As a Recruiter, what's the best Applicant Tracking System (ATS) for a small staffing agency?

For a small staffing agency, the “best” ATS is usually not the same as the best ATS for an internal HR department. You need more than applicant tracking — you need candidate database search, client/job order management, submissions, placements, CRM, email syncing, and reporting.

My shortlist:

Bullhorn Hire Forge AI## My recommendation by agency size

1–5 recruiters (boutique staffing firm)

Best choices:

1. Recruit CRM — if you want something modern and easy to adopt.
2. Bullhorn Starter/Core — if you expect to scale and want a system you won’t outgrow.
3. Zoho Recruit — if budget is the priority.

5–25 recruiters

I would lean toward Bullhorn. Staffing agencies live and die by their database, and Bullhorn is built around the relationship between:

• Candidate → Job
• Client → Job Order
• Candidate → Submission → Placement

That workflow is where generic ATS products often become frustrating.

Temp/contract staffing

I would strongly favor:

• Bullhorn
• Crelate
• Akken because you may need assignment tracking, compliance, extensions, and contractor workflows.

Features I would not compromise on

Before buying, make sure the ATS has:

• Resume parsing
• Boolean/AI candidate search
• Candidate rediscovery (search your existing database first)
• Email sync with Gmail/Outlook
• Client CRM
• Job order tracking
• Candidate submission tracking
• Automated follow-ups
• Reporting on recruiter activity and placements
• Job board integrations
• Mobile access

My overall pick

For a serious small staffing agency, I’d choose:

#1 Bullhorn — best long-term staffing platform. Bullhorn #2 Recruit CRM — best balance of simplicity and agency functionality. Hire Forge AI #3 Zoho Recruit — best low-cost option.

If you tell me:

1. your agency type (IT, healthcare, light industrial, executive search, temp/contract, etc.),
2. number of recruiters, and
3. monthly budget,

I can narrow this down to the top 2–3 choices.

The best Applicant Tracking System (ATS) for a small staffing agency depends on whether you prioritize maximum budget value or robust multi-client CRM features, with Manatal and Zoho Recruit standing out as the top industry choices.

Unlike corporate HR teams, small agencies need built-in client management (CRM), fast resume parsing, and multi-job-board posting without enterprise-level pricing.

Watch this overview of leading recruitment platforms and their agency-focused capabilities to find the right fit:

9:43 5 Best Applicant Tracking Systems in 2026 (AI Features ...4 months ago YouTube · People Managing People

Top ATS Options for Small Staffing Agencies

Key Selection Factors

• Client Relationship Management (CRM): Staffing agencies manage both candidates and paying clients. Ensure your choice tracks client companies, contacts, and deal pipelines alongside talent pools.
• AI Resume Parsing & Scoring: Saves hours by automatically mapping applicant skills to open positions across multiple client requisitions.
• Job Board Distribution: One-click posting to major aggregators (LinkedIn, Indeed, ZipRecruiter) keeps your candidate flow active without manual entry.

If you want, tell me:

• What is your monthly budget per user?
• Do you specialize in a specific industry (e.g., tech, healthcare, light industrial)?

I can narrow down the exact platform for your workflow needs.

The best Applicant Tracking System (ATS) for a small staffing agency is Zoho Recruit , prized for its affordable pricing, robust client-management features, and high-volume candidate tracking tailored specifically for staffing firms.

For a small staffing agency, you need a platform that handles both candidate pipelines and multiple client accounts simultaneously, unlike standard corporate ATS options.

Top ATS Options for Small Staffing Agencies

Key Selection Factors

• Client & Contact Management: Staffing agencies need to track hiring managers and client companies separately from candidates. Ensure your choice has a true CRM component.
• Resume Parsing & Chrome Extensions: Look for tools that let you source directly from LinkedIn or job boards with a single click to populate your database instantly.
• Automation: Automated text messaging, interview scheduling, and status updates keep candidates engaged in high-turnover staffing environments.

