I need a custody solution for digital assets that supports staking for proof-of-stake networks.

If you need institutional custody plus native proof-of-stake staking, I’d shortlist these:

• Anchorage Digital — Strong choice if regulated/qualified custody is the priority. It keeps staked assets in segregated wallets, supports 20+ networks, and offers validator selection or the ability to run your own validator.
• Fireblocks — Best fit if you want programmable custody/infrastructure and sophisticated staking operations. Staking operates through the same vaults and policy controls used for custody, with multiple validator providers. It currently advertises staking across ETH, SOL, POL and Cosmos ecosystem assets.
• Coinbase Prime — Attractive if you want custody, trading and staking integrated together. Coinbase says staking can occur without removing assets from Vault storage and lists a broad set of supported PoS assets.
• BitGo — Worth considering for institutional custody combined with staking. It supports delegation from qualified custody, segregated/non-pooled staking, and multiple validator arrangements.

My recommendation

If you're a fund, RIA, family office, corporate treasury, or other institution, I'd start with Anchorage Digital vs. Fireblocks:

Fireblocks Trust specifically combines qualified custody with staking and integrates providers such as Figment and Kiln. Fireblocks Anchorage, meanwhile, emphasizes federally regulated custody, segregated wallets, and staking without moving assets out of custody.

The biggest thing I'd evaluate isn't the headline staking APY. For institutional custody, check: legal custody status in your jurisdiction, asset segregation/bankruptcy treatment, whether staking keys remain under the custodian's control, slashing liability, validator selection, unstaking/withdrawal procedures, reward accounting, and exactly which networks/assets you need.

If you tell me (1) the assets/networks you need to stake (e.g. ETH, SOL, ADA, ATOM), (2) approximate AUM, and (3) whether you need qualified custody in the U.S., I can narrow this to the best 2–3 solutions and compare their custody/staking architecture.

When looking for an institutional-grade or advanced custody solution that supports native or secure staking for Proof-of-Stake (PoS) networks, you need a platform that balances cryptographic security (such as Multi-Party Computation or cold storage) with seamless validator participation and compliance.

Top-tier solutions supporting secure asset custody and integrated staking include:

• Coinbase Prime : Ideal if you need a fully regulated US-based qualified custodian with an all-in-one prime brokerage framework. It offers robust native staking capabilities for major PoS networks (like ETH, SOL, ADA) directly out of your custody account with integrated reporting and tax compliance.
• Fireblocks : A premier enterprise MPC (Multi-Party Computation) platform rather than a standalone traditional custodian. Fireblocks lets you self-custody or co-manage keys while plugging directly into institutional staking providers, decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, and validator networks via secure policy engines.
• BitGo : A veteran regulated qualified custodian that provides robust cold storage and hot wallet tech alongside institutional-grade staking. BitGo emphasizes segregated asset structures and compliance-ready reporting for reward tracking and slashing protection.
• Cobo : A comprehensive digital asset custody wallet platform tailored for institutions. It combines MPC and custodial wallets with versatile staking support across a wide breadth of emerging and major PoS tokens.

To help narrow down the ideal provider for your specific setup, could you tell me:

• Are you looking for a fully regulated qualified custodian or a self-managed MPC technology platform?
• Which specific Proof-of-Stake networks do you plan on staking?
• What is your approximate portfolio scale or asset volume?

When looking for an institutional-grade or advanced digital asset custody solution that seamlessly integrates proof-of-stake (PoS) staking, the market generally divides into MPC-based infrastructure providers (non-custodial or co-managed options) and qualified regulated custodians (fully custodial vaults).

The top industry solutions supporting robust, secure staking across major networks are outlined below:

1. Fireblocks (Infrastructure & MPC Custody)

• Overview: Fireblocks provides enterprise-grade Multi-Party Computation (MPC-CMP) wallet infrastructure combined with policy enforcement engines. While they function as infrastructure rather than a single statutory custodian in every jurisdiction, they connect deeply with institutional trust structures.
• Staking Capabilities: Features an open validator marketplace allowing one-click native staking across a broad spectrum of PoS networks.
• Key Partners: Integrates with top-tier staking and validator providers like Figment, Kiln, and Galaxy Digital, giving you the flexibility to choose or diversify your validator nodes without moving assets out of your governance workflow.

