We're a remote-first company. What's a good Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solution to replace our legacy VPN?

For a remote-first company, ditching the legacy VPN for a modern Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solution is one of the best moves you can make for both security and employee experience. Instead of dropping employees onto a flat corporate network, ZTNA grants least-privileged, context-aware access to specific applications on an individual basis.

The right choice depends heavily on your current tech stack, company size, and how technical your workforce is.

Top ZTNA Solutions for Remote-First Teams

• Cloudflare One (Cloudflare Access)
  • Best For: Fast, flexible deployment with a generous entry/free tier.
  • How it works: Relies on Cloudflare’s massive global edge. It offers both agentless (browser-based) access for web apps and a lightweight client (WARP) for non-web resources.
  • Why it fits remote teams: Extremely fast performance globally, easy to spin up, and integrates with virtually any Identity Provider (IdP). It also includes a generous free tier (up to 50 users) to test the waters. You can check out details on the Cloudflare Zero Trust platform.
• Tailscale
  • Best For: Developer-heavy, highly technical, or lean remote teams.
  • How it works: Built on WireGuard, it creates a secure, peer-to-peer mesh overlay network device-to-device.
  • Why it fits remote teams: It takes minutes to deploy, completely abstracts away the headache of traditional firewalls/VPN gateways, and treats every remote laptop like it's sitting in the same virtual room without routing traffic through a centralized, sluggish cloud bottleneck. Explore more via Tailscale.
• Zscaler Private Access (ZPA)
  • Best For: Scaling fast, mid-to-large distributed enterprises needing robust security.
  • How it works: Cloud-brokered ZTNA via lightweight app connectors deployed in your private cloud or data center. Users never connect to the network—they connect strictly to authorized apps.
  • Why it fits remote teams: It is an industry benchmark for enterprise-scale zero trust. It completely decouples internal apps from public visibility, making lateral movement impossible if a remote worker's laptop is compromised. Learn more at Zscaler Private Access.
• Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) + Global Secure Access
  • Best For: Organizations already deeply entrenched in the Microsoft 365 / Entra ecosystem.
  • How it works: Native integration combining Microsoft's powerful conditional access policies with their emerging Security Service Edge (SSE) framework.
  • Why it fits remote teams: If your identity source of truth is already Microsoft, adding their native zero-trust network controls minimizes administrative overhead and unifies device compliance (via Intune) with network access. Review the options on Microsoft Entra ID.
• Twingate
  • Best For: Mid-market teams wanting a modern, user-friendly VPN replacement that mimics consumer simplicity with enterprise controls.
  • How it works: Software-defined perimeter that isolates private resources and integrates cleanly with modern IdPs (Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft).
  • Why it fits remote teams: Known for having one of the slickest UX/onboarding flows for end-users, reducing friction for non-technical remote staff. Details are available on Twingate.

To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:

• What Identity Provider (IdP) are you using (Google Workspace, Okta, Microsoft Entra)?
• Roughly how many employees/users need access?
• Are your internal applications mostly web-based (SaaS/Internal web apps) or do you rely heavily on SSH, RDP, or database ports?

For a remote-first company replacing a legacy VPN, I’d shortlist Cloudflare Access, Tailscale, and Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). My default recommendation for many mid-sized engineering-heavy companies would be Cloudflare Access; for a very developer/infrastructure-centric organization, Tailscale is particularly compelling.

My shortlist

What I'd choose

1. Cloudflare Access — best general-purpose choice.

Cloudflare explicitly positions Access as a VPN replacement, providing access to private applications based on identity, device posture and context rather than putting the employee on the corporate network. It also supports infrastructure access such as SSH/RDP.

The particularly nice part for a remote-first company is that you can make internal applications behave much more like SaaS: authenticate the user, evaluate policy, and give them access to only the application they need, rather than exposing an entire subnet.

2. Tailscale — my pick if engineers are the primary users.

Tailscale uses WireGuard-based encrypted connectivity and an identity-centric model. It's especially attractive when "VPN replacement" really means developers need secure access to servers, Kubernetes, databases and cloud infrastructure.

3. Zscaler Private Access — my enterprise pick.

If you have hundreds/thousands of employees, significant compliance requirements, lots of legacy applications, third-party access, or want ZTNA to become part of a broader SSE/SASE security architecture, I'd put ZPA at the top of the enterprise shortlist. ZPA brokers access directly to authorized applications rather than putting users on the network, with extensive segmentation and security controls.

