Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 279 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
The best liquidity provider depends on your specific goals. For mid-sized positions, Hiive offers a transparent marketplace, while
EquityZen is common for smaller positions. If you need upfront money to cover exercise costs and taxes,
ESO Fund and provide specialized exercise financing. For large institutional-level blocks, is a primary venue, and is suited for large-scale, company-sponsored tender offers.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 78% of answers
Best for smaller, individual equity positions. It provides a streamlined process for employees to access investors and is frequently cited for transactions involving popular pre-IPO companies.
Named in 78% of answers
Named in 75% of answers
Named in 60% of answers
When looking for liquidity providers and secondary market platforms for private company shares and employee stock options, the landscape is divided between traditional open secondary marketplaces, company-sponsored program administrators, and option-financing platforms. The top providers and platforms in this space…
When looking for liquidity providers and secondary market platforms for private company shares and employee stock options, the landscape is divided between traditional open secondary marketplaces, company-sponsored program administrators, and option-financing platforms.
The top providers and platforms in this space include:
Note: Direct secondary sales of employee stock options usually require company approval, navigating a Right of First Refusal (ROFR), and complying with company transfer restrictions.
To help narrow down the best path, could you share:
For **secondary market employee stock option liquidity**, the “top liquidity providers” depend on whether you mean: 1. **Selling already-exercised private company shares** (true secondary sale), or 2. **Getting liquidity to exercise options** (exercise financing / option liquidity).
For secondary market employee stock option liquidity, the “top liquidity providers” depend on whether you mean:
The leading players are generally:
| Provider | Primary role | Best known for |
|---|---|---|
| Forge Global | Private-company secondary marketplace | Large late-stage startup share sales, institutional buyers, brokered transactions |
| Nasdaq Private Market | Institutional secondary platform | Company-sponsored tenders, employee liquidity programs, large private-company transactions |
| EquityZen | Secondary marketplace | Employee and shareholder sales, investor access through structured vehicles |
| Hiive | Private share marketplace | Transparent buyer/seller marketplace for venture-backed companies |
| ESO Fund | Option exercise financing | Non-recourse funding for employees who need cash to exercise options and cover taxes |
| Secfi | Option exercise financing + planning | Helping employees exercise options without upfront cash |
| Equitybee | Option exercise financing marketplace | Connecting employees with investors who fund option exercises |
| Industry Ventures | Institutional secondary investor | Venture-backed company liquidity solutions and large secondary transactions |
Parse StrikeRates## By use case
The strongest liquidity venues are usually:
The major providers are:
One important distinction: employee stock options themselves usually are not directly “sold” in the secondary market. In many cases, the employee must first exercise the options into shares (subject to company rules), and then those shares may be eligible for a secondary transaction. Exercise financing providers solve the first problem; secondary marketplaces solve the second.
If you are evaluating this from the perspective of a startup employee, a company running a liquidity program, or an investor buying secondary shares, the ranking changes somewhat.
The secondary market for pre-IPO private stock and employee stock options features several major liquidity providers, platforms, and facilitators. These entities generally function either as marketplaces connecting individual holders with institutional/accredited buyers or as financing providers that help employees…
The secondary market for pre-IPO private stock and employee stock options features several major liquidity providers, platforms, and facilitators. These entities generally function either as marketplaces connecting individual holders with institutional/accredited buyers or as financing providers that help employees exercise options so they can hold out for a future exit.
The leading players in this space include:
Note: Before pursuing any secondary sale, check your company’s internal bylaws. Most startups have strict Right of First Refusal (ROFR) policies and transfer restrictions that require company approval for any secondary transactions.
Are you looking to outright sell your vested shares/options for immediate cash, or do you need financing to exercise upcoming option grants? I can provide more specific details on tax consequences or platform requirements based on your situation.
If by **“liquidity providers”** you mean the firms/platforms that actually source buyers and facilitate secondary sales of private-company employee equity, the leading U.S. players in 2026 are roughly: Provider | Role | Best fit --- | --- | ---
If by “liquidity providers” you mean the firms/platforms that actually source buyers and facilitate secondary sales of private-company employee equity, the leading U.S. players in 2026 are roughly:
| Provider | Role | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Forge Global | Large institutional secondary marketplace + company liquidity programs | Large employee positions, institutional execution |
| Hiive | Two-sided marketplace with visible bids/offers | Employees seeking competitive price discovery |
| EquityZen | Primarily SPV/fund-based secondary transactions | Smaller employee positions / diversified buyer pool |
| Nasdaq Private Market (NPM) | Company-sponsored tenders, auctions and trading windows | Employer-sponsored employee liquidity programs |
| Augment | Institutional/private secondary marketplace | Larger negotiated transactions |
| FNEX | Institutional secondary/dark-pool execution | Large blocks and institutional buyers |
There are really two markets here.
