AI brand recommendation concentration by industry
AI does not recommend brands with the same shape in every market. Consumer electronics is winner-take-most; B2B software is an open list. The right AI visibility target depends on the category.
By Dimitry Apollonsky · July 8, 2026 · 8 min read
Contents
- AI visibility has a category shape
- Consumer categories are winner-take-most
- B2B software categories keep a long list open
- The concentration gap is almost fourfold
- The target is the top slot in some industries and a place on the list in others
- The pattern holds on both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
- The gap survives when every question is run a similar number of times
- The gap survives removing single-brand lookups
- This is AI decisiveness, not market share
- Set goals against your category's baseline
- Get the data
- Sources
- Related research
We analyzed 631,087 distinct brand recommendations across 9,658 buyer questions on ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews from October 19, 2025 to April 24, 2026, reporting 38 industries with at least 30 questions.
AI visibility has a category shape
The median buyer question names 11 recommended brands across repeated runs, and the top brand holds 33% of all the recommendations. That average hides the real story: some industries collapse to one winner, while others keep a long list of brands alive.
The industry baseline matters because a 20% share can mean dominance in one market and mediocrity in another.
Takeaway
Consumer categories are winner-take-most
Consumer Electronics is the clearest winner-take-most category: median top-brand share is 81.1%, the median question names only three brands, and 84% of questions are decisive, meaning one brand holds at least half of all the recommendations. Consumer Goods, Clothing and Apparel, and Sports follow the same pattern.
| Consumer Electronics | 274 | 81.1 | 3 | 84 |
| Consumer Goods | 347 | 66.7 | 5 | 63 |
| Clothing and Apparel | 114 | 65 | 6 | 62 |
| Sports | 249 | 62.5 | 5 | 64 |
| Government and Military | 42 | 53.4 | 9 | 57 |
B2B software categories keep a long list open
Sales and Marketing sits at the other extreme. The median top brand holds only 21.8% of all the recommendations, the median question names 15 brands, and 73% of questions are open, meaning the leader holds less than 30%. Software, AI, Professional Services, IT, and Data and Analytics cluster around the same open shape.
| Sales and Marketing | 191 | 21.8 | 15 | 73 |
| Advertising | 49 | 22.3 | 14 | 76 |
| Events | 62 | 23.1 | 15 | 71 |
| Data and Analytics | 238 | 24.8 | 13 | 62 |
| Information Technology | 643 | 25.5 | 13 | 61 |
| Software | 769 | 27.9 | 13 | 55 |
The concentration gap is almost fourfold
The difference between the most and least concentrated industries is about 3.7x on top-brand share: 81.1% in Consumer Electronics versus 21.8% in Sales and Marketing. The median list of brands differs by about 5x: three brands versus fifteen.
The target is the top slot in some industries and a place on the list in others
In winner-take-most categories, the practical target is becoming the one brand AI repeats. In open categories, the practical target is earning a durable slot across a larger list. The same measured share implies a different job.
The pattern holds on both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
The consumer-versus-software gap is not one engine's quirk. Consumer Electronics remains concentrated on both surfaces, with median top-brand share of 88.2% on ChatGPT and 72.7% on
Google AI Overviews. Software stays open on both, at 30.6% and 28.0%.
| Consumer Electronics | 88.2 | 72.7 |
| Consumer Goods | 77 | 54.5 |
| Financial Services | 31.4 | 30.6 |
| Software | 30.6 | 28 |
| Information Technology | 30 | 26.5 |
| Sales and Marketing | 20.7 | 23.8 |
The gap survives when every question is run a similar number of times
One possible objection is that some industries have more repeated runs, giving more chances for brand variety. Restricting to questions with 9-13 runs does not erase the pattern: Consumer Electronics still has a 74.1% top-brand share and four brands; Sales and Marketing still has a 19.7% top-brand share and sixteen brands.
| Sales and Marketing | 19.7 | 16 |
| Consumer Electronics | 74.1 | 4 |
The gap survives removing single-brand lookups
Consumer electronics includes some specific product questions. Removing single-brand lookups and keeping only questions where AI named at least three distinct brands still leaves Consumer Electronics at 66.7% top-brand share versus 21.6% for Sales and Marketing.
This is AI decisiveness, not market share
Top-brand share here is not a market-concentration index. It measures how consistently AI repeats the same recommended brand across runs for a buyer question. That distinction matters: AI can be decisive in a fragmented real-world market, and diffuse in a market with clear offline leaders.
Set goals against your category's baseline
For a Consumer Electronics brand, the question is whether AI repeats you as the answer. For a B2B software brand, the first goal may be earning a stable place in the shortlist.
This is why a universal AI visibility target is misleading. Compare against how concentrated your category is, then decide whether the work is winning the top slot or getting onto the list.