The problem is coordinating a major shutdown or turnaround at our plant. What's the best turnaround and shutdown management software?

If you mean a major industrial plant turnaround/shutdown—refinery, chemical plant, power generation, pulp & paper, etc.—I would not start with generic project-management software. The best systems are purpose-built for STOs (Shutdown, Turnaround & Outage) and connect scope, work packs, schedule, materials, contractors, costs, execution, and closeout.

My shortlist for 2026

What I'd choose

For a major turnaround with hundreds/thousands of jobs and contractors, my first demos would be:

1. Prometheus — if your plant is heavily invested in SAP, Maximo or Oracle. Its advantage is making the STO part of the same data ecosystem as your asset/maintenance data.

2. iPlanSTO — if the core problem is turnaround planning discipline: scope freeze, work-pack readiness, materials, CPM schedule, change control and learning from previous turnarounds. IAMTech says its platform is used by 50+ industrial operators across 27 countries.

3. PACE XT — particularly worth looking at if your biggest problem is coordination during execution, including simultaneous operations, constraints, field feedback and real-time control.

One important point: Primavera P6 is excellent for the schedule, but I wouldn't automatically call it a complete turnaround-management system. A major STO usually needs much more than a Gantt/CPM schedule—scope governance, work packs, materials, contractor management, permits/isolation interfaces, field progress, cost, startup readiness and lessons learned.

The key question

The right choice depends heavily on where your current process breaks down:

• Scope is constantly changing? → prioritize STO scope governance.
• Schedule is unreliable / critical path keeps moving? → prioritize CPM + live execution.
• Contractors are the bottleneck? → prioritize work-pack and contractor execution.
• Materials aren't ready when the job starts? → prioritize ERP/material integration.
• Management can't see whether you're going to finish on time? → prioritize an STO control tower.
• You're on SAP/Maximo/Oracle? → integration should be a major selection criterion.
• You already have P6 + SAP/Maximo? → look for an STO layer that complements them rather than replacing them.

If you tell me your industry, approximate turnaround size (e.g. 2,000 vs. 20,000 work orders), ERP/CMMS (SAP, Maximo, etc.), and whether you already use Primavera P6, I can narrow this to the 2–3 systems I'd actually put through an RFP, including a feature-by-feature comparison and likely implementation considerations.

What I'd choose

For a major turnaround with hundreds/thousands of jobs and contractors, my first demos would be:

1. Prometheus — if your plant is heavily invested in SAP, Maximo or Oracle. Its advantage is making the STO part of the same data ecosystem as your asset/maintenance data.

2. iPlanSTO — if the core problem is turnaround planning discipline: scope freeze, work-pack readiness, materials, CPM schedule, change control and learning from previous turnarounds. IAMTech says its platform is used by 50+ industrial operators across 27 countries.

3. PACE XT — particularly worth looking at if your biggest problem is coordination during execution, including simultaneous operations, constraints, field feedback and real-time control.

One important point: Primavera P6 is excellent for the schedule, but I wouldn't automatically call it a complete turnaround-management system. A major STO usually needs much more than a Gantt/CPM schedule—scope governance, work packs, materials, contractor management, permits/isolation interfaces, field progress, cost, startup readiness and lessons learned.

The key question

The right choice depends heavily on where your current process breaks down:

Coordinating an industrial shutdown, turnaround, or outage (STO) is high-stakes: every extra hour of downtime costs tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost production. Generic project management tools (like Trello or Asana) usually fall short because they can't handle heavy equipment hierarchies, complex operational isolations (blind lists/lockout-tagout), or tight shift-handover reporting.

The "best" software depends on whether you need a dedicated industrial STO suite, deep integration with your existing enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or heavy-duty cost controls.

The top-tier software solutions tailored specifically for industrial plant turnarounds are categorized below:

Dedicated Industrial STO & Enterprise Suites

• Prometheus Group (STO): Widely regarded as a gold standard for heavy industry. It integrates directly with enterprise systems like SAP or IBM Maximo to act as a single source of truth. It features AI-guided event setups, template-driven work packaging, real-time tracking, and specialized modules for isolation management and blind lists. You can explore their capabilities on the Prometheus Group STO Solutions page.
• Cleopatra Enterprise: A premier choice if your biggest pain points are cost control, estimating, and benchmarking . Cleopatra is built specifically for turnaround project controls, combining scope management, work packages, cost databases, and real-time field change tracking. Learn more via Cleopatra Enterprise STO Control.