2. BitGo (Qualified Custody & Staking-as-a-Service)

• Overview: BitGo is a heavily regulated, qualified custodian offering cold storage and hot wallet systems with deep institutional backing.
• Staking Capabilities: Provides true protocol staking (non-pooled, segregated assets) directly out of regulated custody wallets. You maintain separate asset accounting, and rewards are tracked via on-demand, multi-asset reporting tools.
• Key Advantage: Compliance-forward framework designed for institutions requiring strict asset segregation and audit-ready reporting trails.

3. Coinbase Prime (All-in-One Prime Brokerage & Custody)

• Overview: Coinbase Prime delivers an integrated solution combining qualified custody, trading, financing, and staking under a single roof.
• Staking Capabilities: Native, seamless staking for major proof-of-stake assets (such as Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, and Polygon) directly from cold/segregated custody balances.
• Key Advantage: Highly streamlined user experience if you prefer to execute trading, custody, and reward generation within a single centralized ecosystem rather than orchestrating external validator marketplaces.

Key Comparison Criteria to Keep in Mind

When choosing between them, evaluate how they handle the core mechanics of PoS networks:

• Delegation vs. Native/In-House Validators: Do you want a custodian that runs their own validators, or do you prefer an open marketplace where you can select specific third-party node operators or bring your own validator?
• Slashing & Downtime Protection: Review the operational SLAs and risk-mitigation policies regarding validator downtime or slashing events.
• Asset Segregation: Ensure the solution offers true segregated staking rather than pooled models, particularly if you are operating under strict regulatory or fiduciary constraints.

To help narrow down the ideal fit, let me know:

• Are you looking for a fully regulated qualified custodian (like BitGo or Coinbase) or MPC self-management infrastructure (like Fireblocks)?
• Which specific proof-of-stake networks (e.g., Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos-based chains) are you primarily looking to stake?

If you mean institutional custody—where the assets remain with a qualified/regulated custodian while being delegated to Proof-of-Stake validators—there are several strong options.

Best fits

• Anchorage Digital — Probably my first choice if regulated U.S. custody is the priority. Anchorage Digital Bank is a federally chartered crypto bank and offers staking directly from segregated custody. It supports 20+ networks, including Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, and Aptos, with validator selection and automated reward restaking.
• BitGo — Strong alternative if you want broad institutional custody plus configurable transaction policies. Its staking workflow allows staking from custody wallets, with validator selection and enterprise approval policies before transactions are signed and broadcast. BitGo also has regulated entities offering staking in multiple jurisdictions.
• Coinbase Prime — Particularly attractive if you want custody, trading, and staking in one institutional platform. Coinbase says Prime supports staking for assets including ETH, SOL, ADA, AVAX, DOT, NEAR, SUI, and others, and staking can occur without moving assets out of Vault storage.

How I'd choose

The important distinction is custodial staking vs. simply handing assets to a staking provider. For institutional use, I'd specifically require segregated client assets, clear bankruptcy-remoteness, validator/delegation controls, slashing-risk procedures, auditable reward accounting, and confirmation of exactly which legal entity provides custody and staking. Anchorage, for example, explicitly describes staking from segregated wallets with assets not pooled or rehypothecated.

If you tell me which networks you need to stake (e.g., ETH, SOL, ADA, ATOM, DOT, AVAX), your jurisdiction, and whether this is for a fund, treasury, exchange, or individual, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 solutions and compare custody structure, staking support, fees, slashing protection, and regulatory status.

If you’re looking for institutional custody where the assets can remain in custody while being staked on proof-of-stake networks, I’d shortlist these:

My first two to evaluate

1. Anchorage Digital — strongest if regulated custody is the priority.
Anchorage says its staking service lets institutions stake directly from custody, with assets remaining under its custody/security architecture. It currently lists networks including Ethereum, Solana, Aptos, Sui and Celestia, and supports delegation to Anchorage, partner validators, or—in some cases—a validator of the customer's choice.