The architecture I'd aim for

Don't simply replace:

Laptop → VPN → corporate network → application

with another product that does essentially the same thing.

Aim for:

Laptop → identity/device verification → ZTNA policy → specific application

For example:

• Employee authenticates through your IdP.
• Device posture is evaluated.
• Policy determines whether that employee can access GitLab, Jira, an internal dashboard, SSH, etc.
• The user gets access to that resource, not a routable connection to the surrounding network.
• MFA and conditional access remain enforced.
• Access is logged centrally.
• Compromising one account doesn't automatically provide broad network access.

That's the fundamental security advantage over a conventional VPN: application access instead of network access.

A practical decision rule

If you told me only "we're remote-first and want to kill our VPN," I'd evaluate them in this order:

Cloudflare Access → Tailscale → Zscaler ZPA

But I'd switch the ordering if you told me:

• Mostly developers / Kubernetes / SSH: Tailscale first.
• 50–500 employees / mixed SaaS + private apps: Cloudflare first.
• Large enterprise / compliance / extensive legacy infrastructure: Zscaler first.
• Heavily Microsoft/Entra environment: add Entra Private Access to the shortlist.

One important point: ZTNA isn't automatically better just because the product has "zero trust" in its name. I'd run a proof of concept against your actual applications and test device posture, IdP integration, DNS, non-HTTP applications, SSH/RDP, BYOD, logging/SIEM integration, performance, and failure modes before committing.

Cloudflare explicitly positions Access as a VPN replacement, providing access to private applications based on identity, device posture and context rather than putting the employee on the corporate network. It also supports infrastructure access such as SSH/RDP.

The particularly nice part for a remote-first company is that you can make internal applications behave much more like SaaS: authenticate the user, evaluate policy, and give them access to only the application they need, rather than exposing an entire subnet.

2. Tailscale — my pick if engineers are the primary users.

Tailscale uses WireGuard-based encrypted connectivity and an identity-centric model. It's especially attractive when "VPN replacement" really means developers need secure access to servers, Kubernetes, databases and cloud infrastructure.

3. Zscaler Private Access — my enterprise pick.

If you have hundreds/thousands of employees, significant compliance requirements, lots of legacy applications, third-party access, or want ZTNA to become part of a broader SSE/SASE security architecture, I'd put ZPA at the top of the enterprise shortlist. ZPA brokers access directly to authorized applications rather than putting users on the network, with extensive segmentation and security controls.

Replacing a legacy VPN with Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is one of the best moves a remote-first company can make to improve both security and user experience. Instead of dropping employees onto the corporate network, ZTNA connects them securely and directly to individual applications based on identity and device posture.

The right ZTNA solution depends heavily on your current identity provider and company size:

• Cloudflare Zero Trust
  • Best For: Fast, flexible deployment and budget-conscious or lean teams.
  • Why it fits remote-first: Offers an exceptional agentless (browser-based) or lightweight agent experience. It integrates with any SAML/OIDC identity provider and has a very generous free tier, making it easy to test out before rolling it out company-wide.
• Microsoft Entra ID + Intune (Conditional Access)
  • Best For: Organizations already deeply entrenched in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.
  • Why it fits remote-first: If your remote workforce logs into Windows/Mac endpoints managed via Intune and authenticates via Entra ID, this native approach enforces robust device compliance and conditional access policies without needing a separate third-party overlay.
• • Best For: Mid-market to large enterprises needing a robust, scalable cloud-brokered replacement.
  • Why it fits remote-first: It hides internal apps completely from the public internet (using app connectors) and connects remote workers seamlessly via the Zscaler Client Connector without ever backhauling traffic through a central data center.
• Google BeyondCorp Enterprise
  • Best For: Google Workspace-centric shops.
  • Why it fits remote-first: Leverages Chrome-native security controls and context-aware access policies directly tied to Google Workspace identities and device states.

If you want to narrow this down, let me know:

• What identity provider do you use (Google Workspace, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta)?
• Are your internal apps mostly web-based , or do you have heavy non-web/TCP legacy apps?
• Roughly how many remote employees do you have?

