Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 306 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
To effectively track profitability by client and project, many agencies pair general accounting software with specialized project management tools. QuickBooks Online and
Xero are standard for their robust integration and expense handling. For agencies requiring real-time insights into resource utilization, budgets versus actuals, and granular project financial reporting, tools like
, BigTime, and are widely recommended.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 70% of answers
Named in 59% of answers
Ideal for foundational accounting and expense management. It allows agencies to link income and costs to specific clients, providing a standard, user-friendly approach to tracking project-level financial health.
Named in 52% of answers
Best for agencies needing an all-in-one workspace. It links time tracking and creative work directly to real-time project profitability and budget updates, offering deeper agency-specific reporting than general ledgers.
Named in 52% of answers
For an agency managing both recurring client retainers and variable project expenses, **QuickBooks Online** (Advanced/Plus tiers) and **FreshBooks** stand out as the top accounting tools for tracking profitability by client and…
For an agency managing both recurring client retainers and variable project expenses, QuickBooks Online (Advanced/Plus tiers) and FreshBooks stand out as the top accounting tools for tracking profitability by client and project.
Selecting the right tool depends on whether you prioritize deep financial job-costing or streamlined, client-friendly time tracking.
| Feature / Metric | QuickBooks Online Advanced/Plus | FreshBooks | Zoho Books |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best For | Comprehensive financial & job costing reporting | Service agencies prioritizing time tracking | Growing agencies needing an integrated ecosystem |
| Retainer Management | Recurring invoices; manual application to advance balances | Automated retainer/advance payment tracking | Subscription & recurring billing natively tied to ledgers |
| Project Profitability | Built-in project profitability dashboard & labor cost allocation | Real-time margin analysis & tracked hours to project | Tracks flat-rate/hourly project expenses against revenue |
Top Tool Breakdown
If you can share how many team members log billable hours and whether you prefer an all-in-one platform or separate project management and accounting tools, I can help you narrow down the best choice.
For an agency with **monthly retainers + one-off projects + project expenses**, I’d shortlist these: Tool / stack | Client profitability | Project profitability | Retainers | Best for --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
For an agency with monthly retainers + one-off projects + project expenses, I’d shortlist these:
| Tool / stack | Client profitability | Project profitability | Retainers | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Productive + QuickBooks/Xero | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Growing agencies |
| QuickBooks Online | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Small–mid-size U.S. agencies |
| Xero + Projects | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Accounting + project costing |
| FreshBooks | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Small/simple agencies |
| Harvest + QuickBooks/Xero | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Agencies where labor/time is the key cost |
1. Productive + QuickBooks Online — best for serious profitability management
If your main question is “Which clients/projects actually make us money?”, this is the setup I'd choose. Productive is built around agency economics—projects, retainers, time, budgets, resource costs, utilization and margins—while QuickBooks remains your accounting system of record. Current agency-focused comparisons similarly put Productive at the top when operational profitability is the priority.
2. QuickBooks Online — best if you want fewer systems
QuickBooks Online Plus/Advanced can associate income, labor and expenses with individual projects and calculate project profitability. You can also compare estimates with actuals in Advanced.
That's a particularly good choice if your accountant already uses QuickBooks and your agency isn't yet complex enough to need a dedicated PSA/project-management platform.
3. Xero + Xero Projects — best accounting-first alternative
Xero Projects lets you assign time, bills and expenses to projects and provides project profitability reporting, including revenue, costs and margin.
I'd lean toward Xero if you have significant international/multi-currency business or simply prefer its accounting workflow.
4. FreshBooks — best for a smaller service agency
FreshBooks is easier to operate and particularly strong around client billing, recurring invoices, time tracking and expenses. It's attractive when you don't have a dedicated finance/ops person.
For an agency, accounting profitability and operational profitability aren't quite the same thing.
You ultimately want this hierarchy:
Client → Retainer/Project → Revenue → Employee time cost → Contractor cost → Direct expenses → Gross profit → Gross margin
A basic accounting package can handle the revenue and expenses, but the harder piece is assigning true labor cost to the client/project. That's why a combination such as Productive + QuickBooks or Harvest + QuickBooks can outperform QuickBooks alone.
