Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 339 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Choosing the right tool for your agency depends on your primary operational needs. For all-in-one flexibility, ClickUp is a top choice. If your priority is client-facing collaboration,
Teamwork excels. For simple, creative project needs where minimal complexity is preferred,
Basecamp or are ideal. If you require deep integration of billing, time tracking, and project profitability, look toward specialized platforms like , Scoro, or Workamajig.
Brands AI recommends here
Best for agencies needing high customization. It combines tasks, goal setting, and documentation in one place, though it may take more effort to set up compared to simpler tools meant for smaller teams.
Ideal for client-focused agencies requiring transparent progress sharing and direct approval workflows. It excels at keeping clients involved without needing complex external file-sharing steps.
Best for small creative teams aiming to avoid software overhead. It simplifies projects with straightforward message boards, to-do lists, and file sharing, prioritizing clarity over complex features.
Best for agencies focused on profitability and financial reporting. It uniquely integrates project management with time tracking and invoicing to help monitor project budgets and agency health.
If you're running an agency, I’d avoid choosing a project-management tool just because it’s popular. Agency work has a few special requirements: multiple clients at once, repeatable delivery processes, approvals, scope control, resource capacity, time/budget tracking, and client visibility.
| Tool | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| ClickUp | Full-service / growing agencies | ⭐ Best overall flexibility |
| Teamwork | Client-service agencies | ⭐ Best agency-native option |
| Asana | Marketing/creative teams with repeatable processes | ⭐ Best for simplicity + structure |
| Monday.com | Visual/creative agencies | ⭐ Best visual experience |
| Productive | Agencies that care deeply about profitability | ⭐ Best PM + financial management |
| Basecamp | Small agencies that hate complexity | Best simplicity |
I'd start here if you want one system to run most of the agency.
It can handle projects, tasks, dependencies, recurring work, forms/intake, dashboards, time tracking, workload management, docs, automations and client/guest access. Current agency comparisons consistently put it near the top because of how much it can consolidate.
The catch: you have to design it properly. A badly configured ClickUp workspace becomes a monster.
I'd choose Teamwork over ClickUp if your business revolves around client projects, billable hours, retainers, budgets and profitability.
It has native client portals, time tracking, workload planning, creative proofs/approvals, retainer management and project profitability. That's much closer to the actual economics of an agency than generic task management.
My pick if: you're selling hours/retainers and want project management tied closely to financial performance.
Asana is excellent when you have repeatable campaign/project workflows and don't want to spend weeks engineering your PM system.
Its strengths are clean task management, dependencies, templates, timelines and workflow automation. It's particularly well suited to marketing/PR agencies running similar campaign structures repeatedly.
I'd pick Asana over ClickUp if your philosophy is "fewer features, better adoption."
Monday is particularly good for teams that think in boards, pipelines and visual production stages. It's also strong for client-facing dashboards and showing stakeholders what's happening without overwhelming them.
I'd look closely at it for a creative/design/production agency.
This is the one I'd investigate if you're trying to answer questions like:
Productive combines project management with budgeting, resource planning, time tracking and financial management.
I wouldn't necessarily try to make the PM tool do everything.
For a typical agency, I'd aim for:
CRM → Sales → Client onboarding → Project delivery → Client approval → Time/budget → Reporting
And I'd make the PM platform the operational source of truth.
For example:
ClickUp + Slack + Google Workspace + accounting system
or, for a more financially sophisticated agency:
Teamwork/Productive + Slack + Google Workspace + accounting system
The important part is that Slack shouldn't be where projects live and email shouldn't be where approvals live.
There isn't a universal winner—the 2026 comparisons generally converge on ClickUp for flexibility, Teamwork for agency-specific operations, Asana for structured workflows, Monday for visual teams, and Productive for financial/resource management.