Heavy-Duty Enterprise Project Controls & Scheduling

• Oracle Primavera P6: While not an out-of-the-box "turnaround checklist," P6 remains the heavyweight backbone for scheduling complex industrial shutdowns. Most heavy plants use P6 for the critical path method (CPM) schedule, though it is often paired with a frontend tool like Prometheus Group or proprietary databases to manage the actual work packages and execution phase.
• Planview: Excellent for enterprise-wide portfolio and resource management, helping organizations juggle multiple overlapping plant outages alongside routine capital projects, backed by AI-assisted forecasting.

Choosing the Right Fit

• If you run SAP or Maximo and want end-to-end execution, scheduling, and operations tie-ins: Go with Prometheus Group.
• If cost overruns, estimating accuracy, and tracking contractor change orders are your primary bottlenecks: Go with Cleopatra Enterprise.
• If you just need pure, uncompromised critical-path scheduling muscle: Oracle Primavera P6 is still the industry default.

To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:

• What ERP or CMMS does your plant currently use (e.g., SAP, IBM Maximo, Infor)?
• Is your biggest bottleneck scheduling/tracking, cost estimation/budgeting , or crew/contractor management on-site?

If you mean a major industrial plant turnaround/shutdown—refinery, chemical plant, power generation, LNG, etc.—I would not choose ordinary project-management software. You want a system built around scope control, work packages, planning/scheduling, contractor coordination, materials, cost, readiness, execution, and startup/closeout.

My shortlist

1. Prometheus Group — my first choice

For a major plant turnaround, Prometheus STO is probably where I'd start. Its software is specifically designed for shutdowns, turnarounds and outages and covers scope, work packages, scheduling, cost, contractors, permits and execution. It also integrates with SAP, IBM Maximo and Oracle environments.

Why I like it: if your plant already has SAP PM or Maximo, you don't want a turnaround application creating another island of data. Prometheus is explicitly designed around connecting the STO process to the enterprise asset/ERP environment.

2. AP-Networks / Turnaround Network

This is particularly interesting if your problem isn't just software but turnaround discipline. Turnaround Network provides a cloud-based toolkit for planning and executing turnarounds, including task/deliverable management, process compliance, best-practice deployment and readiness measurement.

I'd put this high on the list for organizations that run large, infrequent turnarounds and want standardized processes across multiple sites.

3. Mach1

Mach1 is worth a serious look if you want a more integrated view of the commercial side of the turnaround. It connects scope → planning → procurement → scheduling → cost control → change → closeout.

What I'd choose by situation

• Refinery/chemical plant + SAP or Maximo: Prometheus
• Multiple plants and need standardized turnaround governance: Prometheus or Turnaround Network
• Huge refinery/petrochemical STO with extensive contractors: Prometheus, STOMS, or Mach1
• Turnaround is tightly intertwined with capital-project execution: InEight
• You mainly need readiness/process discipline rather than another enterprise system: Turnaround Network
• Smaller/frequent manufacturing shutdowns: I'd look beyond the traditional mega-turnaround products; some of them are unnecessarily heavy.

One important point: Primavera P6/MS Project isn't really a substitute for turnaround-management software. They're excellent scheduling tools, but a major turnaround needs much more than a Gantt chart—particularly scope freeze/change control, work-package readiness, contractor/material status, permits, progress capture and startup readiness.

If I were running the software selection

I'd make vendors demonstrate the same hypothetical turnaround, rather than giving you a generic product demo. Give each vendor, say, 3,000 work orders, 500 contractors, 12 process units, 60-day planning window and a 21-day outage, then test:

1. Scope identification and approval
2. Work-package creation
3. Critical-path scheduling
4. Contractor/resource loading
5. Materials/long-lead tracking
6. Daily progress and field updates
7. Change/scope creep
8. Cost forecasting vs. actual
9. Readiness gates
10. Mechanical completion/startup handover
11. Lessons learned feeding the next turnaround

That exercise will separate the genuinely useful STO platforms from software that is essentially a fancy project tracker.

If you tell me your plant type (refinery, chemical, power, food, manufacturing, etc.), approximate turnaround size/duration, and whether you're on SAP, Maximo, Oracle, or something else, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best choices and compare them feature-by-feature.

