What pages does AI cite most? Look at the buyer question

The ClickUp homepage and the American Academy of Dermatology’s adult-acne treatment page each received 285 ChatGPT Search citation links. Their reach differed: 205 questions for ClickUp, 124 for the treatment guide. Zoho CRM received 284 links across 213 questions.

The counts point to different page jobs: identifying a product, explaining a capability or answering a practical concern. Inspect the question before deciding which format your own content needs.

The table contains the twenty most-cited recorded URLs per engine in the weekly panel. Sort by questions to find pages reaching more of the sample, or by links to see repeat citation volume.

The original June study found “best” in 1,200 of the 2,000 most-cited page titles, or 60%. That describes the titles of a selected group of citation leaders. It does not show that 60% of all citations went to listicles or that writing a listicle makes a page more likely to be cited.

The current weekly examples broaden the picture without establishing a format trend: the cohorts, periods and measurements differ. Roundups can answer comparison questions; product pages and references can answer other needs.

For an evaluation question, check whether buyers can compare the options and tradeoffs. For setup or compatibility, inspect the documentation. For price, make the actual cost and conditions easy to find.

Then compare your page with the sources cited for that question. Add useful evidence or explain a missing fact. Copying a headline pattern does not reproduce the reason a page was useful.

Each stored answer/page/hostname link counts once. Search-result wrappers are excluded. Answers without recorded citations are outside the panel; hostnames preserve subdomains and page counts preserve URL variants.

Page rows preserve recorded URL variants, including tracking parameters. Titles are the metadata available when the query ran, not archived proof of the title at citation time. The table is selected by citation links; sorting those rows by reach does not make it a complete reach leaderboard.

The original title-pattern dataset remains separately available. Neither study includes a comparable universe of uncited pages, so neither estimates the citation lift from choosing a format.