To help narrow down the best fit, let me know:

• What is your monthly budget?
• Do you focus on temp, permanent, or executive search placement?

If you’re a small staffing agency, I’d prioritize an ATS that is built around the agency workflow—clients → job orders → candidates → submissions → interviews → placements—not just an ATS designed for an internal HR department.

My shortlist for 2026

🥇 My #1: Bullhorn

For a serious staffing agency, Bullhorn would be my first demo.

The big advantage isn't simply applicant tracking. Bullhorn combines ATS + recruiting CRM + client management, so recruiters can manage candidates and business development in the same system. It also supports resume parsing, candidate search, job posting, submission tracking, email integration, reporting, and an ecosystem of third-party integrations. Bullhorn says more than 4,500 small agencies use its platform.

Current published small-agency pricing starts at:

• Starter — $99/user/month: ATS, resume parsing, client management, job posting/career portal.
• Core — $165/user/month: adds custom workflows, marketplace integrations, LinkedIn integrations, and email sidebar.
• Pro — custom: adds recruitment CRM, AI search/matching, automation, analytics, AI features, etc.

Why I'd choose it: If you expect your agency to grow from 2–3 recruiters to 10+, I'd rather establish your database and workflows in Bullhorn now than migrate later.

Downside: It can be more system than a tiny boutique agency needs, particularly if you're doing only a handful of direct-hire searches.

---

🥈 Loxo — if sourcing is your superpower

I'd put Loxo very high on the list if you're primarily doing permanent placement, executive search, or contingency recruiting and your recruiters spend a huge amount of time sourcing candidates.

Its appeal is the combination of ATS, CRM, sourcing, outreach and AI rather than treating those as separate systems.

Choose Loxo over Bullhorn if: Your biggest problem is "We need more qualified candidates" rather than "We need to manage a complicated staffing operation."

---

🥉 Recruit CRM — probably the sweet spot for a 1–5 person boutique

If you're a small recruiting agency with a lean team, I'd absolutely demo Recruit CRM.

It's aimed at agency recruiting rather than corporate HR and combines ATS and CRM functionality without necessarily requiring the operational complexity of a larger staffing platform. Current industry comparisons put it among the leading options for small/midsize agencies.

I'd seriously consider it if Bullhorn feels like overkill.

---

What I'd choose based on your agency

• 1–3 recruiters, direct hire: Recruit CRM or Loxo
• 1–5 recruiters, contingency recruiting: Bullhorn or Recruit CRM
• Temp/contract staffing: Bullhorn, TrackerRMS, or Avionté
• Mixed temp + permanent staffing: Bullhorn
• Executive search: Loxo
• Very tight budget: Zoho Recruit
• Planning to scale substantially: Bullhorn

One important distinction: temporary/contract staffing changes the answer considerably because you may eventually need timesheets, onboarding/compliance, redeployment, pay/bill, and related back-office capabilities. Bullhorn and other staffing-specific platforms are much better positioned for that than generic ATS products.

My recommendation

If I were advising a small staffing agency today, I'd narrow the demos to:

1. Bullhorn → safest long-term staffing choice 2. Recruit CRM → best lean/boutique alternative 3. Loxo → best if sourcing is the core of your business

I wouldn't choose an ATS based primarily on applicant tracking. For an agency, the CRM/client side is almost equally important. Your system should answer instantly:

What jobs do we have? Which candidates fit? Where have we submitted them? What clients need attention? Which candidates are available? What placements are coming? That's where a staffing-specific ATS/CRM earns its money.

If you tell me (1) number of recruiters, (2) temp vs. permanent vs. both, (3) industry you're staffing, and (4) approximate monthly budget, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 systems for your specific agency and compare them feature-by-feature.

It's aimed at agency recruiting rather than corporate HR and combines ATS and CRM functionality without necessarily requiring the operational complexity of a larger staffing platform. Current industry comparisons put it among the leading options for small/midsize agencies.

