Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 266 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Retrofitting cement plants for carbon capture is a specialized field involving several prominent providers. Companies like Carbon Clean and
SLB Capturi offer modular capture systems designed for easier integration. Others, such as
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, , and Chart Industries, supply large-scale capture and recovery processes. Additionally, engineering firms like Kiewit, Worley, and Ramboll support the technical execution, design, and deployment of these systems.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 73% of answers
Best for facility retrofits requiring space-saving, modular capture technology. Their CycloneCC systems are specifically designed for easier deployment at existing industrial sites like cement plants.
Named in 53% of answers
Named in 50% of answers
Named in 37% of answers
Best for modular CO2 capture systems in existing facilities. They are known for delivering scalable capture units, famously deployed at the large-scale Brevik cement facility in Norway.
Yes. There are several companies developing or supplying **carbon-capture systems that can be integrated with existing cement plants**, rather than requiring an entirely new kiln. ### Major technology providers - **Aker Carbon Capture** — Develops modular amine-based post-combustion capture systems. This is…
Yes. There are several companies developing or supplying carbon-capture systems that can be integrated with existing cement plants, rather than requiring an entirely new kiln.
For an existing conventional cement plant, I'd divide the market roughly like this:
| Technology | Retrofit potential | Main attraction |
|---|---|---|
| Amine / solvent capture | ★★★★★ | Can be installed after existing flue-gas system |
| Solid sorbent capture | ★★★★★ | Modular; potentially lower regeneration energy |
| PSA / cryogenic capture | ★★★★☆ | High-purity CO₂; attractive for certain flue-gas configurations |
| Oxyfuel | ★★★☆☆ | Very high CO₂ concentration, but requires significant kiln modifications |
| Direct separation / LEILAC | ★★★☆☆ | Captures process CO₂ directly; requires calciner modification |
| Calcium looping | ★★★☆☆ | Can integrate well with cement chemistry but adds substantial equipment |
A review of cement CCS technologies identifies amine scrubbing, calcium looping and partial oxyfuel as among the more mature approaches for cement applications, while full oxyfuel and direct-separation approaches require more extensive process changes.
If you're asking because you're evaluating a specific existing cement plant for retrofit, I would focus first on Aker Carbon Capture, Svante, Air Liquide, CarboClearTech and similar end-of-pipe technologies. If you're willing to modify the kiln/precalciner, then thyssenkrupp Polysius' oxyfuel and Calix's LEILAC/direct separation become particularly interesting.
There are also EPC/integration companies—such as FLSmidth, thyssenkrupp Polysius and engineering firms—that can integrate the capture technology with the kiln, rather than simply supplying the capture equipment.
If you tell me the plant size (e.g. 1 Mt cement/year), kiln type, country, and whether you're looking for a commercially available system today, I can narrow this down to the 5–10 most credible retrofit suppliers and compare capture rate, energy penalty, TRL, footprint, and known cement references.
Retrofitting cement plants—which are notoriously difficult to decarbonize because C O 2 cap C cap O sub 2𝐶𝑂2 is released both from burning fossil fuels and the chemical breakdown of limestone—requires specialized carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS)…
Retrofitting cement plants—which are notoriously difficult to decarbonize because C O 2 cap C cap O sub 2𝐶𝑂2 is released both from burning fossil fuels and the chemical breakdown of limestone—requires specialized carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) solutions.
Several key technology providers and engineering firms specialize in retrofitting cement manufacturing operations:
If you're working on a specific project, tell me:
I can provide a more tailored breakdown of vendors or ongoing retrofit case studies.
Retrofitting cement plants with carbon capture is a critical step because a large portion of cement emissions (C O 2 cap C cap O sub 2𝐶𝑂2 ) comes directly from the chemical limestone calcination process itself, rather than just fuel…
Retrofitting cement plants with carbon capture is a critical step because a large portion of cement emissions (C O 2 cap C cap O sub 2𝐶𝑂2 ) comes directly from the chemical limestone calcination process itself, rather than just fuel combustion.
