Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 199 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Optimizing large language models involves diverse technical and strategic needs. Technical firms like LeewayHertz,
InData Labs, and
DataToBiz provide custom model development, fine-tuning, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to ensure accuracy and enterprise alignment. Infrastructure-focused firms like NVIDIA and Arcee offer frameworks for performance and efficiency, while agencies like Minuttia and NoGood specialize in improving brand visibility in AI-driven search results through structured content.
Brands AI recommends here
Best for end-to-end custom LLM development. They excel at fine-tuning models like Llama and GPT for specialized sectors, providing robust solutions for manufacturing and healthcare.
Best for turning LLMs into practical, production-ready enterprise tools. They provide excellent support for custom model fine-tuning and integrating RAG systems into existing workflows.
Best for RAG-based model development. The firm is recognized for integrating proprietary data into AI models to improve business accuracy and customer interaction.
When we talk about "optimizing for large language models," the space splits into two major tracks: Generative Engine Optimization / LLM Visibility (making sure ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini recommend your brand) and Model Fine-Tuning/Performance Optimization (making LLMs run faster, cheaper, and smarter via inference optimization).
Several specialized platforms and digital agencies lead these respective domains:
Are you looking to optimize brand visibility/citations inside consumer AI tools (like ChatGPT and Perplexity), or are you trying to fine-tune and speed up an LLM for a technical product? Let me know so I can point you in the right direction.
If by “optimizing for large language models” you mean GEO/AEO/LLM optimization—getting a company, product, or content cited and recommended in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews—the market is still young, but several firms stand out.
| Need | Firms I'd investigate first |
|---|---|
| Enterprise / Fortune 500 | Profound, Conductor, iPullRank |
| B2B SaaS | Directive, Omniscient Digital, Skale |
| Content-heavy brand | Animalz, Omniscient Digital |
| Technical/complex site | iPullRank, Conductor |
| Measurement / AI visibility intelligence | Profound |
| SEO + GEO together | NP Digital, Directive |
One important caveat: “LLM optimization” isn't equivalent to traditional SEO, and nobody can reliably guarantee that ChatGPT or Claude will mention your brand. The better providers measure prompt-level visibility, citations, source coverage, and changes over time rather than simply promising “AI rankings.” Current industry comparisons emphasize this distinction.
If you're choosing a firm to hire, I can also give you a ranked top 5 with approximate pricing, strengths/weaknesses, and which ones have the strongest evidence of actually moving LLM citations.
If by “optimizing for large language models” you mean getting a company, product, or content cited/recommended in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google’s AI results, the field is usually called GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) or AEO (Answer Engine Optimization).
Based on current 2026 agency research, I’d put these firms on a serious shortlist:
| Firm | Particularly strong for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| Omniscient Digital | B2B SaaS, content + AI search | Best overall for B2B content-led GEO |
| Go Fish Digital | Enterprise SEO, digital PR, technical GEO | Excellent technical/authority combination |
| Directive | Enterprise B2B/SaaS | Strong choice for larger demand-gen organizations |
| Siege Media | Content, data journalism, digital PR | Particularly good at creating sources LLMs can cite |
| Animalz | Expert B2B content | Strong when authority and editorial quality matter |
| WebFX | Large enterprises, scale | Best suited to organizations wanting a large full-service operation |
| Seer Interactive | AI-search research and enterprise SEO | Strong analytical/research orientation |
| Brainlabs | Large global brands | Interesting enterprise option with dedicated AI-search capability |
These aren't simply firms that claim to do “AI marketing”: current industry comparisons specifically identify Omniscient, Siege, Go Fish, Directive, Animalz, WebFX, and Seer among the stronger GEO practitioners.
For LLM visibility: I'd prioritize Omniscient, Go Fish, Siege, and Directive. Their work overlaps the things that actually influence AI answers: authoritative content, entity/knowledge-graph signals, technical SEO, digital PR, and measuring citations across AI systems.
For enterprise scale: WebFX and Directive are more natural fits. Clutch's August 2026 GEO directory, for example, ranks WebFX among its leading U.S. GEO providers.