1. Employee-facing marketplaces: Forge, Hiive and EquityZen help an employee find a counterparty for an individual sale. Hiive is particularly differentiated by its order-book approach and says it provides market pricing across thousands of pre-IPO companies.
2. Company-sponsored liquidity providers: NPM and Forge are particularly important when the company itself approves a tender offer or recurring liquidity program. NPM says it has facilitated 1,000+ liquidity programs and $80B+ in transaction value, with a network of 700+ institutional investors. Nasdaq Private Market Forge similarly offers tender offers and customized employee liquidity programs.
There's an important wrinkle: an unexercised option isn't normally the same thing as freely transferable stock. For example, NPM's employee marketplace says options generally need to be exercised, but it also supports transactions where the sale proceeds fund the exercise cost—effectively a cashless exercise structure, subject to company approval. Nasdaq Private Market Hiive likewise says sellers generally need vested options or exercised shares.
So if you're evaluating these providers for a startup employee liquidity product, I would rank them differently than I would for ordinary pre-IPO share trading:
The bigger question, though, is who is actually putting up the capital. The platforms above are often intermediaries rather than the ultimate buyer. The capital can come from secondary funds, crossover/growth investors, hedge funds, family offices, existing company investors, or other institutional buyers. NPM explicitly describes these categories as the primary demand sources in its liquidity programs.
If you're asking because you're building or evaluating a marketplace for employee option liquidity, I can also map the actual buyer/fund landscape—e.g. the top 15–25 secondary funds that routinely buy employee shares/options, their typical check sizes, preferred company stages, and whether they buy directly or through Forge/NPM/Hiive.
2. Company-sponsored liquidity providers: NPM and Forge are particularly important when the company itself approves a tender offer or recurring liquidity program. NPM says it has facilitated 1,000+ liquidity programs and $80B+ in transaction value, with a network of 700+ institutional investors. Nasdaq Private Market Forge similarly offers tender offers and customized employee liquidity programs.
There's an important wrinkle: an unexercised option isn't normally the same thing as freely transferable stock. For example, NPM's employee marketplace says options generally need to be exercised, but it also supports transactions where the sale proceeds fund the exercise cost—effectively a cashless exercise structure, subject to company approval. Hiive likewise says sellers generally need vested options or exercised shares.
So if you're evaluating these providers for a startup employee liquidity product, I would rank them differently than I would for ordinary pre-IPO share trading:
When looking to monetize vested employee stock options or private company shares before an IPO or acquisition, several dedicated secondary market platforms, marketplaces, and alternative trading systems (ATS) dominate the…
When looking to monetize vested employee stock options or private company shares before an IPO or acquisition, several dedicated secondary market platforms, marketplaces, and alternative trading systems (ATS) dominate the landscape.
The top liquidity providers and platforms facilitating these private secondary transactions include:
Note: Before using any secondary market provider, transactions remain subject to company approval, Right of First Refusal (ROFR) policies, transfer restrictions, and securities laws (such as accredited investor requirements).
If you'd like, let me know:
I can help outline the tax implications or match you with the best execution strategy.
If by **“liquidity providers”** you mean firms that can actually help an employee monetize vested private-company equity/options—rather than simply provide software—the leading players in 2026 are: | Provider | Best fit | Liquidity model | My take | |---|---|---|---|
If by “liquidity providers” you mean firms that can actually help an employee monetize vested private-company equity/options—rather than simply provide software—the leading players in 2026 are:
| Provider | Best fit | Liquidity model | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forge Global | Large, late-stage positions | Secondary marketplace + company-sponsored tenders | Top institutional-scale option |
| Nasdaq Private Market (NPM) | Company-wide employee liquidity programs | Tender offers, auctions, recurring programs | Top for issuer-sponsored liquidity |
| Hiive | Employees selling individual positions | Open marketplace with bids/asks | Strongest marketplace alternative |
| EquityZen | Smaller employee positions | Fund/SPV-based secondary purchases | Good for smaller sellers |
| Industry Ventures | Large/custom liquidity transactions | Institutional secondary capital | Strong for bespoke/block transactions |
| Zanbato / ZX | Institutional-sized blocks | Institutional private-share trading network | More institutional than employee-facing |
| Secfi / ESO Fund | Unexercised options | Financing/exercise + liquidity solutions | Important if the employee hasn't exercised |
1. Forge Global — probably the most important name if you're talking about actual secondary liquidity. Forge provides a marketplace for private-company shares as well as company-sponsored liquidity programs and tender offers. Its private-company solutions specifically target employee liquidity.