For a remote-first company replacing a legacy VPN, I’d shortlist ZTNA platforms based less on “who has the most features” and more on your identity stack, application mix, and security maturity. Modern ZTNA should give users access to specific applications, not put them “inside the network” like a VPN does.

A strong shortlist:

My default recommendations by company profile

1. Remote-first startup or SaaS company (50–500 employees)

I’d start with:

• Cloudflare Access if most apps are web-based.
• Tailscale if the main need is engineers accessing infrastructure.
• Microsoft Entra Private Access if you are already deep in Microsoft 365.

2. Growing company (500–5,000 employees)

I’d evaluate:

• Zscaler ZPA for a dedicated ZTNA program.
• Cloudflare One for simpler operations.
• Netskope if data protection is a major driver.

3. Enterprise with compliance/security operations

I’d look closely at:

• Zscaler
• Palo Alto Prisma Access
• Netskope
• Cisco Secure Access

These are often selected when ZTNA is part of a broader SSE/SASE strategy rather than just a VPN replacement.

Features I would require before choosing

• Identity-provider integration: Entra ID, Okta, Google Workspace, etc.
• Device posture checks: managed device, OS version, EDR health.
• Per-application policies: avoid recreating VPN-style broad network access.
• Strong logging/SIEM integration.
• Support for your legacy apps: SSH, RDP, databases, internal tools, non-web apps.
• Contractor/BYOD access paths without issuing full corporate VPN access.
• Simple rollback plan during migration.

A practical migration path

1. Inventory what VPN users actually access.
2. Classify apps: - Web apps → move first.

• Internal TCP apps → test with connectors.
• Legacy systems → decide whether to modernize or isolate.

3. Integrate your identity provider and MFA.
4. Pilot with IT/security and a small employee group.
5. Remove VPN access application-by-application, not all at once.

If you’re a typical remote-first company with mostly SaaS, cloud infrastructure, and a modern identity provider, I would usually start a proof-of-concept with Cloudflare Access, Zscaler ZPA, and Microsoft Entra Private Access and pick based on operational fit rather than feature count.

For a remote-first company, replacing a legacy VPN with Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) depends heavily on your infrastructure makeup (cloud-native vs. hybrid) and how technical your workforce is. Moving away from a perimeter-centric model means connecting users directly to individual applications rather than placing them onto the corporate network.

The top ZTNA solutions break down into distinct categories based on organizational needs:

1. Best for Cloud-First & Developer-Centric Teams:

If your internal apps, dashboards, and tooling live in the cloud or SaaS environments, Cloudflare's edge-native platform is a seamless fit.

• How it works: It operates via a reverse proxy sitting in front of your applications, authenticating every request against your identity provider (IdP) before letting traffic through.
• Key Strengths: Exceptional global performance, extremely low friction for end users, and flexible clientless or client-based (WARP) options. It also features a generous free tier for smaller teams.

“The most practical ZTNA entry point for most organizations. Cloudflare Access lets you put identity-based access in front of internal applications without installing agents on user devices...”

2. Best Lightweight, Modern VPN Alternative:

If you want a clean, dedicated ZTNA tool that mirrors the simplicity of a VPN replacement without the bloat of a massive enterprise SASE suite.

• How it works: Uses isolated, component-based connectors inside your private networks/clouds with an easy-to-deploy client on user devices.
• Key Strengths: Fast deployment, granular per-resource authorization, and brilliant visibility into network flows without forcing all traffic through a centralized corporate bottleneck.

3. Best for Engineering & Highly Technical Workforces:

Built on WireGuard mesh networking principles, Tailscale is a massive favorite among engineering-heavy and remote-first tech companies.

• How it works: Creates a secure, peer-to-peer overlay network using your existing identity provider for authentication.
• Key Strengths: Incredibly fast setup, minimal configuration overhead, and works smoothly across diverse operating systems and developer environments.

4. Best Enterprise Scale & Security Consolidation:

If your remote-first organization is scaling rapidly or faces strict compliance frameworks requiring full Secure Service Edge (SSE) convergence.

• How it works: Part of the massive Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, connecting users to specific apps via inline policy enforcement while completely shielding private apps from the internet.
• Key Strengths: Market-leading scale, comprehensive threat protection, and robust integration with data loss prevention (DLP).