If you tell me your plant type (refinery, chemical, power, food, manufacturing, etc.), approximate turnaround size/duration, and whether you're on SAP, Maximo, Oracle, or something else, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best choices and compare them feature-by-feature.

I'd put this high on the list for organizations that run large, infrequent turnarounds and want standardized processes across multiple sites.

3. Mach1

Mach1 is worth a serious look if you want a more integrated view of the commercial side of the turnaround. It connects scope → planning → procurement → scheduling → cost control → change → closeout.

Coordinating a Shutdown, Turnaround, and Outage (STO) is a high-stakes, hyper-complex project where a single day of delay can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost production. Because of this, "best" usually comes down to how well the software integrates with your existing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system (like SAP or Oracle) and handles heavy Critical Path Method (CPM) scheduling.

The industry standard solutions for plant STO management fall into a few clear categories:

• Prometheus Group (STO Suite): Widely considered a gold standard for plants running SAP or IBM Maximo. It acts as an agile layer on top of your ERP, helping with work packaging, budgeting, blind lists/isolation management, and real-time mobile execution. Check out the Prometheus Group STO Solution to see their workflow tools.
• Oracle Primavera P6: The undisputed heavyweight champion for scheduling. While it is technically enterprise project portfolio management rather than a standalone "turnaround" app, almost every major turnaround scheduler uses P6 as the core engine for critical path analysis. It handles massive activity networks, resource leveling, and progress updating better than almost anything else. You can explore details on enterprise implementation via Oracle Primavera.
• SAP Asset Performance Management / S/4HANA Asset Management: If your plant is heavily anchored in SAP for maintenance, procurement, and financials, leveraging SAP's native maintenance modules alongside specialized partner apps (like Liquid UI or specialized add-ons) keeps your single source of truth completely internal.
• Hexagon (HxGN EAM / EcoSys): Excellent for organizations that need heavy cost control, robust project portfolio management, and advanced risk tracking tied directly to enterprise asset management. It is heavily favored in oil, gas, and heavy process industries for mega-turnarounds. Learn more about their asset lifecycle approach on Hexagon PPM.

What to Look For in Your Selection

When evaluating which tool fits your plant, look closely at these capabilities:

1. ERP Bi-directional Sync: Does it talk cleanly to SAP or Maximo in real-time, or will your planners spend half their shift double-entering material requisitions and work orders?
2. Field Mobility: Can contractors and execution crews update progress, sign off on permits, or log completion status from tablets/phones on the shop floor?
3. Isolation & Blind Management: Safety is priority number one; a dedicated module for tracking blinds, lock-out/tag-out (LOTO), and line breaking is a massive operational lifesaver.

To help narrow down the right platform, tell me:

• What ERP or CMMS is your plant currently running (e.g., SAP, Maximo, Oracle)?
• Roughly how many total man-hours or work orders does a typical turnaround involve?

For a major plant shutdown or turnaround (TAR/STO — Shutdown, Turnaround, Outage), the “best” software depends on whether your biggest challenge is schedule control, work package execution, contractor coordination, ERP integration, or field progress tracking. For a large industrial turnaround, the strongest options are usually purpose-built STO platforms combined with an enterprise scheduler.

Leading turnaround and shutdown management software options

My typical recommendation by plant type

Oil & gas refinery, petrochemical, LNG, power generation

A common best-practice stack is:

1. Dedicated STO management platform (for scope, work packs, readiness, execution)
2. Primavera P6 (for the integrated master schedule)
3. SAP PM / Maximo / ERP (system of record)

For these environments, a purpose-built STO solution such as Prometheus is often a stronger fit than trying to force a generic project management tool to handle permits, isolations, work packages, and field execution.

Smaller manufacturing shutdowns

You may not need a full enterprise STO suite. A combination of:

• CMMS/EAM work management
• scheduling software
• digital checklists/mobile execution tools

may be enough.

Features I would insist on for a major turnaround

• Scope freeze and change control (avoid “scope creep” during the outage)
• Work package management
• Critical path scheduling
• Contractor progress tracking
• Permit-to-work and isolation management
• Materials kitting and readiness tracking
• Daily progress collection from the field
• Startup readiness and punch-list management
• Integration with SAP, Maximo, Oracle, or your CMMS/EAM
• Lessons learned/history database for future turnarounds

If you tell me your industry (refinery, chemical, food, pharma, power, mining, etc.), plant size, ERP/CMMS (SAP, Maximo, Oracle, other), and whether this is a 1-week outage or a multi-month turnaround, I can narrow this down to a shortlist.