2. Nasdaq Private Market — particularly important when the company itself wants to facilitate employee sales. NPM runs tender offers and recurring liquidity programs, with a network of 600+ institutional investors. Its programs are increasingly being used earlier than the traditional Series D+ stage.
3. Hiive — operates more like a marketplace, with buyers and sellers able to see market interest and bids/asks. It has become a significant venue for employees and other shareholders seeking liquidity without waiting for a company-sponsored tender.
4. EquityZen — another major secondary platform, but with more emphasis on pooling investors into funds/SPVs. It can be attractive when an employee has a smaller position that isn't large enough to attract a direct institutional buyer.
If the employee already exercised the options and owns shares, Forge/Hiive/EquityZen/NPM are the most relevant.
If the employee only owns vested but unexercised options, the market is different. Providers such as Secfi and ESO Fund have historically specialized in financing the exercise of employee options, sometimes coupled with liquidity. That's important because a conventional secondary buyer generally wants actual shares, not an employee's contractual option.
Also, private-company transfers are highly constrained by the issuer's transfer restrictions, ROFR provisions, and investor eligibility. Hiive, for example, notes that sellers generally need vested/exercised equity and that the company's rules govern whether a transaction can proceed.
I'd segment the competitive landscape into three layers:
That's an important distinction because Forge and NPM aren't necessarily the ultimate “liquidity providers.” They can be the marketplace/infrastructure through which the actual capital—secondary funds, family offices, crossover funds, hedge funds, etc.—buys the employee's shares. NPM, for example, explicitly says its programs are driven by third-party investors including growth-equity funds, crossover investors, hedge funds, family offices and private banks.
If your goal is to identify the 10–20 firms that actually deploy their own balance sheet/capital to buy employee shares, rather than marketplaces/intermediaries, that's a different—and arguably more interesting—list. I can map that market by buyer, typical check size, companies targeted, pricing model, and whether they buy exercised shares vs. unexercised options.
If by **“liquidity providers”** you mean firms/platforms that actually help employees monetize vested private-company equity (or finance the exercise of options), the market breaks into a few distinct groups. ### Leading secondary-market platforms | Provider | Best known for | Typical use case |
If by “liquidity providers” you mean firms/platforms that actually help employees monetize vested private-company equity (or finance the exercise of options), the market breaks into a few distinct groups.
| Provider | Best known for | Typical use case |
|---|---|---|
| Forge Global | Large, institutional secondary trades | Employees/founders with sizable positions in well-known late-stage companies |
| Hiive | Transparent marketplace and live bids | Employees seeking competitive price discovery |
| EquityZen | SPV-based secondary transactions | Smaller employee positions and companies with established secondary demand |
| Nasdaq Private Market | Company-sponsored tenders and liquidity programs | Large employee populations where the company wants to control the transaction |
| Zanbato | Institutional/private-share block trading | Larger institutional transactions |
Forge explicitly markets its marketplace to employees selling private-company shares, while Hiive allows sellers to list shares and match against verified buyers.
NPM is somewhat different: it is particularly important when the company itself sponsors the liquidity event. Its network includes 700+ institutional investors, and its programs include tenders, auctions, buybacks and marketplaces.
That's a different market. The employee generally can't simply sell an option through a normal secondary marketplace. Providers such as Secfi and ESO Fund specialize in financing the exercise and/or providing liquidity against the eventual equity value.
So the distinction is:
Vested + exercised shares → Forge, Hiive, EquityZen, NPM, Zanbato
Vested but unexercised options → Secfi, ESO Fund and similar option-exercise financiers
Company-wide employee liquidity → NPM, Forge, Hiive and specialist institutional secondary buyers
If you're asking specifically “who supplies the money?”, rather than who operates the marketplace, the important buyer universe includes:
For example, NPM says its tender programs are commonly funded by growth-equity funds, crossover investors, hedge funds, family offices and private banks. In January 2026, NPM announced a strategic partnership with G Squared specifically to combine G Squared's dedicated secondary capital with NPM's execution infrastructure.
If you're evaluating this as an employee seller, I'd start with:
One important caveat: the “best” provider depends enormously on the company. A platform can theoretically have a large buyer network but have little or no actual demand for your particular company's shares. Company transfer restrictions, ROFR, board approval, transaction size, preferred/common-stock differences, and the company's most recent 409A/financing valuation can matter more than the platform's headline market share.
