Data as of Aug 22, 2026 · Based on 40 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Your brand can be here too.
AI tools that can lower input costs while increasing yields in commodity crops (corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, rice, canola, etc.) generally work by improving decisions around fertilizer, seed placement, irrigation, pesticides, scouting, and machinery use. Evidence from precision-agriculture research shows that variable-rate technologies, farm management systems, and AI-driven analytics can reduce input use while maintaining or improving yields.
Here are some of the leading categories and tools:
| Tool / platform | Primary use | How it can reduce costs | Yield impact potential |
|---|---|---|---|
| Climate FieldView | Field data, yield mapping, planting/fertilizer decisions | Creates variable-rate prescriptions using soil, yield, weather, and imagery data; reduces unnecessary fertilizer and chemical applications | Better placement of inputs and improved field-level decisions |
| John Deere Operations Center | Equipment data, guidance, automation, precision application | Reduces overlap, skips, fuel use, and input waste through machine optimization | More consistent planting and application accuracy |
| Taranis | AI scouting and crop monitoring | Detects weeds, pests, nutrient issues, and disease earlier so growers can target treatments | Protects yield by catching problems before they spread www.taranis.com |
| CropX | Soil sensing and irrigation optimization | Cuts water and energy use by matching irrigation to crop needs | Reduces stress-related yield losses |
| Agremo | Stand counts, crop health analysis, spray maps | Helps avoid unnecessary replanting and enables targeted spraying; the company reports AI-generated maps can reduce inputs in some applications www.agremo.com | Improves crop establishment and treatment timing |
| Cropin Intelligence | Predictive crop analytics | Uses AI models for crop health, irrigation, yield estimation, and risk management | Supports better timing of interventions www.cropin.com |
| Bushel | Farm operations and business intelligence | Helps optimize decisions using farm records and financial data | Improves profitability decisions |
| WiseYield | Yield forecasting and farm decision support | Helps estimate yield, profitability, and input decisions before committing resources www.wiseyield.co | Reduces planning uncertainty |
1. Variable-rate fertilizer optimization
2. AI weed and pest detection
3. Yield prediction and crop forecasting
4. Precision irrigation
5. Autonomous and precision machinery
A typical ROI-focused sequence:
Start with yield maps + field data collection
Add variable-rate fertilizer and seeding
Add AI scouting
Integrate machinery, weather, and financial data
For large-scale corn, soybean, wheat, or cotton operations, the biggest near-term financial gains are usually from nitrogen optimization, variable-rate applications, AI scouting, and machinery efficiency, rather than fully autonomous farming. Precision-ag studies and government reviews consistently identify input reduction and improved yield efficiency as the main economic benefits.
Artificial intelligence tools in agriculture tackle the dual challenge of cutting input waste (like fertilizers, chemicals, and water) and maximizing output for commodity crops (such as corn, soybeans, and wheat) primarily through computer vision, predictive modeling, and variable-rate technology.
Key AI-driven platforms and technologies designed to achieve this balance include:
If you'd like, tell me:
I can help tailor a specific tech stack and ROI estimate for your farm.
Yes. I searched for current tools and focused on commodity/row crops—corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, sorghum, canola, etc. The strongest opportunities are tools that use AI/ML to make variable-rate decisions or selectively apply inputs rather than simply adding another dashboard.
| Tool | Main input it can reduce | Yield mechanism | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| CropX | Water, fertilizer, fungicide, energy | Soil-moisture/nitrogen sensing + agronomic recommendations | Corn, soybeans, cotton, peanuts and irrigated row crops |
| John Deere See & Spray | Herbicide | Computer vision identifies weeds and activates individual nozzles | Corn, soybeans, cotton, wheat, sorghum, canola and other row crops |
| Climate FieldView | Seed, N, P, K, lime, crop protection | Field-level prescriptions, yield analytics and variable-rate management | Large corn/soy/wheat operations |
| Taranis | Unnecessary sprays/fertilizer and scouting costs | Leaf-level imagery + AI detection of weeds, disease, nutrient deficiencies and stand problems | Corn, soybeans and broad-acre crops |
CropX combines soil sensors, weather, machinery and field data to generate recommendations for irrigation, disease control and nutrition. The company reports average user results of up to 20% fertilizer savings, 15% yield increases, 50% water savings and 20% fungicide savings. Those are vendor-reported figures, so I'd validate them against local trials before assuming those economics.