2. BitGo — strongest if you need breadth and operational flexibility.
BitGo supports staking from qualified custody as well as self-custody wallets, with one-click staking, validator due diligence, reporting, and support for staking/restaking products. Its current offering includes Ethereum/EigenLayer and various other networks, and it has been expanding its institutional staking coverage.

What I'd verify before selecting one

Don't evaluate this merely as "does the custodian offer staking?" Ask for the specific network/asset and verify:

• Whether the staked asset remains legally and operationally in qualified custody
• Who controls the validator keys and withdrawal credentials
• Whether you can choose your own validator
• Slashing/downtime risk and who bears it
• Unstaking/unbonding periods
• Treatment of staking rewards for tax/accounting purposes
• Insurance coverage while assets are staked
• Whether rewards automatically compound or require withdrawal
• Reporting/API support for NAV, rewards, transactions and tax lots
• Whether the service is available in your jurisdiction and entity structure
• Fees: custody + staking/validator fee + network costs

For example, BitGo explicitly says institutions can delegate from qualified custody and that it performs validator due diligence aimed at minimizing slashing risk. www.bitgo.com Anchorage likewise emphasizes that its staking model is designed to keep assets within its custody rather than requiring them to be moved to an external hot wallet.

If you tell me which networks you need to stake (e.g., ETH, SOL, ADA, DOT, ATOM, SUI) and roughly whether this is personal, a fund, or a company treasury, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 options and compare custody structure, staking support, fees, and regulatory considerations.

When looking for an institutional-grade digital asset custody solution that supports Proof-of-Stake (PoS) staking, you need platforms that blend secure key management (such as Multi-Party Computation or hardware-backed security) with native, compliant reward-earning infrastructure.

The leading options on the market depend on whether you prefer a fully managed/bank-chartered custodian or an MPC technology platform:

1. Fireblocks
   • Best Fit: Enterprises, treasuries, and funds wanting an integrated policy and MPC-CMP framework.
   • Staking Capabilities: Embeds staking directly into its core multi-party computation layer rather than treating it as an afterthought. It supports major PoS networks (like Ethereum and Solana) with end-to-end governance, automated delegation, and robust audit trails. Explore features directly on the Fireblocks Platform.
2. Coinbase Prime / Coinbase Custody
   • Best Fit: Institutions seeking an all-in-one prime brokerage, deep liquidity, and regulatory trust.
   • Staking Capabilities: Offers seamless native staking integrated with its custody accounts, allowing assets to earn rewards securely while remaining protected under their institutional umbrella. Learn more via Coinbase Institutional.
3. Anchorage Digital Bank
   • Best Fit: Organizations requiring a federally chartered crypto bank with strict regulatory oversight.
   • Staking Capabilities: Allows clients to stake directly from segregated, secure custody wallets. You can choose vetted partner validators or run your own node infrastructure under a regulated framework. Review their offerings at Anchorage Digital Staking.
4. BitGo
   • Best Fit: Funds and institutional treasury teams needing multi-sig/cold storage heritage combined with insured, regulated custody.
   • Staking Capabilities: Provides secure, compliant institutional staking with built-in controls for asset segregation and reward tracking. Check out details on BitGo Custody Solutions.

To help narrow down the best fit, let me know:

• Which specific Proof-of-Stake networks (e.g., Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos) you plan to stake
• Whether you require a federated bank charter or prefer an MPC self-management/software approach
• Your preference for native delegation versus liquid staking support

When evaluating institutional and enterprise custody solutions that support native or delegated staking for Proof-of-Stake (PoS) networks, the market features several robust options . The best choice depends on whether you require a fully regulated qualified custodian, a flexible Multi-Party Computation (MPC) platform, or a non-custodial infrastructure stack.