I'd seriously consider it if Bullhorn feels like overkill.

---

Here are top web results for exploring this topic:

People Managing People·https://peoplemanagingpeople.com 10 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS ) of 2026 Best for in-house talent acquisition teams. Free demo available; Pricing upon request. Visit Website. Rating: 4.7/5. Pinpoint screenshot - 10 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) of 2026 Pinpoint das Leonar.app·https://www.leonar.app 12 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS ) 2026 - Leonar 2. Workable, Best for AI-Powered Screening. Workable has positioned itself as a leader in AI-driven recruitment. Its AI engine helps source candidates, screen resumes, and even draft job descriptions, Reddit·https://www.reddit.com**What's the best ATS system** for a company of size 5-10 employees If you're already using LinkedIn Recruiter, a team of 5-10 can just use that as their ATS, as long as staff are using the tags, projects and notes features correctly. You can also share and change acc Recruiterflow·https://recruiterflow.com**Recruiterflow** - Best AI-Native ATS & CRM for Executive Search ...Recruiterflow is the best AI-Native ATS & CRM software for executive search firms, recruiting agencies and staffing agencies. It comes equipped with ATS, CRM, sequencing, data enrichment, recruitment Enginehire·https://enginehire.io Top ATS Systems for Recruiting Agencies - Enginehire platforms built specifically for large-scale staffing and recruiting agencies. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools that combines ats systems with customer relationship management (CRM). Key Featu Bullhorn·https://www.bullhorn.com**Best ATS** for staffing agencies in 2026 | Blog - Bullhorn The best-fit ATS for a staffing agency meets all the criteria above in one platform. Bullhorn is an applicant tracking system (ATS) and recruitment CRM built for staffing and recruitment agencies, use Metaview·https://www.metaview.ai**Best applicant tracking software** for recruiting teams · Metaview Blog Bullhorn AI-powered online recruitment software homepage for staffing agencies. Bullhorn is the most comprehensive ATS for staffing agencies. ATS, CRM, candidate database, client tracking, placement w Zapier·https://zapier.com The 9 best applicant tracking systems in 2026 - Zapier The 9 best applicant tracking systems. Workable for candidate tracking. Breezy HR for small businesses on a budget. Pinpoint for a premium experience. Zoho Recruit for AI features. Greenhouse for repo Recruiteze·https://recruiteze.com 9 Best ATS For Staffing Agencies [New Picks] - Recruiteze Workable: Best for Candidate Tracking. Workable makes managing candidates a breeze with its advanced tracking features and powerful search capabilities. Whether you're handling a few · Breezy HR: Best U.S. Chamber of Commerce·https://www.uschamber.com**Best Applicant Tracking Systems** for Small Business Recruiting Bullhorn: Best ATS software for small staffing agencies. Bullhorn is a cloud-based ATS and customer relationship management (CRM) platform. Pricing is available via quote. The mobile-first platform su

If I were choosing an ATS as a recruiter running a small staffing agency, my pick in 2026 would be Bullhorn—but Recruit CRM would be my strongest alternative if keeping costs down and maximizing recruiter productivity were the priority.

The important distinction is that a staffing agency needs more than a traditional ATS. You need ATS + recruiting CRM + candidate database + client/job management + sourcing/outreach in one workflow.

My ranking

🥇 1. Bullhorn — Best overall for a staffing agency

This is the one I'd put at the top of your shortlist if you're building a real staffing business rather than just tracking applicants.

Bullhorn is purpose-built around the relationship between client → job order → candidates → submissions → placement. It combines ATS and CRM, has resume parsing, searchable candidate records, job posting, email integration, submission tracking and placement management. More than 4,500 small agencies reportedly use it.

Current small-agency pricing:

• Starter: $99/user/month
• Core: $165/user/month
• Pro: custom pricing, adding recruitment CRM, AI search/match, automation and analytics.