Several prominent technology providers, engineering firms, and specialized innovators actively supply and pilot carbon capture solutions tailored or adaptable for cement plant retrofits:
Note: Large global cement manufacturers like Heidelberg Materials and Holcim frequently spearhead these implementations by partnering directly with these technology vendors to engineer commercial-scale retrofits.
If you are researching a specific project, let me know:
I can narrow down the most fitting provider or case study.
Yes. There are several technology providers targeting **carbon-capture retrofits for existing cement plants**. The most relevant ones are: Provider | Technology | Retrofit suitability | Cement references / status --- | --- | --- | ---
Yes. There are several technology providers targeting carbon-capture retrofits for existing cement plants. The most relevant ones are:
| Provider | Technology | Retrofit suitability | Cement references / status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calix / LEILAC | Direct-separation calciner | Very high — modular system designed to integrate with existing plants | LEILAC-1 at Lixhe, Belgium; LEILAC-2 is designed as a retrofit at Heidelberg Materials' Ennigerloh plant, targeting ~100,000 tCO₂/yr. Heidelberg Materials Leilac |
| Aker Carbon Capture | Amine-based post-combustion capture | High — captures CO₂ from conventional kiln exhaust | One of the leading suppliers of modular amine capture systems, with cement-sector projects and pilots. |
| Air Liquide | Cryogenic/separation and other CO₂ capture technologies | High for end-of-pipe applications | Currently partnering with Holcim at its CaptureLab cement facility in France to test capture technology on real cement-plant emissions. Holcim Holcim |
| Svante | Solid-sorbent adsorption | High — modular capture equipment installed downstream of kiln | Focuses on point-source capture from industrial flue gas, including cement. |
| Carbo Culture | Various carbon-management approaches | More specialized | Less directly comparable to conventional cement-kiln retrofit capture. |
| Carbon Clean | Modular solvent-based post-combustion capture | High | Industrial modular capture approach applicable to cement flue gas. |
| C-Capture | Solvent-based capture | Potentially high | Developing capture specifically for hard-to-abate industrial emissions, including cement. |
1. Post-combustion capture — bolt onto the existing kiln
This is probably the most straightforward retrofit concept. The cement plant continues operating its conventional kiln, while a capture unit treats the exhaust gas downstream.
Typical technologies include:
The advantage is that you don't fundamentally replace the kiln. The downside is substantial energy consumption, particularly for solvent regeneration.
2. Direct separation / integrated capture — modify the calciner
This is where Calix/LEILAC is particularly interesting. Its process uses a special reactor to separate the CO₂ released from limestone during calcination from the combustion gases. That is important because roughly two-thirds of cement's process CO₂ comes directly from calcining limestone, rather than from fuel combustion.
LEILAC specifically says its system is scalable, modular and designed to be retrofitted with low-impact integration into an operating cement plant.
I'd put the market into roughly three groups:
It's worth noting that cement producers themselves are increasingly acting as technology integrators rather than simply buying an off-the-shelf capture unit. Heidelberg Materials, for example, is pursuing multiple capture technologies—including amine, oxyfuel and direct separation—and its Brevik plant in Norway became the first industrial-scale cement CCS facility. Heidelberg Materials Holcim has likewise established a dedicated CaptureLab at a cement plant in France where third-party capture technologies can be tested against real kiln emissions.
If you're looking at this from an investment/project-development perspective, I can also map out 10–15 cement carbon-capture technology providers, their technology, TRL, demonstrated plant size, capture cost, energy penalty, and current commercial projects.
Several specialized engineering firms, technology developers, and equipment providers supply or pilot carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) solutions designed for cement plant retrofits. Because cement manufacturing produces hard-to-abate emissions from both fuel combustion and the chemical calcination of…
Several specialized engineering firms, technology developers, and equipment providers supply or pilot carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) solutions designed for cement plant retrofits. Because cement manufacturing produces hard-to-abate emissions from both fuel combustion and the chemical calcination of limestone , providers use various approaches—including post-combustion solvent scrubbing, modular units, and direct separation technologies.
Key technology providers and engineering groups active in retrofitting cement plants include:
If you're looking into a specific project, let me know:
I can provide more targeted details or project examples.