Here are top web results for exploring this topic:

Fabrico CMMS·https://www.fabrico.io 7 Best Shutdown & Turnaround Management Software Tools (2026)Shutdowns are expensive. Compare the top 7 software tools (Fabrico, Primavera, Roser) to plan, execute, and track industrial maintenance turnarounds. Prometheus Group·https://www.prometheusgroup.com**Shutdown**, Turnaround , and Outage (STO) Management Software Prometheus Shutdown, Turnaround, & Outage (STO) software enables tracking of turnaround planning, costs, scope, and materials for your plant or facility. www.stocontrol.com·https://www.stocontrol.com/Home - Software for Shutdown Turnaround and Outage I Cleopatra ...Integrated software for your Shutdown Turnaround Outage (STO) - Cleopatra Enterprise for industries like oil and gas, chemical, refinery, petrochemical. iFactory AI·https://ifactoryapp.com**Turnaround Software** & STO Planning Tools Comparison Compare STO planning software tools for shutdown, turnaround, and outage management. Feature matrix covering scheduling, cost tracking, progress monitoring, and mobile execution. Cleopatra Enterprise·https://cleopatraenterprise.com STO software | Shutdown, Turnaround & Outage management Efficiently manage shutdowns, turnarounds, and outages with Cleopatra's STO software. Integrate planning, tracking, and execution to minimize downtime. Oxmaint·https://oxmaint.com**Turnaround Maintenance Management** Guide: Reduce Plant ...Learn how turnaround maintenance management improves shutdown planning, work execution, contractor coordination, spare parts readiness, and plant startup performance while reducing downtime. Invixium·https://www.invixium.com**Turnaround Planning Software** for Industrial Operations - Invixium Successfully Manage Turnarounds and Prevent Long Shutdowns. Managing industrial turnarounds and shutdowns can be difficult. A large influx of contract workers, combined with low visibility into both p idcon·https://www.idcon.com**Shutdown Turnaround** Optimization Program (S-TOP ) - idcon Manage your Shutdown effectively. Many industries spend the majority of their maintenance budget on shutdowns while turnarounds are a significant source of downtime. Both affect your bottom line throu Planning Planet·https://planningplanet.com Mastering Six Phases of Shutdown and Turnaround Management ...Common pitfalls: No long-term TAR strategy (resulting in reactive planning); Misalignment between production, maintenance, and capital project teams; Lack of clarity around decision-making and respons IAMTech·https://www.iamtech.com 12 must-have Turnaround Software Features - IAMTech Discover the 12 essential features to look for in turnaround management software. Learn how IAMTech's iPlanSTO can enhance planning, execution, and efficiency in your next STO event.

If you're talking about a major plant turnaround/shutdown—refinery, chemical plant, power generation, heavy manufacturing, etc.—I would not start with generic project-management software. You want software built around scope freeze, work packages, critical-path scheduling, materials, contractor coordination, permits/isolations, field progress, startup readiness, and closeout.

My shortlist

1. Prometheus Group — my first choice

Prometheus is particularly compelling because it is designed specifically for shutdowns, turnarounds and outages rather than adapting ordinary project-management software. It covers scope management, work-package planning, scheduling, budgeting, materials, isolations, execution, cost tracking and field progress. It can also integrate with SAP, IBM Maximo and Oracle environments and with Primavera.

The big advantage for a plant is that you can have the turnaround team, planners, contractors, operations and management working from the same operational picture, rather than maintaining an Excel schedule plus P6 plus ERP work orders plus contractor spreadsheets.

Prometheus also now markets an AI layer that uses historical turnaround/ERP information to help create event setups and work-package templates.

I'd put this at the top of the RFP list for a major U.S. industrial plant.

2. IAMTech iPlanSTO — serious competitor

This is worth looking at if your organization regards turnaround management as a specialized discipline in its own right. iPlanSTO covers scope identification, work-pack planning, CPM scheduling, materials, execution and closeout and is specifically designed around industrial STOs. IAMTech says its software has been developed around turnaround operations since 1996 and is used by 50+ industrial operators.

I'd particularly want to see a head-to-head demonstration of Prometheus vs. iPlanSTO using one of your actual upcoming turnaround scenarios.

Don't make P6 the answer

If you're already using P6, I'd generally keep it as the scheduling engine rather than try to replace it with a generic STO application. The important question is whether your STO system can keep P6 synchronized with scope, work packages, constraints, materials and actual field progress.