Why I'd choose it: You don't want to outgrow your ATS and migrate your entire candidate database in two years. Bullhorn lets you start relatively small and move up within the same platform.

Downside: It isn't the cheapest or necessarily the slickest/most modern interface, and some of the more advanced functionality gets expensive.

---

🥈 2. Recruit CRM — Best value for a small recruiting firm

If I had 2–5 recruiters and wanted something modern, flexible and recruiter-friendly, I'd seriously consider Recruit CRM.

It combines ATS + CRM with:

• AI resume parsing
• Chrome sourcing extension
• email/calendar integration
• candidate and client pipelines
• unlimited open jobs
• job-board posting
• AI sourcing
• calling/recording
• reporting
• email sequencing
• workflow automation on higher tiers.

It also offers a free trial, rather than requiring you to commit immediately.

Why I'd choose it: For a small agency, recruiter efficiency matters more than having every enterprise staffing feature imaginable. Recruit CRM gives you a lot of the functionality I'd want without necessarily forcing you into an enterprise-style platform.

My verdict: Probably the best Bullhorn alternative for a boutique recruiting agency.

---

🥉 3. Loxo — Best if sourcing is your competitive advantage

Loxo is particularly interesting if your recruiters spend a lot of time finding passive candidates rather than waiting for applicants.

Its platform combines:

• ATS
• recruiting CRM
• sourcing / people search
• outbound candidate engagement
• AI-powered sourcing
• automated multi-channel outreach
• sales CRM.

Loxo also has its own job distribution product, Loxo Boost, which can distribute postings across a network of 30,000 job sites.

I'd pick Loxo over Bullhorn if: your business is primarily executive search, professional recruiting, or contingency recruiting where proactive sourcing and outbound recruiting are more important than traditional staffing operations.

---

4. Zoho Recruit — Best budget option

Zoho is the one I'd investigate if you're saying:

"I'm a small agency and I really don't want to spend $100–$200+ per recruiter every month."

The Staffing Agency edition has a free plan, while its paid plans currently list $30/recruiter/month for Standard, $60 for Professional and $90 for Enterprise on monthly billing.

It includes things such as resume parsing, job posting, career site, hiring pipeline, candidate screening and, at higher levels, analytics, SMS/phone integration and candidate/client portals.

The tradeoff: You'll likely spend more time configuring/customizing the system than you would with a staffing-specific platform like Bullhorn or Recruit CRM.

---

5. Happlicant — Worth looking at if you're essentially a one-person agency

Happlicant is specifically positioning itself around solo and independent recruiters, rather than being an enterprise ATS scaled down for an individual.

I'd put it on the shortlist if you're:

• solo
• doing mostly direct-hire/contingency recruiting
• trying to keep overhead extremely low
• more concerned with simplicity than complex staffing operations.

---

What I'd actually buy

My recommendation changes depending on your agency model:

1–2 recruiters, direct-hire/contingency:
→ Recruit CRM

2–10 recruiters, serious staffing agency:
→ Bullhorn

Executive search / passive-candidate sourcing:
→ Loxo

Very tight budget:
→ Zoho Recruit

Solo recruiter:
→ Happlicant or Recruit CRM

Temp/contract staffing with lots of placements, compliance and operational complexity:
→ Bullhorn

The feature I'd prioritize most

Don't make the mistake of choosing based on the prettiest candidate pipeline.

For a staffing agency, I'd prioritize:

Candidate database → powerful search → client CRM → job orders → candidate submission → interview → placement → redeployment

That entire chain should happen in one system.

For example, when a client calls with a new position, you should be able to enter the job and immediately search your existing database for qualified candidates—not create a job in one system, search candidates in another, email them from Outlook, and track the submission in Excel.

That's where staffing-specific ATS/CRM platforms have a major advantage over generic ATS products.