There is some particularly relevant recent evidence. In a 2026 Colorado corn comparison, CropX-managed acres used 3.2 acre-feet versus 5.0 acre-feet of irrigation while producing essentially the same yield—317 vs. 321 bu/acre—and generated an additional $43/acre in net profit.
And an Illinois corn comparison reported 22% higher yield with soil-sensor-guided irrigation and variable-rate irrigation.
Why I like it: It attacks one of the biggest hidden costs in irrigated commodity production: applying water—and consequently nutrients—when the crop doesn't need them.
This is arguably the clearest example of AI directly cutting a commodity-crop input. Cameras and machine learning distinguish crops from weeds and trigger individual spray nozzles only where weeds are detected. It is already deployed across millions of acres.
John Deere says customers using See & Spray in 2025 reduced non-residual herbicide use by nearly 50% on average, saving almost 31 million gallons of herbicide mix. Its sponsored multi-state soybean research found an average +2 bu/acre yield increase, with some locations reaching +4.8 bu/acre.
That's an unusually attractive combination:
less chemical → less crop injury → potentially higher yield.
For fallow applications, See & Spray Select reports an average 77% herbicide savings.
Climate FieldView is less about a single autonomous machine and more about turning farm data into prescriptions. It can create variable-rate scripts for seed, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, lime and crop protection and combines those with yield and field-performance data.
Its nitrogen-management tools have historically reported an average $12.31/acre nitrogen savings among users, although that particular figure comes from an older Climate publication, so I wouldn't treat it as a current guaranteed return.
A particularly useful current integration is with VariMax, which provides real-time variable-rate nitrogen and irrigation recommendations intended to maximize yield while minimizing over-application.
Best use case: a large corn/soy operation that already has yield maps, planter/sprayer data and compatible equipment and wants to optimize N and seeding rates field-by-field.
Taranis uses high-resolution aerial imagery and AI to identify weed pressure, diseases, nutrient deficiencies and plant-population problems at leaf level.
Its value proposition is slightly different: rather than automatically reducing an input, it helps answer where an input is actually justified. That can prevent blanket applications and catch problems early enough to protect yield.
Taranis has also expanded into generative-AI agronomy through its Ag Assistant product.
For a typical Midwestern corn/soybean operation, I'd prioritize:
1. AI targeted spraying → See & Spray
Most tangible input savings and increasingly strong field evidence.
2. Variable-rate nitrogen → FieldView + compatible N recommendation system
Potentially the biggest dollar opportunity because N is such a large corn input. Independent 2026 research also continues to find that variable-rate N can reduce fertilizer use without sacrificing yield.
3. Soil-moisture/irrigation optimization → CropX
Especially compelling for irrigated corn, soybeans and cotton.
4. AI imagery/scouting → Taranis
Most useful where scouting labor is expensive or fields are large enough that problems are routinely discovered too late.
I wouldn't buy an "AI agriculture" platform based on a headline like "20% higher yield." The economic question is whether it improves profit per acre, not yield alone.
The best technologies are therefore those where you can measure:
input dollars saved + additional bushels × crop price − technology cost
For commodity crops, targeted herbicide application and variable-rate nitrogen currently look like the two clearest AI/precision-ag categories for simultaneously attacking input costs and protecting or increasing yield. Recent research also supports the broader proposition that AI/data-driven management can increase wheat yield while reducing N inputs.
If you're evaluating these for an actual farm investment, I can also compare 10–15 leading tools by estimated $/acre cost, crop compatibility, required hardware, claimed ROI, and evidence quality and identify which ones are most compelling for corn, soybeans, wheat, or cotton.