If you tell me the company, approximate value of your options/shares, and whether the options are exercised, I can compare the likely liquidity providers, transaction structures, fees, and expected haircut to the latest preferred/share price.
Hiive
hiive.com
The secondary market for private company shares and employee stock options features several dominant platforms and alternative liquidity providers. These entities match existing shareholders (such as current and former employees) with institutional investors, family offices, and accredited…
The secondary market for private company shares and employee stock options features several dominant platforms and alternative liquidity providers. These entities match existing shareholders (such as current and former employees) with institutional investors, family offices, and accredited buyers.
Top Secondary Market Platforms
Specialized Option Financing & Alternative Models
If you are looking to liquidate specific equity, tell me:
I can help you determine which provider model fits your timeline and tax situation best.
The secondary market for private company equity and employee stock options features several leading platforms, specialized brokers, and structured liquidity…
The secondary market for private company equity and employee stock options features several leading platforms, specialized brokers, and structured liquidity providers.
The top providers and marketplaces that facilitate these transactions include:
Note: Direct sales of employee stock options or un-exercised shares are almost always subject to the issuing company's approval, Right of First Refusal (ROFR), and formal transfer restrictions.
If you'd like, let me know:
I can provide more tailored guidance on which platform fits best or what tax and compliance hurdles to anticipate.
If by **“liquidity providers”** you mean the firms that actually supply capital to buy employees’ private-company shares/options—not merely the marketplaces that arrange the trade—the market is roughly split into **institutional secondary investors, dedicated private-market funds, and company-sponsored tender-offer…
If by “liquidity providers” you mean the firms that actually supply capital to buy employees’ private-company shares/options—not merely the marketplaces that arrange the trade—the market is roughly split into institutional secondary investors, dedicated private-market funds, and company-sponsored tender-offer buyers.
| Firm / platform | Role | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Nasdaq Private Market (NPM) | Marketplace + tender-offer arranger + institutional buyer network | Broad employee liquidity programs |
| Forge | Secondary marketplace / institutional buyer network | Individual employee sales and larger blocks |
| Hiive | Two-sided secondary marketplace | Employees selling shares in actively traded private names |
| EquityZen | Marketplace + investment vehicles/funds | Smaller employee positions; fund-based access |
| G Squared Capital | Major institutional secondary investor | Large, late-stage company tenders |
| Industry Ventures | Dedicated secondary/venture investor | Institutional blocks and company liquidity programs |
| DST Global / affiliated funds | Large private-market investor | Very large, high-profile tender offers |
| Hedge funds / crossover funds / family offices | Direct buyers in tenders and secondaries | Opportunistic purchases of attractive private-company shares |
A key distinction: NPM, Forge, Hiive and EquityZen are primarily liquidity venues/intermediaries. The actual capital can come from secondary funds, growth-equity firms, hedge funds, family offices, existing company investors, or the company itself. NPM says its institutional network now includes 700+ investors, including growth-equity, hedge, secondary funds, family offices and private banks.
The market has recently become more interesting because some platforms are allowing cashless exercise: rather than an employee paying the strike price and taxes first, the buyer is identified first and the exercise cost/withholding can be deducted from the sale proceeds. NPM says this started becoming more common among its clients in 2025.
That's important because a traditional secondary sale generally requires:
vested options → exercise → receive shares → company approval/ROFR → find buyer → sell
whereas cashless exercise can effectively become:
vested options → buyer found → exercise funded from proceeds → settlement
For a company trying to create employee liquidity, I'd put NPM at the top of the shortlist, particularly for a company-sponsored tender. It has completed 1,000+ tender/liquidity programs and says its median recent program was about $35M.
For an individual employee trying to sell, I'd investigate NPM, Forge, Hiive and EquityZen in parallel. A 2026 comparison identifies those four as the major private-company secondary platforms, although their business models differ substantially.
For a $10M–$100M+ company-wide tender, the question changes: you want to identify the actual institutional bidders rather than simply choosing a marketplace. NPM explicitly says it can introduce qualified investors and also distributes through dedicated secondary investors such as G Squared Capital.
One particularly notable 2026 development is that NPM reported single-asset funds becoming the predominant vehicle for the most sought-after private issuers, because companies want tighter control over their cap tables while investors want concentrated exposure.
If you're asking this from the company/issuer side—i.e., “Who should I call to fund a $25M employee tender?”—I can give you a more useful top-10 list of actual institutional secondary buyers, with typical check sizes, company-stage focus, and whether they buy employee common/options directly.