My final recommendation

If this were my small staffing agency, I'd demo three systems before signing anything:

1. Bullhorn — best long-term staffing infrastructure
2. Recruit CRM — best balance of price, usability and recruiting functionality
3. Loxo — best if outbound sourcing is central to the business

And I'd make each vendor run one of your actual jobs through the system during the demo. Don't accept a canned demo.

If you tell me (a) number of recruiters, (b) direct hire vs. temp/contract, (c) industry, and (d) approximate monthly ATS budget, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 choices and compare them feature-by-feature, including current pricing.

For a small staffing agency, you cannot use a generic, in-house corporate ATS (like Greenhouse or Workable). You need a platform that natively combines an Applicant Tracking System (ATS) with a Client Relationship Management (CRM) tool so you can juggle active candidates, client accounts, submissions, and placements all in one dashboard.

The top options tailored for small staffing and recruiting agencies vary depending on your specific workflow and budget:

• Recruit CRM [Best for modern UI & workflow customization]: Blends a powerful agency CRM with an intuitive ATS, featuring great email sync, resume parsing, and an interface designed specifically for agency recruiters. It’s user-friendly and doesn’t require an IT department to set up.
• Bullhorn for Small Business [Best for industry standard & scalability]: The undisputed heavyweight in the staffing industry. Bullhorn offers a streamlined package tailored for small firms. It is reliable, connects to hundreds of marketplace partners, and ensures you won't outgrow the platform as you scale. However, it can be pricier and feel slightly more rigid than newer competitors.
• Zoho Recruit [Best budget-friendly option]: Highly scalable, offering a robust feature set (including AI resume parsing and client portals) at a fraction of the cost of legacy enterprise systems. It is ideal if cash flow and value are your top priorities.
• RecruiterFlow or Crelate [Best for boutique/executive search or heavy automation]: RecruiterFlow is loved for its blazing-fast automation and candidate sequencing, while Crelate offers fantastic depth for professional and specialized staffing without the heavy enterprise bloat of older software.

To help narrow down the ideal choice, let me know:

• What industry does your agency focus on (IT, light industrial, healthcare, executive search)?
• Roughly how many recruiters are on your team right now?
• What is your monthly or annual budget for software?

If you're a small staffing/recruiting agency, I’d put Bullhorn at the top of the shortlist—but the “best” choice depends heavily on whether you do permanent placement, contract/temp staffing, executive search, or a mix.

My 2026 shortlist

🥇 Best overall: Bullhorn

For a staffing agency, I would choose Bullhorn if your goal is to build a system you won't have to replace as the agency grows.

It's specifically designed around the agency workflow: clients → job orders → candidates → submissions → interviews → placements, rather than an ATS designed primarily for an internal HR department. It combines ATS and CRM, and its ecosystem includes hundreds of integrations. Bullhorn says more than 4,500 small agencies currently use it.

The current published small-agency pricing is:

• Starter: $99/user/month
• Core: $165/user/month
• Pro: custom pricing, adding recruitment CRM, AI, automation and analytics

Why I'd pick it: If you're serious about staffing, the CRM component matters almost as much as the ATS. You need to manage clients and business development, not just applicants.

---

🥈 Best alternative: Loxo

I'd look very seriously at Loxo if you're a small permanent-placement/search agency where sourcing is the heart of your business.

Its current Core plan is listed at $149/user/month and includes an AI-native ATS/CRM, AI search, natural-language search, sales CRM, Chrome extension, analytics, job-board posting and hiring-manager portal.

I'd favor Loxo over Bullhorn when:

• You're primarily direct hire/search.
• Your recruiters spend enormous amounts of time sourcing.
• You want a more modern, AI-centric interface.
• You don't need a heavy temp/contract staffing back office.

---

🥉 Best for a lean boutique agency: Recruit CRM

If you're a 1–5 recruiter boutique, I'd put Recruit CRM on your demo list. It's particularly attractive when you want an ATS + recruiting CRM without buying a platform designed for a much larger staffing operation.