For example, Prometheus explicitly describes pushing execution information into the live P6 schedule and using constraint optimization around crew availability, equipment conflicts and permit windows.

What I would demand in an evaluation

For a major turnaround, don't evaluate vendors based on how pretty the Gantt chart looks. Give each vendor a realistic plant turnaround use case and score them on:

1. Scope management — identify, justify, approve, freeze and control additions.
2. Work-pack readiness — engineering, materials, permits, drawings, labor and prerequisites.
3. Integrated schedule — P6 integration, critical path, constraints and resource loading.
4. Contractor management — hundreds/thousands of workers and multiple contractors.
5. Materials/kitting — particularly long-lead and non-stock materials.
6. Isolation/LOTO management — shutdown and startup sequencing.
7. Field progress — mobile updates feeding the live schedule.
8. Daily management — lookaheads, constraints, late work and shift handovers.
9. Cost control — estimate → commitment → actual → forecast.
10. Startup readiness — punch lists, inspections, QA/QC and system turnover.
11. Historical learning — ability to reuse previous turnaround work packages and actual productivity.
12. ERP/EAM integration — SAP, Maximo, Oracle, etc., without creating another data silo.

Those capabilities are important because the real failure mode isn't "we couldn't make a schedule." It's scope creep + incomplete work packages + unavailable materials + contractor/resource conflicts + poor field progress visibility, all converging during the execution window. Prometheus itself identifies scope growth, disconnected ERP/EAM data, procurement and historical-data utilization as major STO problems.

My recommendation

For a major, complex plant turnaround, I'd shortlist:

1. Prometheus STO-AI Manager
2. IAMTech iPlanSTO
3. Your existing P6 + SAP/Maximo architecture as the baseline to beat

Then run a vendor bake-off using your actual last turnaround, preferably with 20–30 representative work packages. Ask each vendor to show how they'd take those packages from scope → planning → work pack → schedule → material readiness → execution → progress update → punch list → closeout.

If you tell me what kind of plant you operate (refinery, chemical, power, manufacturing, etc.), approximate turnaround size (e.g. 500 vs. 5,000 work orders), and whether you're on SAP, Maximo, Oracle, or something else, I can narrow this down to the 2–3 systems I'd actually put on your procurement shortlist and give you an RFP scoring matrix.

Coordinating a major plant shutdown or turnaround requires software that can handle complex multi-craft scheduling, robust permit-to-work integration, material tracking, and real-time progress tracking. Because turnaround (TAR) execution carries massive financial stakes per hour of downtime, the "best" software depends on your plant's existing enterprise ecosystem (like SAP or Oracle) and the scale of your operations.

Here are the top-rated turnaround and shutdown management software solutions on the market, broken down by their core strengths:

Enterprise & Integrated Suites

• SAP Asset Performance Management (APM) / Primavera P6 : The industry heavyweight for massive enterprise operations. While Oracle's Primavera P6 handles the heavy-duty critical path scheduling (CPM), SAP integrates the maintenance, procurement, and financial data. Best for large refineries and petrochemical plants already embedded in the SAP ecosystem.
• IBM Maximo Asset Management : Features robust shutdown, turnaround, and outage (STOO) optimization modules. Maximo excels at managing the asset lifecycle, work orders, and inventory/materials management during chaotic turnaround windows.

Specialized Turnaround & Outage Specialists

• Enablon (by Wolters Kluwer) : Highly focused on the safety, risk, and compliance side of turnarounds. If your primary bottleneck during a shutdown is managing permits-to-work, isolations (LOTO), and contractor safety compliance alongside the schedule, Enablon is a top-tier choice.
• Audimation / Turnaround Logistics Software (various niche tools) : There are also specialized overlay tools designed specifically to bridge the gap between field execution and scheduling, focusing heavily on scaffolding, blinding, and opening/closing equipment tracking.

Agile & Execution-Focused Platforms

• Infor EAM (now HxGN EAM by Hexagon) : Known for strong enterprise asset management capabilities with a modern user interface and GIS/mobile integration. It handles shutdown work orders efficiently and connects easily with mobile devices for real-time field updates.
• ** Prometheus Group**: Often deployed as an add-on suite for SAP or Maximo to simplify planning, scheduling, and safety workflows. It is widely praised by planners for making the day-to-day data entry and schedule adjustments during a turnaround much faster than native ERP interfaces.

