The top three brands captured 10.7% of direct mentions in Impact Investing Funding Advisory.
Share of direct mentions
share of answers
Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 1,505 AI responses · See how Parse measures this
Acumen holds its position as the most-cited leader in impact investing, typically recommended for startups focused on global poverty. However, AI responses are increasingly distinguishing between general impact funds and specialized advisors, with firms like Social Finance rising rapidly for endowment-focused queries.
Impact Investing Funding Advisory
Parse
https://parse.gl
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A hybrid firm funding both for-profit and nonprofit social impact ventures. | 26% | |
| 2 | A pioneering nonprofit impact investor providing 'patient capital' for poverty alleviation. | 23% | |
| 3 | A major grantmaker for global health and development initiatives. | 18% | |
| 4 | Premier deep-tech climate investor focused on science-driven decarbonization. | 17% | |
| 5 | 17% | ||
| 6 | Backs high-risk, 'moonshot' climate tech and carbon removal startups. | 16% | |
| 7 | Funds social entrepreneurs driving large-scale, systemic change. | 16% | |
| 8 | Venture philanthropy organization focused on scaling high-impact social enterprises. | 14% | |
| 9 | 13% | ||
| 10 | 13% | ||
| 11 | 13% | ||
| 12 | 12% | ||
| 13 | 11% | ||
| 14 | A non-profit accelerator specifically designed for tech nonprofits. | 11% | |
| 15 | 10% | ||
| 16 | 10% | ||
| 17 | 9% | ||
| 18 | 8% | ||
| 19 | 8% | ||
| 20 | 8% | ||
| 21 | 8% | ||
| 22 | 7% | ||
| 23 | 7% | ||
| 24 | 7% | ||
| 25 | 7% |
“A general philanthropic grantmaker.” → “Frequently linked to specific investment vehicles like Pivotal Ventures for mission-aligned tech investments.”
Rose from #13 to #4 overall between November and March, becoming the dominant recommendation for endowment-focused prompts.
Declined from #6 to #11 in overall citation rank between November and March, facing more competition in nonprofit funding.
Gained significant prominence in climate tech queries, rising from #17 to #7 overall in the same period.
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39% | 25% | ||
| 13% | 24% | ||
| 28% | 0% | ||
| 26% | 10% | ||
| 18% | 17% |
The two models disagree most about Ford Foundation (ChatGPT #3, Google #23) and Breakthrough Energy (ChatGPT #6, Google #25).
Sources AI cited
joinleland.com is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 29% of analyzed answers.
Share of direct mentions
share of answers
Share of direct mentions
share of answers
Acumen holds its position as the most-cited leader in impact investing, typically recommended for startups focused on global poverty. However, AI responses are increasingly distinguishing between general impact funds and specialized advisors, with firms like Social Finance rising rapidly for endowment-focused queries.
Across 1,505 AI responses, Omidyar Network is mentioned most, named in 26% of them, followed by Acumen (23%) and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (18%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 1,505 AI responses to this market's buyer questions. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is published weekly.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
AI responses consistently position Acumen and
Omidyar Network as the top recommendations for general social impact funding. The answers frequently include other major grantmakers like the Gates Foundation and
Skoll Foundation, providing a stable list of high-profile funders.
AI responses consistently position Acumen and
Omidyar Network as the top recommendations for general social impact funding. The answers frequently include other major grantmakers like the Gates Foundation and
Skoll Foundation, providing a stable list of high-profile funders.
Omidyar Network, , and are consistently the top-cited organizations for funding non-profit tech. Over the observed period, AI models increasingly highlight tech-focused accelerators like as valuable resources alongside these more traditional venture philanthropists.
+4 more
share of answers
Brands mentioned
Omidyar Network,
Acumen, and
New Profit are consistently the top-cited organizations for funding non-profit tech. Over the observed period, AI models increasingly highlight tech-focused accelerators like
Fast Forward as valuable resources alongside these more traditional venture philanthropists.