We're a vertical SaaS business. Which venture firms have a specific investment thesis around software for legacy industries?

Yes. If by “legacy industries” you mean sectors where workflows still run on spreadsheets, paper, on-premise systems, fragmented point solutions, or human-heavy processes, there are a handful of VCs whose thesis is unusually close to that.

I’d divide the market into explicit thesis fits and larger vertical-SaaS specialists.

Most explicit thesis fits

The one I'd investigate first

Aventra is almost uncannily aligned if you're an early-stage vertical SaaS company. Their language is essentially the pitch you're describing: software for industries where operations still rely on fragmented tools, manual processes and outdated systems, with the ambition of becoming the system of record.

NVP Capital is probably the other particularly interesting one. Its thesis is more explicitly vertical AI + enterprise software, so I'd prioritize it if AI is a meaningful part of your product/roadmap.

Larger firms with a very strong vertical-SaaS thesis

Bessemer Venture Partners

This is probably the most important major VC to have on your list, even though its thesis isn't phrased simply as “legacy industries.”

Bessemer has one of the deepest vertical SaaS track records in venture and explicitly says that vertical software can unseat incumbents and transform industries. Its historical portfolio includes companies such as Procore, Mindbody and Shopify.

Bain Capital Ventures

Worth targeting if your vertical SaaS can expand beyond subscriptions into payments, fintech, payroll, lending, insurance or other embedded financial products. That's where the vertical SaaS model becomes particularly interesting to larger investors.

Construct Capital / Eclipse Ventures / Ironspring Ventures

These become especially attractive if “legacy industry” means the physical economy:

• Construct Capital — manufacturing, logistics, transportation and infrastructure.
• Eclipse Ventures — technology transforming industrial/physical-economy businesses.
• Ironspring Ventures — industrials, construction, infrastructure, energy and utilities.
• Schematic Ventures — supply chain, logistics and freight.
• Brick & Mortar Ventures — construction and field operations.

I'd put these ahead of generalist VCs if your customers have equipment, inventory, trucks, crews, warehouses, factories, job sites, physical assets, etc.

A particularly interesting growth-stage option

If you're already at meaningful scale, Frontier Growth deserves serious attention. Its investment criteria are almost a checklist for an established vertical SaaS company:

• mission-critical vertical platform
• deep industry-specific workflows
• late-adopting industry
• replacement of legacy competitors
• strong retention
• $3–20M ARR
• $5–30M initial equity investment

Frontier GrowthThat's substantially more specific than the usual “we like B2B SaaS” positioning.

How I'd prioritize the list

Assuming you're a US-based vertical SaaS company replacing incumbent/legacy software, my initial target list would look roughly like:

1. Aventra Capital — if pre-seed/seed
2. NVP Capital — if vertical AI / enterprise
3. New Stack Ventures — if early-stage and in an underserved legacy sector
4. Bessemer — if you have substantial traction and a very large vertical
5. Navigate Ventures — if you're $3M+ ARR and post-PMF
6. Frontier Growth — if you're $3–20M ARR and approaching growth-equity territory
7. Bain Capital Ventures — particularly if there is an embedded-fintech opportunity
8. Construct / Eclipse / Ironspring / Schematic — if you're in the physical economy

The important distinction I'd make is “legacy industry” vs. “vertical SaaS.” The best investors for you aren't necessarily the funds that say vertical SaaS most often; they're the ones that believe software can become the operating system for an industry that has historically been poorly digitized. That's a much narrower—and more useful—investor thesis.

If you tell me your vertical, ARR/stage, geography, and whether you're pre-seed/seed/A/Series B, I can narrow this to 15–20 specific firms/partners, including relevant portfolio companies and why each one would plausibly take the meeting.

Bessemer has one of the deepest vertical SaaS track records in venture and explicitly says that vertical software can unseat incumbents and transform industries. Its historical portfolio includes companies such as Procore, Mindbody and Shopify.

The venture capital landscape features several specialized firms that explicitly focus on B2B software, vertical market software (VMS), and workflow automation for traditional or legacy industries (such as construction, manufacturing, logistics, supply chain, and the broader "industrial/built" environment).