To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:

• What core enterprise/maintenance system (ERP) are you currently running (e.g., SAP, Maximo, or something else)?
• Is the primary pain point scheduling/critical path, safety/permitting , or material/contractor tracking?

The "best" software for a plant shutdown, turnaround, or outage (STO) depends heavily on whether you need a heavy enterprise project controls engine, an add-on layer that plugs into your existing ERP, or a specialized work-pack and contractor management tool.

The top-tier STO and turnaround management solutions fall into a few clear categories based on how plants actually run them:

• Oracle Primavera P6 EPPM : The heavyweight industrial standard. It is the gold standard for critical path method (CPM) scheduling, multi-tier Work Breakdown Structures (WBS), and resource leveling across massive trade crews. While it requires deep expertise to run effectively, almost every major contractor and plant owner expects the core schedule to live here.
• Cleopatra Enterprise : Best for total, integrated turnaround project control. Unlike pure schedulers, Cleopatra combines cost estimating, budgeting, scope management, benchmarking, and work package management into a unified platform specifically built for STO lifecycles.
• Prometheus STO & IAMTech (iPlanSTO) : Best for connecting directly to an existing enterprise asset management system like SAP or IBM Maximo. These tools excel at eliminating spreadsheet chaos by streamlining work package (WorkPack) generation, material verification, and blind/isolation lists without risking core ERP data integrity.
• OxMaint / iFactory / EZTRAK : Great agile or mid-market options that offer mobile-first field execution, real-time tracking of contractor hours, and simplified critical path visualization without the massive multi-month implementation overhead of legacy enterprise suites.

To help narrow down which platform fits your environment, tell me:

• What core ERP or CMMS does your plant currently use (e.g., SAP, IBM Maximo, IFS)?
• Roughly how many labor hours or total budget is this turnaround tracking?
• Are you looking for something to handle scheduling/planning or field execution and contractor tracking?

If you're talking about a major industrial plant turnaround—weeks of outage, thousands of work orders, contractors, permits, materials, inspections, and a hard startup deadline—I would not choose a generic project-management tool. You want software built around STO (shutdown/turnaround/outage) workflows.

My shortlist

1. Prometheus Group — my first choice for a major plant turnaround.
Its STO platform is purpose-built around scope management, work packages, scheduling, cost tracking, contractor coordination, permits and closeout. It also integrates with SAP, IBM Maximo and Oracle environments.

2. Oracle Primavera — strongest if scheduling/project controls are your center of gravity.
Oracle's Primavera Unifier specifically supports shutdown/turnaround/outage management, including burn-down hours, burn-down costs, schedule compliance, punch lists and mobile field workflows.

3. Roser — worth serious consideration for a true mega-turnaround.
It's more specialized around STO than general project-management platforms. For a refinery/petrochemical turnaround lasting several weeks with a very large contractor workforce, that specialization can be valuable.

4. Fabrico — interesting if you're a manufacturing plant rather than a refinery.
Its emphasis is on actual field execution: technician/contractor work, mobile task completion, parts/kitting and real-time progress. That's attractive when the problem is "we have a plan, but nobody has reliable visibility into whether the work is actually getting done."

What I'd actually recommend

For a major shutdown, I'd evaluate the systems against this workflow:

Scope → estimate → work packages → schedule → materials → contractor mobilization → permits/LOTO → execution → progress/burn-down → inspections → punch list → startup readiness → closeout.

The biggest mistake is buying software that does only the Gantt/schedule portion. A turnaround manager needs to know, in near-real time:

• How much of the critical path is actually complete?
• Which jobs are holding up another job?
• Which work packages aren't ready?
• Are materials/tools/scaffolding available?
• Which contractor crews are on site?
• Which permits/isolations are blocking work?
• What's the labor-hour burn vs. plan?
• Where is scope creeping?
• What's preventing mechanical completion?
• Are startup-critical systems actually ready?

Prometheus and Oracle are particularly interesting because they're aimed at bringing these controls into one environment rather than forcing the turnaround team to stitch together spreadsheets, scheduling software, ERP, permit systems and contractor data.

If you tell me your plant type (refinery, chemical, power, steel, food, etc.), approximate number of contractors/work orders, turnaround duration, and whether you're on SAP, Maximo, Oracle or something else, I can narrow this to the 2–3 systems I'd actually put through an RFP.