If you tell me your agency size, what you sell (e.g. ads, web, branding, AI, consulting), number of clients, and how you currently manage projects, I can narrow this down to the one I'd use and show you exactly how I'd structure the workspace.
The catch: you have to design it properly. A badly configured ClickUp workspace becomes a monster.
I'd choose Teamwork over ClickUp if your business revolves around client projects, billable hours, retainers, budgets and profitability.
It has native client portals, time tracking, workload planning, creative proofs/approvals, retainer management and project profitability. That's much closer to the actual economics of an agency than generic task management.
My pick if: you're selling hours/retainers and want project management tied closely to financial performance.
Asana is excellent when you have repeatable campaign/project workflows and don't want to spend weeks engineering your PM system.
Its strengths are clean task management, dependencies, templates, timelines and workflow automation. It's particularly well suited to marketing/PR agencies running similar campaign structures repeatedly.
I'd pick Asana over ClickUp if your philosophy is "fewer features, better adoption."
Monday is particularly good for teams that think in boards, pipelines and visual production stages. It's also strong for client-facing dashboards and showing stakeholders what's happening without overwhelming them.
I'd look closely at it for a creative/design/production agency.
Choosing the right project management tool for an agency depends heavily on your workflow, billable hours tracking needs, and client collaboration style. Here is a breakdown of the top tools agencies rely on, categorized by their core strengths:
If you can share a bit more about your agency, I can narrow this down:
No sources cited
If you’re running an agency, I’d avoid building a giant stack of overlapping PM tools. The right setup depends heavily on whether you’re primarily managing creative production, marketing retainers, web/dev projects, or a mix.
For most agencies, I’d shortlist these:
| Tool | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| Teamwork.com | Client-service agencies | 🥇 Best agency-specific choice |
| Asana | Creative/marketing agencies | 🥇 Best balance of usability + sophistication |
| ClickUp | Agencies wanting an all-in-one system | 🥇 Best flexibility |
| Monday.com | Visual workflows + operations | Great for teams that love dashboards/boards |
| Wrike | Larger/complex agencies | Powerful, but heavier |
| Productive | Agencies focused heavily on profitability | Excellent if utilization/margins are central |
If your agency makes money by selling client projects, retainers, and people's time, Teamwork is unusually well suited to that business model.
It combines project management with client management, resource planning, billable time, budgets, retainers, profitability, utilization, and client approvals.
That distinction matters. A generic PM system can tell you:
"The website project is 73% complete." An agency-oriented system can help answer:
"We're 73% complete, but we've consumed 91% of the budget and the designer is already over capacity." That's much more useful operationally.
Asana is particularly strong if your biggest problem is getting lots of creative/marketing work through a repeatable workflow.
It gives you projects, templates, dependencies, forms, automations, workload/capacity planning, approvals, dashboards, and time/budget tracking.
Its agency-specific functionality has also expanded considerably: client projects, creative proofing, workload management, and tracking billable/non-billable time and budgets are all supported.
I'd choose Asana over Teamwork if workflow simplicity and team adoption matter more to you than deep agency financial management.
I'd consider ClickUp if you're thinking:
"I want one platform for projects + SOPs + docs + tasks + internal processes + dashboards." It's extremely flexible, which is both its advantage and its danger. You can build almost anything, but agencies can end up spending weeks designing a system nobody actually wants to use.
Rather than using 5 PM tools, I'd aim for something like:
CRM → PM → Communication → Files → Finance
For example:
The goal should be one source of truth for delivery. Don't let Slack become your project-management system.
One particularly important point: don't choose based on task-management features. Almost all of these can handle tasks, boards, calendars, dependencies and automations. The differentiator for an agency is whether the system connects scope → people → time → budget → client → profitability. That's why Teamwork stands out to me for true client-service agencies.
If you tell me what kind of agency you run, team size, number of clients, and whether you bill hourly/retainer/project, I can narrow this down to the one system I'd use and exactly how I'd structure it.