The key venture and strategic firms with a dedicated thesis around software for legacy and traditional industries include:

Specialist Early-Stage & Niche Funds

• 640 Oxford : An early-stage firm focused explicitly on the "reindustrialization" of legacy industries. They heavily back Vertical SaaS and productivity tools that digitize manual work and streamline operations in traditional sectors.
• Brick & Mortar Ventures : A prominent early-stage VC firm focused on software and hardware transforming the "built world"—specifically targeting architecture, engineering, construction (AEC), and real estate industries.
• Building Ventures : Invests primarily at the seed and Series A stages in technologies, robotics, and SaaS designed to modernize the design, construction, and operations of legacy physical infrastructure.
• Laconia Capital : A seed-stage B2B software investor with a core thesis centered on bringing "systematic order to traditional industries" (spanning supply chain, fintech-enabled workflows, and operational software for legacy spaces).
• Ironspring Ventures : Focuses on digital transformation for traditional industrial sectors like manufacturing, logistics, and construction, backing B2B software and supply chain tech.

Generalists & Multi-Stage Funds with Strong Legacy/Industrial SaaS Theses

• General Catalyst : Highly active in "transformation of regulated and traditional industries". They frequently back applied AI and workflow software designed to overhaul massive legacy footprints, notably in industrials and healthcare.
• January Ventures : A pre-seed/seed fund that explicitly targets early-stage B2B founders transforming traditional, non-tech industries and legacy enterprise processes.

Corporate & Non-Traditional VMS Backers

• Constellation VMS Ventures : Run via Constellation Software Inc. (CSI) , a legendary consolidator of vertical market software. This $200M initiative specifically targets early-stage vertical market software (VMS) initiatives, often pairing startup founders with an existing CSI business unit for domain expertise and long-term holding power.

If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:

• What specific legacy industry are you targeting (e.g., manufacturing, construction, maritime)?
• What funding stage are you currently raising for (Pre-Seed/Seed vs. Series A/B)?

I can help you prioritize which of these firms best aligns with your current metrics and sector.

Yes. There’s a fairly distinct investor category here, and I’d separate firms whose thesis explicitly says “legacy/under-digitized industries” from generalist VCs that happen to have strong vertical-SaaS portfolios.

Best thesis-level fits

The major VC I'd absolutely target: Bessemer

Bessemer Venture Partners is probably the most important firm to put on the list even though its thesis isn't limited to “legacy industries.”

It has one of the strongest vertical-software track records in venture—Procore, ServiceTitan, Toast, Veeva, Mindbody, etc.—and has spent years articulating the idea that specialized software becomes the operating system for individual industries.

So if your pitch is:

“This industry is huge, fragmented and poorly served by generic software. We're building its system of record and eventually its operating system.” Bessemer is an unusually natural conversation.

How I'd prioritize them

If I were building a fundraising pipeline for a vertical SaaS company, I'd probably start with:

Tier 1 — thesis is almost word-for-word your story

1. Aventra
2. NVP
3. Spider Capital
4. C2 Ventures

Tier 2 — elite firms with deep vertical/legacy-industry experience 5. Bessemer 6. Bain Capital Ventures 7. Construct 8. Eclipse 9. Ironspring

Tier 3 — highly dependent on the vertical 10. Schematic — logistics/supply chain 11. Brick & Mortar — construction/built world 12. General Catalyst 13. 8VC 14. Insight Partners — especially once you're at scale

One interesting distinction: Aventra and NVP are probably the closest conceptual matches, while Bessemer is probably the strongest institutional/track-record match. Aventra explicitly says it wants companies that replace fragmented workflows with a centralized system of record; NVP explicitly talks about modernizing under-digitized legacy industries.

If you tell me the specific vertical you're selling into + ARR + growth rate + current/target round, I can narrow this to 10–15 firms and the specific partners you should approach at each, including their closest portfolio-company comps.

“This industry is huge, fragmented and poorly served by generic software. We're building its system of record and eventually its operating system.” Bessemer is an unusually natural conversation.

How I'd prioritize them

If I were building a fundraising pipeline for a vertical SaaS company, I'd probably start with:

Tier 1 — thesis is almost word-for-word your story

1. Aventra
2. NVP
3. Spider Capital
4. C2 Ventures

Tier 2 — elite firms with deep vertical/legacy-industry experience 5. Bessemer 6. Bain Capital Ventures 7. Construct 8. Eclipse 9. Ironspring

Tier 3 — highly dependent on the vertical 10. Schematic — logistics/supply chain 11. Brick & Mortar — construction/built world 12. General Catalyst 13. 8VC 14. Insight Partners — especially once you're at scale

One interesting distinction: Aventra and NVP are probably the closest conceptual matches, while Bessemer is probably the strongest institutional/track-record match. Aventra explicitly says it wants companies that replace fragmented workflows with a centralized system of record; NVP explicitly talks about modernizing under-digitized legacy industries.