“Zscaler receives praise for "scalable zero trust access that outperforms legacy VPNs." Enterprises note "strong policy enforcement for remote users."”

What to Focus on During Your Evaluation

• Identity Provider (IdP) Integration: Ensure the ZTNA hooks natively into whatever you use for IAM (e.g., Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Google Workspace).
• Device Posture Checks: For remote workers using a mix of corporate-managed and personal machines, look for solutions that verify endpoint health (EDR/MDM status) before granting access.
• App Protocols: Make sure the tool supports everything you run—not just standard web apps (HTTP/HTTPS), but also SSH, RDP, or database connections if your engineers need them.

To help narrow down the right fit, tell me:

• Do your internal applications live mostly in the cloud (AWS/GCP/Azure/SaaS) or do you have legacy on-prem data centers?
• Roughly how many employees need access?

For a remote-first company replacing a legacy VPN, I’d shortlist Cloudflare Access, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Zscaler Private Access, and Tailscale. The right choice depends mostly on your identity stack, application mix, and how much security infrastructure you want ZTNA to absorb.

My default recommendation: Cloudflare Access

Cloudflare Access is probably the best general-purpose VPN replacement for a remote-first company.

Why I like it:

• Application-level access rather than broad network access — users get access to the specific resources they're authorized for, reducing lateral movement.
• Works with self-hosted, SaaS, and non-web applications, so you're not limited to browser apps.
• Strong fit for distributed teams because Cloudflare's edge is already globally distributed.
• Supports identity, device posture, MFA, and context-aware policies.
• Migration can be incremental: put a few internal applications behind Access, prove it out, then retire portions of the VPN.
• There's a free tier for teams under 50 users, with paid plans starting at $7/user/month when billed annually.

When I'd choose something else

Microsoft Entra Private Access deserves particular attention if you're already a Microsoft shop. It extends Entra Conditional Access and MFA to private/on-prem applications and is explicitly designed to replace legacy VPNs.

Zscaler Private Access is the enterprise heavyweight: it brokers connections between authorized users and authorized applications rather than putting users onto the network.

What I'd implement

Don't simply replace:

VPN → new ZTNA VPN

Instead aim for:

User → identity/device verification → specific application → least-privilege access

I'd migrate in roughly this order:

1. Inventory VPN usage — determine which applications, servers, subnets, and protocols people actually use.
2. Integrate your IdP — Entra ID, Okta, Google Workspace, etc.
3. Start with low-risk applications and a small employee pilot.
4. Require MFA + managed-device/posture checks for sensitive resources.
5. Move applications from subnet-level permissions toward per-app policies.
6. Keep the old VPN running as a fallback during migration.
7. Analyze VPN logs for anything still being used.
8. Remove VPN access once the remaining dependencies have been migrated.

The key architectural question is whether you really need network-level connectivity. If most employees are accessing web apps, Git, SSH, RDP, internal APIs, databases, etc., ZTNA can usually give them the individual access they need without exposing the underlying network.

If you tell me your approximate company size, IdP (Microsoft/Google/Okta), where your apps live (AWS/Azure/on-prem), and whether employees need things like SSH/RDP/SMB, I can narrow this to 2–3 products and give you a concrete recommendation.

Replacing a legacy VPN with a Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solution is a major step toward securing a remote-first workforce. Modern Ztna moves away from perimeter-based network access to continuous, identity- and context-aware verification.

Here are the top ZTNA solutions widely adopted by remote-first companies:

• Cloudflare One (Cloudflare Access) : Best for lightning-fast edge performance and ease of integration. It combines ZTNA, Secure Web Gateway (SWG), and DNS filtering into a unified global edge network, minimizing latency for globally distributed teams.
• Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) : An industry leader in enterprise-grade security. It connects users directly to apps rather than the network, entirely hiding internal applications from the public internet and preventing lateral movement.
• Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Access) : Excellent for organizations needing deep security inspection and advanced threat prevention. It integrates robust ZTNA 2.0 principles with comprehensive enterprise cloud security.
• BeyondCorp Enterprise (Google Cloud) : Ideal for organizations heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. It leverages device posture, user identity, and context to grant fine-grained access without a traditional client.
• Twingate : Great for small-to-medium remote teams or companies looking for an easier deployment than legacy enterprise tools. It offers granular, per-resource access controls and sets up in minutes while integrating with existing identity providers.

