Parse
Work with usPricing
Sign inCheck your brand
Research/How often does AI cite a competitor's website?

How often does AI cite a competitor's website?

About one in twenty. Of 136,478 reviewed links where the cited page mentioned a ranked recommended brand, 6,965, or 5.10%, came from a different brand in the same market.

By Dimitry Apollonsky · July 21, 2026 · 10 min read

5.10%
of reviewed links came from a competitor website
6,965 of 136,478
▸Contents
  • About one in twenty reviewed links came from a competitor website
  • Four in ten reviewed links came from another known brand
  • Google AI Mode used competitor websites more often than ChatGPT Search
  • Competitor sources appeared at every recommendation rank
  • Competitor citations were most common in recruiting software and community platforms
  • Comparison and best-of pages supplied 84.81% of competitor links
  • New Relic pages most often supported Dynatrace and Datadog
  • Ownership and alias checks keep the result conservative
  • What marketers should do
  • Get the data
  • Sources
  • Related research
Contents
  • About one in twenty reviewed links came from a competitor website
  • Four in ten reviewed links came from another known brand
  • Google AI Mode used competitor websites more often than ChatGPT Search
  • Competitor sources appeared at every recommendation rank
  • Competitor citations were most common in recruiting software and community platforms
  • Comparison and best-of pages supplied 84.81% of competitor links
  • New Relic pages most often supported Dynatrace and Datadog
  • Ownership and alias checks keep the result conservative
  • What marketers should do
  • Get the data
  • Sources
  • Related research

We reviewed 136,478 links between cited pages and recommended brands across 29,804 pages, 4,808 recommended brands, and 8,259 brands that owned cited domains in 39,339 answers to 1,264 organic prompts on ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode from May 31 through July 16, 2026.

5.10%
of reviewed links came from a competitor website
6,965 of 136,478
6,965
competitor-owned page links
136,478
reviewed links
84.81%
of competitor-owned links came from comparison and best-of pages

About one in twenty reviewed links came from a competitor website

A reviewed link connects one cited page to one ranked recommended brand that the page mentioned. The cited domain belonged to a different brand in the same market in 6,965 of 136,478 links, or 5.1034%.

Lily Ray's 69% result covered 224 of 323 self-promotional listicles that Google logoGoogle AI Overviews cited while leaving the publisher out of the recommendation. This study measures something different across two engines: the share of all eligible reviewed links whose cited domain belongs to another brand in the same market. It refines that result rather than contradicting it. Marketers should inspect who owns the source behind each recommendation instead of treating every cited brand site as support for its own products.

5.10%
of reviewed links came from a competitor website
6,965 of 136,478

Takeaway

Add source ownership to recommendation audits. A cited brand website can be supplying evidence for another brand in its market.

Four in ten reviewed links came from another known brand

Another known brand owned 55,607 of the 136,478 reviewed links, or 40.7443%. Competitors in the same market supplied 6,965 of those 55,607 links, or 12.5254%.

The broad first-party versus third-party split misses an important distinction. A brand-owned page can be first-party for the publisher and still function as third-party evidence for the brand being recommended.

40.74%
of reviewed links came from another known brand
55,607 of 136,478
12.53%
of those other-brand links came from a competitor
6,965 of 55,607

Google AI Mode used competitor websites more often than ChatGPT Search

Google logoGoogle AI Mode used a competitor-owned page in 5,169 of 83,592 reviewed links, or 6.1836%. ChatGPT logoChatGPT Search did so in 1,796 of 52,886, or 3.3960%.

A competitor-source audit should cover both engines. The combined rate hides a clear engine difference, but this comparison does not isolate why their source mixes differ.

Competitor-owned share of reviewed links
  • Google logoGoogle AI Mode6.18% (5,169 of 83,592)
  • ChatGPT logoChatGPT Search3.40% (1,796 of 52,886)

Takeaway

Keep competitor-source rates separate by engine. One combined number hides where the exposure is.

Competitor sources appeared at every recommendation rank

Competitor websites supplied 1,840 of 37,250 reviewed links for #1 recommendations, or 4.9396%. The rate was 5.5072% for ranks #2 to #3 and 4.8946% for rank #4 or lower.

The pattern is not confined to brands near the bottom of an answer. Check who owns the sources behind the top recommendation as well as the brands further down the list.

Competitor-owned share by recommendation rank
  • #14.94% (1,840 of 37,250)
  • #2 to #35.51% (2,411 of 43,779)
  • #4 or lower4.89% (2,714 of 55,449)

Competitor citations were most common in recruiting software and community platforms

Among markets with at least 20 competitor-owned links, Technical Recruiting Assessment Software had 37 of 211 reviewed links from competitors, or 17.5355%. Online Community Forum Platforms followed at 49 of 281, or 17.4377%. Reddit and Community Marketing Services recorded 1,475 of 8,708, or 16.9384%.

Market context changes the expected rate. Teams should Compare logoCompare their source mix with their own buyer market and keep the link counts in view, because small markets can post high rates from few links.