When targeting legacy, physical, or blue-collar industries (such as construction, manufacturing, logistics, supply chain, trucking, and field services), generalist VCs often struggle to understand unsexy workflows, pen-and-paper handoffs, or complex localized compliance.

A specialized ecosystem of venture capital firms explicitly focuses on digitizing the "physical economy" and traditional industries via vertical SaaS and vertical AI.

Niche & Sector-Specific VCs (The Physical Economy Specialists)

1. • Ironspring Ventures : Focuses explicitly on digital transformation for traditional industrial sectors like manufacturing, construction, supply chain, and heavy equipment. They frequently back early-stage vertical SaaS and operating systems modernizing heavy industries.
2. • Schematic Ventures : Invests in early-stage technology companies disrupting the supply chain, logistics, and manufacturing sectors. They heavily target software and workflow automation built for legacy industrial infrastructure.
3. • Building Ventures : A dedicated early-stage fund focused on the "built environment"—architecture, engineering, construction (AEC), and real estate. Ideal if your vertical SaaS targets contractors, developers, or building operations.
4. • Fifth Wall : The dominant name in proptech and construction tech. While they invest larger checks, their thesis revolves around bringing legacy real estate, construction, and property management up to speed with modern cloud and AI infrastructure.

Generalist / Multi-Stage Giants with Massive vSaaS Track Records

If you are looking for premier brand-name venture partners who deeply understand the "Vertical SaaS playbook" (pricing, land-and-expand, embedded payments) and actively hunt for "Vertical SaaS 2.0 / Vertical AI" in unsexy sectors:

1. • Bessemer Venture Partners : Pioneer of vertical SaaS investing. They backed defining historical giants like Shopify, Procore, and ServiceTitan, and maintain an active thesis around finding software for niche, overlooked operational roles.
2. • Index Ventures : Frequently highlights an explicit thesis around combining vertical software with embedded payments to drag pen-and-paper legacy industries into modern workflows.
3. • Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) : Outspoken proponents of "Vertical SaaS 2.0" and AI-native automation for specific vertical labor markets. They actively seek out software replacing legacy workflows in massive, non-tech-native sectors.

If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:

• What specific legacy industry your vertical SaaS targets (e.g., trucking, commercial plumbing, manufacturing)?
• What funding stage you are currently raising for (Seed, Series A, etc.)?

I can give you a tighter shortlist of partners and recent deal activity matching your sector.

Backing software for legacy, un-digitized, or heavy industries (construction, manufacturing, logistics, supply chain, the trades, and field services) has become a major conviction area for specialized and generalist venture firms alike.

The top venture capital firms with an explicit investment thesis or dedicated track record around legacy and industrial vertical SaaS include:

• • Ironspring Ventures : An early-stage firm that explicitly focuses on leading and co-leading investments in software and technology digitizing the industrial world—spanning construction, manufacturing, transport, and logistics.
• • Building Ventures : A dedicated fund focused exclusively on the "future of the built environment," backing early-stage startups transforming architecture, engineering, construction, and property operations.
• • Momenta : An industrial impact venture capital firm targeting digital disruptors, supply chain innovators, and software enhancing operational efficiency and sustainability in legacy industrial sectors.
• • Navitas Capital : Focuses heavily on technology, software, and hardware innovations driving productivity and digitization across real estate, construction, and legacy property sectors.
• • Blackhorn Ventures : Invests in infrastructure, industrial, and heavy-duty legacy sectors where software and resource-efficiency can radically alter traditional physical operations.
• • Bessemer Venture Partners : While a massive generalist, Bessemer has a legendary, multi-decade history in vertical SaaS (having backed category-defining giants like Procore for construction and ServiceTitan for the trades) and actively hunts for next-gen platforms moving off legacy stacks.
• • Bain Capital Ventures (BCV) : Known for deep thesis-driven work in vertical SaaS and enterprise software transforming foundational, non-consumption, and operational heavy sectors.