OASE
oase.com
Yes. There are several technology providers pursuing **carbon-capture retrofits for existing cement plants**, but they use quite different approaches. | Provider | Technology | Retrofit fit | Example / status | |---|---|---|---|
Yes. There are several technology providers pursuing carbon-capture retrofits for existing cement plants, but they use quite different approaches.
| Provider | Technology | Retrofit fit | Example / status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leilac / Calix | Indirectly heated calciner / “direct separation” | Very strong — modular replacement/addition to the calciner | LEILAC-2 at Heidelberg Materials’ Ennigerloh plant is designed for ~100,000 tCO₂/yr capture. www.heidelbergmaterials.comwww.leilac.com |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) | Amine-based post-combustion capture | Strong — treats cement-kiln exhaust | U.S. DOE FEED work for Heidelberg Materials' Mitchell, Indiana plant targets ~2 MtCO₂/yr. www.energy.gov |
| Svante | Solid sorbent capture | Strong — post-combustion retrofit | DOE-supported pre-FEED work at LafargeHolcim's Florence, Colorado plant targeted >1.5 MtCO₂/yr. www.energy.gov |
| RTI International | Non-aqueous solvent (NAS) capture | Strong — post-combustion retrofit | DOE FEED study at CEMEX Balcones, Texas, targeting ~1 MtCO₂/yr. www.energy.gov |
| Air Liquide | Cryogenic CO₂ purification / Cryocap | Retrofit-oriented, particularly for CO₂ purification | DOE FEED study associated with Holcim's Ste. Genevieve plant in Missouri. www.energy.gov |
| thyssenkrupp Polysius | Pure Oxyfuel | Potentially significant retrofit, but involves kiln/process modifications | Its Pure Oxyfuel technology is being demonstrated at Heidelberg Materials' Mergelstetten R&D facility in Germany in 2026. www.heidelbergmaterials.comwww.heidelbergmaterials.com |
1. Leilac/Calix — direct separation
This is arguably the most specifically designed-for-retrofit technology. Instead of capturing CO₂ from the entire kiln exhaust, Leilac's indirectly heated calciner separates the CO₂ released by limestone calcination before it mixes with combustion gases. The company says its modular system is designed to integrate into existing plants with minimal downtime.
The LEILAC-2 demonstration is particularly relevant: it's being integrated into an operating Heidelberg Materials plant and is designed for approximately 100,000 tonnes/year of CO₂ capture.
2. MHI — conventional post-combustion capture
MHI's amine system is closer to a conventional industrial CCS retrofit: keep the existing cement process and install a capture plant downstream to separate CO₂ from flue gas. Heidelberg Materials is among the U.S. projects being evaluated with this approach.
3. Svante — solid sorbents
Svante uses solid sorbent technology to capture CO₂ from industrial flue gases. It's another approach that can be added downstream of an existing cement kiln, making it potentially attractive where replacing the calciner isn't desirable. The DOE specifically lists cement retrofit work involving Svante.
4. thyssenkrupp Polysius — oxyfuel
Oxyfuel changes the combustion environment so that the resulting exhaust is much richer in CO₂, simplifying capture. Heidelberg Materials says it is evaluating oxyfuel alongside amine and direct-separation technologies. Its Pure Oxyfuel demonstration began operations at Mergelstetten in July 2026.
There are really two markets here:
Heidelberg Materials is particularly useful as a benchmark because its Brevik CCS facility in Norway has been operating since 2025 and captures about 400,000 tonnes of CO₂ annually from an existing cement plant. The capture facility was integrated without stopping normal cement production.
If you're evaluating this as a technology/vendor opportunity for a specific cement plant, I would narrow the field to Leilac/Calix, MHI, Svante, thyssenkrupp Polysius, and Air Liquide, then compare them on CAPEX per tonne captured, energy penalty, retrofit complexity, capture rate, kiln availability requirements, and CO₂ purity/compression requirements.