If you're a 5–15 person agency, I'd probably start with QuickBooks Online + Harvest for simplicity/cost, and move to Productive + QuickBooks once resource planning, utilization and margin management become important. Harvest is specifically strong at showing profitability by client, project and task from tracked time.
If you tell me your agency size, approximate annual revenue, number of clients, and whether employees/contractors are your biggest cost, I can narrow this to the best 1–2 options and explain how I'd structure the client/project accounting.
For an agency with **monthly retainers + one-off projects + pass-through expenses**, I’d narrow the field to these: Tool / stack | Client profitability | Project profitability | Retainers | Expense tracking | Best fit --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
For an agency with monthly retainers + one-off projects + pass-through expenses, I’d narrow the field to these:
| Tool / stack | Client profitability | Project profitability | Retainers | Expense tracking | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QuickBooks Online + Harvest | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | Best overall for most U.S. agencies |
| Xero + Xero Projects | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | Best accounting-first alternative |
| FreshBooks | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★☆ | Smaller service/creative agencies |
| Productive + QBO/Xero | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ | Agencies where profitability/operations are central |
| Scoro / Kantata + accounting | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | Larger, resource-heavy agencies |
1. QuickBooks Online + Harvest — best overall
QuickBooks is the accounting system; Harvest supplies detailed time/project economics. QuickBooks' current project-profitability reporting can show project margin, employee/vendor time costs, and unbilled time and expenses.
This is particularly good if you want to answer:
2. Xero + Xero Projects — best integrated option
Xero Projects is unusually good if you want the accounting and project-costing pieces closer together. You can attach time, bills and expenses to projects and compare revenue, costs and margins against budget.
I'd favor this if your agency has lots of projects and international/multicurrency clients.
3. FreshBooks — best for a smaller agency
FreshBooks is simpler and more service-business-oriented. It's attractive when you want time tracking, expenses, invoicing and project profitability without implementing a heavier PSA system. Current comparisons particularly favor it for smaller agencies.
4. Productive — best if you really mean “agency profitability,” not just accounting
If your biggest question is “Which clients, projects, people and services are actually making us money?”, I'd look seriously at Productive. It is more of an agency PSA/operations platform than an accounting package, and can sit alongside QuickBooks or Xero. It becomes especially compelling once you have enough staff that utilization, capacity, budgets and delivery margins matter.
I wouldn't expect your general ledger alone to provide the best agency profitability picture.
A good setup is:
Accounting → revenue, expenses, AR/AP, tax Time/project system → hours, labor cost, project budgets Reporting → client/project gross margin
For example, a $15,000 monthly retainer might look fantastic in QuickBooks. But if the team spends 180 hours delivering it, plus $2,000 of contractors and $1,000 of media/production costs, its actual contribution margin may be mediocre.
So if you're a small-to-mid-sized U.S. agency, my default recommendation would be QuickBooks Online + Harvest. If you want fewer moving parts, Xero Projects is probably the strongest accounting-centric alternative.
If you tell me roughly agency headcount, number of active retainers, annual revenue, and whether you track employee time, I can narrow this to the best 2 options for your specific workflow.
For agencies managing a blend of recurring client retainers, ad-hoc project work, and associated project expenses, tracking profitability down to the specific client and sub-project requires accounting tools with native **job costing** or **project tracking** modules. The best choices range from lightweight cloud…
For agencies managing a blend of recurring client retainers, ad-hoc project work, and associated project expenses, tracking profitability down to the specific client and sub-project requires accounting tools with native job costing or project tracking modules.