If you'd like, let me know:

• What is your specific vertical (e.g., construction, manufacturing, trucking, field services)?
• What funding stage are you currently raising for (Seed, Series A, etc.)?

I can narrow down these recommendations to the exact partners and check sizes best suited for your business.

Yes. There’s a fairly distinct investor category here, and I’d separate true “legacy-industry modernization” theses from firms that merely happen to have a good vertical SaaS portfolio.

The strongest thesis-level fits

The bigger, more established names I'd also target

Bessemer Venture Partners is probably the most important generalist to include. Its long-running vertical SaaS thesis is essentially that every sufficiently large industry eventually gets its own software operating system. The portfolio—Procore, ServiceTitan, Toast, Veeva, etc.—is unusually strong evidence that this isn't just marketing.

Bain Capital Ventures is another particularly good fit if your SaaS has the potential to become more than workflow software—payments, fintech, payroll, lending, AI, or other monetization layers. It has repeatedly articulated a vertical SaaS thesis.

Then there are the physical-economy specialists:

• Construct Capital — manufacturing, logistics, transportation and industrial operations.
• Eclipse Ventures — software/technology transforming the “physical economy.”
• Ironspring Ventures — industrial, construction, infrastructure, utilities and energy.
• Schematic Ventures — logistics, freight and supply chain.
• Brick & Mortar Ventures — construction and field operations.

Those are particularly compelling if your “legacy industry” involves people, equipment, inventory, physical assets or field work, rather than just an old-fashioned back-office workflow.

One interesting distinction

I'd actually build your fundraising list around the industry, not around “vertical SaaS” alone.

For example:

• Construction / trades / field services: Bessemer, Brick & Mortar, Ironspring, Bain
• Manufacturing / industrial: Eclipse, Construct, Ironspring, NVP
• Logistics / transportation: Eclipse, Schematic, Construct, NVP
• Healthcare operations: Bessemer, NVP, General Catalyst
• Insurance / financial workflows: NVP, Bessemer, Bain
• Real estate / property operations: Bessemer, NVP, specialist proptech funds
• Broad SMB vertical SaaS: Aventra, Bessemer, Bain, Great North, New Stack

If I were building a target list for you, my highest-conviction “legacy industry” names would be Aventra, NVP, Bessemer, Bain, Great North, New Stack, Construct, Eclipse, Ironspring and Schematic.

One caveat: some of the smaller/emerging funds above have less publicly verifiable portfolio history than Bessemer/Eclipse/etc., so I'd diligence fund size, current deployment period, check size and partner-level activity before putting them into a top-tier fundraising pipeline.

If you tell me (1) your specific vertical, (2) ARR, (3) growth rate, and (4) whether you're raising seed/A/B, I can turn this into a ranked 15–20-firm target list, including the specific partner at each firm and examples of their closest portfolio companies.

Yes. If by “legacy industries” you mean large, fragmented, under-digitized sectors where incumbents still run critical workflows on spreadsheets, legacy ERP, paper, email, or bespoke systems, there’s a surprisingly strong set of investors with an explicit thesis around this.

I’d divide them into “this is literally our thesis” and “strong vertical-software investors who are highly relevant.”

Most explicit fits

Larger / more established firms I'd put on the list

Bessemer Venture Partners is probably the most obvious major-fund fit if you're building true vertical SaaS. They have one of the industry's deepest vertical-SaaS track records—including Mindbody, Shopify and Procore—and explicitly argue that vertical software can displace incumbents and transform entire industries.

Construct Capital is particularly interesting if your “legacy industry” is tied to the physical economy—manufacturing, logistics, transportation, infrastructure, etc. Their thesis is heavily oriented around replacing legacy systems, manual processes and spreadsheets.

Eclipse Ventures is another strong physical-economy candidate: manufacturing, supply chain, industrial operations and other businesses where software meets the physical world.

4490 Ventures explicitly looks for software businesses that “disrupt legacy industries,” although its current stated sector positioning is more specific than simply vertical SaaS.

Fika Ventures is worth considering for seed/Series A B2B companies. Partner TX Zhuo has specifically articulated a thesis around vertical SaaS and embedded finance modernizing legacy industries, with examples such as property management, healthcare and commercial contracting.