Yes. There are several companies developing or supplying carbon-capture systems specifically applicable to **retrofit of existing cement plants**. The main approaches differ substantially, so the right vendor depends on whether you want a bolt-on post-combustion system, oxyfuel conversion, or a process-integrated…
Yes. There are several companies developing or supplying carbon-capture systems specifically applicable to retrofit of existing cement plants. The main approaches differ substantially, so the right vendor depends on whether you want a bolt-on post-combustion system, oxyfuel conversion, or a process-integrated solution.
| Provider | Technology | Retrofit suitability | Example / status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) | Amine solvent, post-combustion | High | FEED for Heidelberg Materials' Mitchell, Indiana plant: ~2 Mt CO₂/yr target, using KM CDR Process + KS-21 solvent. netl.doe.gov |
| Air Liquide | Cryogenic CO₂ capture / purification | High | DOE-backed FEED at Holcim's Ste. Genevieve, Missouri plant; Cryocap technology. www.energy.gov |
| Svante | Solid sorbent / rotary adsorption | High | U.S. DOE project for a LafargeHolcim cement plant in Colorado, targeting >1.5 Mt CO₂/yr. www.energy.gov |
| RTI International | Non-aqueous solvent (NAS) | High | FEED/pre-FEED work associated with CEMEX Balcones, Texas. www.energy.gov |
| MTR (Membrane Technology & Research) | Membrane separation | Potentially high | DOE-supported work at CEMEX Balcones. www.energy.gov |
| Sustainable Energy Solutions (SES) | Cryogenic Carbon Capture™ | High | Engineering-scale demonstration with Eagle Materials/Central Plains Cement in Missouri, in partnership with Chart and FLSmidth. www.netl.doe.gov |
| Calix / LEILAC | Direct separation during calcination | Very interesting for cement | LEILAC-2 is designed as a retrofittable module at Heidelberg Materials' Ennigerloh plant in Germany, targeting up to 100,000 t CO₂/yr. www.energy.govwww.heidelbergmaterials.com |
| Capsol Technologies | High-temperature solvent (HPC), end-of-pipe | High | Markets its CapsolEoP system specifically for industrial facilities including cement and describes it as an integrated carbon-capture plant design. www.capsoltechnologies.com |
| Baker Hughes | Multiple post-combustion technologies, including chilled ammonia | High | Offers post-combustion capture applicable to cement plants. www.bakerhughes.com |
1. Post-combustion capture — easiest conceptual retrofit
The cement kiln continues operating conventionally and a capture plant is added downstream of the kiln/preheater exhaust. This includes MHI, Air Liquide, Svante, RTI, MTR, SES and Capsol. The U.S. DOE's cement-industry guide identifies solvent, sorbent, membrane and cryogenic approaches among current cement retrofit projects.
This is probably the first category I'd investigate if you have an existing kiln that you don't want to fundamentally rebuild.
2. Direct separation — particularly attractive for cement
Calix's LEILAC approach is different: it separates the CO₂ released from limestone during calcination rather than trying to extract dilute CO₂ from the entire kiln exhaust stream. The LEILAC-2 demonstration is explicitly designed as a retrofit module with minimal downtime.
3. Oxyfuel
Oxyfuel replaces combustion air with oxygen, producing a much more CO₂-rich exhaust stream. It can be highly attractive for cement but requires more substantial modification to the kiln system than a conventional end-of-pipe capture system. Heidelberg Materials is currently demonstrating oxyfuel-related technology at Mergelstetten, Germany.
The cement manufacturers themselves aren't necessarily the technology vendors. For example, Heidelberg Materials, Holcim and CEMEX are developing and demonstrating capture projects, but they frequently partner with specialist technology companies.
For example, Heidelberg's Mitchell project is a particularly useful real-world benchmark: the planned retrofit is designed for ~2 million tonnes/year of CO₂ capture, or about 95% of the plant's emissions, using MHI's solvent technology.
If you're evaluating this for an actual cement plant retrofit, I can also give you a shortlist of 10–15 vendors ranked by technology readiness, expected capture cost, energy penalty, retrofit complexity, and commercial references—including which ones are actually capable of a 1–2 MtCO₂/year installation.
Retrofitting existing cement plants with carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a major focus for industrial decarbonization . Because cement manufacturing generates "unavoidable" process emissions from limestone calcination (about 60% of total emissions) alongside fuel combustion, specialized technology…
Retrofitting existing cement plants with carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a major focus for industrial decarbonization . Because cement manufacturing generates "unavoidable" process emissions from limestone calcination (about 60% of total emissions) alongside fuel combustion, specialized technology providers partner with major building material groups to deploy custom post-combustion, oxyfuel, or direct separation retrofits.