A recent 2026 comparison of staffing CRMs includes Recruit CRM alongside Bullhorn, Loxo, Crelate, Avionté, TrackerRMS and others, reflecting how broad the small-agency market has become.

The key distinction

Don't choose an ATS based primarily on “How good is it at tracking applicants?”

For a staffing agency, I'd weight the decision roughly like this:

30% — Candidate search/matching
Can I find the right person in my existing database in seconds?

25% — Client/CRM functionality
Can recruiters manage prospects, clients, contacts, job orders and BD activity?

15% — Recruiter workflow
Email, texting, tasks, notes, sequences, interview tracking, submissions.

10% — Job distribution
Can I get jobs posted across the channels I actually use?

10% — Reporting
Placements, recruiter activity, pipeline, source, revenue, fill rates.

10% — Integrations/scalability
LinkedIn, job boards, email, payroll/back office, assessments, onboarding, etc.

My recommendation by agency type

1–3 recruiters, permanent placement:
→ Loxo or Recruit CRM

1–10 recruiters, serious staffing business:
→ Bullhorn

Temp/contract staffing:
→ Bullhorn (I'd strongly favor it because the staffing-specific workflow becomes increasingly important)

Executive search / highly relationship-driven recruiting:
→ Loxo or Bullhorn

Extremely price-sensitive startup:
→ Zoho Recruit / Recruit CRM, then upgrade when the agency has traction.

Agency expecting to grow to 10–50+ recruiters:
→ Bullhorn from the beginning to avoid an eventual migration.

One important warning

I'd not automatically choose the cheapest ATS. For a staffing agency, the cost of a bad system isn't just the subscription—it is lost candidates, duplicated outreach, missed follow-ups, poor client visibility and eventually having to migrate your entire database.

If I were starting a small staffing agency today, my demo order would be:

1. Bullhorn → 2. Loxo → 3. Recruit CRM

And I'd make each vendor run one of your actual job orders through the system during the demo. That's much more revealing than a generic sales presentation.

For a small staffing agency, the "best" ATS isn't a corporate HR tool like Greenhouse or Workable (which are built for internal hiring teams rather than managing clients, leads, and billable placements). You need a hybrid ATS + CRM that tracks candidates, manages client accounts, and handles submittals and placements in one workflow.

The top options tailored specifically for small, agile staffing desks are broken down below by their distinct advantages:

• Bullhorn for Small Agencies — Best for industry-standard scaling and automation. Bullhorn is the heavy-hitting market leader for staffing. They offer packaged solutions designed specifically for small, growing firms to give you enterprise-grade CRM and candidate tracking without the massive corporate overhead. It connects to hundreds of marketplace partners and features great mobile access and email syncing. The downside: It can be pricier and feel slightly rigid to configure compared to lighter modern alternatives.
• Recruit CRM — Best for an intuitive, modern user experience. This platform was built specifically for headhunters and staffing agencies, blending a powerful CRM with a clean ATS. It features brilliant AI resume parsing, visual drag-and-drop pipelines, native email/LinkedIn integration, and a very shallow learning curve. It's ideal if you want to get a lean team up and running fast without dealing with clunky, dated interfaces.
• JobAdder — Best for ease-of-use and nimble boutique agencies. JobAdder is widely praised by small and startup recruiting firms as a streamlined alternative to Bullhorn. It offers lightning-fast workflow capabilities, excellent job board integrations, and an interface that doesn't require a dedicated IT or operations person to manage.
• Zoho Recruit — Best for tight budgets and high customizability. Zoho offers a dedicated staffing agency edition that is remarkably affordable compared to competitors. It gives you end-to-end client and candidate management, resume parsing, and workflow automation. It’s a stellar value pick, especially if you already use or want integration with other tools in the Zoho ecosystem.
• Crelate — Best for niche executive search and specialized desks. Crelate provides a flexible, fast, and intuitive mix of ATS and CRM functionality that is particularly popular with independent recruiters and boutique search firms working in niche verticals. It excels at activity tracking, relationship management, and deep reporting.