That distinction matters. A generic PM system can tell you:
"The website project is 73% complete." An agency-oriented system can help answer:
"We're 73% complete, but we've consumed 91% of the budget and the designer is already over capacity." That's much more useful operationally.
Asana is particularly strong if your biggest problem is getting lots of creative/marketing work through a repeatable workflow.
It gives you projects, templates, dependencies, forms, automations, workload/capacity planning, approvals, dashboards, and time/budget tracking.
Its agency-specific functionality has also expanded considerably: client projects, creative proofing, workload management, and tracking billable/non-billable time and budgets are all supported.
I'd choose Asana over Teamwork if workflow simplicity and team adoption matter more to you than deep agency financial management.
Monday
monday.com
Choosing the right project management tool for an agency depends heavily on your agency's size, budget, and core services (creative, development, marketing, or consulting). Unlike internal teams, agencies need to juggle client visibility, billable hours, resource capacity, and distinct workflows.
The top-performing tools for agencies are broken down below by their distinct strengths:
If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:
I can give you a tailored recommendation and help you evaluate pricing or migration strategies.
If you're running an agency, I’d avoid choosing a project-management tool based purely on task lists. Your system needs to handle clients, recurring work, deadlines, approvals, team capacity, time/budget, and profitability.
Based on the current 2026 landscape, I’d narrow it to these:
| Tool | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| Teamwork | Client-service agencies | 🥇 Best agency-native choice |
| ClickUp | Agencies wanting flexibility/all-in-one | 🥇 Best value/flexibility |
| Asana | Teams wanting simplicity + structure | 🥈 Best UX |
| Monday.com | Creative/visual agencies | 🥈 Best visual workflow |
| Productive | Agencies focused heavily on utilization/profitability | 🥇 Best financial/agency ops |
| Wrike | Larger, complex agencies | Best for enterprise complexity |
If I were setting up an agency today, I'd shortlist Teamwork and ClickUp first.
1. Teamwork — my default recommendation for a serious client-services agency
Teamwork is purpose-built around agency/client work: client portals, billable/non-billable time, project budgets, retainers, workload planning, creative approvals and profitability reporting are all core parts of the platform.
That makes it particularly attractive if you sell retainers, projects, creative services, marketing, consulting, development, etc.
2. ClickUp — best if you want to build your own operating system
ClickUp gives you considerably more flexibility. It has tasks, docs, dashboards, automations, time tracking, workload management and client/guest access, making it possible to consolidate a lot of your agency's systems. The tradeoff is that you can easily over-engineer it.
I'd choose ClickUp if you're comfortable spending some time designing the system properly.
3. Asana — choose this if adoption matters more than customization
Asana is cleaner and more opinionated. It handles projects, dependencies, timelines/Gantt, workload, reporting, custom fields, automations and time tracking well.
It's a particularly good choice if you have a team that will resist a complicated operational system.
4. Monday.com — great for visual/creative teams
If your agency thinks in boards, stages, campaigns and visual pipelines, Monday is compelling. It's particularly good for client-facing dashboards and visually communicating project status.
5. Productive — worth serious consideration if profitability is the problem
If you're asking questions like "Which clients are actually profitable?", "Are we over capacity?", "How much of our team's time is billable?", or "How much budget is left on this retainer?", I'd put Productive near the top. Agency-focused comparisons consistently highlight its resource planning and financial capabilities.
I'd keep the number of tools small.
Core operating system → Teamwork OR ClickUp
Communication → Slack or Teams
Files → Google Drive / Microsoft 365
CRM → HubSpot, unless your PM platform's CRM capabilities are genuinely sufficient
Accounting → QuickBooks/Xero
Time tracking → Native in Teamwork/ClickUp/Productive rather than adding another app
Client communication/approvals → Ideally handled through the PM platform rather than scattered across email, Slack, texts and comments.