Here are top web results for exploring this topic:
Cropin·https://www.cropin.com Top10 AI tools for agriculture reshaping yield forecasting - Cropin ... cost, and data type. The platform analyses about 40 raw indices to derive insights like crop health, growth, harvest readiness, yield estimation, etc. Cropin also provides farmers with actionable,
Farm Progress·https://www.farmprogress.com Survey: Farmers double down on technology - Farm Progress Here's why farmers are adopting more technology: 74% to reduce input costs. 70% to save time and improve labor efficiency. 59% for increased yields · Here's why farmers are adopting more technology: 7
ZarSage AI·https://zarsage.ai Best AI Tools for Agriculture in 2026: Top Platforms Compared More precise use of inputs. Precision agriculture AI tools can reduce waste by helping apply inputs such as herbicides, fertilizers, and water only where they are most needed. The cost and environment
Alliance Bioversity International·https://alliancebioversityciat.org How to Improve Crop Yield with Technology & AI Tools Precision agriculture: tailoring inputs to needs. Precision agriculture is a cornerstone of digital agriculture. This approach involves collecting and analyzing data to apply the right amount of input
Axios·https://www.axios.com Putting farmers first with AI - Axios AI's impact is no longer confined to office work; it's also transforming agriculture. PepsiCo is using AI to help farmers make faster, more informed decisions in the field.
Cloud Security Alliance (CSA)·https://cloudsecurityalliance.org**AI** in Agriculture : Smarter Crops , Healthier Livestock, Better Yields AI in Agriculture: Smarter Crops, Healthier Livestock, Better Yields. Published 02/10/2025. Home · Industry Insights. AI in Agriculture: Smarter Crops, Healthier Livestock, Better Yields. Written by D
www.osforyour.business·https://www.osforyour.business/agriculture/best-ai-tools-for-agriculture-in-2025-a-comprehensive-comparison Best AI Tools for Agriculture in 2026: A Comprehensive Comparison AI tools for agriculture in 2026 fall into four main categories: crop health monitoring, precision irrigation and resource management, harvest optimization and yield prediction, and equipment and supp FarmTogether·https://farmtogether.com**AI** in Agriculture : Productivity Gains and New Pressures on Farmland Artificial intelligence can improve productivity by helping farmers detect crop stress earlier, optimize planting schedules, and apply inputs more precisely. By analyzing patterns in soil conditions, LinkedIn·https://www.linkedin.com How US Agriculture Companies Are Using AI to Increase Crop Yield ...Average farm profit margin: 3–5%. A single weather event or pest outbreak can eliminate an entire year's profit. AI is changing the economics of farming — not by replacing farmers, but by giving them Ditstek Innovations·https://www.ditstek.com How AI Applications in Agriculture Improve Crop Yield & Efficiency Predictive Analytics for Yield Forecasting. AI farming tools analyze soil health, weather conditions, and crop growth patterns to provide accurate yield forecasts. These insights help farmers plan ahe
No sources cited
Yes. For commodity crops such as corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, sorghum, and canola, the most economically compelling agriculture-AI tools today tend to fall into four categories: targeted spraying, variable-rate fertility, irrigation optimization, and AI scouting/prescriptions.
| Tool | Main cost lever | Yield upside | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Deere See & Spray | Herbicide | Strongest published yield evidence | Corn, soybeans, cotton, wheat, sorghum, canola |
| Climate FieldView | Seed, N, fertilizer, crop protection | Prescription optimization | Corn/soy/wheat and broad row-crop operations |
| CropX | Water + potentially fertilizer | Maintain yield while reducing irrigation | Irrigated corn and other row crops |
| VariMax + FieldView | Nitrogen + irrigation | Optimize N toward yield goal | Corn and other N-intensive crops |
| John Deere ExactApply | Chemical/application costs | Better placement, less overapplication | High-acreage spraying operations |
This is the standout if herbicide is a major input cost. Computer vision and machine learning distinguish weeds from crops and activate individual nozzles only where weeds are detected.
John Deere reports an average nearly 50% reduction in non-residual herbicide use in 2025, across more than 5 million acres. Its trials reported an average +2 bu/acre soybean yield increase, with some field results reaching +4.8 bu/acre versus broadcast spraying.
Why the yield increase matters: this isn't simply an "input reduction" technology. Better weed targeting can reduce crop injury and improve weed control, potentially producing both lower chemical costs and more grain.
FieldView is less of a single AI machine and more of an agronomic decision system. It can create variable-rate seed and fertility prescriptions, targeted crop-protection plans, and analyze yield results against inputs. Its seed scripts use data from more than one million test plots.
