Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 999 AI responses · See how Parse measures this
Network Firewall Solutions
Parse
https://parse.gl
pfSense has taken the top spot among AI recommendations for network firewalls, rising to become the most-cited solution in the niche. This reflects a broader trend in AI-generated answers, which increasingly favor flexible, open-source platforms like and , especially for users with technical expertise.
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The 'gold standard' for open-source firewalls, valued for its flexibility and power. | 59% | |
| 2 | A popular | 53% | |
| 3 | 28% | ||
| 4 | A user-friendly, plug-and-play appliance popular for home network security. | 27% | |
| 5 | 27% | ||
| 6 | A leading open-source intrusion detection system for network monitoring. | 26% | |
| 7 | A prominent open-source SIEM and XDR platform for comprehensive security monitoring. | 25% | |
| 8 | 24% | ||
| 9 | The classic open-source IDS/IPS, cited as a viable commercial product alternative. | 22% | |
| 10 | Recommended for business-grade security in a compact, subscription-optional form. | 19% | |
| 11 | 19% | ||
| 12 | 17% | ||
| 13 | 16% | ||
| 14 | 16% | ||
| 15 | 16% | ||
| 16 | Frequently cited for its hardware appliances running the popular | 15% | |
| 17 | 13% | ||
| 18 | 13% | ||
| 19 | 12% | ||
| 20 | 11% | ||
| 21 | 11% | ||
| 22 | Known for fanless mini PCs ideal for running | 10% | |
| 23 | 10% | ||
| 24 | 10% | ||
| 25 | 10% |
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
Sources AI cited
reddit.com is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 43% of analyzed answers.
Rose from #4 to the #1 most-cited brand between October and March.
Fell from the top-ranked brand in October to #3 by March.
Became a top recommendation for open-source SIEM/HIDS from November onward.
“A modern firewall requiring subscriptions for advanced features” → “A hardware option where core firewall functions work without a subscription”
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63% | 71% | ||
| 66% | 63% | ||
| 32% | 34% | ||
| 34% | 26% | ||
| 32% | 13% |
The two models disagree most about Protectli (ChatGPT #25, Google #4) and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) (ChatGPT #9, Google #24).
pfSense has taken the top spot among AI recommendations for network firewalls, rising to become the most-cited solution in the niche. This reflects a broader trend in AI-generated answers, which increasingly favor flexible, open-source platforms like pfSense and OPNsense, especially for users with technical expertise.
Across 999 AI responses, pfSense is mentioned most, named in 59% of them, followed by OPNsense (53%) and IPFire (28%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 999 AI responses to this market's buyer questions. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is published weekly.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
What is the best open-source firewall software for a network engineer to deploy on custom hardware?
Responses consistently recommend pfSense and
OPNsense as the top two choices for network engineers. Their dominance solidified over the period, with other mentions like
IPFire and typically positioned as secondary alternatives for specific use cases.
Early responses in November split between open-source hardware like Netgate and commercial brands like . From December onward, AI models consolidated heavily around and running on custom or hardware as the primary solution for subscription-free firewalling.
I need a firewall that is hardware-based and does not require an annual license subscription.
Early responses in November split between open-source hardware like Netgate and commercial brands like
Fortinet. From December onward, AI models consolidated heavily around
pfSense and
OPNsense running on custom or
Netgate hardware as the primary solution for subscription-free firewalling.