The important part is that the PM system becomes the source of truth. A client request shouldn't live in someone's Slack DM, a deadline shouldn't exist only in someone's head, and an approval shouldn't disappear into an email thread.
Don't buy Asana + ClickUp + Monday + Notion + Trello and try to figure out which one sticks.
Pick one system of record, build your agency's workflows around it, and integrate everything else into that.
If you tell me what kind of agency you run, team size, number of clients, whether you're retainer/project-based, and what you're currently using, I can recommend the exact tool and show you how I'd structure Clients → Projects → Tasks → Automations → Reporting for your agency.
Choosing the right project management tool for an agency depends heavily on your workflow, billable hours tracking needs, and team size. Here is a breakdown of the top project management tools tailored for agency environments, categorized by their strengths:
To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:
If you’re running an agency, I’d avoid choosing a PM tool just because it has good task management. Your system should also answer:
That changes my shortlist considerably.
| Tool | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| Teamwork | Client-service agencies | Best overall agency choice |
| ClickUp | Flexible all-in-one operations | Best value / most customizable |
| Productive | Agencies focused on profitability | Best PM + financial management |
| Asana | Marketing/creative teams | Best for clean, repeatable workflows |
| monday.com | Visual/creative agencies | Best for easy adoption |
| Wrike | Larger creative/enterprise agencies | Best for complex approval workflows |
Recent agency-focused comparisons consistently put Teamwork, ClickUp, Monday, Asana and Productive near the top, but they excel at different parts of the agency operating model.
If your agency does client projects, retainers, consulting, marketing, design, development, etc., I'd start here.
Teamwork is purpose-built around agency/client-service economics: client portals, billable/non-billable time, project budgets, retainers, workload planning, creative approvals and profitability reporting are native features.
The important distinction is that you can connect:
SOW → tasks → hours → budget → client → profitability
rather than stitching those things together yourself.
That's particularly valuable if you're managing a lot of simultaneous client work.
I'd choose ClickUp if your agency has unusual workflows or you want one extremely configurable workspace.
It's strong for:
The downside is also the upside: you have to configure it well. Agency profitability reporting, for example, generally requires more setup than in Teamwork.
So I'd pick ClickUp if you're comfortable designing your own system.
Productive is particularly interesting if you're trying to run the agency based on margin, utilization and capacity, rather than simply "getting projects done."
It's designed to combine project management with budgeting, resource planning, profitability and financial management.
I'd seriously consider it if you're asking questions like:
"Which clients are actually profitable?"
"Who is underutilized next month?"
"How much capacity do we have for another $100k of work?"
That's a different level of agency management than basic task tracking.
I'd choose Asana over ClickUp when your team needs clarity more than configurability.
It's particularly good for agencies with repeatable workflows—campaigns, launches, content production, marketing programs, etc. Recent agency comparisons rate it highly for structured, repeatable campaign workflows.
The tradeoff: you'll likely need other systems for things like deeper financial/project profitability management.
Monday is a good choice when adoption is the biggest concern.
If your team looks at a board and immediately understands:
Client → Deliverable → Owner → Status → Deadline
Monday can be very effective. It's also particularly approachable for creative teams and stakeholders who don't want to learn a complicated PM system.
I wouldn't necessarily try to make your PM platform your entire tech stack.
I'd aim for something like:
CRM
→ Sales pipeline / leads / opportunities
PM system
→ Client → SOW → projects → deliverables → tasks → deadlines
Time + financials
→ Hours → budget → margin → utilization
Communication
→ Slack/Teams for conversation, not project management
Docs/knowledge
→ SOPs, briefs, templates, strategy
Accounting
→ Actual invoicing, expenses, bookkeeping
The PM system should be the operational source of truth, rather than trying to replace every other system.
Small agency (1–10):
→ ClickUp if you want flexibility
→ Teamwork if you want agency-specific functionality
Growing agency (10–30):
→ Teamwork or Productive
30+ people / serious resource planning:
→ Productive, Teamwork, or Wrike, depending on how complex your delivery operation is.