Climate reports that farmers using its seed scripts have averaged +5 bu/acre versus farmers creating their own scripts—though that's company-reported observational data, so I would not assume the same gain on every farm.
Best use: combine yield maps + soil variability + seed-rate prescriptions + fertility + crop-protection data, then run replicated comparisons on your own fields.
CropX combines soil sensors, weather and field data to optimize irrigation. In a 2026 Colorado corn comparison, sensor-managed acres used 3.2 acre-feet versus 5.0 acre-feet of irrigation, roughly a 36% reduction, while yields were essentially unchanged: 317 versus 321 bu/acre. The farmer calculated an additional $43/acre in net profit.
That's an important distinction: for irrigation AI, maintaining yield while cutting water/pumping costs can be more valuable than chasing a theoretical yield increase.
For corn and other nitrogen-intensive crops, this is worth investigating. The integration provides variable-rate and flat-rate nitrogen and irrigation recommendations, using field information to determine where and when inputs are needed.
Nitrogen is particularly attractive for AI optimization because the objective isn't simply "use less N": it's put N where the crop can economically convert it into yield.
Dryland corn/soybeans:
Irrigated corn:
Large row-crop operation with its own sprayer:
Wheat/canola/sorghum:
See & Spray is particularly interesting because the current platform explicitly supports these crops, although its wheat capability is currently specified for broadleaf weeds.
I'd distinguish "AI marketing" from demonstrated farm economics. The strongest cases are technologies that control a physical input in real time—like spraying a weed rather than the whole field or irrigating based on root-zone moisture. Those give you a measurable counterfactual: chemical/water used, yield harvested, and ultimately $/acre and $/bushel.
If your goal is specifically maximizing farm profit rather than simply increasing yield, I'd rank See & Spray + variable-rate nitrogen + irrigation optimization + yield/input analytics as the most promising combination.
AI tools in agriculture lower input costs (fertilizers, chemicals, water, and seed) and protect or boost commodity crop yields (like corn, soybeans, and wheat) by moving from blanket field management to micro-zone precision.
The primary AI-driven platforms and hardware integrations used to achieve this measurable ROI include:
If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:
Climate AI
climate.ai
AI-powered precision agriculture tools lower input costs by 10% to 30% while boosting commodity crop yields by 5% to 30%. They achieve this by replacing uniform, whole-field applications with ultra-targeted, data-driven interventions.
The leading categories of agricultural AI tools engineered for large-scale commodity crops (like corn, soybeans, wheat, and cotton) include:
Traditional spraying blankets entire fields with chemicals. AI smart sprayers use computer vision and deep learning models to identify weeds and spot-treat them in milliseconds.
AI engines analyze historical satellite data, drone imagery, and soil maps to create hyper-localized prescription maps. Instead of planting and fertilizing at a flat rate, machinery automatically adjusts inputs based on zone productivity.
AI-driven climate platforms construct complex simulations of extreme weather patterns, soil moisture vaporization, and localized microclimates.
AI models process real-time data from IoT soil probes and evapotranspiration data to calculate the exact amount of water a crop requires day by day.
AI image recognition scans fields via drones or automated tractor-mounted cameras to spot fungal outbreaks or insect infestations long before they are visible to the naked eye.
Summary of Financial and Resource Impacts
| Technology Category | Input Cost Reduction | Yield Increase Impact | Key Input Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Spraying | Up to 90% | Indirect (less crop stress) | Herbicides / Pesticides |
| Variable Rate (VRA) | 10% – 15% | 5% – 10% | Seeds, Nitrogen, Fertilizer |
| Smart Irrigation | 20% – 30% | Stable high-yield retention | Water & Pumping Fuel |
| AI Disease Scouting | 30% – 40% | Prevents 10% – 30% crop loss | Broad-spectrum Fungicides |
To help me tailor a more specific recommendation, what specific commodity crop are you growing, and what is your primary high-cost bottleneck (e.g., fertilizer prices, chemical usage, or water access)?