The best choices range from lightweight cloud options to powerful enterprise solutions depending on your agency's scale and complexity:
To help narrow down which tool fits your workflow best, tell me:
For an agency with **monthly retainers + one-off projects + reimbursable expenses**, I’d separate “accounting” from “operational profitability.” The key is being able to attribute **revenue, employee time, contractor costs, and expenses to both a client and a specific project**. [Enterprise…
For an agency with monthly retainers + one-off projects + reimbursable expenses, I’d separate “accounting” from “operational profitability.” The key is being able to attribute revenue, employee time, contractor costs, and expenses to both a client and a specific project.
| Tool / stack | Client profitability | Project profitability | Retainers | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Productive + QuickBooks/Xero | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Growing agencies |
| QuickBooks Online + Harvest | Good | Good | Good | Small/midsize agencies |
| Xero + Projects/Harvest | Good | Good | Good | Xero users/international |
| Scoro | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Larger, more complex agencies |
| FreshBooks | Good | Good | Good | Small/simple service agencies |
Productive is probably my first choice if profitability is the primary objective.
It is designed around agency economics: projects, retainers, time, budgets, resource costs, expenses, utilization, and profitability. You can see whether a retainer is actually profitable after accounting for the team's delivery time, rather than merely seeing that the client paid $10,000. It can sit alongside QuickBooks or Xero as the operational/project layer while the accounting system remains the financial source of truth.
I'd choose this if: you have roughly 10+ people, multiple simultaneous projects, or you're routinely asking “Are we making money on this client?”
QuickBooks is excellent for the actual accounting: invoices, expenses, bank reconciliation, recurring retainer billing, and financial statements. Its Projects functionality can track project income and costs, but agencies often add Harvest for more usable time and project-budget tracking.
The workflow becomes:
Client → Project → employee time → contractor/expense → invoice → project margin
That is a very solid setup for a 3–15 person agency.
Xero is a strong alternative to QuickBooks, particularly if you have international clients or prefer Xero's accounting workflow. Its project functionality can associate income and costs with individual jobs, although a dedicated tool can provide deeper agency profitability reporting.
Scoro is worth considering when you want project financials + resource planning + utilization + forecasting + retainers in a more comprehensive system.
I'd look here rather than Productive if the agency has multiple departments, substantial resource-planning requirements, or more complex financial operations. The tradeoff is considerably more implementation and complexity.
FreshBooks is attractive when you want easy invoicing, time tracking, expenses, and project profitability without building a sophisticated finance stack. It's particularly appropriate for smaller creative/service firms, but I'd move to Productive/Scoro as operational complexity increases.
One important caveat: don't judge client profitability from revenue minus expenses alone. For an agency, employee time is often the biggest direct delivery cost. Your system should assign an internal cost rate to each person's hours, then calculate something like:
Client/project gross profit = revenue − employee labor cost − contractor costs − direct expenses
That exposes the classic problem where a $20k/month retainer looks fantastic until you discover the team is spending 180 hours servicing it. Project-level accounting is specifically intended to uncover that kind of hidden margin problem.
If you tell me your team size, monthly retainer revenue, number of active clients/projects, and whether you use employees vs. contractors, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 setups and explain how I'd structure the client/project tracking.
QuickBooks is excellent for the actual accounting: invoices, expenses, bank reconciliation, recurring retainer billing, and financial statements. Its Projects functionality can track project income and costs, but agencies often add Harvest for more usable time and project-budget tracking.
The workflow becomes:
Client → Project → employee time → contractor/expense → invoice → project margin
That is a very solid setup for a 3–15 person agency.
Xero is a strong alternative to QuickBooks, particularly if you have international clients or prefer Xero's accounting workflow. Its project functionality can associate income and costs with individual jobs, although a dedicated tool can provide deeper agency profitability reporting.
Scoro is worth considering when you want project financials + resource planning + utilization + forecasting + retainers in a more comprehensive system.
I'd look here rather than Productive if the agency has multiple departments, substantial resource-planning requirements, or more complex financial operations. The tradeoff is considerably more implementation and complexity.
FreshBooks is attractive when you want easy invoicing, time tracking, expenses, and project profitability without building a sophisticated finance stack. It's particularly appropriate for smaller creative/service firms, but I'd move to Productive/Scoro as operational complexity increases.