Creative/marketing agency where adoption is the main issue:
→ Monday or Asana
Agency where profitability is the biggest issue:
→ Productive or Teamwork
Agency where you want to customize absolutely everything:
→ ClickUp
One thing I'd not do: put your agency on Notion just because everyone likes Notion. It's excellent for knowledge management, but I'd rather have a proper agency PM system controlling delivery, budgets and capacity. Agency-focused comparisons make the same distinction.
If you tell me what kind of agency you run, team size, number of clients, and whether you bill fixed-fee/retainer/hourly, I can narrow this down to the 1–2 tools I'd actually use in your situation, including the stack I'd pair with them.
Choosing the right project management tool for an agency depends heavily on your workflow, client management needs, and billing structures. Here is a breakdown of the top tools tailored for agency environments, categorized by their strengths:
To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:
Choosing the right project management tool for an agency depends on your core focus (creative, development, client-heavy) and how your team collaborates.
Here are the top project management tools tailored for agency environments, categorized by their strengths:
To help narrow down the best fit, let me know:
I can give you a tailored recommendation and comparison based on those details.
If by “agency” you mean a client-service agency—multiple clients, recurring projects, deadlines, approvals, freelancers/team members, and ideally time/budget tracking—I’d narrow the field considerably.
| Tool | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| Teamwork.com | Client-service agencies | My #1 pick if you need project profitability, billable time, retainers, client access, and resource planning |
| Asana | Creative/marketing agencies | Best balance of simplicity + power |
| ClickUp | Agencies wanting one highly customizable system | Powerful, but easy to over-engineer |
| monday.com | Visual workflows + management dashboards | Great interface; better if leadership wants lots of visual reporting |
| Notion | Small/simple agencies | Excellent docs + lightweight PM, but I'd avoid making it the core system once operations get complex |
1. Teamwork.com if you're serious about running the agency through the PM system.
It's specifically built around agency work rather than generic task management. It has native client portals, billable/non-billable time tracking, retainer management, workload planning, project budgets, profitability reporting, and creative approvals.
That's a big deal because an agency doesn't just need to answer:
“What does Sarah need to do today?”
It needs to answer:
“Are we on track to deliver Client X's work, within the retainer, with the right people allocated, and at the margin we expected?”
Teamwork is unusually good at that.
2. Asana if you want the team to actually enjoy using the PM system.
Asana is excellent for structured workflows, campaigns, deadlines, dependencies, templates, forms, automation, portfolios, reporting, and multiple project views.
I'd pick it over Teamwork if your agency is more creative/marketing/strategy oriented and financial/project-accounting features aren't the center of your operation.
3. ClickUp if you want to build your own operating system.
This is the “we want the software to work exactly the way we work” option. The upside is enormous flexibility. The downside is that you can spend an absurd amount of time building ClickUp instead of running the agency. Recent user discussions reflect exactly that tradeoff.
I'd want your system to look roughly like:
Lead → Client → Project → Deliverables → Tasks → Approval → Delivery → Time/Budget → Profitability
And I'd want the PM platform to handle at least:
That's why I'm leaning Teamwork or Asana, rather than simply saying “ClickUp has the most features.”
Creative/marketing agency: → Asana
Web/dev agency: → Teamwork.com or ClickUp
Paid media/performance agency: → Teamwork.com or Asana
Brand/design agency: → Asana
Large agency with lots of retainers + freelancers: → Teamwork.com
Small agency that wants an all-in-one workspace: → ClickUp
Tiny/early-stage agency: → Asana, keep it simple.
If you tell me what kind of agency you run, team size, number of clients, and what you're currently using (even if it's just Slack + spreadsheets), I can give you a much more specific stack—including PM + CRM + time tracking + client portal + invoicing + automation—rather than just picking a PM app.