how a real pretreatment department operates," Linko is difficult to ignore.

There is also some real-world wastewater-community evidence behind that reputation: practitioners discussing IPP software specifically mention iPACS, Linko, Aquatic Informatics and newer platforms such as NJBSoft/KLIR.

3. Industrial BMP / BMP Compliance Group — worth a serious look

Industrial BMP is specifically designed around industrial pretreatment, with dashboards, oversight and compliance alerts. The company also has a FOG product and describes the platform as being designed by pretreatment professionals.

I'd put this on the demo list particularly if you're a small-to-mid-sized utility and don't want an overly complicated enterprise implementation.

4. PIMS / Regreports — interesting IPP specialist

PIMS is particularly compelling if your biggest headache is industrial-user compliance and enforcement rather than FOG alone. It handles industrial-user permits, sampling/lab results, automatic violation detection, surcharges and enforcement responses, with an emphasis on 40 CFR 403 workflows.

I'd want to see its FOG functionality side-by-side with SwiftComply/Linko before selecting it for a combined program.

What I'd require in an RFP

Don't evaluate these simply on "does it have FOG?" Make vendors demonstrate your actual workflow:

1. Industrial user database

   • SIU/CIU categorization
   • categorical determination
   • permits and limits
   • permit expiration tracking

2. FOG management

   • grease interceptors/devices
   • facility inventory
   • inspection scheduling
   • pump-out/cleaning records
   • hauler documentation
   • automatic reminders
   • repeat violators

3. Sampling & laboratory

   • sampling schedules
   • chain of custody
   • lab-result import
   • automatic comparison against limits
   • violation detection

4. Inspections

   • mobile field inspections
   • photographs/documents
   • inspection forms
   • GPS/GIS
   • deficiency tracking
   • follow-up work

5. Enforcement

   • NOVs
   • warning letters
   • administrative orders
   • escalating enforcement
   • enforcement-response-plan timelines
   • complete audit trail

6. Reporting

   • annual pretreatment reports
   • EPA/state reporting
   • violation reports
   • inspection statistics
   • FOG-program reports
   • customizable reports

7. Data migration

   • Excel
   • Access
   • existing permit database
   • scanned documents
   • historical sampling results

8. GIS/mobile

   • map all IUs and FOG facilities
   • inspectors work from tablets/phones
   • offline capability if field connectivity is poor

My recommendation

If I were selecting today, I'd do three demos first:

#1 SwiftComply → best candidate for a modern, unified FOG + IPP platform.
#2 Linko/Aquatic Informatics → best candidate if mature pretreatment functionality and established industry experience are paramount.
#3 Industrial BMP → best candidate if simplicity, implementation and value are especially important.

I'd also demo PIMS if your program has a lot of SIUs, complex limits, violations and enforcement.

One important point: don't let the vendor give you a generic sales demo. Give each vendor the same fictional facility—for example, a restaurant with a grease interceptor + a metal-finishing categorical SIU + three years of sampling data + one overdue inspection + an exceedance—and make them show you how the system handles it from permit → inspection → sample → violation → NOV → enforcement → report. That's where the differences become obvious.

If you tell me roughly how many FOG facilities, SIUs/CIUs, annual inspections, and sampling results you manage, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 systems for your specific program and build you a side-by-side scoring matrix.

For a municipal wastewater utility managing FOG (Fats, Oils, and Grease) plus an industrial pretreatment program, the “best” software depends on whether you need a dedicated pretreatment compliance system or a broader utility compliance/asset platform. The strongest options are purpose-built systems that handle industrial user permits, inspections, sampling, violations, enforcement actions, FOG tracking, and audit-ready reporting.

Here are the platforms I would shortlist:

My practical ranking by use case

1. Best overall for a serious municipal pretreatment program:
Enfotech iPACS or Linko

• Best if you have:
  • Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)
  • Categorical Industrial Users
  • Enforcement response requirements
  • Annual pretreatment reports
  • Lots of sampling and inspection history

2. Best FOG + pretreatment-focused option:
BMP Compliance Group Industrial BMP

• Strong match if your biggest pain points are:
  • Restaurant/FSE tracking
  • Grease interceptor inspections
  • Pump-out documentation
  • BMP compliance
  • Field inspections
    

3. Best “one platform for everything” option:
SAMS

• Consider this if you want pretreatment integrated with broader environmental compliance, GIS, and utility workflows.