Tracking profitability by client and project for an agency requires a two-tier approach . Standard general ledger accounting software (like QuickBooks or Xero) handles the legal, boring side of money—taxes, bank reconciliations, and overall profit-and-loss . However, they struggle with the day-to-day operational…
Tracking profitability by client and project for an agency requires a two-tier approach . Standard general ledger accounting software (like QuickBooks or Xero) handles the legal, boring side of money—taxes, bank reconciliations, and overall profit-and-loss . However, they struggle with the day-to-day operational reality of tracking employee time, material costs, and burn rates against rigid monthly retainers.
The most successful agencies either use a dedicated Professional Services Automation (PSA) / Agency Management platform that feeds into an accounting ledger, or an accounting tool paired with a robust project tracker.
These platforms are purpose-built to handle billable hours, custom rate cards, complex multi-month retainers, and project expenses in a single view.
If you already like your core accounting software but need a clean, lightweight layer to calculate actual profit per client without an enterprise software rollout:
If you want to keep everything strictly inside an accounting system without syncing multiple external apps:
If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:
Tracking profitability by client and project for an agency requires bridging two distinct worlds: the **general ledger** (where cash, bills, and tax-ready P&Ls live) and the **operational layer** (where billable hours, team cost rates, and scopes live). Relying strictly on `traditional accounting software` often…
Tracking profitability by client and project for an agency requires bridging two distinct worlds: the general ledger (where cash, bills, and tax-ready P&Ls live) and the operational layer (where billable hours, team cost rates, and scopes live). Relying strictly on traditional accounting software often results in blind spots regarding whether a retainer is actually profitable after factoring in team hours and project expenses.
The industry standard approach relies either on all-in-one Professional Services Automation (PSA) tools or a tightly integrated two-tier tech stack.
Tier 1: All-in-One Agency & Project Accounting Platforms
These platforms combine time tracking, resource management, expense allocation, retainer tracking, and invoicing directly with financial reporting.
Tier 2: The "Two-Layer" Best-of-Breed Stack
If your CPA insists on standard general ledger software for corporate taxes, or if you prefer specialized tools for operations, separate your accounting ledger from your operational tracker and sync them.
Key Capabilities to Verify Before Choosing
If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:
I can recommend the ideal setup or integration path for your specific workflow.
For an agency with **recurring client retainers + one-off projects + pass-through/project expenses**, I’d shortlist these: | Tool | Client profitability | Project profitability | Retainers | Expenses | Best for | |---|---|---|---|---|---|
For an agency with recurring client retainers + one-off projects + pass-through/project expenses, I’d shortlist these:
| Tool | Client profitability | Project profitability | Retainers | Expenses | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QuickBooks Online + Harvest | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | Best overall accounting stack |
| Xero + Xero Projects | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★★ | Strong accounting + project costing |
| FreshBooks | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | Smaller service agencies wanting simplicity |
| Productive | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ | Agencies where operational profitability is the priority |
| Scoro / Kantata | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | Larger/more complex agencies |
1. QuickBooks Online + Harvest — best balance
QuickBooks Online is the accounting backbone, while Harvest handles detailed time/project tracking. QuickBooks Online Plus and Advanced can assign income and costs to projects and calculate project profitability.
This is particularly attractive if your accountant already works in QuickBooks and you need reliable P&L, bank reconciliation, AP/AR and tax reporting, while still wanting to know:
2. Xero + Xero Projects — best integrated alternative
Xero has Projects built into the ecosystem. You can estimate project costs, track staff time and expenses, invoice, and monitor profitability. Its Project Financials report compares tasks and expenses with budget, while the profitability dashboard calculates project profit from invoiced amounts less project costs.
A nice feature for agencies is that actual bills/spend can be assigned directly to projects, so you can capture things like freelancers, production costs, travel, software, and other client-specific expenses.
3. FreshBooks — best if you want simplicity
FreshBooks is unusually good for a smaller agency because its Project Profitability reporting is already oriented around clients, projects, time, expenses, revenue and margin. Its Profitability Summary can be grouped by client or project, while the detailed report breaks profitability down by services and expenses.
It also supports expense markups and applying project time against client retainers.