User Experiences

I found Cloudflare Access super easy to roll out for our remote team without needing a massive infrastructure overhaul.

Zscaler ZPA completely eliminated our reliance on traditional VPNs and made managing contractor access way less stressful.

If you'd like to narrow down the choices, let me know:

• Your current Identity Provider (IdP) (e.g., Okta, Azure AD/Entra ID, Google Workspace)
• The scale of your workforce (number of remote employees/contractors)
• Whether you host resources primarily in cloud environments (AWS/GCP/Azure) or on-premises data centers

For a remote-first company, I’d shortlist Cloudflare Zero Trust, Twingate, Tailscale, and Zscaler Private Access. The right choice depends mostly on company size, how much internal infrastructure you have, and whether you want ZTNA alone or a broader security platform.

My practical ranking

ZTNA's key advantage over a traditional VPN is that users don't simply get "onto the corporate network." Access is granted to particular applications/resources based on identity and other policy signals, reducing lateral-movement risk.

🥇 I'd start with Cloudflare Zero Trust

For a remote-first organization, Cloudflare is probably the best default to evaluate first. Its architecture is particularly well suited to distributed users, and it can provide browser-based/clientless access for appropriate applications as well as private-network access. Cloudflare also publishes a specific migration architecture for replacing VPN concentrators with ZTNA.

It's especially attractive if you want to eventually combine ZTNA with secure web access, DNS security, and other SSE capabilities rather than maintaining several separate products.

When I'd choose the others

Twingate — My pick if your main goal is "get rid of the VPN without creating a giant security project." It is designed around resource-level access rather than putting users on a flat network. It's particularly compelling for small-to-mid-sized distributed organizations.

Tailscale — Excellent if your infrastructure is heavily developer-oriented and people need SSH, databases, Kubernetes, internal services, etc. It's more of an identity-aware mesh networking approach than a conventional enterprise ZTNA/SSE platform.

Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) — I'd move this to the top if you're a large organization with substantial compliance requirements, thousands of users, lots of private applications, or plans to consolidate ZTNA with a broader SSE deployment. It is one of the leading enterprise-scale options.

Prisma Access — Particularly compelling if you're already standardized on Palo Alto Networks and want ZTNA to become part of a broader SASE architecture.

What I'd evaluate in a POC

Don't just test whether employees can connect. Test these scenarios:

1. Employee → SaaS/internal web app
2. Employee → SSH/database/internal service
3. Unmanaged device → sensitive app
4. Compromised account → resources it shouldn't reach
5. Employee leaves → access revoked immediately
6. Contractor → one application, nothing else
7. Remote employee in different continents → latency
8. Admin → audit trail showing exactly who accessed what

Also make identity + device posture central to the design: your IdP/SSO, MFA, MDM, endpoint security, and ZTNA policy should work together rather than treating ZTNA as merely a new VPN client.

Bottom line: If you gave me no other information, I'd run a POC of Cloudflare Zero Trust vs. Twingate, with Zscaler added if you're enterprise-scale. If your workforce is primarily engineers accessing infrastructure, I'd substitute Tailscale for Twingate.

If you tell me your employee count, IdP (Microsoft Entra/Okta/etc.), where your apps live (AWS/Azure/on-prem), and whether you have MDM, I can narrow this to a 2–3 vendor shortlist and give you a migration architecture.

For a remote-first company, I’d shortlist Zscaler Private Access, Cloudflare One, Twingate, Netskope One Private Access, and Microsoft Entra Private Access. The right choice depends heavily on how much legacy/on-prem infrastructure you still have.

My default recommendation: Zscaler Private Access

Zscaler Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) would be my first enterprise-grade evaluation. It is purpose-built to replace VPNs: users get access to specific applications rather than the underlying network, and applications can remain invisible to the public internet. ZPA also integrates with identity providers via SAML/SCIM and supports cloud and data-center applications.

Why I'd pick it: strong security model, mature enterprise controls, good fit for a distributed workforce, and particularly good if you have a mixture of AWS/Azure and legacy internal applications.

The shortlist

Twingate is particularly attractive if your requirement is basically "make our internal resources securely reachable without maintaining a VPN." Its model binds connections to verified identity, device and resource, rather than putting the user onto a network.