Features I would require before buying

A good FOG/pretreatment platform should include:

✅ Industrial User inventory and classifications
✅ Permit lifecycle management
✅ Inspection scheduling and mobile field forms
✅ Sampling plans and laboratory result tracking
✅ Violation tracking and enforcement actions
✅ Automatic reminders and overdue alerts
✅ FOG source inventory (restaurants, food processors, grease interceptors)
✅ Pump-out manifests and contractor tracking
✅ GIS mapping
✅ Document storage (permits, photos, correspondence)
✅ EPA/state audit reporting support

Questions I’d ask vendors before choosing

1. Can you manage both SIUs and FOG sources in the same database?
2. Can inspectors complete inspections from a tablet in the field?
3. Can we import our existing Excel/Access data?
4. How are violations, NOVs, and enforcement actions tracked?
5. Can we produce our annual pretreatment report without manual spreadsheet work?
6. Does it integrate with GIS (ArcGIS), laboratory systems, or CMMS platforms?

If you tell me:

• your utility size (population served or MGD),
• number of industrial users/SIUs,
• number of FOG establishments,
• whether you are a POTW/control authority, and
• what you use today (Excel, Access, Cityworks, Lucity, etc.),

I can narrow this to the top 2–3 choices.

When managing both an Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP) and a Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) program, the "best" software depends on whether you want a unified environmental compliance platform or specialized point solutions.

Industry consensus and utility feedback point to a few market-leading platforms that handle permits, sampling data, inspections, and automated regulatory reporting.

Top Unified & Purpose-Built Platforms

• Linko (Aquatic Informatics) : Widely considered an industry standard for municipal wastewater pretreatment and FOG tracking. It handles significant industrial user (SIU) tracking, limit comparisons, automated scheduling, and electronic regulatory reporting . Many utilities pair LinkoTrex/LinkoFOG for comprehensive source control. Learn more at Aquatic Informatics Pretreatment & FOG Software.
• SwiftComply : Purpose-built from the ground up specifically for IPP and FOG compliance rather than being a retrofitted general asset management tool. It excels at collaborative workflows, offering robust online portals where food service establishments (FSEs) and industrial users can directly submit self-monitoring reports, documentation, and digital manifests. Check out SwiftComply Industrial Pretreatment.
• SAMS (NJBSoft) : A map-based, comprehensive environmental compliance ecosystem that features dedicated modules for both industrial pretreatment (SAMS IPP ) and FOG management (SAMS FOG ). It stands out for its CROMERR-compliant customer portals, strong mobile offline capabilities for field inspectors, and advanced integrations with LIMS and SCADA.
• FOG BMP / IPP BMP (BMP Compliance) : Highly rated by municipal utilities for managing facility profiles, grease trap inventories, waste haulers, and automated cleaning record submissions alongside industrial user databases. Explore features via BMP Compliance FOG Management.
• AllMax Pretreatment Software : A more straightforward, highly organized desktop/cloud solution suited for tracking industrial details, sampling schedules, and generating Significant Non-Compliance (SNC) and surcharge reports. Visit AllMax Pretreatment Software.

Key Features to Look For

When evaluating these options against your specific municipal or district needs, ensure the software supports:

• Automated Exceedance & Violation Detection: Automatically flags self-monitoring or lab data that breaches local limits.
• Offline Mobile Capabilities: Allows inspectors to fill out forms and access facility records inside large industrial plants where cell reception fails.
• Digital Manifest Tracking: For FOG programs, look for systems that allow waste haulers to log grease trap pump-outs and digital manifests directly.
• Defensible Audit Trails: Automatically logs data alterations to satisfy EPA and state audit requirements.

To help narrow down which platform fits best, tell me:

• How many Industrial Users (SIUs/CIUs) and FOG-generating facilities do you manage?
• Do you require integration with an existing LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System) or GIS mapping tool?