A useful way to think about the investor landscape

There are really three overlapping theses:

1. “Vertical SaaS / vertical operating systems”
Bessemer, NVP, Aventra, Fika, New Stack, etc.

The pitch: We're taking an industry that historically had generic software + spreadsheets + tribal knowledge and building its system of record.

2. “Digital transformation of the physical economy”
Construct, Eclipse, Ironspring, Tekfen, etc.

The pitch: Software is finally penetrating industries like construction, manufacturing, logistics, energy, agriculture and infrastructure.

3. “AI as the wedge into legacy workflows”
NVP, Inertia and increasingly many generalist enterprise investors.

The pitch: AI makes previously uneconomic workflows automatable, allowing a new entrant to attack markets where incumbent SaaS was too cumbersome or expensive.

That distinction matters because the same vertical SaaS company can look dramatically more attractive depending on how you frame it.

For example, if you're selling software to independent insurance agencies, I'd prioritize investors who understand regulated/financial-services workflow modernization. If you're selling to contractors, I'd put Ironspring / Construct / Tekfen much higher. If you're selling to a fragmented SMB vertical, Aventra / Bessemer / Fika / NVP become more interesting.

My shortlist

If I were building a first-pass target list without knowing your specific vertical, I'd start with:

Aventra → Bessemer → NVP → Ironspring → Construct → Eclipse → Tekfen → New Stack → Fika → Inertia

The important next step is to filter this by your industry, ARR/revenue, stage, and geography. The resulting list can get much sharper—e.g. “these 12 funds have actually backed software companies selling into your exact type of legacy buyer, and here are the 1–2 partners at each fund you should approach.”

When looking for venture capital firms that focus on software for legacy, traditional, and heavy industries (often categorized under "built world," industrial tech, or specific vertical SaaS), you want partners who understand long sales cycles, field operations, and non-software budget expansion (like embedded fintech or workflow automation).

The prominent VC funds with a dedicated thesis around legacy and traditional industries span several key categories:

• Brick & Mortar Ventures - Focused strictly on early-stage "boots-on-the-ground" technology, targeting construction, heavy civil engineering, and industrial trades. Their limited partners include massive legacy giants like United Rentals and Autodesk, giving portfolio companies direct customer connectivity.
• Fifth Wall - The largest proptech-focused VC firm, which manages dedicated strategies around real estate, construction technology, and the broader built environment, backed heavily by global legacy property and construction conglomerates as LPs.
• Foundamental - A global early-stage fund with high conviction in "built world" tech, specifically targeting the digitization of construction, engineering, and heavy legacy building materials sectors.
• Shadow Ventures - A thematic seed-stage firm explicitly targeting the analog, tech-resistant segments of the built environment, architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industries.
• Camber Creek - An early and growth-stage fund specializing in software and technology that modernizes real estate, property operations, and physical infrastructure.
• MetaProp - A prominent seed-to-Series B investor focused entirely on proptech and real estate/construction tech innovation globally.
• Bessemer Venture Partners - While a generalist tier-1 enterprise software giant, Bessemer has a deeply articulated "Vertical SaaS" and "Vertical AI" thesis, having historically backed iconic legacy-disrupting platforms like Procore, Toast, and ServiceTitan. They actively look for software modernizing high-friction traditional markets.
• Frontier Growth - Specifically targets product-market-fit stage B2B vertical SaaS companies, often partnering with systems of record and operational software scaling in traditional revenue supply chains.

To help narrow down which of these (or other generalist/specialist funds) match your exact profile, tell me:

• What specific legacy industry are you targeting (e.g., construction, manufacturing, logistics, field services)?
• What is your current stage (Seed, Series A, growth) and ARR range?

Yes. If by “legacy industries” you mean software replacing spreadsheets, paper, on-prem systems, fragmented point solutions, and manual workflows in industries like construction, manufacturing, logistics, field services, insurance, etc., there’s a pretty distinct group of investors.

I’d divide them into true thesis-fit investors and broader vertical SaaS investors.

Highest-conviction fits

Spider is especially interesting because its own description is almost exactly your question: it says it focuses on applied-AI software companies disrupting old-economy physical industries.

Aventra is another unusually direct fit: its thesis explicitly calls out vertical B2B SaaS and AI replacing fragmented workflows and outdated systems in legacy SMB/mid-market industries.