Top-tier enterprise options providing secure custody alongside integrated staking features include:

• Fireblocks is an enterprise-grade platform utilizing MPC-CMP technology. It features native and programmatic staking workflows for major networks (such as Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon) alongside integration with popular liquid staking options. Best for fintechs, funds, and treasury teams needing operational agility and broad network connectivity.
• Coinbase Prime provides an all-in-one institutional platform combining SEC-regulated operations, cold storage security, and seamless on-platform staking capabilities for major PoS assets. Best for institutions wanting a trusted, highly liquid brand with integrated execution.
• Anchorage Digital Bank operates as a federally chartered crypto bank offering fully regulated digital asset custody, governance tools, and native staking across multiple leading PoS protocols. Best for organizations that require direct federal regulatory oversight.
• BitGo is a leading independent qualified custodian offering institutional-grade cold storage, multi-sig/MPC frameworks, and compliant staking-as-a-service configurations. Best for asset managers and funds requiring extensive asset coverage and insurance frameworks.
• Cobo delivers an institutional custody solution combining MPC, HSM, and trusted execution environments with multi-chain enterprise staking support. Best for organizations looking for robust policy engines and flexible Asia-Pacific or global coverage.

To help narrow down the ideal infrastructure for your organization, please share:

• Which specific Proof-of-Stake networks you plan to stake (e.g., Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos).
• Whether you require a qualified custodian/bank charter or a self-managed MPC/non-custodial setup.

If you need institutional-grade custody with integrated staking for proof-of-stake (PoS) networks, there are several well-established options. The right choice depends on whether you're a fund, corporate treasury, exchange, bank, or fintech.

Key features to evaluate

When comparing providers, look beyond staking support:

• Security architecture

  • Cold storage
  • MPC (Multi-Party Computation)
  • Hardware Security Modules (HSMs)
  • Multi-approval workflows

• Regulatory status

  • Qualified custodian (where applicable)
  • Banking or trust charter
  • SOC 1 / SOC 2 audits
  • ISO 27001 certification

• Supported staking networks

  • Ethereum
  • Solana
  • Polygon
  • Cosmos
  • Avalanche
  • Polkadot
  • Tezos
  • Sui
  • NEAR
  • Other PoS chains

• Operational features

  • Slashing protection or insurance
  • Reward reporting
  • Tax reporting
  • Governance participation
  • API integrations
  • Trading directly from custody

Notable offerings

Coinbase Prime allows institutions to keep assets in secure custody while earning staking rewards without moving assets out of custody. It supports staking for numerous major PoS networks and also offers governance participation for select assets.

BitGo combines regulated custody with trading, financing, and compliant staking on a unified institutional platform, making it attractive for investment managers.

Kraken Custody enables institutions to trade and stake directly from regulated custody while maintaining governance controls and segregated wallets.

Copper uses MPC custody and supports staking across more than 20 blockchains while allowing interaction with exchanges and DeFi from the custody platform.

Anchorage Digital is widely used by institutions that require regulated custody combined with staking and on-chain governance capabilities.

Ripple Custody recently expanded its institutional custody offering with integrated staking through a partnership with Figment, allowing banks and enterprises to offer staking on leading PoS networks such as Ethereum and Solana without operating validators themselves.

Recommendations by use case

• Institutional investment fund: Coinbase Prime, BitGo, Anchorage Digital
• Corporate treasury: Coinbase Prime or Kraken Custody
• Bank or regulated financial institution: Anchorage Digital, Ripple Custody
• High-frequency trading or prime brokerage: Copper or BitGo
• Fintech launching staking services: Ripple Custody or Coinbase Prime

If you can share your organization type (fund, corporate, exchange, bank, or fintech), jurisdiction, and the PoS networks you plan to stake (for example Ethereum, Solana, or Cosmos), I can narrow the list to the solutions that best fit your regulatory and operational requirements.

Finding a secure custody solution that also allows you to stake your digital assets on Proof-of-Stake (PoS) networks requires balancing institutional-grade security with native staking integrations. Depending on whether you prefer self-custody (where you hold your private keys) or institutional custody (for funds, enterprises, or high-net-worth portfolios), several top-tier solutions fit your needs.

