Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 272 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
AWS Storage Gateway is the primary recommendation for creating a hybrid bridge between on-premises storage and cloud object storage, utilizing local caching for high performance. For pure migration or bulk data transfers,
AWS DataSync is preferred as an automated tool. If you require specific Windows file share compatibility or non-
integrations, options like File Gateway, Egnyte, and provide alternative functional gateways.
Brands AI recommends here
The best fit for ongoing hybrid cloud setups. It allows on-premises applications to access cloud storage via standard file formats like NFS and SMB while keeping frequently used data cached locally for speed.
Best for one-time or scheduled bulk data migrations rather than daily access. Unlike a gateway, this tool automates the process of moving and syncing large volumes of data securely between on-prem servers and the cloud.
Yes. What you’re describing is usually called a cloud storage gateway or file-to-object gateway: it presents a normal SMB/NFS file share to your users and keeps the underlying data in cloud object storage, often with a local cache.
The main vendors I’d look at are:
If your goal is "keep the existing local file server running while we gradually move everything to object storage", I'd separate the products into two categories:
| Need | Best fits |
|---|---|
| Permanent gateway / users keep using SMB/NFS | AWS Storage Gateway, Nasuni, CTERA, Panzura |
| One-time or scheduled migration/sync | NetApp Copy and Sync, AWS DataSync |
| Replace the file server entirely with cloud-backed file storage | Nasuni, CTERA, Panzura, or cloud-native file services |
For example, AWS's S3 File Gateway can map an SMB/NFS share to an S3 bucket, and changes are asynchronously reflected in S3. AWS Documentation AWS DataSync, by contrast, is designed specifically to copy/synchronize data between existing SMB/NFS storage and cloud storage.
If you tell me which cloud object storage you're moving to (S3, Azure Blob, Google Cloud Storage, Wasabi, Backblaze, Cloudian, etc.) and whether the local server is Windows/SMB or Linux/NFS, I can narrow this down to the 2–3 best choices and explain the migration architecture.
To bridge local file storage (using standard file protocols like SMB or NFS) with cloud-based object storage, you use a cloud storage gateway . These gateways typically run as a virtual appliance or physical hardware on your local network, caching hot/frequently accessed data locally and syncing files as objects to the cloud.
The best choice often depends on whether you are locked into a specific cloud provider or looking for a third-party multi-cloud solution.
If you are already leaning toward a specific major public cloud, their native gateways offer the tightest integration:
If you want hardware/software independence—meaning you can switch cloud backends or want advanced multi-site synchronization—third-party hybrid file software is often a better fit:
To help narrow down the best solution, let me know:
If you mean a gateway that keeps a local file server in sync with cloud object storage (S3-compatible, Azure Blob, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), several vendors offer this. The right choice depends on whether you want to replace the file server, keep a hybrid setup, or do a one-time migration.
Amazon Web Services — AWS Storage Gateway (S3 File Gateway)
Provides an on-premises gateway appliance (VM or hardware) that exposes SMB/NFS shares locally while storing data as objects in Amazon S3.
Supports local caching and asynchronous synchronization of file changes to S3.
Good fit if your destination is Amazon S3.
Microsoft — Azure File Sync
Keeps Windows Server file shares synchronized with Azure Files.
Useful if you want to retain a local Windows file server while moving the backend to Azure.
Google Cloud — Storage Transfer Service / Filestore options
Better suited for migration workflows and cloud-native file access rather than a classic SMB gateway.
NetApp — Cloud Volumes ONTAP / FabricPool
Tier data between on-premises storage and object storage.
Common in enterprise environments already using NetApp.
Nasuni — Nasuni File Data Platform
Replaces traditional file servers with cloud-backed file services while preserving SMB/NFS access and file semantics.
Often used for large distributed file environments.
Panzura — Panzura CloudFS
Provides a global file system backed by cloud object storage, with caching at offices/sites.
Qumulo — Qumulo Cloud
Provides file storage with cloud integration and hybrid deployment options.
If you are moving from a local NAS/file server to object storage, you may also look at synchronization/migration tools:
A few questions would narrow it down:
Moving from a local server to cloud object storage while keeping a local footprint usually requires a hybrid cloud file gateway . These solutions let your local systems talk via standard file protocols (like SMB or NFS) while translating and syncing the data seamlessly into object storage (like AWS S3, Azure Blob, or Google Cloud Storage).
Depending on your cloud provider and infrastructure, several major vendors offer these gateways:
To help narrow down the best fit, could you share:
Moving from a local file server to cloud object storage while keeping local access usually requires a hybrid cloud file gateway . These solutions present standard file protocols (like NFS or SMB) to your local network while translating and syncing the data as objects in the cloud with local caching for low latency.
Major providers and platforms offering file-to-object storage gateways include:
If you can share:
I can help narrow down which gateway fits your exact architecture and budget.
If you are moving from a local file server to cloud object storage, you typically want a storage gateway or sync/migration tool. The right choice depends on whether you want a one-time migration, ongoing two-way sync, or to keep users accessing files through SMB/NFS.