Netskope One Private Access is worth serious consideration if you're also looking to consolidate ZTNA + DLP + broader SSE/security controls. It supports legacy protocols such as SSH/RDP and has agentless/browser access for unmanaged or third-party devices.

What I'd actually pilot

For a typical remote-first company, I'd run a 2–3 week pilot with Zscaler + Twingate + Cloudflare and test:

1. Identity: Okta/Entra integration, MFA and conditional access.
2. Device posture: block unmanaged/noncompliant endpoints.
3. Application coverage: SaaS, web apps, SSH, RDP, databases, file shares, etc.
4. Least privilege: can you give Alice access to one application without exposing its subnet?
5. User experience: latency, reconnect behavior, sleep/wake, roaming between networks.
6. Admin experience: policy creation, troubleshooting and audit logs.
7. BYOD/contractors: browser-based access without installing a VPN client.
8. Migration: whether you can run ZTNA alongside the legacy VPN and migrate application-by-application.

The key architectural test is "application access, not network access." If the product essentially recreates a VPN by giving users broad access to subnets, you're not getting the full benefit of ZTNA.

Bottom line:

• Enterprise/security-first → Zscaler
• Cloud-first + good economics → Cloudflare
• Simple and developer-friendly → Twingate
• Heavy DLP/SSE requirements → Netskope
• Deep Microsoft environment → Entra Private Access

If you tell me roughly employee count, IdP (Okta/Entra/etc.), AWS/Azure/on-prem mix, and whether you need SSH/RDP/database access, I can narrow this to a 2-vendor recommendation and give you a migration architecture.

Replacing a legacy VPN with Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is one of the highest-impact moves a remote-first company can make . Instead of placing remote employees "on the network" (which creates massive lateral movement risks if a laptop is compromised), modern ZTNA connects users exclusively to the specific applications they are authorized to see, verified via identity and device posture.

The best ZTNA solution depends heavily on your team's size, your current tech stack, and whether your engineering culture demands high speed and minimal friction. Top-tier options are categorized below by their strengths for remote-first organizations:

• • Best For: Fast, cloud-native deployment and teams already leveraging web/cloud apps.
  • Standout Feature: Acts as a reverse proxy with a massive global edge network (over 300 points of presence). It supports both agent-based access (via the WARP client) and fully clientless, browser-based access (ideal for third-party contractors or BYOD). There is also a generous free tier for smaller teams to pilot.
• Twingate
  • Best For: Modern, developer-focused, or mid-market teams looking for an effortless drop-in VPN replacement without changing network architecture.
  • Standout Feature: Extremely praised for user experience and simple administration. It provides granular, resource-level network segmentation without routing all traffic through a heavy corporate tunnel, and integrates smoothly with major identity providers like Okta, Google Workspace, and Microsoft Entra ID.
• Zscaler Private Access (ZPA)
  • Best For: Scale-focused or fast-growing distributed enterprises that want a comprehensive Security Service Edge (SSE) platform.
  • Standout Feature: Part of the massive Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange. It connects users directly to private apps via a cloud-native broker without ever exposing internal IPs or allowing lateral traversal. It is robust, highly compliant, and ideal if you also need deep data loss prevention (DLP) and inline threat protection.
• Tailscale
  • Best For: Highly technical, engineering-driven, or developer-heavy remote teams.
  • Standout Feature: Built on a peer-to-peer WireGuard mesh overlay. It is blazing fast, incredibly lightweight to install across Mac, Windows, Linux, and mobile, and handles complex multi-cloud or home-lab style server access with minimal configuration overhead.
• Microsoft Entra Private Access
  • Best For: Organizations deeply embedded in the Microsoft 365 / Entra ID ecosystem.
  • Standout Feature: An identity-centric ZTNA solution that natively plugs into your existing Microsoft Conditional Access policies, making adoption seamless if your users already authenticate via Entra ID.

If you want to narrow this down, tell me:

• What Identity Provider (IdP) do you use (Google Workspace, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID)?
• Are your internal apps mostly web-based , or do you heavy-lift legacy protocols like RDP, SSH, or SMB?
• Roughly how many users need access?

I can give you a tailored recommendation and migration path.