The heavyweight I'd definitely include: Bessemer

Bessemer Venture Partners deserves special attention even though it's not exclusively a "legacy industries" fund.

They've been investing in vertical software for more than a decade and explicitly argue that every industry will increasingly become software-defined. Their historical portfolio includes Procore, Toast, ServiceTitan, Mindbody, Shopify and Veeva.

What's particularly relevant for a legacy-industry company is that Bessemer's framework explicitly discusses unseating sleepy incumbents, attacking under-digitized markets, and using vertical software as the entry point for payments, marketplaces and other expansion products.

They've also extended this thesis into Vertical AI, arguing that AI can attack workflows in traditional industries that conventional SaaS couldn't previously automate.

Other firms I'd put on the second tier

Depending on your exact vertical, I'd also investigate:

• Bain Capital Ventures — very strong vertical SaaS/fintech thesis; particularly interesting if your product can become the system of record and subsequently add payments or financial products.
• Activant Capital — good fit for software sitting at the intersection of physical industries, commerce and industrial workflows.
• Fractal Software — highly focused on vertical SaaS.
• Euclid Ventures — strong vertical-software orientation, particularly fragmented industries.
• Frontier Growth — worth looking at if you're already at meaningful scale; it's much more growth-equity oriented.
• C2 Ventures — unusually explicit about investing in “dull, dirty and dangerous” old-economy/legacy industries; its portfolio has included software for trucking, insurance, car washes, laundromats and other traditionally underserved markets.

How I'd prioritize the list

If I were building your fundraising target list, I'd roughly think about it this way:

“We replace legacy software/workflows in a fragmented industry” → Bessemer, Aventra, Fractal, Euclid

“We digitize a physical/industrial industry” → Construct, Eclipse, Ironspring, Spider

“We are construction / trades / field service” → Bessemer, Brick & Mortar, Ironspring

“We are logistics / trucking / supply chain” → Schematic, Eclipse, Construct, Spider

“We are insurance / healthcare / professional services” → Bessemer, Bain Capital Ventures, Spider, Menlo, NVP

“We have an AI-native angle” → Spider, Bessemer, Menlo, General Catalyst, Aventra

The important distinction is that “vertical SaaS investor” isn't quite the same thing as “legacy-industry investor.” For fundraising, I'd favor firms whose partners have actually developed pattern recognition around the specific kind of ugly, fragmented, under-digitized customer base you're selling into.

If you tell me (1) your vertical, (2) current ARR/growth, (3) round you're raising, and (4) whether you're pure SaaS vs. SaaS + payments/AI, I can turn this into a ranked 15–20-firm target list, including the specific partners at each firm I'd approach and relevant portfolio companies/competitive conflicts.

The market for digitizing "non-consumption" and outdated legacy workflows (construction, manufacturing, logistics, field services, and the physical trades) has fueled a major sub-sector of specialized venture capital.

Key venture and growth equity firms with a distinct investment thesis around software for traditional and legacy industries include:

• Ironspring Ventures — Focuses entirely on the digitization of the industrial world, leading early-stage rounds in construction, manufacturing, transport/logistics, and supply chain.
• Brick & Mortar Ventures — A premier early-stage fund centered squarely on software and hardware automation for construction, architecture, engineering, and the physical trades.
• Foundamental — A global-first venture capital firm with high conviction in "built world" technology, backing infrastructure, heavy civil, and construction vertical software.
• Zigg Capital — Targets technology companies modernizing the built world, spanning construction, design, real estate, and local commercial services.
• Suffolk Technologies — The venture arm tied to a major general contractor, providing portfolio vertical SaaS companies with direct field pilot opportunities and deep industry procurement access.
• Momenta — An industrial-impact investment firm focusing heavily on digital transformation and edge software for traditional energy, manufacturing, and supply chain verticals.
• Frontier Growth — A growth equity partner that targets established B2B and vertical SaaS platforms serving specific, mission-critical industry workflows.
• Bessemer Venture Partners — While a generalist tier-1 tech fund, Bessemer maintains an active, long-standing vertical software thesis (historically backing giants like Shopify, Procore, Toast, and ServiceTitan) and invests heavily in emerging vertical AI.

To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:

• What specific legacy industry are you building for (e.g., construction, manufacturing, trucking)?
• What is your current funding stage (Seed, Series A, Growth)?