Markets with the highest competitor-owned shares
  • Technical Recruiting Assessment Software17.54% (37 of 211)
  • Online community forum platforms17.44% (49 of 281)
  • Reddit and Community Marketing Services16.94% (1,475 of 8,708)
  • Subscription and Usage-Based Billing Platforms16.83% (664 of 3,946)
  • HIPAA-compliant healthcare software platforms15.75% (20 of 127)
  • Online Coding Bootcamps15.20% (26 of 171)
Displayed markets have at least 20 competitor-owned links.

Comparison and best-of pages supplied 84.81% of competitor links

Comparison and best-of pages supplied 5,907 of 6,965 competitor-owned links, or 84.8098%. Other pages supplied 961, customer and case-study pages supplied 67, and product and documentation pages supplied 30.

The practical risk is concentrated in pages that name several options. Audit comparison content for which competitors it helps an AI engine recommend, not only whether the page earns citations.

Competitor-owned links by page type
  • Comparison and best-of pages84.81% (5,907)
  • Other pages13.80% (961)
  • Customer and case-study pages0.96% (67)
  • Product and documentation pages0.43% (30)

Takeaway

Review comparison pages as shared market evidence. A page can earn a citation while directing the recommendation to a competitor it names.

New Relic pages most often supported Dynatrace and Datadog

New Relic logoNew Relic pages supplied 155 reviewed links for Dynatrace logoDynatrace across 14 pages and 33 prompts. They supplied another 144 for Datadog logoDatadog across 17 pages and 36 prompts. FlyPix pages supplied 138 links for Planet logoPlanet across 20 pages and 30 prompts.

These pairs identify where to inspect the actual pages and answers. They do not show that the source owner intended to endorse the recommended brand or that the recommendation was factually correct.

Leading source-brand and recommended-brand pairs
New Relic logoNew RelicDynatrace logoDynatrace1551433
New Relic logoNew RelicDatadog logoDatadog1441736
FlyPixPlanet logoPlanet1382030
InterTeam MarketingTaktical Digital125214
Soar logoSoarSingle Grain124222
Dash0Honeycomb1171218
InterTeam MarketingFoundation Inc.106213
InterTeam MarketingSociallyin97217
Soar logoSoarFoundation Inc.92116
KYROEsri86218

Ownership and alias checks keep the result conservative

The study counted each link once and found zero duplicates. It excluded 23,289 links without one clear brand owner for the cited domain and 15,617 without a primary market on both brands. Alias checks removed 136 apparent competitor links, changing the rate from 5.2030% to 5.1034%.

These rules reduce false competitor matches. The remaining sorting still depends on known domain ownership and known markets for each brand, so the result should be read as a conservative observed cut rather than a complete count of every competitor relationship.

Method checks and exclusions
Reviewed links in the headline136,478
Rate before alias checks5.2030%
Rate after alias checks5.1034%
Links without one clear domain owner23,289
Links without a primary market on both brands15,617
Duplicate reviewed links0
Alias links removed after checking136

What marketers should do

Competitor websites supplied 6,965 of 136,478 reviewed links, the rate differed by engine, and comparison pages supplied 5,907 of the competitor-owned links. The named pairs show which source owners repeatedly support other brands in the same market.

Track the owner of every cited domain next to the brand being recommended. Split the audit by engine and recommendation rank. Review your comparison pages for competitors they support, and inspect competitor pages that support your brand. Repeat the same query over a window of the same length next quarter before treating any pair as lasting.

Get the data

Dataset CSVThe metrics behind every figure in this report.

Sources

  1. Lily Ray: self-promotional listicles can help competitors win in AI search · accessed 2026-07-21
  2. Ahrefs: self-promotional content works until it backfires · accessed 2026-07-21
  3. Semrush: why 62% of AI citations do not lead to brand mentions · accessed 2026-07-21
  4. Yext: citation behavior across 17.2 million AI citations · accessed 2026-07-21

Related research

Does AI reuse cited pages for different brands?
Rarely. AI reused 37,773 of 475,522 cleaned cited pages, or 7.94%, with different ranked brands across different organic prompts.
How often does AI cite a brand's own website?
Often. Of 1,060,513 page citations tied to ranked brand recommendations, 288,629, or 27.22%, pointed to the recommended brand's own website.
Do AI-cited pages actually mention the brand?
Not always. In 80,623 of 209,116 reviewed citations, or 38.55%, the cited page did not mention the brand attached to the citation.
What pages AI cites most: best-of listicles dominate
Domain studies tell you AI loves Reddit, YouTube, and Wikipedia. The page level shows what it actually pulls from them: six in ten of AI's most-cited pages are “Best X” listicles.
ChatGPT Search vs Google AI Mode: same brands, different sources
The two newest AI search surfaces do not read the same web. On the same 18,206 prompts, ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode share only 6.2% of cited sources per prompt, while sharing 26.9% of named brands.

About this research

Dimitry Apollonsky

Founder, Parse

I built Parse to track where AI answers really come from: the sources they cite and the brands they name. DM me on LinkedIn to talk shop.

See which websites support your AI recommendations.

Run a free check against live AI answers — no account needed.

Parse

Parse indexes AI recommendations so brands know where they stand.

Products

  • Brands
  • Markets
  • Integrations
  • Work with us
  • Pricing
  • MCP

Resources

  • Research
  • Methodology
  • Blog

© 2026 Parse. All rights reserved.

LegalPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service