If by "profitability" you mean true agency economics, don't just track invoiced revenue minus vendor expenses. You want to allocate internal labor cost to every client/project.
For example:
Client retainer: $15,000/month
Internal labor cost: $6,000
Freelancers: $2,000
Client expenses: $1,000
Gross contribution: $6,000 / 40%
That lets you identify a client who looks great from a revenue perspective but consumes far too many hours.
My recommendation:
If you tell me your agency size, monthly retainer count, whether you use contractors, and whether you need time tracking, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 options and compare their current pricing/features.
For an agency managing client retainers, project-based work, and direct expenses, standard general ledger accounting software (like basic QuickBooks or Xero) usually falls short on its own . Traditional accounting tracks *where money went* , but agency profitability requires tracking *how internal time and direct…
For an agency managing client retainers, project-based work, and direct expenses, standard general ledger accounting software (like basic QuickBooks or Xero) usually falls short on its own . Traditional accounting tracks where money went , but agency profitability requires tracking how internal time and direct costs map against fixed or recurring revenue.
The most successful agency setups use a two-layer approach : a dedicated operational/PSA (Professional Services Automation) platform to track time, budgets, and retainers, paired cleanly with a core financial ledger.
Top All-in-One Agency & Profitability Platforms (The Operations Layer)
These tools are purpose-built to handle retainer burn rates, staff cost rates versus billable rates, and project expense allocation in real time.
Core Financial Ledgers (The Accounting Layer)
If you prefer not to use an all-in-one agency platform, you should pair a dedicated time/project tracker with a robust general ledger:
Key Capabilities to Prioritize
When evaluating these tools for your agency, ensure they handle the following mechanics:
To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:
For an agency, I’d separate **financial accounting** from **operational project profitability**. The best choice depends mainly on agency size and how deeply you need to track labor, retainers, and project costs. | Tool / stack | Client profitability | Project profitability | Retainers | Expenses & accounting | Best…
For an agency, I’d separate financial accounting from operational project profitability. The best choice depends mainly on agency size and how deeply you need to track labor, retainers, and project costs.
| Tool / stack | Client profitability | Project profitability | Retainers | Expenses & accounting | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QuickBooks Online + Harvest | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Most U.S. agencies |
| Productive + QuickBooks/Xero | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent via accounting integration | Agencies where margin visibility is critical |
| Xero + Harvest/Toggl | Excellent | Very good | Very good | Excellent | International/multi-currency agencies |
| FreshBooks | Very good | Very good | Good | Good | Small service/creative agencies |
| Scoro | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Very good | Larger agencies wanting an all-in-one system |
| Sage Intacct | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Larger/multi-entity agencies |
For a typical U.S. agency: QuickBooks Online + Harvest is probably the best balance.
QuickBooks handles the actual books, bank reconciliation, invoices, expenses, and financial statements, while Harvest supplies the detailed time/project data needed to determine whether a retainer is actually profitable. Current agency comparisons also consistently identify this type of stack as a strong fit for small-to-midsize agencies.
If profitability management is the priority, choose Productive + QuickBooks. Productive is more agency-native: it can combine budgets, time, staff/contractor costs, retainers, utilization, and project/client margins. That makes it much better for answering questions like “We billed Client A $15,000 this month—did we actually make money?”
Xero is a particularly good alternative if you have international clients or want strong multi-currency capabilities.
Whichever stack you choose, make sure every transaction ultimately rolls up to:
Client → Retainer/project → Revenue → Labor → Contractor costs → Direct expenses → Gross profit → Gross margin
For retainers, I'd also track retainer revenue vs. hours/cost consumed. A $10,000/month retainer isn't necessarily a good client if the team spends $9,000 delivering it.
One important distinction: accounting software alone often isn't enough for this. The general ledger tells you whether the company made money; time/project software tells you which clients and projects made or lost money. Current agency-focused guidance makes the same distinction between the general ledger and project economics.
If you tell me your approximate agency size (e.g. 5, 20, or 50+ people), number of clients, and whether you bill mostly fixed retainers or hourly/project fees, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 setups.