To help narrow down the ideal match, tell me:

• What vertical or industry does your agency focus on (IT, light industrial, healthcare, executive search)?
• What is your current team size and expected hiring volume?
• Are you looking for built-in invoicing/back-office features , or strictly front-office ATS/CRM?

If you’re running a small staffing agency, I’d narrow the field considerably. You don’t just need an ATS—you need an ATS + recruiting CRM that connects candidates, jobs, clients, submissions, and placements.

My shortlist for 2026

*Published/market pricing varies by plan, billing term, modules, and implementation.

🥇 My #1: Bullhorn

For a real staffing agency rather than an in-house recruiting department, I'd choose Bullhorn if the budget allows it.

Bullhorn is purpose-built around the agency workflow: client → job order → candidates → submission → interview → offer → placement. It combines the ATS with a client CRM, resume parsing, database search, email integration, job posting, submission tracking, and placement management. Bullhorn says more than 4,500 of its customers have fewer than 10 users.

Its current Starter plan is listed at $99/user/month, including applicant tracking, resume parsing, client management, job posting/career portal, support, and implementation. Core is $165/user/month and adds things such as custom workflows and additional integrations.

Why I'd pick it: If you expect to grow from 3–5 recruiters to 10–20+, I'd rather have you build your processes in Bullhorn now than migrate later.

Downside: It's more expensive and more complex than the lightweight ATS products.

🥈 Best value: Manatal

If you're a 1–5 person agency and watching expenses, I'd seriously demo Manatal.

It starts around $15/user/month, offers ATS + recruiting CRM functionality, resume parsing, candidate recommendations, job posting and integrations, and is substantially cheaper than Bullhorn.

The tradeoff is that you won't get the same depth of staffing-specific functionality and ecosystem as Bullhorn.

🥉 Recruit CRM

I'd put Recruit CRM high on the list if you're primarily doing direct-hire/permanent placement or executive/white-collar recruiting rather than high-volume temporary staffing.

It's designed specifically around agency recruiting and combines ATS + CRM, with strong pipeline and automation capabilities. Current market comparisons put it roughly in the $85–$165/user/month range depending on plan.

What I'd choose based on your agency

• 1 recruiter / very small startup: Manatal or Recruit CRM
• 2–5 recruiters, limited budget: Manatal
• 3–10 recruiters, serious staffing operation: Bullhorn
• Temp/contract staffing: Bullhorn becomes particularly compelling
• Permanent/direct-hire: Recruit CRM, Bullhorn, or Loxo
• Executive search / sourcing-heavy: Loxo or Recruit CRM
• Planning significant growth: Bullhorn
• Want the cheapest competent solution: Manatal

One important point: don't evaluate these as ordinary corporate ATSs. Staffing agencies need the client/sales side just as much as the candidate side. A generic ATS can look inexpensive until you discover you're maintaining a separate CRM, spreadsheet for placements, email system, and sourcing tools.

If I were buying for a small agency

I'd demo these three in this order:

1. Bullhorn — best long-term staffing platform
2. Recruit CRM — best middle ground for recruiting agencies
3. Manatal — best low-cost option

And I'd make each vendor run your actual workflow, not a canned demo:

New client → new job → search database → parse a resume → contact candidate → submit candidate → client feedback → interview → offer → placement → reporting.

Whichever system makes that workflow fastest with the fewest clicks is probably the right ATS for you.

If you tell me (1) number of recruiters, (2) temp/contract vs permanent, (3) your approximate monthly ATS budget, and (4) whether you need payroll/timekeeping, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 systems for your specific staffing agency and compare them feature-by-feature.