Key technology providers and engineering firms active in retrofitting cement plants include:
These technology providers typically collaborate directly with cement giants—such as Heidelberg Materials, Holcim, Cemex , and TITAN Group —via pilot projects, front-end engineering design (FEED) studies, and full-scale commercial installations.
If you're researching a specific project, let me know:
I can provide more detailed case studies or engineering breakdowns.
Retrofitting cement plants with carbon capture technology is an active area of development, with several engineering firms and technology providers scaling up solutions tailored to the industry's unique high-temperature and process-emission…
Retrofitting cement plants with carbon capture technology is an active area of development, with several engineering firms and technology providers scaling up solutions tailored to the industry's unique high-temperature and process-emission challenges.
Key providers and technology developers active in retrofitting cement plants include:
Are you looking into a specific region, budget scale, or capture methodology (such as post-combustion vs. direct separation) for a cement plant retrofit project?
Yes. There are several companies developing **carbon-capture systems specifically suitable for retrofitting existing cement plants**. The main approaches are post-combustion capture, oxyfuel/calciner redesign, and modular capture systems. | Provider | Technology | Retrofit relevance | Cement references |…
Yes. There are several companies developing carbon-capture systems specifically suitable for retrofitting existing cement plants. The main approaches are post-combustion capture, oxyfuel/calciner redesign, and modular capture systems.
| Provider | Technology | Retrofit relevance | Cement references |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leilac | Indirectly heated calciner that separates process CO₂ during calcination | Very high — specifically designed as a modular retrofit to existing kilns | Heidelberg Materials’ plants in Belgium/Germany; Leilac-2 targets ~100,000 tCO₂/yr www.leilac.comwww.leilac.com |
| Svante | Solid-sorbent rotary contactors/filters | High — modular point-source capture installed alongside existing equipment | Lafarge Richmond, Canada; commercial-scale work at Holcim Florence, Colorado www.svanteinc.com |
| Carbon Clean | Amine-based CycloneCC/CaptureX modular capture | Very high — compact, modular systems intended to integrate with existing industrial operations | CEMEX Rüdersdorf, Germany and CEMEX Victorville, California projects www.carbonclean.com |
| Heidelberg Materials / Brevik CCS | Post-combustion amine capture + CO₂ transport/storage | Demonstrated at full industrial scale | Brevik, Norway captures ~400,000 tCO₂/yr from an operating cement plant www.reuters.com |
| Aker Solutions | Large-scale amine-based carbon capture and process integration | High, particularly for large brownfield industrial sites | Has extensive industrial CCUS engineering capability; typically works with plant owners/EPC partners |
1. Leilac — probably the most purpose-built retrofit option.
Rather than capturing CO₂ from the entire kiln exhaust, Leilac changes the calcination arrangement so that the CO₂ released from limestone is separated inherently. Its technology is explicitly designed for modular retrofit with minimal downtime.
2. Svante — strong conventional retrofit candidate.
Svante uses solid sorbents in structured filters and rotary contactors. Its systems are designed for dilute industrial flue gas, including cement and lime, and the company offers modular equipment and project-development support.
3. Carbon Clean — strong modular post-combustion option.
Its CycloneCC system is particularly interesting where space is constrained around an existing kiln. Carbon Clean says the system is modular/prefabricated and designed for hard-to-abate industries including cement. It has also worked directly with CEMEX on adapting the technology to cement production.
I'd divide the supplier landscape into:
The distinction matters because "who provides carbon capture?" and "who delivers a turnkey retrofit?" are usually different questions. For example, Carbon Clean supplied the capture technology for the CEMEX Rüdersdorf concept while KBR provided FEED engineering.
If you tell me the cement plant size (e.g., 1 Mt clinker/year), country, and whether you want capture of 90%+ of emissions, I can narrow this down to the 5–10 companies actually capable of supplying a commercial retrofit today, including approximate capture costs, technology maturity, and reference plants.