For a smaller SaaS company: I'd look first at Omniscient, Animalz, or Siege rather than paying an enormous enterprise agency retainer. Recent market comparisons put serious GEO engagements anywhere from roughly $5K–$25K+/month, depending on scope.
One caveat: “LLM optimization” is still a young and somewhat fuzzy category. A lot of agencies are essentially renaming conventional SEO as GEO. The firms I'd favor are ones that can show before/after AI citations, prompt-level measurement, third-party mentions, and actual changes in AI-generated recommendations, rather than merely promising “ChatGPT rankings.”
If you tell me whether you're optimizing a brand/company, a website, an LLM application, or content, I can narrow this to the 5 best firms for that specific use case and compare their pricing, clients, capabilities, and track record.
When looking at firms that excel at optimizing for large language models (LLMs) , "optimization" generally falls into two distinct categories:
The leading firms categorized by their core area of expertise include:
Enterprise AI, RAG, and Model Fine-Tuning
LLM Visibility, Citation Optimization, and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)
Are you looking to optimize how your brand or content is cited by LLMs (LLMO/GEO) , or are you trying to tune/optimize an LLM system on private data (RAG/fine-tuning) ? Let me know so I can give you a more tailored recommendation.
If by “optimizing for large language models” you mean LLMO/GEO/AEO—getting a company, product, or content cited and recommended by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc.—there’s now a fairly substantial specialist market.
There are some unusually focused local specialists:
I'd distinguish real LLM optimization from agencies that have simply renamed SEO as “AI SEO.”
A strong provider should be doing at least four things:
For an enterprise brand, I'd start with iPullRank, Directive or The Enough Agency. For a B2B company wanting a specialist rather than a traditional SEO agency, I'd investigate TrajectoryGEO. For a Portuguese/Lisbon business, AISO Hub or Reach GEO are particularly relevant.
One caveat: LLM optimization is still a young field, and many agencies' claimed “citation lift” figures are self-reported. I'd ask any firm for a before/after prompt set, methodology, and examples where they can demonstrate that their intervention caused the visibility change—not merely that visibility increased.
If you tell me what you're trying to optimize (company, SaaS product, personal brand, ecommerce, etc.) and your target market, I can narrow this to the 5 firms I'd actually interview, including approximate pricing and strengths.
Optimizing for large language models (LLMs) spans two entirely different meanings: technical/inference optimization (making models run faster, cheaper, and more efficiently in production) and Generative Engine Optimization / GEO (optimizing a brand's web presence so AI search tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini cite them).
Top-tier firms excel across both categories:
These engineering-first firms help enterprises compress, quantize, and customize models for production:
These marketing and data-science agencies specialize in engineering brand authority so models explicitly recommend your business:
If you're looking to hire or partner with a firm, let me know:
I can narrow down the most suitable agency match for your goals.
Optimizing for large language models—often referred to as LLMO (LLM Optimization), GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) , or AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) —involves ensuring a brand or site is accurately crawled, understood, and cited by AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini.
The leading firms and specialized agencies excelling in this space fall into distinct categories based on their core strengths:
If you are looking to optimize a specific type of property, let me know:
I can help narrow down which partner aligns best with your goals.
If by “optimizing for large language models” you mean LLM/GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)—helping a company get mentioned, recommended, and cited by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews—the market is still relatively young. The strongest firms tend to combine technical SEO, authoritative content, digital PR/entity building, and actual AI-visibility measurement.