Taranis
taranis.com
Gamaya
gamaya.com
Yes. For commodity crops—especially corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, sorghum, and canola—the strongest AI opportunities today are less about “AI growing the crop” and more about using less of an expensive input while protecting or increasing yield.
| Tool | Main input it can reduce | How it works | Yield upside |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Deere See & Spray | Herbicide | Cameras + machine learning distinguish weeds from crops and activate only the necessary nozzles | Strongest documented combination of savings + yield |
| CropX | Irrigation / water | Soil sensors + weather + AI determine when/how much to irrigate | Protects yield while reducing water/pumping costs |
| Taranis | Crop-protection inputs | High-resolution aerial imagery + AI detects weeds, disease, insects and nutrient problems at leaf level | Earlier intervention can prevent yield loss |
| OneSoil | Seed, fertilizer, chemicals | Satellite imagery + agronomic models create variable-rate prescriptions and identify field variability | More precise placement of inputs |
| **Bayer Climate FieldView | Seed/fertilizer/chemicals | Field data, imagery, machinery data and analytics support variable-rate and management decisions | Primarily improves input efficiency and consistency |
This is the standout if your goal is lower chemical cost + potentially higher yield.
Its computer vision identifies weeds in real time and activates individual sprayer nozzles rather than broadcasting herbicide across the entire field. John Deere says its 2025 customer data showed nearly 50% average reduction in non-residual herbicide use, while its trials reported an average +2 bu/acre soybean yield increase, with some results as high as +4.8 bu/acre.
It works across major commodity crops including corn, soybeans, cotton, wheat, sorghum, barley, canola, sugar beets and peanuts.
Best fit: large row-crop operations with meaningful herbicide expenditures and enough acreage to justify the equipment/upgrade.
CropX combines soil-moisture sensors, weather data and agronomic models to determine when irrigation is actually needed.
A 2026 CropX case study on a Colorado corn farm reported irrigation falling from 5.0 to 3.2 acre-feet, about a 36% reduction, while yields were essentially unchanged: 317 vs. 321 bu/acre. The farmer calculated an additional $43/acre in net profit after accounting for the sensors.
Best fit: irrigated corn, cotton, soybeans and other crops where pumping/electricity/water costs are significant.
The important distinction is that CropX isn't necessarily trying to increase yield. Keeping yield constant while substantially reducing water cost can be a major yield-equivalent improvement in farm economics.
Taranis uses high-resolution aerial imagery and AI to identify problems at extremely fine resolution—weeds, insects, disease and nutrient deficiencies.
Its newer Yield Impact system, available for enrolled corn acres in the 2026 season, uses crop-growth modeling to estimate how many bushels per acre a detected problem could cost if left untreated.
That's economically interesting because it changes the question from:
“Should I spray this field?”
to:
“Is this problem costing enough bushels to justify the treatment?”
That can prevent both unnecessary applications and missed interventions.
OneSoil combines satellite imagery, field productivity analysis, soil sampling and AI-driven agronomic recommendations to create variable-rate application maps.
This is particularly interesting if you don't want to buy specialized machinery. The economic opportunity is to stop treating a 500-acre field as though every acre has identical:
Best fit: operations already capable of variable-rate seeding/fertilizer/application.
If I were evaluating these strictly on ROI for commodity farming, I'd rank the opportunities roughly:
1. AI targeted spraying → herbicide savings + yield protection
2. AI irrigation → water/pumping savings with yield maintenance
3. AI scouting → prevent disease/insect/weed yield losses
4. AI variable-rate fertilizer → reduce overapplication while maintaining yield
5. AI variable-rate seeding → optimize plant population by productivity zone
The key is that not all “AI agriculture” products have demonstrated economic ROI. I'd put considerably more weight on systems with replicated field trials or measurable before/after farm economics than on platforms that simply provide dashboards or satellite imagery.
If you're looking at this from an investment/business opportunity perspective, the most interesting gap is probably AI-driven nitrogen optimization: fertilizer is one of the largest variable costs in corn and other commodity crops, and the ideal system would dynamically combine soil data, weather, crop biomass and yield potential to determine exactly where additional N will pay for itself.
Artificial intelligence in agriculture lowers input costs (such as chemical, fertilizer, and water waste) while protecting or lifting commodity crop yields (corn, wheat, soybeans) by shifting operations from blanket field treatments to hyper-precise, data-driven execution.
Leading AI tools and platforms actively deployed in commodity crop management include:
Would you like to explore how these tools integrate with specific machinery brands , or are you looking to evaluate AI solutions based on farm size and initial budget constraints?