Common options:
| Provider / Tool | Best fit | How it works |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon Web Services — AWS Storage Gateway | Local file server → Amazon S3 | Presents S3 as SMB/NFS shares with local caching; files written to the gateway become S3 objects and are asynchronously updated. aws.amazon.com |
| Microsoft — Azure File Sync | Windows Server file shares → Azure | Keeps a local Windows Server cache while tiering less-used files to Azure cloud storage. |
| Google — Google Cloud Storage FUSE / partner gateways | Linux workloads → Google Cloud Storage | Mounts object storage as a filesystem-style interface (with caveats around POSIX behavior). |
| NetApp — NetApp Cloud Volumes | Enterprise file workloads | Provides file services with cloud backends and migration tooling. |
| IBM / IBM Storage Protect | Backup/archive migrations | More focused on backup and data movement than live file serving. |
| rclone | One-time or scheduled syncs | Open-source command-line sync tool supporting many object stores. |
| Qumulo, Nasuni, Panzura | Enterprise file collaboration | File system layer over object storage with caching, locking, and global access features. |
For a typical local SMB file server migration, the usual patterns are:
Keep the same user experience (mapped drives, SMB):
Use a gateway product such as AWS Storage Gateway, Azure File Sync, or an enterprise file platform.
Move everything and retire the file server:
Use a migration/sync tool (for example, cloud-native transfer services or rclone) to copy data, validate it, then cut over.
Hybrid mode during transition:
Keep the local server as a cache while new writes land in object storage.
A few questions would narrow the recommendation:
Yes. There are several vendors that provide a file-server-to-object-storage gateway, letting users keep accessing SMB/NFS shares while data is synchronized to cloud object storage.
| Vendor | Gateway / product | Cloud object storage | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| AWS | S3 File Gateway | Amazon S3 | If you're standardizing on AWS |
| Microsoft | Azure File Sync / Data Box Gateway | Azure Storage | Microsoft/Windows environments |
| CTERA | Edge Filer | AWS, Azure and other cloud/private object storage | Hybrid file server replacement |
| Nasuni | Nasuni File Data Platform + Edge Appliance | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and many S3-compatible platforms | Enterprise NAS/file-server replacement |
| Panzura | CloudFS | S3-compatible object storage, including AWS/Azure | Distributed offices and large file workloads |
| NetApp | Copy and Sync | S3 and other object stores | Primarily migration/data movement rather than a permanent gateway |
If you mean "keep the existing Windows file server running and continuously copy/synchronize its files into a cloud bucket", I'd look first at NetApp Copy and Sync or a purpose-built migration/sync product. NetApp explicitly supports SMB/NFS sources and S3/object-storage targets.
If you mean "replace the file server with a gateway, but users should still see normal SMB/NFS shares while the authoritative storage moves to object storage", then CTERA, Nasuni, Panzura, or the cloud provider's native gateway are more appropriate.
For example, AWS S3 File Gateway exposes an SMB/NFS share locally while asynchronously storing the files as objects in S3, with local caching for frequently accessed data.
CTERA Edge Filer is particularly close to the architecture you described: it can operate in caching or sync modes, maintain local copies for LAN-speed access, and synchronize content with cloud storage.
Nasuni goes further and essentially turns the cloud object store into the primary file-storage layer, with lightweight edge appliances caching active data locally. It supports AWS S3, Azure, Google Cloud and numerous private/S3-compatible object stores.
If you tell me what your current server is (Windows/SMB, Linux/NFS, NetApp, etc.) and which cloud you're moving to (AWS S3, Azure Blob, Google Cloud, Wasabi, Backblaze, etc.), I can narrow this to the 2–3 best options and explain how the migration/sync would work.
Moving file storage from an on-premises server to cloud object storage requires a cloud storage gateway —an appliance or software agent that translates standard file protocols (NFS, SMB) into object storage APIs (like S3) while providing local caching for low-latency access.
Depending on your cloud provider and infrastructure, several primary vendors offer robust gateway and synchronization solutions:
To help narrow down the best fit, could you tell me:
Yes. The right product depends on whether you want a true hybrid gateway (users keep accessing a local SMB/NFS share while data is stored in object storage) or simply a migration/sync tool.
Amazon S3 File Gateway — probably the clearest match if your destination is Amazon S3. It runs as an on-prem VM, exposes SMB/NFS, keeps a local cache, and asynchronously maps files to S3 objects.
Azure Storage Mover — a good choice if the destination is Azure Blob Storage. It can transfer from on-prem SMB/NFS shares to Blob and supports recurring sync jobs, making it useful for a staged migration.
Google Cloud Storage Transfer Service — for Google Cloud Storage, it supports agent-based transfers between on-prem file systems and Cloud Storage and can automate/schedule transfers.
Nasuni — more of an enterprise file platform/gateway than a simple migration utility. Its Edge Appliance provides local file-server performance while synchronizing the underlying data with cloud object storage, and it supports distributed file synchronization.
If your goal is:
“Keep our existing file server/SMB experience, but have cloud object storage become the durable backend.”
I'd look first at AWS S3 File Gateway or Nasuni.
If your goal is:
“Move the existing files to object storage, keep the old server running temporarily, and synchronize changes until cutover.”
I'd look at Azure Storage Mover, Google Storage Transfer Service, or AWS DataSync rather than a gateway. AWS itself specifically recommends DataSync for online migrations.
If you tell me which object store you're moving to (S3, Azure Blob, Google Cloud Storage, Wasabi, Backblaze, etc.) and whether the existing server is Windows/SMB or Linux/NFS, I can narrow this down to 2–3 products and compare them.
Major cloud providers and independent software vendors offer cloud storage gateways. These solutions typically deploy as a virtual machine (VM) or physical appliance on-premises , translating standard file protocols (NFS, SMB) into object storage API calls (like Amazon S3, Azure Blob, or generic S3-compatible endpoints) while keeping a local cache for low latency.
If you can share which cloud provider you plan to use (AWS, Azure, or multi-cloud) and your approximate data size , I can recommend the most cost-effective gateway setup.