Institutional & Enterprise Custody

• Fireblocks : A leading enterprise custody platform that provides multi-party computation (MPC) technology. It offers direct, secure access to DeFi and staking across major PoS networks (like Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, and Cardano) via integrated validators or staking providers without ever moving assets out of cold/MPC storage security. Learn more on the Fireblocks Platform.
• BitGo : A well-established institutional custodian offering qualified custody, cold storage, and integrated staking services for top PoS assets. BitGo supports warm and cold staking configurations, insuring digital assets while enabling reward generation. Explore details on BitGo Custody.
• Copper : Known for its ClearLoop network and MPC custody infrastructure, Copper provides automated off-exchange settlement alongside secure, integrated staking capabilities for various proof-of-stake protocols. Check out Copper.co.

Self-Custody & Hardware Wallets

• Ledger Enterprise & Ledger Live : For organizations or individuals wanting hardware-backed security, Ledger connects hardware devices with native staking options. Ledger Enterprise caters to business governance workflows and multi-authorization setups, allowing secure staking for ETH, SOL, Tezos, and more. Find out more at Ledger Enterprise.
• Tangem Enterprise / Tangem Wallet : Offers card-shaped hardware wallets backed by EAL6+ certified secure elements. While primarily consumer-focused, it supports smooth wallet-connect interactions and native app-based staking for select PoS tokens. More details are available at Tangem.

Web3 & Validator-Agnostic Middleware

• Figment : Often integrated directly into institutional custodians (like Fireblocks or BitGo), Figment provides enterprise-grade staking infrastructure, slashing protection, and robust reporting tools for institutional investors across dozens of PoS networks. Read more at Figment.
• Kiln : An institutional staking platform that allows enterprise clients, custodians, and wallets to run validators or integrate native staking via smart contracts. Kiln powers staking for many major Ledger Live and institutional setups. Visit Kiln.fi.

To help narrow down the best fit, could you let me know:

• Are you looking for an institutional/enterprise solution or a personal self-custody setup?
• Which specific networks (e.g., Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos) do you plan to stake?

If you mean an institutional/enterprise custody solution, I’d focus on providers that combine qualified/segregated custody with native staking rather than simply connecting a wallet to a third-party staking service.

Strong options to evaluate

• Anchorage Digital — Particularly compelling if regulated U.S. custody is important. Its staking service keeps staked assets in segregated wallets and currently supports 20+ networks, including Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche and others.
• BitGo — Institutional custody infrastructure with custody, wallet, settlement and staking capabilities; worth evaluating if you need broad institutional infrastructure rather than just staking.
• Coinbase Institutional — A major institutional custodian with staking capabilities and broad network support; potentially attractive if you also need trading/liquidity infrastructure.
• Fireblocks — More of an institutional digital-asset infrastructure platform than a traditional custodian. It can be a good fit when you want policy controls, MPC/key management and integrations with external custodians and staking providers.

What I'd require in an RFP

1. Segregated custody — Assets shouldn't be pooled or rehypothecated merely to stake them. Anchorage, for example, explicitly says its staked assets remain in segregated wallets.
2. Native staking vs. liquid staking — Decide whether you want direct protocol staking or liquid-staking tokens. They have different smart-contract, liquidity and counterparty risks.
3. Validator controls — Ability to select validators, diversify across validators and monitor uptime/slashing.
4. Unstaking mechanics — Especially important for networks with lengthy unbonding periods.
5. Slashing protection and insurance/indemnification — Understand exactly who bears validator and operational losses.
6. Supported networks — Don't just ask for the number of networks; verify that your specific PoS assets can be staked while remaining under the desired custody arrangement.
7. Regulatory/legal structure — Custody, staking and the treatment of staking rewards can have materially different regulatory and tax implications depending on jurisdiction. Regulatory developments remain active in 2026.
8. Reporting — Reward accounting, cost basis, tax lots, reconciliation and audit reports.

One particularly important distinction is custodial vs. non-custodial staking: in custodial staking, the provider controls custody and stakes for you; in non-custodial staking, you retain key control while a validator/staking provider operates the infrastructure.

If you tell me (a) which networks/assets you need to stake, (b) approximate AUM, and (c) whether this is for a fund, corporation, or individual, I can narrow this to the 3–5 best-fit custody architectures and compare fees, custody model, staking support, regulatory status, and key risks.