Yes. For commodity crops such as corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and sorghum, the most economically interesting agricultural-AI tools are generally not “AI crop advisors” in isolation. The strongest ROI tends to come from AI/ML that changes a specific input decision—herbicide, water, nitrogen, fungicide, seed rate, or scouting labor—while protecting yield.
| Tool | Main input lever | How AI helps | Yield potential | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Deere See & Spray | Herbicide | Computer vision identifies weeds and selectively sprays them | High where weed pressure is significant | Corn, soybeans, cotton, small grains |
| CropX | Water + fertilizer + crop protection | Combines soil sensors, weather, satellite data and agronomic models | High on irrigated crops | Corn, soybeans and other irrigated row crops |
| OneSoil | Seed + fertilizer + crop protection | AI/satellite imagery identifies productivity zones and generates variable-rate maps | Medium–high | Broad-acre commodity farming |
| Taranis | Scouting + crop protection | High-resolution imagery/AI detects weeds, pests, disease and nutrient problems | Medium–high | Large-acre row crops |
| Sentera | Scouting + stand/plant health | Computer vision from drone/aircraft imagery identifies plant-level problems | Medium–high | Large farms and agronomy providers |
For farms already running compatible sprayers, this is one of the most compelling applications because it attacks a large, recurring expense directly.
Its cameras and machine learning distinguish crops from weeds and spray only detected weeds. John Deere reports an average 77% herbicide savings for its See & Spray Select fallow-ground system.
For in-crop See & Spray Gen 2, John Deere reports third-party/university trials across seven states showing an average +2 bushels/acre soybean yield versus broadcast herbicide application.
Why I like it: the ROI doesn't depend on AI predicting the weather perfectly. It physically reduces chemical applied while potentially improving weed control.
CropX combines soil-moisture sensors, weather, satellite imagery, machinery data and agronomic models/AI to determine irrigation and crop-management actions. Its stated capabilities include irrigation, disease, nutrition and variable-rate management.
There's particularly interesting recent corn evidence: in a 2026 Colorado case, CropX-managed corn used 3.2 acre-feet versus 5.0 acre-feet under conventional irrigation while producing essentially the same yield.
And in an Illinois side-by-side comparison, CropX-managed irrigated corn reportedly produced 22% higher yield while preventing seven observed soil-moisture stress events.
Why I like it: irrigation is a relatively easy input to measure financially—acre-feet, pumping electricity/fuel, labor and yield.
OneSoil is more of a software/data layer than a machine. It uses satellite imagery and AI to identify productivity zones, monitor crop health and generate variable-rate maps for seeding, fertilizer and crop protection.
That makes it attractive if you want to test AI without immediately buying specialized hardware.
Best use: identify low-return areas where you're routinely applying the same amount of seed/fertilizer as high-performing areas.
The key economic question isn't "Can AI generate a map?" It is whether variable-rate application produces enough savings or yield improvement to exceed the software, equipment and agronomic costs.
For a typical Midwest commodity operation, I'd rank the opportunities roughly:
1. AI targeted spraying → herbicide savings
2. AI/soil sensing → irrigation optimization
3. AI variable-rate nitrogen/fertilizer → input efficiency
4. AI scouting → earlier pest/disease intervention
5. AI variable-rate seeding → seed savings + stand optimization
6. AI yield forecasting → better marketing/harvest decisions
The first two have a particularly attractive characteristic: you can measure the input reduction directly.
Be skeptical of vendor claims like "10–20% higher yield." AI doesn't inherently increase yield. The economic benefit comes from making a better agronomic decision—for example, applying herbicide only where weeds exist, irrigating before water stress, or putting nitrogen where the crop can actually use it.
CropX itself reports ranges such as 10–20% fertilizer reduction and 10–20% yield increases, but those are aggregated commercial results rather than a guarantee for an individual corn or soybean farm.
If you're evaluating these as a business investment, I'd focus on tools where you can run a controlled AI vs. conventional strip trial and calculate:
incremental yield revenue + input savings − technology cost − implementation cost = actual ROI per acre.
If you tell me which commodity crop, approximate acreage, irrigation status, and region, I can narrow this to the 3–5 tools most likely to produce positive ROI and estimate the $/acre economics.