| Firm | Best for | Why it stands out |
|---|---|---|
| iPullRank | Enterprise / sophisticated technical work | One of the better-known SEO firms moving deeply into AI search and LLM visibility. |
| 7 Eagles | GEO strategy & execution | Frequently cited among specialist GEO agencies in 2026. www.sona.com |
| Aimers | AI-search visibility | Another specialist agency appearing in current 2026 GEO rankings. www.sona.com |
| Searchbloom | SEO + GEO | Currently ranked #1 in GoodFirms' August 2026 GEO category, with 94 verified reviews. www.goodfirms.co |
| Parachute Design | Canadian businesses | Explicitly structures its service around GEO for ChatGPT/Claude/Perplexity/Gemini plus AEO for Google AI Overviews. parachutedesign.ca |
| Net Site Marketing | B2B / e-commerce | Reports a 2026 case where ChatGPT cited pages increased 214.5%, alongside gains in Gemini and Google AI visibility. agencies.semrush.com |
| Azuro Digital | Canadian SMB/mid-market | Toronto-based and specifically offers AI-search/LLM optimization alongside technical SEO and web work. agencies.semrush.com |
I'd particularly investigate Parachute Design, Net Site Marketing, Azuro Digital, and SeoLogist. Current Canadian agency listings show a growing number of firms claiming LLM/GEO expertise, but there's a big difference between adding “LLM optimization” to an SEO services page and having demonstrated AI-citation results.
The key question I'd ask any firm:
“Show me three clients where you measured AI visibility before and after, across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, and show me the actual queries and citations.”
That's a much better filter than asking whether they “do GEO.” Current industry reviews specifically emphasize multi-LLM tracking, citation outcomes, structured content, entity signals, and measurable before/after results.
If you tell me what industry you're in, your approximate budget, and whether you're targeting Canada, the U.S., or globally, I can narrow this to the 5 firms I'd actually interview, including pricing and evidence of results.
If by “optimizing for large language models” you mean Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)—improving the odds that a company, product, or expert is mentioned, recommended, and cited in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google’s AI results—the market is still young, but a few firms stand out.
| Firm | Best fit | Why consider them |
|---|---|---|
| Directive | Enterprise B2B / SaaS | Strong combination of technical SEO, content, and enterprise GEO. It is repeatedly identified as an enterprise-focused GEO provider. thedigitalelevator.comwww.sourceadvisory.ai |
| Animalz | Content-heavy B2B brands | Particularly strong when the problem is authoritative content and topical expertise that LLMs can retrieve and cite. thedigitalelevator.comwww.miniloop.ai |
| Omniscient Digital | B2B SaaS | Content strategy + organic search + AI visibility; a good choice if you want GEO integrated with an existing content engine. thedigitalelevator.comwww.miniloop.ai |
| iPullRank | Technically complex enterprises | Stronger choice for large, complicated sites where technical SEO, information architecture, entities, and structured data matter. thedigitalelevator.com |
| Skale | SaaS / tech companies | More specialized around AI-search growth for SaaS and technology companies. thedigitalelevator.comwww.sourceadvisory.ai |
| Siege Media | Enterprise content | Particularly attractive if the core problem is creating authoritative, linkable/citable content at scale. thedigitalelevator.com |
| Go Fish Digital | Data-driven programs | Worth considering when you want GEO tied closely to measurement, experimentation, and analytics. thedigitalelevator.com |
There are also GEO-native specialists emerging. For example, Source Advisory positions itself as a pure-play GEO firm rather than an SEO agency that has simply added GEO to its menu.
I'd separate firms that do the optimization from software that measures LLM visibility.
For measurement, names that come up repeatedly include Profound, Peec AI, and Otterly.AI. These platforms monitor things such as mention/share-of-voice, citations, competitors, and which sources LLMs rely on.
My practical shortlist would be:
One caveat: GEO is not simply “SEO for ChatGPT.” The better programs work on entity authority, structured data, authoritative third-party references, content architecture, and measuring actual citations/mentions across multiple models. Current industry comparisons specifically emphasize citation-source visibility and measurement rather than simply producing more AI-friendly content.
If you tell me what you're optimizing (a company, website, personal brand, product, or content library) and roughly your budget, I can narrow this to the 3 firms I'd actually interview and explain what each should charge.
Optimizing for large language models—often referred to as LLMO (Large Language Model Optimization), GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) , or AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) —focuses on ensuring your brand is found, understood, and cited by AI models (like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity) rather than just ranking as a blue link on traditional search engine pages.
Top agencies and optimization firms leading this transition specialize in different pillars of AI visibility:
If you'd like to narrow this down, please share:
I can recommend the most relevant partner profile for your specific stage.
Onely
onely.com